Demographic and Redeployment Data
In total, 101 postgraduate trainees were invited to participate with 28 responding yielding a 28% total response rate; 19 (68%) Restorative Dentistry, 3 (11%) Prosthodontic, 3 (11%) Periodontic, and 3 (11%) Endodontic trainees responded, with Figure 1A, B, and C indicate the age groups, post type and training grade.
Figure 2 indicates the clinical roles for respondents in the first and third waves of the pandemic, with most (89%, n=28) stating they worked in dental hospital in March 2020 and 87% (n=26) in July 2021. Only 36% (n=10) of STs were asked to redeploy at any point between March 2020 (n=8) and July 2021 (n=2), with 6 of 8 STs agreeing to take part in March 2020 redeployment and all STs agreeing in July 2021. Figure 3A indicates the roles undertaken during redeployment with STs stating being redeployed in March 2020 to urgent dental care centres within the same training unit (47%, n=7) and/or different training unit (20%, n=3), whilst in July 2021 STs were redeployed to critical care and/or covid testing (66%, n=2) centres.
Figure 3B indicates the tasks STs were undertaking during redeployment. In March 2020 most STs performed either emergency dental care (80%, n=8) and/or telephone/remote consultations (60%, n=6). In July, 67% (n=2) STs performed ‘other tasks’ associated with Covid vaccination and testing, and 33% (n=1) performed ventilation tasks on general medical wards.
Perceived Impact on Specialty Training
More STs felt concerned or extremely concerned about the impact of Covid-19 and associated measures in March 2020 (81% n=22) than in July 2021 (64%, n=18). Additionally with regards to workload change and allocation, a larger proportion of STs in July 2021 (45%, n=14) reported either a somewhat or significant increase in workload compared to March 2020 (33%, n=8), whilst in March 2020 54% (n=13) reported a somewhat or significant decrease in workload compared to July 2021 (26%, n=8).
Figure 4A indicates the different ways in which Covid-19 pandemic negatively affected specialty training. In March 2020, the most commonly reported activities that were affected were: reduction in logbook procedures (75%, n=21), reduction in patient contact/clinical time (75%, n=21), cancellation/postponement of courses (71%, n=20), and inability to complete portfolio work-based assessments (68%, n=19). Whilst in July 2021 these were: reduction in logbook procedures (64%, n=18), reduction in patient contact/clinical time (46%, n=13), cancellation/postponement of courses (36%, n=10), and cancelled/postponement of study days (32%, n=9).
Figure 4B indicates how the Covid-19 pandemic positively impacted specialty training. In March 2020, STs indicated an increase in time and opportunities for: clinical governance activities (32%, n=9), portfolio write up (32%, n=9), ‘other’ activities including research time (25%, n=7), and dealing with stressful situations (25%, n=7). However in July 2021, STs stated an increase in opportunities for: research (32%, n=9), dealing with stressful situations (29%, n=8), leadership skills (29%, n=8), and portfolio write up (21%, n=6).
Figure 4C indicates the perceived impact of Covid-19 pandemic on future careers with 43% (n=12) of STs indicating a somewhat or significantly negative impact, and only 14% (n=4) indicating a somewhat or significantly positive impact. Figure 4D provides insights into how STs described their feelings to expand on the perceived impact on their careers. Inductive thematic analysis revealed two common themes to describe the impact of Covid and its associated measures which were on trainee clinical training exposure and mental health/wellbeing.
Perceived impact on mental health, wellbeing, and support
Most STs in March 2020 (54%, n=15) and July 2021 (57%, n=16) reported a somewhat or significant negative impact of Covid-19 pandemic on their mental health and wellbeing, with 79% (n=22) describing feeling slightly or significantly more stressed in March 2020 compared to 68% (n=19) in July 2021.
Figure 5A and B provide insights into the perception of support provided to STs during both first and third waves of the pandemic respectively. In March 2020, the majority of ST’s felt very well or somewhat supported for appropriate PPE (75%, n=21), safe working environment (68%, n=19), adequate supervision (61%, n=17), access to Covid-19 testing (61%, n=17), distribution of workload (61%, n=17), guidelines on patient management (61%, n=17) and regular communication and updates (57%, n=16). In July 2021, STs reported they felt very well or somewhat supported for appropriate PPE (82%, n=23), access to Covid-19 testing (79%, n=22), safe working environment (68%, n=19), adequate supervision (61%, n=17), distribution of workload (57%, n=16), guidelines on patient management (57%, n=16) and regular communication and updates (54%, n=15).
Trainee thoughts on preparedness for future pandemics
When asked which actions/activities would have the perceived impact of the pandemic on their training the most to least common responses were as follows: extending training post 30% (n=8), increased departmental teaching 25% (n=7), utilising study budget following year 21% (n=6), increased opportunity for e-learning 19% (n=5), and ‘other’ 6% (n=3) including better timetabling and option for flexibility in training.