The goal of aneurysm surgery is to achieve complete exclusion of the aneurysm from the circulation while preserving parent and perforating/branching vessels. A variety of intraoperative monitoring techniques such as intraoperative DSA, micro vascular Doppler ultrasonography, electrophysiological monitoring, and fluorescents techniques have been introduced. [3, 8, 17, 25]
Intraoperative DSA is the gold standard technique for intraoperative monitoring and is advocated by some groups for most cases of intracranial aneurysms, the practical difficulties associated with the routine use of this modality for all aneurysm clippings have limited its utility to selected patients.[9, 18] Moreover, the invasive nature of this procedure, higher cost and the complication rate of 0.4–3.5% restricted its use to selected higher risk cases in most centers.[23, 27]
Fluorescence modules have been successfully integrated with the operating microscope and became widely used. In many institutions worldwide, ICG has been routinely incorporated in surgery for elective and ruptured cerebral aneurysms[2, 20, 26, 27]. It has similar rates of clip reposition and parent vessel stenosis when compared head-to-head with either intraoperative or postoperative DSA [16, 20, 27].
Intraoperative FL-VA has proven to be a valuable alternative to ICG for cerebral aneurysm microsurgery. Nevertheless, there is a limited number of studies that compare postoperative imaging with intraoperative findings of FL-VA.[5, 7, 10, 12, 14, 26, 28]
Küçükyürük et al. in a study with 50 consecutive patients. After clip ligation of the aneurysm, they administered 100 mg of fluorescein intravenously. FL-VA allowed for the real-time assessment of the surgical field in a three-dimensional view through binoculars, providing good image quality. In 79.68% of the aneurysms, FL-VA confirmed that the clip application was satisfactory. However, postoperative angiographies revealed remnants at the aneurysm neck in 5 patients and parent artery stenosis in 3 patients, which were not recognized intraoperatively, resulting in an unexpected finding rate of 12.5%.[10]
In the present study, utilizing an FL dose of 0.5 mg/kg per administration, unexpected findings were identified in 16.3% (10 aneurysms) of the postoperative CTA. One aneurysm indicated as a neck remnant in FL-VA, but CT angiography revealed a residual aneurysm. Five aneurysms had neck remnants, and three had stenosis in branching vessels, which were not observed in FL-VA but were detected in CT angiography. These findings are similar with studies that have compared the results of ICG-VA with postoperative DSA or CTA. These studies have consistently found that the concordance between ICG-VA and postoperative imaging typically remains at around 90%.[2–4, 6, 18]
Dashti et al (2009) studied 239 ICG-VA done in 190 patients with intracranial aneurysms and found an unexpectedly high rate of neck residuals in deep-sited aneurysms (64%) as compared to the overall rate of neck residues in 6% of the cases. In addition, the branch vessel occlusion was observed in 6% of the cases with no incidence of parent artery occlusion.[2]
While no studied factor showed significant association with the discordance observed between FL-VA and CT angiography, distinct findings emerged from investigations on ICG-VA. Studies, such as those by Dashti et al.[2], demonstrated discrepancies in videoangiography using fluorescence, particularly in cases of deep-seated aneurysms. Gruber et al.[4] echoed these observations, attributing the diminished image quality in ICG videoangiography to the challenges posed by deep surgical fields. In this study, the presence of a deep-seated (ACoA and posterior circulation) aneurysm was not found to be a factor associated with discordance between FL-VA and post-operative imaging, a common observation in most FL-VA studies. This is attributed to the ability to acquire good quality imaging with FL-VA even in deep-seated field [14, 24].
According to certain authors, a comparison between intraoperative ICG-VA and FL-VA reveals several advantages associated with FL-VA. It allows for the continuation of microsurgery while FL-VA is being performed. In addition, it delivers high-quality images suitable for evaluation of even small perforating arteries due to lack of ‘chromatic aberration’ that ICG-VA is prone to. Moreover, the ease of interpretation of these images obtained intraoperatively is similar to ICG-VA[21, 22]. In a prospective comparative analysis reported by Lane et al.[12, 13], FL-VA provided even superior detail in 32% of patients when compared with ICG-VA.
Concerning the disadvantages of FL-VA, the main one is the loss of quality when using sodium fluorescein repeatedly due to its stain on the vessel wall. Another limitation of FL-VA is its inability to visualize anatomy beyond what is directly visible within the surgical field. [11, 12, 14, 21]
Limitations:
Firstly, despite it being a prospective case series regarding FL-VA use in cerebral aneurysm surgeries, it was conducted at a single center. Secondly, despite numerous studies demonstrating the high sensitivity and specificity of postoperative CT angiography in detecting residual aneurysms and adjacent vessel stenosis, digital arteriography is still considered the gold standard. Finally, prospective and randomized studies are still necessary to compare the results of FL-VA with other techniques such as ICG-VA and IA.