Synthesis of Iridium-Based Nanocomposites With Catalase Activity For Cancer PTT/PDT Therapy

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-375111/v1

PDF

Research

Synthesis of Iridium-Based Nanocomposites With Catalase Activity For Cancer PTT/PDT Therapy

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-375111/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 07 Jul, 2021

Read the published version in Journal of Nanobiotechnology →

You are reading this latest preprint version

The combination of photothermal therapy (PTT) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) has attracted attention due to its enhanced tumor synergetic effect. This study proposes a novel nanoenzyme-based theranostic nanoplatform, IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6), for the combined PTT and PDT of tumors. IrO₂ was prepared by a simple hydrolysis method and coated with a thin layer of mesoporous silica (MSN) to facilitate the physical adsorption of Chlorin e6 (Ce6). The PDA coating and IrO₂ NPs of the nanoplatform demonstrated an improved photothermal conversion efficiency of 29.8 % under NIR irradiation. Further, the Ce6 loading imparts materials with the ability to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) under 660 nm NIR laser irradiation. It was also proved that the IrO₂NPs could catalyze the hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) in the tumor microenvironment (TME) to generate endogenous oxygen (O₂), thereby enhancing the efficiency of PDT. The in vitro and in vivo experiments indicated that the nanocomposites were highly biocompatible and could produce a satisfactory tumor therapeutic effect. Thus, the findings of the present study demonstrate the viability of using theranostic nanoenzymes for translational medicine.

Nanoscience

Photothermal therapy

Photodynamic therapy

Cancer treatment

Biocompatibility

Iridium nanocomposite

Cancer is currently one of the major obstacles preventing the reduction of the global mortality rate[1, 2]. Traditional cancer treatment strategies, such as chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery, result in unavoidable side effects, the development of drug resistance, and ineligibility for surgery [3–5]. The limitations of these treatments have motivated researchers to develop new cancer treatments with relatively few side effects and a high efficiency. Near-infrared light (NIR)-induced tumor therapies, such as photothermal therapy (PTT) and photodynamic therapy (PDT), have attracted the attention of many researchers because they are highly effective, non-invasive, spatiotemporally controllable, and lead to relatively few side effects [6, 7].

PDT involves the absorption of photon energy by a photosensitizing agent (PSA), resulting in the transfer of its electrons to the oxygen molecules (O₂) in the cancer cells. This leads to the production of a highly toxic reactive oxygen species (ROS, e.g., ¹O₂) that cause irreparable damage to the cancer cells [8]. A light operative dose, reasonable PSA concentration, and adequate oxygen are necessary for effective tumor ablation. In addition, the amount of O₂ directly affects the efficiency of PDT [9]. Due to the rapid and uncontrolled proliferation of tumor cells, the O₂ levels in solid tumors are inadequate, thereby reducing the therapeutic efficiency of PDT [10, 11]. Thus, researchers have proposed innovative strategies to enhance the O₂ concentration in tumors [12]. Oxygen carriers, such as perfluorocarbon (PFC) nanoparticles NPs, can facilitate continuous oxygen supply and have been used to enhance the O₂ concentration in tumors for PDT [13]. Enzyme-like substances with catalase activity have recently been used with PSA to counter hypoxia and enable ROS generation [14]. Researchers have discovered that the overexpression of H₂O₂ in a tumor microenvironment (TME) can be utilized for the catalytic generation of endogenous O₂ and facilitate tumor PDT [15, 16]. Nanoenzymes, in comparison with natural catalase, have a relatively low cost, high activity, and qualified thermostability. Therefore, they can be employed to enhance the therapeutic effect of PDT [17–19].

PTT is an alternative phototherapy technique that can utilize the photothermal effects of photothermal transduction agents (PTAs) to raise the temperature of the surrounding environment and trigger the ablation and apoptosis of cancer cells [20, 21]. The application of a PTA with high biocompatibility and efficient photothermal conversion efficiency is likely to improve the efficiency of photothermal therapy [22]. Several PTAs, such as two-dimensional (2D) materials [23], noble metal materials [24], metal chalcogenide materials [25], and conjugated polymers (e.g., polydopamine (PDA) and polypyrrole (PPy)), have been synthesized in recent years [26, 27].However, owing to the poor performance of a single PTA, high-energy NIR laser irradiation or a relatively strong dose of PTA is required to obtain the desired treatment effect[28]. In addition, it is difficult to achieve satisfactory therapeutic activity by solely using PTT[29]. Thus, modern studies are focusing on dual-mode therapy combinations of PTT and PDT [30, 31]. The main obstacle involves building a reasonable nanoplatform to maximize the synergistic effects of PTT and PDT to kill tumor cells.

The application of iridium oxide (IrO₂) has recently drawn attention due to its high biocompatibility and photothermal conversion efficiency [32]. Studies have discovered that IrO₂ has catalase (CAT)-like activity that enables it to catalyze H₂O₂ in the TME to generate endogenous O₂, thereby enhancing the efficiency of PDT [33]. However, few studies have utilized IrO₂ nanomaterial-based nanoplatform systems for the combined PTT and PDT treatment of tumors. An IrO₂@[email protected] nanocomposite was synthesized in this study for the PTT and PDT dual-mode therapeutic treatment of tumors. IrO₂ was prepared by a simple hydrolysis method and coated with a thin layer of mesoporous silica (MSN) to facilitate the physical adsorption of Chlorin e6 (Ce6). Subsequently, PDA was coated on the surface of IrO₂@MSN, followed by the grafting of bovine serum albumin (BSA) on the surface of IrO₂@[email protected] as a stabilizer. The installation of IrO₂@[email protected] (Ce6) serves several purposes. The PDA coating and IrO₂ NPs demonstrate significant photothermal conversion under NIR irradiation. IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) can produce ROS to kill cancer cells under photon activation. IrO₂ can also catalyze the decomposition of H₂O₂ to enhance the production of O₂ in the TME, thereby enhancing the therapeutic effect of PDT. In vitro and in vivo experiments have proved that IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) is biocompatible and can passively target tumors through the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect, thereby harnessing the clinical and synergistic effects of PTT and PDT for the tumors. The design of IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) provides a framework for the design of multifunctional nanocomposites that can accurately treat cancer.

2.1. Preparation and characterization of IrO₂@[email protected] and the loading of Ce6

2.1.1. Synthesis of IrO₂-PVP NPs

For the synthesis of IrO₂-PVP nanoparticles, first, 0.05 g IrCl₃ and 0.1 g PVP were dissolved in 15 mL of distilled water by magnetic stirring (400 rpm) at room temperature. Then, the solution pH was adjusted to 12 using NaOH solution (2.0 M), and the mixture was allowed to react at 80° C for 12 hours with stirring. Finally, the mixture was further separated by centrifugation (12000 rpm, 5 min), and then rinsed three times with ethanol and distilled water. The sample in this experiment was freeze-dried and collected for the following usages.

2.1.2. Synthesis of IrO₂@MSN NPs

For the synthesis of IrO₂@MSN nanoparticles, the as-prepared IrO₂-PVP NPs were dissolved in 65 mL ethanol upon ultrasonication for 30 min. Then, 2.8 mL NH₃·H₂O (28%) was added dropwise and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 minutes. Subsequently, 0.1 mL TEOS was dissolved in 6.5 mL ethanol and added dropwise to the mixture at a rate of 0.5 mL/min under vigorous stirring. After stirring at room temperature for 6 h, the obtained products were centrifuged and washed twice with ethanol and once with distilled water. To further remove the surfactant template of CTAB, the product was stirred with saturated ammonium nitrate ethanol solution for 12 h. The resulting product was centrifuged, and washed it with double-distilled water extensively.

2.1.3. Preparation of IrO₂@[email protected] NPs

In this step, we dissolved 0.2 g dopamine in Tris buffer solution (40 mL, 0.01 M, pH = 8.5), and then mixed it with the as-prepared IrO₂@MSN NPs. After stirring it at room temperature for 4 h, the color of the solution changed into dark brown because of the oxidation, and the formed PDA coated IrO₂@MSN (IrO₂@[email protected]) NPs were collected by centrifugation (8500 rpm, 5 min). The product was washed three times with ethanol and water to remove any possible remnants.

2.1.4. Preparation of IrO₂@[email protected]

IrO₂@[email protected] was synthesized by the amidation reaction between BSA and PDA. Specifically, the as-prepared IrO₂@[email protected] and 0.25 g BSA were added to 15 mL phosphate buffer (Na₂HPO₄-NaH₂PO₄, pH = 8.0) under 4 h of ultrasounding at room temperature. Finally, the product was conventionally centrifuged (13000 rpm, 10 min) and washed it three times with distilled water.

2.1.5. Ce6 loading of IrO₂@[email protected] NPs

For the synthesis of IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6), Ce6 was dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 1000 µg/mL. Afterwards, the prepared Ce6 stock solution was diluted into different concentrations and mixed with IrO₂@[email protected] (IrO₂@[email protected] finally at 1000 µg/mL, Ce6 finally at 50, 100, and 200 µg/mL). Then, the mixture was magnetically stirred overnight at room temperature. Thereafter, the reaction products were centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 8 min to obtain IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) NPs. The supernatant containing excess Ce6 was carefully collected for the loading amount calculation of Ce6. In brief, we used UV-vis-NIR spectroscopy to read the absorbance at 404 nm of the supernatant to reckon the concentration of Ce6 as per the absorbance-concentration standard curve. The loading efficiency of Ce6 was calculated by W_t/W \(\times\) 100% (W_t and W stand for the weight of loading Ce6 and total Ce6, respectively.), and the loading percentage of Ce6 was calculated by W_t/W_S \(\times\) 100% (W_t and W_s stand for the weight of loading Ce6 and the weight of IrO₂@[email protected], respectively.).

2.2. Measurement of the dissolved oxygen content

In this step, the catalase-like catalytic efficiency of IrO₂@[email protected] at different temperature (37°C and 80°C) was evaluated by mixing IrO₂@[email protected] (finally concentration at 200 µg/mL) with various concentration of H₂O₂ (finally at 5, 10, 20 and 50 µM). After the addition of H₂O₂, we used an oxygen probe (JPBJ-608 portable dissolved oxygen meter, Shanghai REX Instrument Factory) to monitor the dissolved oxygen content, and use a digital camera to record the bubble releasing of the reaction. At the same condition, the IrO₂@[email protected] without the addition of H₂O₂ was set as a control.

2.3. Detection of the singlet oxygen

1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran (DPBF), a classical probe for the measurement of singlet oxygen, was employed for the detection of the singlet oxygen. Briefly, 2.95 mL IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) in dimethyl sulfoxide was mixed with 50 µL DPBF in dimethyl sulfoxide. The terminal concentration of IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) and DPBF was 20 µg/mL and 10 µM, respectively. Then, the mixture was added with H₂O₂ (10mM, 45 µL), while the mixture added with H₂O (45 µL) was set as the control group. We exposed the above solutions to a 660 nm NIR laser (0.3 W/cm²) in a dark environment for 20 min, and used the Uv-vis-NIR spectrophotometer (Lambda 25, PerkinElmer, USA) to record the absorption intensity at designed time intervals.

2.4. Photothermal Conversion Performance

In order to explore the photothermal conversion performance, the as-prepared IrO₂ @[email protected](Ce6) was prepared in different concentrations (0, 100, 250 and 500 µg/mL in saline). Then, 100 µL of the above samples were added in each well of a 96-well plate and exposed to the 808 nm NIR laser (1 W/cm², 5 min). To investigate the power density-dependent thermal characteristics, IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) with the concentration of 200 µg/mL was select to be irradiated with 808 nm NIR laser at different power (0.5, 0.8 and 1 W/cm²) for 5 min. The photothermal stability of IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) was also validated via the 808 nm NIR laser irradiation (0.8 W/cm²) for 5 on/off cycles (laser on for 10 min and laser off for 10 min in each cycle). We use FLIR™ E60 camera (FLIR, USA) to record the temperature increment (ΔT) of the above experiment for specific analysis.

2.5. In vitro cellular viability

In this section, L929 cells were chosen to assess the potential cellular cytotoxicity of IrO₂@[email protected] in vitro. On the one hand, the CCK8 kit was performed to detect the cell viability after cultured with IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6). In brief, L929 cells were seeded into 96-well plate (8000 cells/well) and maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO₂. After 24 h, the medium was replaced by various concentrations (100 µL, 0, 50, 100, 250 and 500 µg/mL in RMPI1640) of IrO₂@MSN @ PDA-BSA(Ce6). Another 24 h later, 100 µL fresh RMPI1640 with 10 µL CCK8 test solution was added in each tested well to replace the old solution and then incubated for another 2 h. Using a microplate reader to read the absorbency of each well at 450 nm to calculate cell viability. On the other hand, calcein-AM/PI Live/Dead kit was used to further determine the cytocompatibility of IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6). L929 cells were cultured and disposed of with the same as the CCK8 assay but lastly stained with calcein-AM/PI (100 µL) based on the manufacturer for 30 min at 37°C. The counterstained cellular morphology was recorded using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus BX53).

2.6. In vitro tumor therapy

To study the cytotoxic effects of IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) in vitro, HT29 cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 8 × 10³ cells/well and maintained in a humidified cell-incubator with 5% CO₂ at 37°C overnight for cell attachment. Then, each well was filled with 100 µL IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) (in DMEM, 200 µg/mL) and continue culturing for 12 h. Then, we divided cells into 4 groups (n = 6). Cells in group 2 were irradiated with 808 nm laser (1 W/cm², 5 min) to assess the effect of PTT. Cells in group 3 were exposed to 660 nm laser (0.3 W/cm², 3 min) and cells in group 4 were treated with the medium containing H₂O₂ (100 µmol/L) and the pH was adjusted to 6.0 with HCl. Cells in group 5 were exposed to a synergistic procedure of NIR irradiation, including 808 nm (1 W/cm²) for 5 min and 660 nm (0.3 W/cm²) for 3 min. Cells treated with DMEM without other intervention were set as the control (group 1). Finally, we used CCK-8 and the calcein-AM/PI Live/Dead staining to evaluate the relative viabilities of cells.

2.7. In vitro hemocompatibility

The hemocompatibility of IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) was investigated by the typical in vitro hemolysis assay as below: fresh complete blood samples (1 mL) were collected from healthy KM mice and centrifuged (3000 rpm, 3 min, 4°C) to obtain the mouse red blood cells (mRBCs). After that, the harvested mRBCs were washed with PBS three times and reposited in PBS for further experiments. Then, the above mRBCs dispersions (0.3 mL) was mixed with 1 mL of different concentrations (100, 250 and 500 µg/mL) of IrO₂@[email protected] and cultured at 37°C. Meanwhile, mRBCs dispersions (0.3 mL) were incubated with 1 mL of PBS (negative control) or 1 mL of DI water (positive control). After incubating for 4 h, the supernatant of the above mixture was gathered via centrifugation (12000 rpm, 5 min). Subsequently, we recorded the absorbance of the supernatants at 580 nm to compute the hemolysis percentage (HP) according to literature.

2.8. In vivo biocompatibility and biodistribution

To evaluate the biocompatibility and biodistribution of IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) in vivo, the healthy KM female mice (SPF grade) were randomly sent into two groups (n = 24 per group). All animal experiments were conducted under the protocols approved by the Laboratory Animal Center of Changhai Hospital of Second Military Medical University, the policies of National Ministry of Hkiuealth. One group was intravenously (I.V.) injected with saline as a control, another group was injected with IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) solution (250 µL, 1 mg/mL in PBS). The body weight of all experimental mice was weighed and recorded per two days. Mice were heart punctured for collect blood samples after anesthesia on 1, 7, 28 days and then were euthanized for organs collection. The blood samples were used for blood routine analysis and blood biochemical index testing in virtue of a Sysmex XS-800i automated hematology analyzer and a DxC 800 automatic biochemical analyzer. These crucial organs (heart, lung, liver, kidney, and spleen) were partly sectioned and immediately dipped in 4% polyformaldehyde for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Besides, the remaining part of the organs was used for quantitative detection of the Silicon (Si) ion biodistribution through the Agilent 700 Series ICP-OES.

2.9. In vivo tumor therapy

HT29 cells (10⁷ cells per mouse, in 150 µL of serum-free DMEM) were subcutaneously implanted into the right back of the Balb/c nude mice (female, 4–6 weeks old). Three weeks after the cell-injection, a tumor nodule about 0.15–0.20 cm³ in each mouse was established. Then, the tumor mice were randomly allocated to five groups with six mice in each group as follows: mice in group 1 were I.V. injected with saline and served as the control group. Mice in group 2 were given with IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) solution (200 µL, 1 mg/mL in PBS, I.V.) for PTT. Mice in group 3 were treated with IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) solution (200 µL, 1 mg/mL in PBS, I.V.) for PDT. With regard to the dual-modal tumor therapy, 200 µL (I.V.) and 20 µL (I.T.) IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) were separately injected in group 4 and group 5. Twelve hours after the injection, mice in group 1 and group 2 were irradiated with 808 nm NIR laser (1.0W/cm²) for 5 min, while mice in group 3 were subjected to the 660 nm laser (0.3 W/cm²) for 5 min. As the combined treatment group, the mice in group 4 and group 5 were successively exposed to 808 nm NIR laser (1.0W/cm²) and 660 nm laser (0.3 W/cm²) for 5 min. The FLIR E60 infrared camera was exploited to keep the record of ΔT measurement and thermal imaging during the treatments. Mice in all groups were then raised for 4 weeks, and we measured the tumor volume every 3 days. The efficiency of in vivo tumor treatment was assessed by the relative tumor volume.

2.10. Statistical analysis

All the data acquest from the above experiments were reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA. P values < 0.05 was regard as statistically significant. Data indicated with (*) deputize for p < 0.05, (**) for p < 0.01, and (***) for p < 0.001.

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of IrO₂@[email protected]

Colloidal-stable polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)-decorated IrO₂ NPs (PVP-IrO₂) were prepared through facile hydrolysis and then coated with a thin layer of MSN to carry Ce6 through physical adsorption. PDA was then coated on the surfaces of the IrO₂@MSN particles under alkaline conditions because DA self-polymerizes to form PDA. A BSA modifier was grafted onto the IrO₂@[email protected] surface under ultrasonic conditions through an amidation reaction between the -COOH group of BSA and the -NH₂ group of PDA in a buffered solution of Na₂HPO₄-NaH₂PO₄ to achieve colloidal stability (Scheme 1). The morphology of the product was analyzed using SEM and TEM. A spherical shape with an average diameter of approximately 84 ± 13 nm (Figs. 1a and b) was obtained. Therefore, we can conclude that NPs have a certain degree of aggregation, which is attributed to the interaction between the PDA and BSA that were grafted onto the NPs. The preparation of samples for SEM and TEM may have resulted in NP aggregation as well. The hydration kinetic diameter and Tyndall effect of the IrO₂@[email protected] NPs in distilled water and PBS remained constant and clearly visible after 12 h of storage. This indicates that the surface-modified BSA endows durable colloidal stability to the IrO₂@[email protected] NPs in different solutions. EDS (Fig. S1) and elemental mapping (Fig. 1d–f) confirmed the coexistence of O, Si, and Ir. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms were used to investigate the porous structure (Fig. 1g). The results indicated that the IrO₂@[email protected] NPs had a high specific surface area (149.6521 m²/g) and large pore volume (0.2 cm³/g). The average pore size was 5.7 nm (Fig. 1h). The XRD results of the IrO₂@[email protected] NPs (Fig. 1i) did not contain typical diffraction peaks, indicating the poor crystalline state of the NPs. The chemical structure of IrO₂@[email protected] NPs was determined through FTIR. The absorption peak at 1089 cm^− 1 represents the tensile and asymmetric vibration of Si-O-Si (Fig. S2), indicating the existence of SiO₂ in the IrO₂@[email protected] NPs. The vibration at 1422 cm^− 1 is attributed to the -COOH group of BSA. The vibration signals at 1640 cm^− 1 and 1500 cm^− 1 are attributed to the deformation vibrations of amide I (-NH₂) and amide II (-NH-) of BSA, respectively. The vibration peaks of the PDA and BSA amide groups due to the stretching of the -NH- group are located at 3400 cm^− 1 and 3000 cm^− 1, respectively. The peaks corresponding to the -C = C- stretching vibration of PDA is located at 1500 cm^− 1. These results collectively confirm that PDA and BSA were successfully decorated onto the IrO₂@MSN surface.

3.2. Ce6 loading

The conspicuous pore sizes of the IrO₂@[email protected] NPs are likely to facilitate guest molecule loading. A classical PSA named Ce6 was chosen as the model drug to be loaded onto the synthesized IrO₂@[email protected] It is essential to evaluate the loading performance of IrO₂@[email protected] because the tumor PDT is dose-dependent. The UV-vis-NIR spectra of IrO₂@[email protected] before and after the loading of Ce6 are shown in Fig. 2b. The NPs carrying Ce6 have two typical characteristic peaks at 404 nm and 665 nm, in comparison to the spectrum of the pure IrO₂@[email protected] This proves that Ce6 was successfully loaded onto IrO₂@[email protected] The Ce6 loading of IrO₂@[email protected] was then optimized by varying the concentration of Ce6. Ce6 concentrations of 50, 100, and 200 µg/mL resulted in Ce6 loading values of approximately 76.3 %, 61.3 %, and 43.0 % on IrO₂@[email protected], respectively. The Ce6 loading ratio was calculated by dividing the weight of the loaded Ce6 with the weight of IrO₂@[email protected], which was equal to 3.8 %, 6.1 %, and 8.6 % at Ce6 concentrations of 50, 100, and 200 µg/mL, respectively (Fig. 2c). According to the abovementioned results, a Ce6 concentration of 200 µg/mL was selected for the subsequent experiments.

3.3. Catalytic efficiency and ¹O₂ generating capacity

IrO₂@[email protected] can improve the PDT efficiency by catalyzing the decomposition of H₂O₂ to generate endogenous O₂ due to the catalase-like activity of IrO₂. The addition of H₂O₂ to the IrO₂@[email protected] solution results in the immediate generation of several O₂ bubbles, as shown in Fig. 2d. This intuitively confirms the catalytic ability of IrO₂. Further, the catalytic efficiency of IrO₂@[email protected] was concentration-dependent. An increase in the IrO₂@[email protected] concentration led to an increase in the concentration of the dissolved O₂ (Fig. 2e). The IrO₂@[email protected] NPs possess the required thermal stability and are superior to the traditional catalase, which is vulnerable to hyperthermia (Fig. 2g). The catalytic ability of IrO₂@[email protected] was satisfactory at 37 °C and highly dependent on the substrate concentration (Fig. 2f). The catalytic ability of IrO₂@[email protected] remained constant even after increasing the temperature to 80 °C. This thermal stability further enhances PDT efficiency in the PTT-induced high-temperature environment.

The amount of ¹O₂ contained in the solution was measured through light radiation to verify whether the O₂ generated by IrO₂@[email protected] could be utilized to enhance the tumor PDT. The irradiation of the IrO₂@[email protected] solution led to a reduction in the light absorption by the DPBF, thereby confirming the generation of ¹O₂ (¹O₂ can oxidize the probe of DPBF and catalyze its discoloring reaction). In addition, it was observed that the rate of reduction in the light absorption increased with the addition of H₂O₂. This confirms the ability of the IrO₂@[email protected] NPs to enhance ¹O₂ generation in the presence of H₂O₂. The improved ¹O₂ generation indicates that IrO₂@[email protected] can be used as an intelligent nanozyme system to facilitate tumor PDT in the TME.

3.4. Photothermal Conversion Performance

In addition to enhancing the tumor PDT, IrO₂@[email protected] is a PTA that can be used in the PTT of tumors. The absorbance capacity of IrO₂@[email protected] for wavelengths ranging from 400 to 1000 nm was first studied. IrO₂@[email protected] demonstrated a high light absorbance capacity, and the light absorbance increased with increasing NP concentration in the abovementioned wavelength range (Fig. 2i). The absorbed light was partially transformed into heat. The photothermal ability of IrO₂@[email protected] was studied by varying the NIR laser power and NP concentration. The ΔT of IrO₂@[email protected] increased with the increasing concentration of the solution at a fixed power density, as shown in Fig. 3a. However, the ΔT of water was negligible. The ΔT values of the solutions at concentrations of 100, 250, and 500 mg/mL were 7.0, 16.4, and 30.2°C, respectively. IrO₂@[email protected] was then used at a concentration of 250 mg/mL to study the impact of power density on heat production. The ΔT values of IrO₂@[email protected] were 7.7, 12.6, and 16.4°C at power densities of 0.5, 0.8, and 1.0 W/cm² (808 nm), respectively. An E60 thermal imaging camera (FLIR Systems, Inc., USA) was used to record the concentration, irradiation, and laser-power-density-dependent temperature surges of IrO₂@[email protected] (Figs. 3b and d). It was confirmed that the photothermal ability of IrO₂@[email protected] was dependent on the material concentration and laser power density. The photothermal conversion efficiency and heat transfer time constant (τs) were equal to 29.8 % and 175.7 s, both of which are comparable to the values obtained for graphene and black phosphorus nanosheets (Figs. 3f and g) [34, 35]. IrO₂@[email protected] is considered photothermally stable because its ΔT variation during the five rounds of NIR laser irradiation substantial (Fig. 3e).

3.5. In Vitro Biocompatibility Assay

In vitro biocompatibility, including cytocompatibility and hemocompatibility, is an essential factor in the biomedical applications of nanomaterials. Therefore, the cytocompatibility of IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) was assessed using a CCK-8 cell viability assay and calcein-AM/PI double staining. The cell viabilities were maintained above 95 % after 24 h of co-cultivation with varying concentrations of IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6), as shown in the CCK-8 results depicted in Fig. 4a. There were no evident differences between the abovementioned sample and the control group. These trends are similar to the results of CCK-8 and calcein-AM/PI double staining, which stained the live cells and dead cells green and red, respectively (Fig. 4b–f). This indicates that there were no obvious differences between the results of the experimental and control groups after culturing the samples for 24 h. These results indicate that the cytocompatibility of IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) is satisfactory within experimental dosages. The hemocompatibility of IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) was evaluated using a hemolysis assay. The HP of IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) remained lower than 5 %, even at a high material concentration of 500 µg/mL. The HP values were equal to 0.4 ± 0.14 %, 1.2 ± 0.25 %, and 2.16 ± 0.3 % at IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) concentrations of 100, 250, and 500 µg/mL, respectively (Fig. 4g). In addition, the mRBCs of the control and experimental groups were completely separated from the solution with relative ease, whereas the mRBCs in the positive control were completely ruptured (Fig. 4h). The hemolysis assay indicated that the NPs had a minimal impact on the structural integrity of mRBCs, thereby ensuring the safety of intravenous material injections.

3.6 In Vivo Biocompatibility and Biodistribution

The biocompatibility of IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) in animals was also studied. The body weights of mice were measured every two days after the I.V. materials injection. The body weights of the experimental and control groups did not differ significantly (p > 0.05), as shown in Fig. 5a. However, the blood routine (Fig. S3) and serum biochemistry parameters (Fig. 5b) of the mice administered with IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) were not similar to those of the control group (p > 0.05). The potential toxicity of IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) to vital organs, such as the heart, liver, spleen, lungs, and kidneys, was also evaluated. The H&E staining of these organs demonstrated that no obvious damage was caused during the preset feeding periods (1, 7, and 28 days). This indicates that IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) does not cause acute or chronic organ damage. The potential metabolic pathway of IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) was then investigated by conducting an in vivo biodistribution of Si ions. The accumulation of Si in the liver and kidney one day after the injection was higher than that observed in the other organs due to the non-specific uptake of the reticuloendothelial system. The amount of Si in the major organs gradually decreased with time. As a result, the concentration of Si in the tested organs was lower than 5 µg/g 28 days after the injection.

3.7. In Vitro PTT/PDT Tumor Therapy.

The efficiency of the combined tumor therapy in HT-29 cells and tumor-bearing nude mice was studied to realize the desirable biocompatibility of IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) in vitro and in vivo. The HT-29 cells cultured with IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) in the absence of light intervention did not report excessive cell death. However, the survival rate of the cells after being subjected to 808 nm NIR laser irradiation was reduced to 48.9 % (***p < 0.001, versus control, Fig. 6a) due to the excellent photothermal conversion ability of IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6). In comparison with the control group, the viability of the HT-29 cells irradiated with a 660 nm laser decreased to 65.8 % (PDT group, ***p < 0.001, versus control). The addition of H₂O₂ to the DMEM under conditions similar to those of the PDT group drastically reduced the viability of the HT-29 cells to 17.6 % (***p < 0.001, versus control; ***p < 0.001, versus PDT). The differences in the cell viability values indicate that the co-existence of H₂O₂ and IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) could enhance the tumor PDT effect. This is because IrO₂ catalyzed the decomposition of H₂O₂ to produce endogenous oxygen, which was further sensitized by the Ce6 while being irradiated by a 660 nm laser. Owing to the PTT and CAT-mimicking abilities of IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6), the HT-29 cells were almost completely dead after being irradiated by the 808 nm and 660 nm lasers successively (***p < 0.001, versus control). The results of the calcein-AM/PI live/dead staining were similar to those of the CCK-8 cell viability assay. The HT-29 cells in the control group were stained with a strong green fluorescence, whereas most HT-29 cells treated with PTT, PDT, enhanced PDT, and PDT/PTT were stained red (Fig. 6b–f). This validates the in vitro therapeutic effect of IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6).

3.8. In Vivo Combined Tumor Therapy

The in vitro therapeutic effect investigation provides preliminary confirmation that IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) is suitable for multimodal tumor therapy. This was verified by the tests conducted on animals. The variations in the temperatures of the tumor-bearing nude mice that received the material injections were measured using a thermal imaging camera. The ΔT of the control group was only 4.3°C after being subjected to NIR irradiation at 808 mm (5 min), whereas ΔT for the mice injected with the I.V. and I.T. materials were 10.3°C and 20.8°C, respectively. The variation in the temperatures of the mice injected with the I.V. material also proved that IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) could passively accumulate at the tumor site through the EPR effect. The volume of the tumors of the mice belonging to the control group increased to 9.12 times their original values after 28 days of feeding. However, the tumor volumes of the PTT group increased to 2.56 times their original values (***p < 0.001, versus control). This indicates that PTT can kill a few cancer cells while the surviving ones continue to grow. Similarly, the tumor volumes of the PDT group increased to approximately 3.42 times their original values (***p < 0.001, versus control). There was no obvious difference between the tumor volumes of the PDT and PTT groups (p > 0.05). This suggests that a single dose of PTT or PDT produces a certain therapeutic effect. However, the tumors of the mice in the combined therapy group were completely eradicated, irrespective of the material injection method (Figs. 7c and d). This confirms the superior efficiency of the combined tumor therapy of the IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) NPs.

An IrO₂@[email protected](Ce6) nanoenzymatic composite platform for the treatment of tumors through the combined effects of PTT and PDT was designed in this study. The MSN coating introduced abundant pores for Ce6 loading, and the conjugated BSA endowed the NPs with sufficient biocompatibility in vitro and in vivo. The loading of Ce6 facilitated the photo-triggered generation of single oxygen, resulting in photodynamic cell death. IrO₂ functions as a CAT-mimic to catalyze the decomposition of H₂O₂ in the TME to generate endogenous oxygen and alleviate the hypoxia of solid tumors. This enhances the PDT of Ce6 by offering local oxygen and promoting the generation of ¹O₂. In addition, the PDA coating and IrO₂ NPs exhibited remarkably high photothermal conversion efficiencies, resulting in the ablation of solid tumors through hyperthermia. The therapeutic effect of IrO₂ @[email protected](Ce6) for multimodal tumor therapy was proved both in vitro and in vivo. The results indicated that the tumors of the mice in the combined therapy group could be completely eradicated. The findings of the present study highlight the feasibility of using theranostic nanoenzymes for translational medicine.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this manuscript and its supplementary material

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest or financial conflicts to disclose.

Funding

Not applicable

Authors' contributions

HW and QJ designed and performed the experiment, and wrote the manuscript. KL, CZ ,MX and SW analyzed the data. ZF and JZ supervised the research

Acknowledgements

H. W. and Q. J. contributed equally to this work. This research is financially supported by Shanghai Sailing Program 20YF1448400, Naval Medical University Sailing Program 2019-QH-16, Shanghai Changhai Hospital Youth Found.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information is available from the online or from the author.

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A: Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 2021, 71:7-33.
Zeng H, Chen W, Zheng R, Zhang S, Ji JS, Zou X, Xia C, Sun K, Yang Z, Li H, et al: Changing cancer survival in China during 2003-15: a pooled analysis of 17 population-based cancer registries. Lancet Glob Health 2018, 6:e555-e567.
Vasan N, Baselga J, Hyman DM: A view on drug resistance in cancer. Nature 2019, 575:299-309.
Herrmann J: Adverse cardiac effects of cancer therapies: cardiotoxicity and arrhythmia. Nat Rev Cardiol 2020, 17:474-502.
Liu Y, Bhattarai P, Dai Z, Chen X: Photothermal therapy and photoacoustic imaging via nanotheranostics in fighting cancer. Chem Soc Rev 2019, 48:2053-2108.
Liu S, Pan X, Liu H: Two-Dimensional Nanomaterials for Photothermal Therapy. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2020, 59:5890-5900.
Monro S, Colon KL, Yin H, Roque J, 3rd, Konda P, Gujar S, Thummel RP, Lilge L, Cameron CG, McFarland SA: Transition Metal Complexes and Photodynamic Therapy from a Tumor-Centered Approach: Challenges, Opportunities, and Highlights from the Development of TLD1433. Chem Rev 2019, 119:797-828.
Yang J, Hou M, Sun W, Wu Q, Xu J, Xiong L, Chai Y, Liu Y, Yu M, Wang H, et al: Sequential PDT and PTT Using Dual-Modal Single-Walled Carbon Nanohorns Synergistically Promote Systemic Immune Responses against Tumor Metastasis and Relapse. Adv Sci (Weinh) 2020, 7:2001088.
Liang R, Liu L, He H, Chen Z, Han Z, Luo Z, Wu Z, Zheng M, Ma Y, Cai L: Oxygen-boosted immunogenic photodynamic therapy with gold [email protected] dioxide to inhibit tumor growth and metastases. Biomaterials 2018, 177:149-160.
Liu P, Xie X, Shi X, Peng Y, Ding J, Zhou W: Oxygen-Self-Supplying and HIF-1alpha-Inhibiting Core-Shell Nanosystem for Hypoxia-Resistant Photodynamic Therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2019, 11:48261-48270.
Luo K, Wu H, Chen Y, Li J, Zhou L, Yang F, Huang M, An X, Wang S: Preparation of Bi-based hydrogel for multi-modal tumor therapy. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2021, 200:111591.
Pucelik B, Sulek A, Barzowska A, Dabrowski JM: Recent advances in strategies for overcoming hypoxia in photodynamic therapy of cancer. Cancer Lett 2020, 492:116-135.
Cheng Y, Cheng H, Jiang C, Qiu X, Wang K, Huan W, Yuan A, Wu J, Hu Y: Perfluorocarbon nanoparticles enhance reactive oxygen levels and tumour growth inhibition in photodynamic therapy. Nat Commun 2015, 6:8785.
Chang M, Hou Z, Wang M, Wang M, Dang P, Liu J, Shu M, Ding B, Al Kheraif AA, Li C, Lin J: Cu2 MoS4 /Au Heterostructures with Enhanced Catalase-Like Activity and Photoconversion Efficiency for Primary/Metastatic Tumors Eradication by Phototherapy-Induced Immunotherapy. Small 2020, 16:e1907146.
Cheng X, He L, Xu J, Fang Q, Yang L, Xue Y, Wang X, Tang R: Oxygen-producing catalase-based prodrug nanoparticles overcoming resistance in hypoxia-mediated chemo-photodynamic therapy. Acta Biomater 2020, 112:234-249.
Sahu A, Min K, Jeon J, Yang HS, Tae G: Catalytic nanographene oxide with hemin for enhanced photodynamic therapy. J Control Release 2020, 326:442-454.
Wang D, Wu H, Lim WQ, Phua SZF, Xu P, Chen Q, Guo Z, Zhao Y: A Mesoporous Nanoenzyme Derived from Metal-Organic Frameworks with Endogenous Oxygen Generation to Alleviate Tumor Hypoxia for Significantly Enhanced Photodynamic Therapy. Adv Mater 2019, 31:e1901893.
Du B, Tung CH: Enzyme-Assisted Photodynamic Therapy Based on Nanomaterials. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2020, 6:2506-2517.
Dan Q, Hu D, Ge Y, Zhang S, Li S, Gao D, Luo W, Ma T, Liu X, Zheng H, et al: Ultrasmall theranostic nanozymes to modulate tumor hypoxia for augmenting photodynamic therapy and radiotherapy. Biomater Sci 2020, 8:973-987.
Hou X, Tao Y, Pang Y, Li X, Jiang G, Liu Y: Nanoparticle-based photothermal and photodynamic immunotherapy for tumor treatment. Int J Cancer 2018, 143:3050-3060.
Nam J, Son S, Ochyl LJ, Kuai R, Schwendeman A, Moon JJ: Chemo-photothermal therapy combination elicits anti-tumor immunity against advanced metastatic cancer. Nat Commun 2018, 9:1074.
Hu K, Xie L, Zhang Y, Hanyu M, Yang Z, Nagatsu K, Suzuki H, Ouyang J, Ji X, Wei J, et al: Marriage of black phosphorus and Cu(2+) as effective photothermal agents for PET-guided combination cancer therapy. Nat Commun 2020, 11:2778.
Murugan C, Sharma V, Murugan RK, Malaimegu G, Sundaramurthy A: Two-dimensional cancer theranostic nanomaterials: Synthesis, surface functionalization and applications in photothermal therapy. J Control Release 2019, 299:1-20.
Zhang Y, Lv F, Cheng Y, Yuan Z, Yang F, Liu C, Cao Y, Zhang K, Lu H, Zada S, et al: [email protected] Bimetallic Nanoplates Decorated Mesoporous MnO2 for Synergistic Nucleus-Targeted NIR-II Photothermal and Hypoxia-Relieved Photodynamic Therapy. Adv Healthc Mater 2020, 9:e1901528.
Chen G, Ma B, Wang Y, Xie R, Li C, Dou K, Gong S: CuS-Based Theranostic Micelles for NIR-Controlled Combination Chemotherapy and Photothermal Therapy and Photoacoustic Imaging. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2017, 9:41700-41711.
Rong L, Zhang Y, Li WS, Su Z, Fadhil JI, Zhang C: Iron chelated melanin-like nanoparticles for tumor-associated macrophage repolarization and cancer therapy. Biomaterials 2019, 225:119515.
Sun W, Du Y, Liang X, Yu C, Fang J, Lu W, Guo X, Tian J, Jin Y, Zheng J: Synergistic triple-combination therapy with hyaluronic acid-shelled PPy/CPT nanoparticles results in tumor regression and prevents tumor recurrence and metastasis in 4T1 breast cancer. Biomaterials 2019, 217:119264.
Zhou L, Zhao J, Chen Y, Zheng Y, Li J, Zhao J, Zhang J, Liu Y, Liu X, Wang S: MoS2-ALG-Fe/GOx hydrogel with Fenton catalytic activity for combined cancer photothermal, starvation, and chemodynamic therapy. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2020, 195:111243.
Wan G, Chen B, Li L, Wang D, Shi S, Zhang T, Wang Y, Zhang L, Wang Y: Nanoscaled red blood cells facilitate breast cancer treatment by combining photothermal/photodynamic therapy and chemotherapy. Biomaterials 2018, 155:25-40.
Ferroni C, Del Rio A, Martini C, Manoni E, Varchi G: Light-Induced Therapies for Prostate Cancer Treatment. Front Chem 2019, 7:719.
Sun W, Zhao X, Fan J, Du J, Peng X: Boron Dipyrromethene Nano-Photosensitizers for Anticancer Phototherapies. Small 2019, 15:e1804927.
Gu W, Zhang T, Gao J, Wang Y, Li D, Zhao Z, Jiang B, Dong Z, Liu H: Albumin-bioinspired iridium oxide nanoplatform with high photothermal conversion efficiency for synergistic chemo-photothermal of osteosarcoma. Drug Deliv 2019, 26:918-927.
Zhen W, Liu Y, Lin L, Bai J, Jia X, Tian H, Jiang X: BSA-IrO2 : Catalase-like Nanoparticles with High Photothermal Conversion Efficiency and a High X-ray Absorption Coefficient for Anti-inflammation and Antitumor Theranostics. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2018, 57:10309-10313.
Gulzar A, Xu J, Yang D, Xu L, He F, Gai S, Yang P: Nano-graphene oxide-UCNP-Ce6 covalently constructed nanocomposites for NIR-mediated bioimaging and PTT/PDT combinatorial therapy. Dalton Trans 2018, 47:3931-3939.
Wan S, Zhang B, Li S, He B, Pu Y: Combination of PEG-decorated black phosphorus nanosheets and immunoadjuvant for photoimmunotherapy of melanoma. J Mater Chem B 2020, 8:2805-2813.

Scheme01.png
Scheme 1. The schematic synthesis procedure and therapeutic mechanism of [email protected]@PDA-BSA(Ce6)
Supportinformation.docx

PDF

Journal Publication

published 07 Jul, 2021

Read the published version in Journal of Nanobiotechnology →

Editorial decision: Major revision
21 Apr, 2021
Review #4 received at journal
20 Apr, 2021
Review #3 received at journal
14 Apr, 2021
Review #2 received at journal
14 Apr, 2021
Review #1 received at journal
09 Apr, 2021
Reviewer #4 agreed at journal
05 Apr, 2021
Reviews received at journal
02 Apr, 2021
Reviewer #2 agreed at journal
01 Apr, 2021
Reviewer #3 agreed at journal
01 Apr, 2021
Reviewers invited by journal
01 Apr, 2021
Reviewer #1 agreed at journal
01 Apr, 2021
Editor assigned by journal
31 Mar, 2021
Submission checks completed at journal
31 Mar, 2021
Editor invited by journal
31 Mar, 2021
First submitted to journal
29 Mar, 2021

You are reading this latest preprint version

Synthesis of Iridium-Based Nanocomposites With Catalase Activity For Cancer PTT/PDT Therapy

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

1. Introduction

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Preparation and characterization of IrO₂@[email protected] and the loading of Ce6

2.1.1. Synthesis of IrO₂-PVP NPs

2.1.2. Synthesis of IrO₂@MSN NPs

2.1.3. Preparation of IrO₂@[email protected] NPs

2.1.4. Preparation of IrO₂@[email protected]

2.1.5. Ce6 loading of IrO₂@[email protected] NPs

2.2. Measurement of the dissolved oxygen content

2.3. Detection of the singlet oxygen

2.4. Photothermal Conversion Performance

2.5. In vitro cellular viability

2.6. In vitro tumor therapy

2.7. In vitro hemocompatibility

2.8. In vivo biocompatibility and biodistribution

2.9. In vivo tumor therapy

2.10. Statistical analysis

3. Results And Discussions

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of IrO₂@[email protected]

3.2. Ce6 loading

3.3. Catalytic efficiency and ¹O₂ generating capacity

3.4. Photothermal Conversion Performance

3.5. In Vitro Biocompatibility Assay

3.6 In Vivo Biocompatibility and Biodistribution

3.7. In Vitro PTT/PDT Tumor Therapy.

3.8. In Vivo Combined Tumor Therapy

4. Conclusion

Declarations

References

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Synthesis of Iridium-Based Nanocomposites With Catalase Activity For Cancer PTT/PDT Therapy

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

1. Introduction

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Preparation and characterization of IrO2@[email protected] and the loading of Ce6

2.1.1. Synthesis of IrO2-PVP NPs

2.1.2. Synthesis of IrO2@MSN NPs

2.1.3. Preparation of IrO2@[email protected] NPs

2.1.4. Preparation of IrO2@[email protected]

2.1.5. Ce6 loading of IrO2@[email protected] NPs

2.2. Measurement of the dissolved oxygen content

2.3. Detection of the singlet oxygen

2.4. Photothermal Conversion Performance

2.5. In vitro cellular viability

2.6. In vitro tumor therapy

2.7. In vitro hemocompatibility

2.8. In vivo biocompatibility and biodistribution

2.9. In vivo tumor therapy

2.10. Statistical analysis

3. Results And Discussions

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of IrO2@[email protected]

3.2. Ce6 loading

3.3. Catalytic efficiency and 1O2 generating capacity

3.4. Photothermal Conversion Performance

3.5. In Vitro Biocompatibility Assay

3.6 In Vivo Biocompatibility and Biodistribution

3.7. In Vitro PTT/PDT Tumor Therapy.

3.8. In Vivo Combined Tumor Therapy

4. Conclusion

Declarations

References

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

2.1. Preparation and characterization of IrO₂@[email protected] and the loading of Ce6

2.1.1. Synthesis of IrO₂-PVP NPs

2.1.2. Synthesis of IrO₂@MSN NPs

2.1.3. Preparation of IrO₂@[email protected] NPs

2.1.4. Preparation of IrO₂@[email protected]

2.1.5. Ce6 loading of IrO₂@[email protected] NPs

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of IrO₂@[email protected]

3.3. Catalytic efficiency and ¹O₂ generating capacity