In our study, PTCy at a standard or reduced dose was used in combination with tacrolimus and low-dose post-engraftment ATG as GvHD prophylaxis for patients with AML and MDS undergoing first allo-HSCT from a haploidentical donor. Various combinations of PTCy and ATG have been explored by several groups. Most combinations consisted of pre-transplant ATG and PTCy at varying doses, showing low rates of grade III–IV aGvHD and cGvHD along with amelioration of GRFS9, 12–15. The most common cause of death was infection in these regimens12. More recently, post-transplant ATG with PTCy has emerged as a feasible combination. One study exploring the efficacy of post-transplant low-dose ATG on day 8 added to 80-mg/kg PTCy observed an overt reduction of GvHD and superior GRFS compared with the findings with 10-mg/kg ATG alone16. However, an Italian study adding a single dose of 5-mg/kg anti T-lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) on day 5 to standard dose PTCy delayed platelet engraftment 17. Survival outcomes were comparable between groups and the addition of ATLG significantly reduced the incidence of cGvHD without impacting the incidence of aGvHD. Immune reconstitution was impacted without increasing the risk of relapse or infection17. Thus, the combination of PTCy and ATG/ATLG in various patterns is demonstrated to be a safe and promising approach for patients with hematological malignancies undergoing allo-HSCT.
To our knowledge, our group is the first to apply post-engraftment ATG in combination with PTCy. Our adjustment takes full advantage of PTCy in purging alloreactive lymphocytes and of ATG to further diminish lymphocytes escaped from PTCy at engraftment.
Apart from the use of post-engraftment ATG, another major difference between our study and previously published studies comparing standard and lower doses of PTCy lies in the intensity of the conditioning regimen, which is a risk factor for GvHD. Patients treated with MAC display a higher risk of GvHD than those treated with RIC. Although European groups have demonstrated parallel efficacy and safety of PTCy 80 mg/kg among geriatric patients receiving RIC regimens8, 9, this dose of PTCy has not been specifically evaluated among patients receiving MAC regimens. Attempts to reduce PTCy doses for patients of advanced age and higher HCT-CI scores are driven by their fragility to chemotherapy and higher risk of developing treatment-related comorbidities and mortality. Based on the encouraging outcomes of low GvHD with standard-dose PTCy and post-engraftment ATG from our former study18, here we treated patients older than 55 years old or with a HCT-CI score ≥ 3 or with prior cardiac history with reduced dose PTCy at 80mg/kg and found similar incidence of GvHD and comparable post-transplant survival compared with standard dose PTCy. Though reduced dose PTCy was corelated with increased risk of NRM in univariate analysis, the result of multivariate analysis brought evidence that this risk of mortality was linked with comorbidity and disease related risk instead of the dose of PTCy. Indeed, our group of frail patients whom we evaluated to be in need of reduced dose PTCy still underwent a higher rate of NRM; however, our study showed that the combination of reduced PTCy, tacrolimus and post-engraftment ATG allowed them to obtain comparable overall survival and quality of life as their younger and fitter counterpart.
Our cohort had limited capacity to fully evaluate the impact of reduced-dose PTCy on the incidence of toxicities (e.g., cardiac events or fluid overload) due to the limited number of these events, which was basically the aim of using lower doses of cyclophosphamide. In addition, one can say that the major limitation of our study lies in the demographic difference between the two groups, which is linked with the design of this retrospective study. It is correct, however real-life treatment strategy must consider the reality of the population to be successful. Our study suggests that a reduced dose of PTCy associated with post-engraftment ATG and tacrolimus for haplo-HSCT after MAC is not associated with higher incidences of graft failure or GvHDs. However, to know if this approach conducts to better results, notably in older patients, can only been assessed in a prospective study.