2.1 Agents Reagents: TiO2 NPs, tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), sodium borohydride (NaBH4), hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), cyclohexane (C6H12), concentrated hydrochloric acid (HCl), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), ethanol (C2H5OH), 3-(4,5-di-methylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), Rhodamine B (C28H31ClN2O3), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were acquired from Aladdin Industrial Inc. (Shanghai, China). The mono-N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (DOTA-NHS Ester) was supplied by Yare Bio Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China) provided the 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) and Gadolinium acetate hydrate (C6H11GdO7). Fetal bovine serum (FBS), DMEM medium, RPMI-1064 medium, and Trypsin-EDTA 0.25% were obtained from Gibco (Grand Island, USA). The phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and penicillin-streptomycin solutions were acquired from GE Healthcare HyClone (LA, USA). Solarbio Biotech Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) supplied both formaldehyde solution and Hoechst 33258 (C25H24N6O·3HCl). Beyotime Biotech Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China) provided the calcein-AM/PI double stain kit. Resiquimod (R848) was obtained from InvivoGen (San Diego, CA, USA). Binding buffer was purchased from Immunostep (Salamanca, Spain).
2.2 Synthesis of mSiO2 coated bTiO2 based nanoparticles
2.2.1 Synthesis of bTiO2 nanoparticles
The TiO2 was reduced to bTiO2 employing NaBH4 as the reducing agent. Initially, 1 g of TiO2 powder was mixed with NaBH4 at a 1:1 mass ratio for 30 min before being placed in a tube furnace heated with 10°C min− 1. Under an argon atmosphere, the temperature was raised to 350°C, and the reaction lasted for 3 h. The produced bTiO2 NPs were washed with ultrapure water, centrifuged thrice to eliminate NaBH4, and then dried for further use.
2.2.2 Synthesis of bTiO2@mSiO2 nanoparticles
Ultrasound was employed to disperse 100 mg of bTiO2 NPs in 20 mL of water. 0.3 mL of 0.1 mM NaOH solution and 500 mg of CTAB were added to the bTiO2 solution, which was then heated to 60℃ with magnetic stirring. 20 mL of cyclohexane containing TEOS (20 V/V%) was added after 2 h of magnetic stirring, and the mixture was then continuously stirred at 60℃ for 24 h. CTAB was removed from mSiO2-coated bTiO2 by heating it to 80°C in acetone following centrifugation and alternating washings with ethanol and water. Centrifugation was then employed to collect the as-prepared bTiO2@mSiO2 NPs.
2.2.3 Synthesis of DOTA-Gd modified bTiO2@mSiO2
The surface of bTiO2@mSiO2 was amino-functionalized by APTES. In particular, 20 mg bTiO2@mSiO2 NPs were dispersed in 20 mL of ethanol, followed by the addition of 2 mL of APTES and heating to 80℃ while stirring for 12 h. After centrifugation, the prepared bTiO2@mSiO2-NH2 NPs were collected and subjected to modification using gadolinium acetate hydrate and DOTA-NHS-Ester. The PH value of the gadolinium acetate hexahydrate solution was adjusted to 6.5 by adding NaOH after an excessive quantity of DOTA-NHS-ester was introduced. Following a 24-hour stirring period, the dispersion of bTiO2@mSiO2-NH2 was introduced into the reaction system. The pH value was subsequently adjusted to a range of 7.5 to 8.5, and the mixture was stirred for an additional 24 h at ambient temperature. The DOTA-Gd modified bTiO2@mSiO2@Gd NPs were obtained after centrifugation.
2.2.4 Synthesis of bTiO2@mSiO2@Gd/R848 nanoparticles
R848 was loaded by physical adsorption. Briefly, bTiO2@mSiO2@Gd and R848 were mixed in sterile water. After stirring for 24 h, the bTiO2@mSiO2@Gd/R848 NPs were obtained by centrifugation.
2.3 Characterization
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM, FEI Tecnai F20) was utilized to examine the micro-morphologies of NPs. The zeta potential and hydrated particle size distribution of the NPs were determined using a nano-size zeta potential analyzer (Nano ZS, Malvern Instruments Ltd, England). The UV-visible absorption spectra of the NPs were examined using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (T10CS, Persee General Equipment Co., Ltd, China). The Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR, Thermo Nicolet 6700, US) was employed to acquire the infrared (IR) spectra of the NPs. The elemental composition was examined using an inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) system developed by Spectro Analytical Instruments GmbH of Germany. MR scanners were utilized to examine the relaxation and MRI characteristics of NPs. Furthermore, to assess the photothermal performance of bTiO2@mSiO2@Gd/R848 NPs, cuvettes were filled with 1 mL of bTiO2@mSiO2@Gd/R848 dispersions with varying concentrations of Ti (0-200 µg mL− 1) and exposed to 808 nm near infrared (NIR) radiation for 600 s at 1.5 W cm− 2. To determine the power-dependent photothermal performance in the NIR, 1 mL of bTiO2@mSiO2@Gd/R848 dispersions containing 150 µg mL− 1 Ti were exposed to an 808 nm NIR for 600 s at different power densities (varying from 0.5 to 2.0 W cm− 2). To assess photothermal stability, 6 on/off repeating cycles of 808 nm NIR (1.5 W cm− 2) were applied to 1 mL of bTiO2@mSiO2@Gd/R848 every 300 s. The imaging acquired through the use of the IR thermal imaging equipment was compiled for subsequent comparisons, and the temperature values continually collected were analyzed and represented as time-temperature curves.
2.4 Cytotoxicity of the nanoparticles
To examine the cytotoxicity of bTiO2@mSiO2@Gd/R848 and bTiO2@mSiO2@Gd NPs, Panc02 cells were cultured for 24 h in 96-well plates after seeding. After removing the old culture medium, various amounts of NPs (ranging from 50 to 300 µg mL− 1) were introduced to each well and left to incubate for 24 h in the incubator. Following that, MTT reagent (20 µL; 5 mg mL− 1 in PBS) was introduced to each well and left for another 4 h. After removing the mediums, DMSO was employed to dissolve the formazan crystals. Cell viabilities were calculated by detecting the absorbance of formazan solutions using the microplate absorbance reader.
2.5 Characterization of cellular uptake
The uptake of bTiO2@mSiO2@Gd/R848 NPs by Panc02 cells was observed by fluorescence confocal microscopy. Rhodamine B, a fluorescent dye, was utilized to label the bTiO2@mSiO2@Gd/R848 NPs. Before being treated with DMEM and bTiO2@mSiO2@Gd NPs for 4, 8, and 12 h, respectively, Panc02 cells were cultivated in a 35 mm petri dish and incubated for 24 h. Before being fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, the cells were washed twice in PBS. After that, the cells were washed with PBS and then treated with Hoechst 33342 (2 µg mL− 1) to stain the nucleus.
2.6 In vitro PTT evaluation
Panc02 cells were cultured for 12 h in 96-well plates with DMEM, bTiO2@mSiO2@Gd, or bTiO2@mSiO2@Gd/R848 NPs at 150 µg mL− 1 Ti concentrations. The media were subsequently substituted with fresh DMEM. Each well was exposed to an 808 nm NIR laser for 5 or 10 min at 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 W cm− 2 power densities, respectively. Cell viability was then evaluated using MTT. In addition, the CAM/PI staining approach was utilized to directly evaluate the cell state following therapy. Panc02 cells were specifically exposed to 808 nm NIR (1.5 W cm− 2) radiation for 0, 5, or 10 min after being cultured for 12 h in DMEM or bTiO2@mSiO2@Gd/R848 NPs with Ti (150 µg mL− 1). The cells were then examined using fluorescence microscopy after being stained with CAM/PI.
2.7 PTT synergistic immunotherapy promotes DCs maturation in vitro
The transwell method was implemented as a means to examine the impact of NPs on the in vitro maturation of DCs. The upper section included Panc02 cells after various treatments, while the lower section contained DCs. The various treatments were as follows: Following incubation with DMEM (1), bTiO2@mSiO2@Gd NPs (2), and bTiO2@mSiO2@Gd/R848 NPs (3), the Panc02 cells were irradiated with or without 808 nm NIR (1.5 W cm− 2), respectively. Each cell was cultured for an additional 32 h. After collecting and staining DCs in the lower chamber with CD11c, CD86, and CD80, flow cytometry was employed to examine the expression of co-stimulatory molecules CD86 and CD80 on DCs in various treatment groups.
2.8 In vivo toxicity evaluation of nanoparticles
Female C57BL/6 mice (6 − 8 weeks) were randomly divided into three groups to assess the in vivo toxicity of the NPs. The mice were administered intravenous injections of PBS, bTiO2@mSiO2@Gd, or bTiO2@mSiO2@Gd/R848, and their weights were then measured during a feeding period of 20 days. After 20 days, all mice were sacrificed. Routine blood tests were performed on the mice in each group, and their major organs, such as the lung, heart, liver, and spleen, were fixed in a 10% formalin solution and histologically examined using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining.
2.9 In vivo MR evaluation
The mice were injected with 1 × 106 Panc02 cells orthotopically to establish the PDAC models. Both PBS and NPs/R848 were administered intratumorally to the mice. The MR images of the tumors were captured by a 3.0T MRI system (MAGNETOM Prisma, Siemens).
2.10 In vivo PTT synergistic immunotherapy
Six groups of female C57BL/6 mice (6–8 weeks) were randomly assigned. To generate the PDAC models, 1 × 106 Panc02 cells were injected orthotopically into the mice. The tumors were then given time to grow until they reached 250 mm3 before experiments. To assess the synergistic immunotherapy of PTT in vivo, the following treatments were administered to the tumor-injected animals: (1) In the NPs/R848 or NPs/R848 + Laser groups, bTiO2@mSiO2@Gd/R848 was administered, followed by 808 nm NIR laser irradiation or not. (2) The NPs or NPs + Laser groups were given bTiO2@mSiO2@Gd before being exposed to an 808 nm NIR laser or not. (3) The PBS or PBS + Laser group received PBS before being irradiated with an 808 nm NIR laser or not. The body weights and tumor volumes of various groups were assessed on alternate days over 14 days. Furthermore, the main tumors retrieved from the mice on the third day of treatment were embedded in paraffin wax after being preserved in neutral buffered formalin (10%). Subsequently, the embedded tissue samples underwent sectioning and were subjected to blocking using a 2.5% Normal Goat Serum Blocking Solution. Following this, the samples were stained with H&E, CD80, CD86, CD4, and CD8.