According to the current study, 10,636 cases (17.4%) of malaria were microscopically confirmed over the past six years. Despite the implementation of various control and elimination strategies [2, 3], a substantial malaria burden persists at the study site. Our findings align with comparable prevalence reported in Dembecha [20], Kaffa zone [21], Sibu Sire [22], and Dembia [23], while differing significantly from studies in Bale Zone [24], Arjo-Didessa sugar development site [25], and Harari [26]. Notably, our results show lower prevalence compared to Mojo health center [6], Ataye [27], and University of Gondar Specialized Referral Hospital [7]. This variation may stem from differences in geographical location, demographic characteristics, and economic activities among study participants. Additionally, regional disparities in the implementation of malaria prevention and control measures in Ethiopia contribute to the observed differences. Although the incidence of malaria in Ethiopia has decreased, the pace varies across regions [2]. Furthermore, the observed variation may be influenced by the general public's knowledge of bed net usage, malaria transmission, and health-seeking behavior [7].
The current study reveals a steady decline in malaria cases from 2017/18 to 2021/22, consistent with findings from other locations [6, 28, 29]. However, an unexpected threefold increase in cases in 2022/23 raises concerns about a potential malaria resurgence in the study area. Government and stakeholders have intensified efforts in malaria prevention and control to meet national strategic plan goals [3, 4]. Community initiatives, including expanded indoor residual spraying, rapid diagnosis, increased access to insecticide-treated nets, and enhanced awareness, may have contributed to the earlier decline. Conversely, disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, ongoing conflicts, and unrest may explain the sudden surge in malaria cases in 2022/23. Drought-induced displacement and climate change could also contribute to malaria resurgence in Ethiopia [30]. These findings emphasize the importance of vigilant monitoring and surveillance of intervention strategies to avert catastrophic events and advance national goals of zero malaria incidence and mortality by 2030 [2, 3].
This study revealed that the prevalent Plasmodium species identified among participating patients was P. falciparum, consistent with Ethiopia's national malaria profile [3] and previous research in different regions [20, 23, 24, 26]. However, this contrasts with earlier studies that reported a higher prevalence of P. vivax species [6, 7, 28]. These differences may be attributed to the severity of P. falciparum infection, drug resistance, and agro-climatic variations.
The investigation revealed that males were more likely than females to test positive for malaria, possibly due to their outdoor working environments involving industrial, agricultural, and day labor activities coinciding with peak mosquito biting hours. This observation aligns with studies from various malarious parts of Ethiopia [6, 7, 20, 23, 25]. Additionally, the age group of 15–24 years exhibited the highest malaria prevalence, followed by the 25–34 age group, consistent with previous Ethiopian research [6, 7, 31]. This could be attributed to the outdoor nature of work in these age groups. In contrast, children under five years old showed a lower malaria prevalence, likely due to reduced mosquito exposure and the use of bed nets.
Regarding seasonal transmission dynamics, the study areas experienced year-round malaria cases, with the highest peak observed in autumn. This seasonal pattern is linked to the creation of stagnant water and higher relative humidity after the summer rainy season, providing an ideal breeding environment for mosquitoes. The seasonality observed in this study aligns with findings in Modjo [6], Dembecha [20], Harari [26], and Ataye [27].
Limitation of the study
The study has limitations primarily related to the data source. Since the trend analysis relies on secondary data, the reliability of the information cannot be fully confirmed. Moreover, critical details such as participants' clinical presentations, body temperature, treatment and diagnosis history are not available, limiting a comprehensive understanding of individual cases. The absence of information on weather conditions throughout the months, seasons, and years, as well as participants' travel history to malarious areas, further restricts the contextual insights that could have been gained from these factors.