Case Report
A 74-year-old man presents to Sichuan Provincial Cancer Hospital with progressive worsening of sore throat for more than four months without fever, night sweats, and weight loss. Before admission, the patient went to the community hospital for symptomatic treatment, but the pain was not relieved. He then underwent a tonsil biopsy and sent the biopsy specimen to the Department of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University. A plenty of diffuse large-sized proliferating atypical lymphocytes with necrosis can be seen under microscope (Fig. 1A). Immunohistochemically, the atypical cells were positive for CD20 (Fig. 1B), MUM-1(Fig. 1C), Ki-67/MIB (80%) (Fig. 1D), C-MYC (50%) (Fig. 1E), and EBER1/2-ISH (Fig. 1F). A positive rearrangement of the IgH gene was confirmed by Genescan analysis (Shanghai State Medical Laboratory Co.Ltd). The patient was in good health and have no family history of genetic history.
The complete blood count, coagulation markers, liver and kidney function, electrolytes, electrocardiogram, and DNA copies of EBV were all within the normal range. Cardiac ultrasound showed mild regurgitation of the aortic valve and mitral valve, and ventricular diastolic function was reduced. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) revealed abnormal metabolic activity in multiple sites, such as both lateral walls of the oropharynx, the left posterior wall of the nasopharynx, bilateral submandibular, bilateral cervical para-vascular and left posterior cervical triangle. The Deauville assessment was five. The patient was diagnosed with nongerminal central subtype stage II EBV-positive DLBCL. Then the patient received four cycles of R-CHOP regimen (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, doxorubicin liposome and dexamethasone) and was assessed for efficacy using PET/CT, which revealed complete remission (Deauville assessment is two). The patient then received two cycles of R-CHOP and the efficacy was assessed using contrast-enhanced CT, indicating no new lesions. Since then, the patient has not been regularly followed up.
After approximately two years, the patient sought medical help due to itching and swollen lymph nodes all over the body. Cervical lymph node biopsy shows that some areas of lymphoid tissue are distinguishable, see partial naked follicles. The interfollicular zone widens, in which small blood vessels are seen to proliferate, partially intertwined, and the endothelium is swollen (Fig. 2A). Immunohistochemical analyses of tumor cells indicated positivity for CD3 (Fig. 2B), CD4 (Fig. 2C), CD10 (partially) (Fig. 2D), CD21(Fig. 2E), and EBER1/2-ISH (dispersedly) (Fig. 2F). Ki67/MIB was expressed by 60% of lymphoma cells. Lymphoma cells were negative for CD20, CD8, CXCL13, CD15, PAX-5. Gene rearrangement found the clonal amplification peak of the TCR γ gene within the range of the target fragment; no IGH gene rearrangement was found. Sanger sequencing revealed that no mutations were detected in exon 2 (G17Val) of the RHOA gene and codon 172 of the IDH2 gene. Bone marrow tissue immunohistochemistry did not show exact lymphoma involvement. PET/CT revealed abnormally elevated glucose metabolism in cervical, thoracic, and abdominal lymph nodes. The DNA copies of EBV in serum were 1.25E + 4 copies/ml. Then, the patient was diagnosed with EBV-positive AITL. Given that the patient developed AITL after DLBCL, and the tumor accumulation was wide, new strategy of therapy should be considered. So, histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, chidamide, combined with COEP (cyclophosphamide, vindesine, etoposide, prednisone) was administered. The DNA copies of EBV in serum after treatment were 2.30E + 02 copies/ml. The patient ultimately died after six months diagnosed with AITL. The overall survival of this patient is thirty months.
NGS
To explore the possible mechanisms by which patients develop AITL following treatment with DLBCL, NGS was adopted. In the DLBCL hotspot gene profile, NGS detected that the patient had mutated genes, including EP300, TET2, KMT2D, and STAT6. Furthermore, among the genes associated with intranodal and peripheral T-cell lymphoma, NGS also detected mutations in TET2, and the mutation site was consistent with that detected in DLBCL. The TET2 mutation frequencies were 31.58% and 39.92% in DLBCL and AITL, respectively (Fig. 3). After the patient was diagnosed with AITL, a mutation at the same site (c.C4579T) of TET2 was also detected in the peripheral blood. The pathways and mutated genes involved in DLBCL and AITL are shown in Table 1 [2, 5].
Table 1
Frequencies of gene mutations involved in different pathways in DLBCL and AITL
Pathways
|
Involved genes (frequency of mutations)
|
DLBCL
|
|
B cell development and differentiation
|
MEF2B (7%–12%), IRF8 (8%–11%), BCL6 (6%–11%), PRDM1 (7%–12%), EBF1 (8%–11%)
|
BCR and Toll-like receptor signaling
|
MYD88 (18%–27%), CD79B (14%–15%), CARD11 (11%–15%), PRKCB (4%–5%), PTPN6 (4%–5%), LYN (3%–4%), GRB2 (2%–3%) and TLR2 (3%)
|
NF-κB pathway
|
TNFAIP3 (9%–18%), TBL1XR1 (7%–13%), KLHL6 (9%–10%), NFKBIE (3%–8%), ZC3H12A (3%–7%) and NFKBIA (5%)
|
MAPK–ERK pathway
|
BRAF (3%–6%) and KRAS (3%–4%)
|
PI3K–AKT–mTOR
|
PTEN (3%–4%)
|
p53 and DNA damage
|
TP53 (21%–24%), UBE2A (4%–8%) and ZNF423 (0.4%–2%)
|
Cell cycle
|
PIM1 (22%–29%), BTG1 (14%–16%) and CCND3 (5%–11%)
|
Cell apoptosis
|
BCL2 (10%–17%) and FAS (8%–10%)
|
NOTCH pathway
|
DTX1 (12%–15%), SPEN (9%–11%) and NOTCH2 (7%–8%)
|
Cell migration
|
GNA13 (8%–11%), RHOA (4%–5%) and CXCR4 (2%–3%)
|
JAK–STAT
|
STAT3 (6%–10%), STAT6 (4%–5%) and IL6 (2%)
|
Epigenetic regulators
|
KMT2D (25%–33%), HIST1H1E (13%–16%), CREBBP (17%–18%), HIST1H1C (10%–12%), TET2 (0%–12%), EZH2 (7%–9%)
|
Immune escape
|
HL AB (12%–22%), B2M (9%–17%), HL AA (8%–16%), CD70 (9%), CD58 (6%–11%), HL AC (4%–7%)
|
AITL
|
|
RAS superfamily
|
RHOAG17V (50%–72%)
|
Epigenetic regulators
|
TET2 (47%–86%), DNMT3A (20%–48%), IDH2R172 (20%–45%)
|
TCR signaling pathway
|
PLCγ (14%), CD28 (9%–11%), FYN (3%–4%), VAV1 (5%)
|
Structural alteration
|
CTLA4-CD28fusion (58%), ICOS-CD28fusion (5%)
|
Abbreviations: DLBCL, Diffuse large B cell lymphoma; AITL, Angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma.
Table 2. Clinical manifestations, morphology, immunophenotype, genotype, treatment regimen and efficacy of EBV-associated lymphoma
|
Clinical presentation
|
Morphology
|
Immunophenotype and genotype
|
%EBV association
|
Therapy
|
Efficacy
|
cHL
|
A nodal disease with virtually all cases arising in peripheral lymph nodes (mediastinum). When the disease advances, it may infiltrate spleen, liver and other extranodal locations.
|
Large neoplastic cells (CD30+ HRS) and a diverse group of reactive bystander cells (histiocytes, small lymphocytes, plasma cells, epithelioid histiocytes, epithelioid granulomas and eosinophils).
|
CD30+(100%), CD15+(75%), PAX5(weak), CD20−/+. Expression of EBV markers (both EBER and EBV-LMP) is a useful finding in cHL cases, where EBV-LMP expression is characteristically seen in the HRS cells.
|
10-80
|
ABVD
Nivolumab
Pembrolizumab
Tislelizumab
Camrelizumab
Nivolumab + BV
EBV-CTL and LMP-2-CTL
|
5-year PFS/ OS: 71%/91%, CR %: 73% (primary).
ORR: 66%-89%, CR: 59% (r/r).
ORR: 69%, CR: 22.4% (r/r).
ORR: 87.1%, CR: 62.9% (r/r).
CR: 28%, ORR: 76% (r/r).
CR: 67%, ORR:85%, OS: 98% (r/r, or high-risk).
Tolerated and sustained clinical responses (relapsed).
|
BL
|
Bulky, rapidly growing masses, involving the bones of the jaw and other facial bones, as well as kidneys, gastrointestinal tract, ovaries, breast, and other extranodal sites.
|
A diffuse infiltrate of monomorphic, medium-size B cells in a “starry sky” pattern, imparted by numerous benign macrophages, and by an extremely high proliferative index, with a Ki-67 approaching 100%.
|
CD20+, CD10+, Bcl-6+, Bcl-2−, CD5−, TdT−, monotypic sIg+, Ki67 ~100%; t(8;14), t(2;8), or t(8;22) (myc and IgH or IgL); no bcl-2 or bcl-6 translocation.
|
100
|
(DA)R-EPOCH
HyperCVAD +/-R
|
EFS: 95%, OS: 100% (primary).
3-year EFS: 80%, 3-year OS: 89%.
|
DLBCL
|
Nodal involvement and high IPI scores, higher rates of extranodal involvement (gastrointestinal tract, skin, and BM being).
|
Large, transformed cells/immunoblasts and HRS-like cells.
Reactive background: small lymphocytes, plasma cells, histiocytes and epithelioid cells. Geographical necrosis and angioinvasion.
|
PanB (CD19, CD20, CD22, CD79a, PAX5) +, MUM1+, CD10–, BCL6–, CD30+, CD15(–/+), EBNA2–/+(7-36%), LMP1+ (> 90%), PDL1/PDL2+/–, EBER+ (>80%, bcl-2 and bcl-6 abnormalities common, myc abnormal in a minority).
|
10
|
R-CHOP
Polatuzumab vedotin+R-CHP
Acalabrutinib+R-CHOP
Sintilimab + R-CHOP
Tislelizumab + zanubrutinib
BV + chemotherapy
BV + lenalidomide + rituximab
|
ORR: 50-94%, CR: 25-67%, 5-year OS: 45%-54% (RWD).
2-year PFS 76.7%, 5-year OS: 45%-54% (primary).
Clinical trial.
Clinical trial.
Clinical trial.
Clinical trial (r/r).
Clinical trial (r/r).
|
AITL
|
Lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, systemic symptoms, and an aggressive course with a poor response to therapy.
|
Complete structural effacement. Infiltrating cellular components include clear cells, blastic cells, arborizing vessels composed of HEVs, and inflammatory cells (small lymphocytes, eosinophils, macrophages, and plasma cells).
|
CD3, CD4, and CD5 are positive in most cases. Tfh lymphomas be diagnosed by positive immunostaining for at least 2 (ideally 3) of the following 7 antigens: CD10, BCL6, PD1, CXCL13, CXCR5, ICOS, and SAP.
|
80-90
|
CHOP
CHOP-like
CHOEP
5-azacytidine+CHOP
CHOP plus lenalidomide
R-CHOP
Geptanolimab
Romidepsin
Chidamide
Bortezomib
|
3-year EFS: 50.0%, 5-year PFS: 23.0%(primary).
CR: 35-39%, ORR: 70-79%, OS: 30-40% (primary or RWD).
3-year EFS: 67.5%, 5-year PFS: 40% (RWD).
1-year PFS: 61.1% (primary).
2-year PFS: 42% (primary).
2-year PFS: 40.0% (RWD).
PR: 50%, SD: 50% (r/r).
It can induce complete and lasting response (r/r).
It has significant single drug activity and controllable toxicity (r/r)
ORR: 67% (r/r).
|
NKTCL
|
Destructive ulcerative/necrotizing
lesion, causing obstructive symptoms.
|
Diffuse lymphoid infiltrate of small, medium sized or large cells, which show different degrees of atypia. Angiocentric and/or angioinvasive pattern. Zonal geographic necrosis.
|
Majority of the cases: NK cells (CD56+, CD3ε,
EBER+, cytotoxic molecules+, surface CD3-)
CD56- subset: T cells (surface CD3+, CD3ε+,
CD8+, cytotoxic molecules, TCRαβ or γδ, EBER+).
|
100
|
DDGP regimen
SMILE regimen
P-Gemox
AspaMetDex regimen
Daratumumab
Sintilimab
Avelumab
LMP-CTL
Bortezomib+ CHOP
|
First-line treatment.
ORR: 79%, CR: 45% (newly diagnosed stage IV, or r/r).
ORR: 80%, CR: 51.4% (newly diagnosed advanced).
ORR: 77.8% (newly diagnosed advanced stage or r/r).
ORR: 25-35.7% (r/r).
ORR: 68% (r/r).
CR: 24%; ORR: 38% (r/r).
OS: 100%; PFS:90% (primary).
ORR: 61.5% (stage III or IV).
|
CAEBV
|
No known immunodeficiency. IM-like symptoms for at least 3 months. High viral load in peripheral blood (>102.5 copies/ml). Demonstration of EBER in affected tissues.
|
Non-specific lymphoid infiltrate without atypia, mimicking a reactive disorder.
|
Cytotoxic T, CD4+ or CD8+ or TCR γ+ (59%) or NK-cells (41%). Monoclonal, or oligoclonal or polyclonal TCR/EBV. EBER+ cells: % variable.
|
100
|
Steroids, etoposide, and cyclosporine or cytotoxic
chemotherapy + HSCT
|
OS: 87%.
|
PTLD
|
Nonspecific, systemic manifestations. Multiorgan failure and a fulminant clinical course that can fatal. Fever and lymphadenopathy, associated with widespread disease, B-symptoms and extranodal involvement (Waldeyer’s ring, liver, gastrointestinal tract, BM, and CNS).
|
Preservation of underlying tissue architecture. PH
shows plasma cells with scattered immunoblasts. IM-like
lesions show predominantly immunoblasts, sometimes with RS like cells and/or plasmacytic differentiation.
|
Plasma cells show polytypic light chain staining. Immunoblasts are CD20+, CD79a+, PAX-5+, CD30+, CD15-. Admixed T-immunoblasts present (CD3+, CD5+). EBER positivity in B-immunoblasts.
|
>90
|
R-CHOP
Rituximab
EBV-CTL
Bortezomib+Rituximab
HDACIs
|
First-line treatment.
It is related to the elimination of PTLD related mortality.
CR: 84.6%.
ORR (4 months): 42.9%; CR:42.9%; PFS (6 months): 43%.
Clinical trial.
|
Abbreviations: cHL, classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma; HRS, Hodgkin and Reed–Sternberg cells; EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; EBER, Epstein-Barr virus encoded RNA's; EBV-LMP, EBV encodes latent membrane protein; ABVD, doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine; PFS, Progression-free survival; OS, Overall survival; CR, Complete response; r/r, relapsed or refractory; ORR, Overall response rates; BL, Burkitt lymphoma; (DA)R-EPOCH, dose-adjusted rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin; EFS, Event-free survival; HyperCVAD +/-R, hyper-fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone+/-rituximab; DLBCL (NOS), Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (Non-specific); IPI, International Prognostic Index; BM, bone marrow; R-CHOP, Rituximab combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone; R-CHP, Rituximab combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisolone; BV, brentuximab vedotin; AITL, Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma; HEVS, high endothelial venules; Tfh, Follicular helper T; CXCR5, C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 5; ICOS, CD28-related inducible T-cell costimulatory; SAP, signaling lymphocytic activation molecule-associated protein; RWD, real-world data; PR, Partial remission; NKTCL, nasal NK/T cell lymphoma; NK: Natural killer; DDGP, cisplatin, dexamethasone, gemcitabine and pegaspargase; SMILE, dexamethasone, methotrexate, ifosfamide, asparaginase, and etoposide; P-GEMOX, pegaspargase, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin; AspaMetDex regimen: L-asparaginase with methotrexate and dexamethasone; LMP, latent membrane protein; CTL, cytotoxic T cells; CAEBV, chronic active Epstein Barr virus (Systemic form) Infection; IM, infectious mononucleosis; HSCT, Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; PTLD, posttransplant lymphoproliferative diseases; CNS, central nervous system; PH, Plasmacytic hyperplasia; HDACi, Histone deacetylase inhibitors.