Manual compression with pressure dressing was the commonly used technique for femoral venous hemostasis. We demonstrated the efficacy and safety of using the PSS technique to achieve hemostasis after the removal of femoral large-calibe venous delivery sheaths (≥ 8 Fr) in pediatric patients undergone transcatheter closure for ASD in real-world clinical practice. The deployment technique is quite easy to learn and can be performed in 5 min. As it allows hemostasis to be achieved rapidly, decreasing the duration of bed rest.
During the initial postoperative period, manual compression requires medical staff to spend approximately 30 min, while children must stay in bed for at least 18 h, making it a difficult task for them. Activity is typically accompanied by irritation, crying and struggle, as well as recurrent bleeding. Suturing is a surgical technique for closing skin wounds. Previous studies evaluating the suturing technique have been reported that it can be used for hemostasis after removal of large-caliber femoral venous sheaths in adults.
Bagai and Zhao first reported suturing methods, also known as "FoE" or "FoZ," to achieve hemostasis in adult femoral veins[10]. Mehmet et al. found that the suturing technique was effective in compressing the external soft tissue at the puncture site, causing the constriction of the injured blood vessel and the achievement of venous hemostasis[12]. Due to the brevity of hemostasis, the compression is usually momentary. Two days post-operation, the stitches were taken out and a vascular ultrasound found no evidence of thrombosis, embolism, or venous narrowing.
Subsequently, this method was commonly employed for hemostasis after taking out large-caliber sheath after radiofrequency ablation of adult arrhythmia. The technique is safe and feasible, with an overall success rate of 92%. There are a few reports of surgical suture hemostasis after the removal of femoral venous sheaths in children, and the overall success rate is 98.7%[4–8]. It has been demonstrated that 89.3% of children cease bleeding quickly after ligation, 10.7% of them managing to stop the flow within two minutes, which indicates that the technique is highly effective in achieving rapid hemostasis in this demographic and can significantly reduce the time spent in hospital[13]. In our study, this technique is safe and feasible among the ASD pediatric population as well, which is quite similar to the study reported by Zhou et al. among a larger population group (104 patients). In their study, the success rate of the FoE technique was 98.1%, venous sheath sizes ranged from 7 Fr to 14 Fr, and no puncture site hematoma was reported[14].
The incidence of vascular complications in FoE has been reported to range from 3–9.8%[5–7, 13, 15]. In this study, no patient had PSS procedure-related major complications, which provided evidence to support the safety of the technique. More importantly, compared with manual compression, PSS technique has faster hemostasis and shorter bed rest time, which reduces the time of medical staff and makes children feel more comfortable.
The suturing process can be quickly mastered by personnel and requires no extended training. Compared with FoE, the PSS method is more appropriate for the extraction of single sheath tubes from ASD patients who require fewer sutures. Suture failure was reported in 5 patients (1.3%) due to suture breakage during knot tying[16]. As far, all reports on the applications of the PSS technique have been successful. The technique is to achieve hemostasis by compressing subcutaneous soft tissue with suture to cause vasoconstriction of different degrees. Therefore, it is not suitable for children who are very thin and lack subcutaneous tissue to have sutured hemostasis. For obese children, even a large curved needle may not grasp enough subcutaneous tissue to compress the femoral vein, resulting in the risk of compression deviation and rebleeding. If the suture is too tight, the skin tension is very heavy, which can cause discomfort in children. Compared with pressure closure devices, PSS technology is unrestricted by the age and vessel diameter, and offers significant economic advantages.
This study was mainly constrained by the retrospective non-randomized observation method. We compiled consecutive data on transcatheter closure over a relatively brief timeframe, with a modest sample size in the PSS group. Compared with our single center experience, multi-center clinical studies need to be evaluated. According to previous experience, the incidence of severe vascular complications at the puncture site is low in children, and vascular complications are the result of femoral venipuncture, not the complication of suture technique. Furthermore, the best of bed rest time and limb braking time has not been determined. The ideal time point of suture removal is not clear, and long-term use may lead to adhesion of subcutaneous tissue. However, the PSS technique was used in all successive children (≥ 8 Fr) by the operator, without any excluding factors.
Based on this retrospective data, the PSS technique is a safe and effective method of providing rapid hemostasis for removal of large-caliber femoral delivery venous sheaths following occlusion in children. This technique provides significantly shorter hemostatic time and bed rest time, as compared to manual compression, along with potential cost savings. The PSS technique is considerably faster to perform and is more comfortable for children than manual compression.