121 patients with 121 TKAs had complete clinical and radiological information and were included in the final analysis. Some basic information of patients was shown in Table 2. The mean age of those included in the study at the time of operation was 66.65 years (49 to 87); 102 (84%) were women; their mean pre-operative BMI was 26.64 kg/m2 (18.56–39.54); 74 knees (61%) were in patients with an ASA grade of 4. Their activity levels range from 4 to 9.
Table 2
Characteristics of 121 participants (N = 121)
| Preoperative | 3 months | 1 year | 3 years | 5 years | P |
KSS score | 76.43 ± 24.84 | 121.69 ± 12.62 | 164.97 ± 8.14 | 170.96 ± 8.70 | 182.47 ± 8.17 | < 0.001 |
WOMAC score | 44.50 ± 12.69 | 26.47 ± 11.20 | 10.30 ± 3.34 | 5.47 ± 2.67 | 3.27 ± 1.69 | < 0.001 |
VAS score | 6.93 ± 0.96 | 4.57 ± 1.18 | 1.61 ± 1.15 | 1.65 ± 0.93 | 1.61 ± 0.92 | < 0.001 |
Note: Values are the mean ± SD. P value is compared between 5 years after surgery and preoperative by t test. |
The clinical outcomes (KSS, WOMAC and VAS score) were shown in Table 2. After TKA, a steady improvement in the clinical outcomes (WOMAC, KSS, VAS score) was observed.
During the 5-years follow-up period, the bone density in the medial, lateral and distal areas after TKA decreased compared with that before surgery. As shown in Fig. 2, the mean rBMD of the medial side, lateral side and distal side decreased by 3.04%, 0.96% and 2.17% respectively at 3 months after surgery compared with the baseline. At 1 year after surgery, the mean rBMD of the medial side, lateral side and distal side decreased by 5.64%, 3.23% and 2.93%, respectively. At 3 years after surgery, the values were 7.25%, 4.67% and 1.80%, respectively. At 5 years after surgery, they were 5.37%, 3.77% and 1.67%, respectively.
The baseline rBMD was measured within 1 week after TKA. The percent change in rBMD (rBMD%) was calculated by the following equation: rBMD% =100%*[rBMD (baseline)-rBMD (each time)]/ rBMD (baseline). In brief, in this study, a UCLA activity rating of 4–5, 6–7 and 8–9 was considered to describe a low, moderate and high activity level, respectively. There were no significant differences in patient age, sex, BMI or HKA angle among the various UCLA activity ratings (Table 3). The UCLA activity rating was significantly associated with the average rBMD% in the proximal tibia at 1 year (P < 0.001) and 3 years (P = 0.002) but not at 5 years (P = 0.239). The average rBMD% in the proximal tibia decreased with UCLA activity rating until a moderate activity level and then started to increase (Fig. 3). The smallest reduction in the average rBMD was at a moderate activity level, and the rBMD increased (0.86%, 0.43%) at a moderate activity level compared with the corresponding baseline at both 1 and 3 years.
Table 3
P values for age, sex, BMI and HKA angle among UCLA activity ratings
| 1 year (n = 97) | 3 year (n = 79) | 5 year (n = 26) | Method |
Sex | 0.645 | 0.499 | 0.597 | Chi-squared |
HKA angle | 0.935 | 0.091 | 0.066 | ANOVA |
Age | 0.278 | 0.957 | 0.436 | ANOVA |
BMI | 0.422 | 0.825 | 0.658 | ANOVA |
The parabola fitted by nonlinear regression was a suitable trend curve for representing the relationship of the average rBMD% in the proximal tibia with the UCLA activity rating (Fig. 4). Regression of the average BMD% against the UCLA activity rating showed the following optimal equations:

Where Y(1y) and Y(3y) are the average rBMD% in the proximal region at 1 and 3 years, respectively, and X is the UCLA activity rating.
The UCLA activity rating significantly influenced the rBMD% in the medial (1year, P < 0.001, 3 years, P = 0.005) and lateral (1 year, P = 0.02, 3 years, P = 0.002) metaphysis, while the influence was not significant in the distal metaphysis at either 1 or 3 years. The change trend of the rBMD% in the medial and lateral metaphysis was generally similar to that of the average rBMD% in the proximal tibia. Compared with the rBMD in the lateral metaphysis, the rBMD in the medial metaphysis showed a significantly greater reduction at both 1 year (P = 0.003) and 3 years (P = 0.002). A decreased rBMD in the medial metaphysis was consistently seen at each activity level, while an increased rBMD was found in the lateral metaphysis at a moderate activity level (Table 4). The differences in rBMD% between the corresponding lateral and medial regions L1, L2, M1, and M2 were significant at both 1 year (P = 0.001, P = 0.026) and 3 years (P < 0.001, P = 0.008), while the differences in rBMD% between the corresponding lateral and medial regions L3, L4, M3, and M4 were not significant at either 1 year (P = 0.053, P = 0.396) or 3 years (P = 0.359, P = 0.678). The greatest difference in rBMD% between corresponding lateral and medial regions was found between regions L1 and M1.
Table 4
rBMD% in medial, lateral and distal regions
| Level | N | L1 | M1 | L2 | M2 | L3 | M3 | L4 | M4 |
1y | 4 | 10 | 10.55 ± 3.50 | 12.23 ± 11.45 | 8.55 ± 5.86 | 9.30 ± 8.60 | 8.84 ± 5.51 | 10.17 ± 6.14 | 7.96 ± 6.19 | 5.33 ± 7.50 |
5 | 15 | 1.14 ± 9.03 | 4.80 ± 14.86 | -0.19 ± 9.47 | 0.68 ± 14.65 | 0.01 ± 9.19 | 1.19 ± 9.86 | -4.23 ± 10.96 | 0.80 ± 8.83 |
6 | 19 | -3.41 ± 6.82 | 4.55 ± 14.51 | -4.54 ± 8.86 | 2.34 ± 12.27 | -2.28 ± 7.00 | 2.92 ± 10.61 | 0.89 ± 8.05 | 2.35 ± 8.10 |
7 | 12 | -3.70 ± 14.64 | 3.92 ± 16.54 | -2.27 ± 14.38 | 1.60 ± 10.83 | -0.17 ± 14.72 | 0.66 ± 12.59 | -2.59 ± 10.42 | -3.81 ± 14.29 |
8 | 16 | 3.40 ± 10.06 | 6.96 ± 14.42 | 1.84 ± 9.60 | 2.40 ± 9.19 | 5.92 ± 9.13 | 2.90 ± 8.68 | 4.30 ± 8.24 | 2.84 ± 7.71 |
9 | 25 | 10.50 ± 12.14 | 14.77 ± 12.70 | 7.85 ± 10.36 | 10.04 ± 15.52 | 7.15 ± 9.46 | 10.36 ± 10.93 | 7.24 ± 8.62 | 8.23 ± 10.24 |
3y | 4 | 10 | 6.81 ± 9.01 | 15.18 ± 13.19 | 11.23 ± 10.67 | 12.21 ± 9.18 | 13.11 ± 9.51 | 10.49 ± 10.13 | 10.18 ± 11.68 | 9.22 ± 10.52 |
5 | 13 | 4.95 ± 13.57 | 11.03 ± 17.53 | 6.12 ± 14.40 | 9.56 ± 13.41 | 7.18 ± 11.26 | 9.48 ± 12.12 | 3.39 ± 6.76 | 6.49 ± 10.33 |
6 | 17 | 2.07 ± 8.28 | 4.16 ± 18.31 | -4.47 ± 18.96 | 0.17 ± 18.76 | 0.97 ± 7.41 | -1.19 ± 14.48 | 2.09 ± 11.80 | -1.23 ± 13.24 |
7 | 12 | -3.60 ± 11.21 | 4.53 ± 18.59 | 0.45 ± 9.39 | -1.59 ± 12.91 | 0.61 ± 8.90 | -0.33 ± 11.05 | -0.08 ± 7.81 | 3.14 ± 10.73 |
8 | 9 | 5.84 ± 21.70 | 11.21 ± 21.15 | 2.26 ± 17.39 | 7.77 ± 13.07 | -0.55 ± 15.95 | 4.73 ± 13.29 | 0.30 ± 12.81 | 0.11 ± 14.06 |
9 | 18 | 12.09 ± 11.42 | 25.74 ± 11.74 | 11.52 ± 8.98 | 18.41 ± 12.09 | 9.93 ± 10.43 | 14.63 ± 11.48 | 9.80 ± 11.32 | 10.86 ± 12.94 |
Note: Values are the mean ± SD. |