The Iridium (III) catalyzed oxidation of methionine has been studied in aqueous alkaline medium. Kinetic experiments were comes out at different concentrations of one reactant keeping the concentrations of other constant.
Stoichiometric and Product analysis
The stoichiometry of the reaction was studied by estimating the amount of HCF (II) ions produced after definite interval of time with standard solution of ceric (IV) sulphate using Ferroin indicator14. The result obtained indicated that four moles of HCF (III) was consumed by one mole of methionine and the product was identified as methionine sulphone15–16. The stoichiometry of the reaction was found to correspond to the equation.
CH3 –S-(CH2)2-CH (NH2) – COO− + 4HCF (III)\(\underrightarrow{\varvec{I}\varvec{r}\left(\varvec{I}\varvec{I}\varvec{I}\right),\varvec{H}2\varvec{O}}\) CH3-SO2-(CH2)2-CH (NH2)-COO− + 4HCF (II)
The reaction product was isolated by solvent extraction method using an organic solvent, n-butanol – glacial acetic acid-water and it was identified by its IR spectrum(Fig. 1) which showed the bands(v) at 1152.64 and 1394.32 cm− 1 corresponding to O = S = O stretching, the band(v) at 1655cm− 1 due to –COOH stretching and a broad band(v) at 3223cm− 1 corresponds – NH stretching respectively. The positions of the absorption bands for sulphone were found to be in good agreement with the literature values of symmetric and asymmetric SO2 stretching frequency.
Effect of Oxidant
The effect of Oxidant was studying by varying the concentration of HCF(III) from 2 x 10− 4 to 6 x 10− 4 mol dm− 3 were carried out keeping fixed concentrations of the other reagent. The initial rates were calculated by plotting absorbance vs time plots. (Fig. 2) Pseudo first order plots were made and the evaluated first order rate constant were found to be independent of the initial concentration of the oxidant, thereby confirming the order with respect to the oxidant to be one.(Fig. 3)
Effect of Substrate
To study the effect of substrate concentration on reaction rate, the substrate concentration has been varied from 0.1 x 10− 4 to 1 x 10− 4 mol dm− 3. First order dependence of rate on lower concentration of substrate tends to be zero order at its higher concentration. The linear plots of rate− 1 vs [S]−1 suggests Michaeils – Menten type of kinetics.(Fig. 4)
Effect of Hydroxide ion
Increase in rate with hydroxide ion concentration reveals first order kinetics with respect to hydroxide ion concentration. The concentration has been varied from 0.1–0.4 mol dm-3.
Effect of Catalyst
The reaction rate also increases with the catalyst concentration indicating a direct dependence of rate on catalyst concentration. The concentration of iridium was varied from 0.335 x 10− 5 to 3.35 X 10− 5 mol dm− 3.(Fig. 5)
Effect of Ionic Strength
Effect of ionic strength was studied by using KCl. The linear increase in log(-dc/dt) with õ suggest the positive salt effect i.e.the involvement of two similarly charged reacting species in the reaction.(Fig. 6)
Activation Parameter
Thermodynamic parameters of the reaction were studied at four different temperature 35, 40, 45 and 50°C. Linear plots of log K2 vs 1/T indicate that the reaction obeys Arrhenius equation. The value of energy of activation Ea, enthalpy of activation ∆H#, entropy of activation∆S # and free energy of activation ∆F # were evaluated as ginen in table 2.(Fig. 7) The graphical value of energy of activation (Ea) is 13.07 Kcal mol− 1.
Table 1. Effect of [HCF(III)],[Methionine],[NaOH],and [Ir(III)] on the reaction rate at temperature 35°C of reaction mixture
[HCF(III)] X 10− 4 mol dm− 3
|
[Methionine) ] X 10− 4
− mol dm− 3
|
[Ir(III)] X 10− 5
− mol dm− 3
|
[NaOH] X 10− 4
− mol dm− 3
|
(dA/dt)i X 103(min− 1)
|
2.0
|
3.0
|
3.35
|
0.4
|
1.4
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
3.35
|
0.4
|
2.2
|
4.0
|
3.0
|
3.35
|
0.4
|
3.0
|
5.0
|
3.0
|
3.35
|
0.4
|
3.9
|
6.0
|
3.0
|
3.35
|
0.4
|
4.8
|
3.0
|
1.0
|
3.35
|
0.4
|
0.6
|
3.0
|
2.0
|
3.35
|
0.4
|
1.4
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
3.35
|
0.4
|
2.0
|
3.0
|
4.0
|
3.35
|
0.4
|
2.6
|
3.0
|
5.0
|
3.35
|
0.4
|
3.4
|
3.0
|
6.0
|
3.35
|
0.4
|
4.0
|
3.0
|
7.0
|
3.35
|
0.4
|
4.6
|
3.0
|
8.0
|
3.35
|
0.4
|
5.0
|
3.0
|
9.0
|
3.35
|
0.4
|
5.0
|
3.0
|
10.0
|
3.35
|
0.4
|
5.0
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
0.335
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
0.67
|
0.4
|
0.9
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
1.01
|
0.4
|
1.3
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
1.34
|
0.4
|
1.7
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
1.67
|
0.4
|
2.0
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
2.01
|
0.4
|
2.4
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
2.34
|
0.4
|
2.8
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
2.68
|
0.4
|
3.1
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
3.01
|
0.4
|
3.6
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
3.35
|
0.4
|
4.0
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
3.35
|
0.1
|
1.2
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
3.35
|
0.2
|
2.0
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
3.35
|
0.3
|
2.8
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
3.35
|
0.4
|
3.6
|
Table 2 Temperature Parameter
[HCF(III) = 3.00 X 10− 4 mol dm− 3, Methionine = 3.00 X 10− 4mol dm− 3,[NaOH] = 0.4mol dm− 3, [Ir(III)] = 3.35 X 10-5mol dm− 3,ƛmax = 420nm,µ = 0.5 mol dm− 3.
Temp.
[●C]
|
Initial rate
(dA/dt)i x 103
(min− 1)
|
K2 x 102
(l mol− 1sec− 1)
|
Temp. Coefficient
|
Energy of Activation
(Ea)
(kcal mol− 1)
|
Frequency Factor A X10-8(lmol− 1 sec− 1)
|
Energy of Activation
-∆S#
(E.U.)
|
Enthalpy of Activation
∆H#
(kcal mol− 1)
|
Free Energy of Activation
∆F#
(kcal mol− 1)
|
35
40
45
50
|
1.6
2.7
3.4
5.2
|
3.84
5.63
7.67
10.74
|
-
-
2.0
1.90
|
-
14.66
11.85
13.74
|
1.276
1.318
1.279
1.289
|
23.502
23.469
23.560
23.575
|
12.808
12.798
12.788
12.778
|
20.039
20.157
20.275
20.392
|
Mean value
|
1.95 ± 0.05
|
13.42 ± 1.57
|
1.291 ± 0.015
|
23.527 ± 0.058
|
12.793 ± 0.015
|
20.216 ± 0.177
|
Reacting Species of Iridium
Methionine exists as Zwitter ion in aqueous solution. In case of 3rd transition series, element of higher states are more stable. It is reported (17–21) that in hydrochloric acid medium IrCl63− is the stable species. It does not give divalent complex. The stable species are Ir3+and Ir1+. The aquation of IrCl63− gives IrCl5 (H2O) 2, IrCl4 (H2O) 21− species as shown as following equation -
[IrCl6]3− + nH2O → [IrCl6 − n (H2O) n]−3(−n)
Since no retarding effect of Cl− ions was observed, the hydrated species cannot be the reactive species. Only [IrCl6]3− have been considered as the only reactive species. Sheila et al.22 also reported IrCl63− as the reactive species in oxidation reaction.
Mechanism:-
In the mechanism it is assumed that organic substrate form a loosely bonded complex(C1) with Ir3+ which slowly reacts with HCF(III) ions resulting into Ir+,HCF(II) and intermediate product (IP). Ir1 + is deoxidized to Ir3+ by two moles of HCF (III) via one electron transfer process and the IP disproportionate to final product.
The rate of reaction can be given as
Rate = \(\frac{-d\left[HCF\left(III\right)\right]}{dt}\) = K2 [C1][HCF (III)]
According to above mechanism the rate of disappearance of HCF(III) can be given as-
\(\frac{-d\left(HCF\right(III)}{dt}\) = \(\frac{k1k2K\left[S\right]\left[OH-\right]\left[HCF\left(III\right)\right]\left[Ir3+\right]T}{k-1+k2\left[HCF\left(III\right)\right]+ k1K\left[S\right][OH-]}\) -----(1)
At very low concentration of HCF (III)ions and organic substrate the value of k2[HCF(III)] and k1K[S][OH-] will be quite small. Hence neglecting these factors so Eq. 1 reduces to
r = \(\frac{k1k2K\left[S\right]\left[OH-\right]\left[HCF\left(III\right)\right]\left[Ir3+\right]T}{k-1}\) --- (2)
r = kk2K[S][OH−][HCF(III)][Ir3+]T
where k =\(\frac{k1}{k-1}\)
The rate law Eq. (2) clearly accounts for the first order kinetics with respect to HCF(III), organic substrate, hydroxide ion and the catalyst at their lower concentration.
The validity of rate law might be ensured by rewriting the Eq. (1) as follows—
\(\frac{1}{r}\) = \(\frac{\text{k}-1}{\text{k}1\text{k}2\text{K}\left[\text{S}\right]\left[\text{O}\text{H}-1\right]\left[\text{H}\text{C}\text{F}\left(\text{I}\text{I}\text{I}\right)\right][\text{I}\text{r}3+]}\) + \(\frac{1}{\text{k}1\text{K}\left[\text{S}\right]\left[\text{O}\text{H}-\right]\left[\text{I}\text{r}3+\right]\text{T} }\) + \(\frac{1}{\text{k}2\left[\text{H}\text{C}\text{F}\left(\text{I}\text{I}\text{I}\right)\right]\left[\text{I}\text{r}3+\right]\text{T}}\)
The straight line plots between 1/rate vs 1/HCF (III) and 1/rate vs 1/Methionie proves the validity of above rate law. The value of k2 and k1Khas been calculated from the intercept of 1/rate vs 1/HCF (III) and 1/rate vs 1/methionine plots(2.551 X 10− 6 and 4.0788 X 104 mol− 1S− 1 respectively). The constancy in k1K and k2 clearly shows the validity of derived rate law equation on the basis of proposed mechanism.