3.1 Effect of oscillating magnetic field on supercooling of oil-sealed distilled water
First, the method reported by (Huang et al., 2018) was used to observe the supercooling degree of distilled water after nutmeg oil was sealed, and it was found that it could be stored stably at -13 °C, while at lower temperatures, it would freeze. In this study, a total of ten supercooled storage experiments were conducted at -18 °C using oil-sealed water, both with and without the application of a magnetic field. The results from all experiments remained consistent. Fig. 3 displays a typical cooling temperature curve of oil-sealed water. It reveals that oil-sealed water without OMF treatment underwent a noticeable temperature shift during the cooling process, leaping from -16 °C to -7.5 °C. However, after being treated with an OMF, oil-sealed water could remain at -18 °C for 24 hours. Additionally, Fig. 3 presents photographs of both OMF-treated and non-OMF-treated samples after 24 hours of the experiment. It could be seen that the water treated by the combination of the OMF and the oil-sealed liquid surface had not been frozen, but the water that had only been treated by the oil-sealed liquid surface was frozen. Based upon the results of the cooling curve and photo of oil-sealed water, a 6 mT/50 Hz OMF could further increase the supercooling degree of water. Therefore, this magnetic field was used in the subsequent experiment for the supercooled storage of fresh-cut fruits.
Fig. 3 Typical cooling curves and photos of oil-sealed water with and without OMF
The reason that oil-sealed water resulted in obvious supercooling could be attributed to the replacement of the water/air interface with an oil/water interface, significantly raising the energy barrier for heterogeneous crystallization at the surface, almost reaching the level of homogeneous crystallization (Huang et al., 2018). The applied magnetic field induced changes in molecular energy, altering the length and angle of hydrogen bonds in water molecules (Hu et al., 2012). This affects the reorientation, formation, and breaking of hydrogen bonds. Increased average hydrogen bond strength, resulting from the magnetic field, hinders water molecule detachment from existing molecular clusters. As a result, diffusion and binding to the solid-liquid interface become challenging, inhibiting the formation of ice crystals. Therefore, applying the magnetic field in conjunction with the oil sealing treatment further enhanced the subcooling degree of distilled water. This effect lays the foundation for the application of magnetic fields to increase the supercooling degree of fresh food.
3.2 Effect of oscillating magnetic field on supercooling of fruits
3.2.1 Cooling curve
To investigate the effect of the OMF-assisted technology in inducing continuous supercooling of fruits, three fruits were chosen as samples. The temperature of the samples was monitored and recorded for 12 hours. Each experiment used one sample and was repeated five times. Fig. 4 shows typical cooling curves with and without OMF. When there was an OMF (6 mT), the temperature of fruits could be maintained at -5 °C±0.2 °C without ice crystal nucleation. While, when there was no OMF, the temperature of fruits would undergo a sudden phase transition during cooling, resulting in freezing. The effect of increasing supercooling was consistent with the results on distilled water discussed before. This indicated that magnetic field treatment might prolong the supercooling degree of fruits by influencing cell sap in vacuoles. A previous study conducted by (Her et al., 2019) on honeydew melons found that OMF could keep a supercooled state for long periods at 8 mT (1 Hz), whose intensity and frequency were different from this study. The supercooled state of food can be affected by various factors such as the composition of the sample, the cooling rate, fluctuations in storage temperature, and humidity.
3.2.2 Weight loss
Fruits and vegetables are very easy to lose weight and water loss is the main reason. Generally, the less water loss, the higher the quality of fruits and vegetables. Table 2 shows the weight loss of fruits stored at -5 °C for 12 hours with and without an OMF. Both pears and apples exhibited significant weight loss, whereas this effect was less pronounced in cherry tomatoes, primarily due to the protective nature of the peel. The weight loss of supercooled pears with OMF was 9.78%. While that of thawed pears without OMF was 13.77%, decreasing by 29.0%, which verified the basic law that supercooling preservation results in less weight loss (Osuga et al., 2021). The data for apples presented a similar situation. The reasons for the weight loss of the two groups are not identical. The water loss observed in supercooled samples was due to the direct evaporation of water and cellular respiration when samples were exposed to the environment. As a result of the vapor pressure difference between food and the atmosphere, carbohydrates will release water during oxidation in respiration and transpiration (Zhan et al., 2012). The weight loss of frozen samples was due to the puncture of cell membranes by ice crystal growth during freezing, resulting in loss of cell fluid and shrinkage of cells (Alizadeh et al., 2007).
Table 2 Weight loss of fruits after different treatments
Group
|
Weight loss (%)
|
Pear (With OMF)
|
9.78±0.39a
|
Pear (Without OMF)
|
13.77±0.82b
|
|
|
Apple (With OMF)
|
13.74±0.63a
|
Apple (Without OMF)
|
19.70±0.91b
|
Cherry tomato (With OMF)
|
0.21±0.03a
|
Cherry tomato (Without OMF)
|
0.23±0.04b
|
The data presented represents the mean ± standard deviation of five samples, and dissimilar superscripts indicate a significant difference between the OMF group and the control group (p<0.05).
3.2.3 Color
The color of the food surface is a major concern for consumers (Pathare et al., 2013). The appearance of fruit samples after 12 hours of storage is presented in Fig. 5, including samples treated with OMF and those without OMF treatment, as well as the fresh samples. Table 3 displays the L*, a*, and b* values of different sample groups, with relevant data processed statistically. The samples treated with OMF remained visually fresh for an extended period without freezing occurrence. Nevertheless, the surface color of the samples treated with OMF also showed significant changes (p<0.05). The reason for the subtle difference is that due to exposure to air, the phenol oxidase released by cells undergoes oxidation with oxygen, resulting in a change in the color of the fruit (Wang et al., 2022). Compared to fresh samples, the frozen/thawed samples without OMF exhibited significant changes after 12 hours, displaying an overall poor visual appearance due to the loss of cellular fluid caused by freezing.
Fig. 5 The appearance difference of fruit samples after 12 hours under different treatment methods: (a) Pear; (b) Apple; (c) Cherry tomato
Table 3 Color parameters of fruits after different treatments
Group
|
L*
|
a*
|
b*
|
Pear (Fresh)
|
72.48±0.35a
|
0.44±0.09a
|
10.21±0.31a
|
Pear (With OMF)
|
70.25±0.69b
|
0.63±0.02b
|
13.29±0.33b
|
Pear (Without OMF)
|
35.16±1.01c
|
1.45±0.17c
|
7.24±0.68c
|
Apple (Fresh)
|
77.36±1.45a
|
1.93±0.11a
|
19.97±1.79a
|
Apple (With OMF)
|
70.42±0.09b
|
1.85±0.05b
|
29.16±0.22b
|
Apple (Without OMF)
|
63.86±1.39c
|
1.86±0.12c
|
25.12±0.99c
|
Cherry tomato (Fresh)
|
42.96±0.34a
|
27.63±1.48a
|
35.03±0.72a
|
Cherry tomato (With OMF)
|
45.98±0.58b
|
22.69±0.87b
|
30.74±2.61b
|
Cherry tomato (Without OMF)
|
51.6±1.76c
|
22.18±1.05c
|
26.35±0.48c
|
|
|
|
|
|
The data presented represents the mean ± standard deviation of five samples, and distinct superscripts denote a significant difference (p<0.05).
3.2.4 Texture
The texture parameters, which are associated with the freshness of fruits, are shown in Table 4. The hardness and adhesiveness of the fruit showed no significant difference with the OMF treatment group, while the group without OMF showed great changes, with a decrease in hardness and an increase in adhesiveness (p<0.05). The deterioration of the texture of frozen samples was attributed to the formation and destruction of ice crystals. Large ice crystals can puncture cell membranes, causing changes in the texture of food (Choi et al., 2015). Based on the above results, it could be inferred that OMF treatment can effectively maintain the macroscopic quality of fruits.
Table 4 Texture parameters of fresh-cut pears after different treatments
Group
|
Hardness (g)
|
Adhesiveness (mJ)
|
Pear (Fresh)
|
229.35±5.89a
|
0.15±0.02a
|
Pear (With OMF)
|
224.71±5.34a
|
0.16±0.01a
|
Pear (Without OMF)
|
169.01±9.13b
|
0.36±0.05b
|
Apple (Fresh)
|
238.6±28.3a
|
0.15±0.1a
|
Apple (With OMF)
|
226.8±15.6a
|
0.16±0.04a
|
Apple (Without OMF)
|
197±16.4b
|
0.17±0.03b
|
Cherry tomato (Fresh)
|
73.6±5.92a
|
0.06±0.005a
|
Cherry tomato (With OMF)
|
63.6±9.07a
|
0.07±0.016a
|
Cherry tomato (Without OMF)
|
32.53±6.09b
|
0.05±0.008b
|
The data presented represents the mean ± standard deviation of five samples, and distinct superscripts denote a significant difference (p<0.05).