This preprint is under consideration at Malaria Journal. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research
Sisay Dugassa
Addis Ababa University
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6951-3299
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: Ethiopia embarked on combating malaria with an aim to eliminate malaria from low transmission districts by 2030. This involves malaria vector interventions by implementing mainly indoor residual spraying (IRS) and long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) against endophilic and endophagic female Anopheles mosquitoes. Limited published reports are available about the status of malaria in areas under malaria elimination program in Ethiopia. This study intended to assess the prevalence of malaria in selected areas with a long history of implementing malaria prevention and elimination strategies.
Methods: A cross-sectional parasitological survey was conducted in two selected malaria endemic areas in Dembiya District, Northwest Ethiopia. Thin and thick blood smears collected from 735 randomly selected individuals were microscopically examined for malaria parasites. Six years retrospective malaria data was also collected from the medical records of the health centres. Structured questionnaires were prepared to collect information about the socio-economic data of the population. The data were analysed using SPSS version 20 and p ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results: The six-year retrospective malaria prevalence trend indicates an overall malaria prevalence of 22.4%, out of which Plasmodium falciparum was the dominant species. From a total of 735 slides examined for the presence of malaria parasites, 3.5% (n=26) were positive for malaria parasites, in which P. falciparum was more prevalent (n=17; 2.3%), P. vivax (n=5; 0.7%), and mixed infections (n=4; 0.5%). Males were 2.6 times more likely to be infected with malaria than females (AOR = 2.6; 95% CI: 1.0, 6.4), and individuals with frequent outdoor activity were 16.4 times more vulnerable than individuals with limited outdoor activities (AOR= 16.4, 95% CI: 1.8, 147.9). Furthermore, awareness about malaria transmission was significantly associated with the prevalence of malaria.
Conclusions: Malaria is still a public health problem in Dembiya district irrespective of the past and existing vector control interventions. A malaria elimination plan might not be successful unless other alternative intervention tools targeting outdoor malaria transmission are included. For this, continuous monitoring of vectors’ susceptibility, density, and behaviour is very important in such areas.
Keywords
Malaria prevalence, malaria control, Anopheles, Plasmodium, malaria risk factors
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Review
Version 1
Posted 02 Apr, 2021
No community comments so far
Review #1 received
Received 30 Jul, 2021
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 25 Jul, 2021
Reviews received
Received 10 Jul, 2021
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 09 Jul, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 04 Apr, 2021
First submitted
On 29 Mar, 2021
Editor assigned
On 28 Mar, 2021
Submission checks complete
On 28 Mar, 2021
Editor invited
On 28 Mar, 2021
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Parasitology
Learn more about our company.
This preprint is under consideration at Malaria Journal. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research
Sisay Dugassa
Addis Ababa University
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6951-3299
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Review
Version 1
Posted 02 Apr, 2021
No community comments so far
Review #1 received
Received 30 Jul, 2021
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 25 Jul, 2021
Reviews received
Received 10 Jul, 2021
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 09 Jul, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 04 Apr, 2021
First submitted
On 29 Mar, 2021
Editor assigned
On 28 Mar, 2021
Submission checks complete
On 28 Mar, 2021
Editor invited
On 28 Mar, 2021
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Parasitology
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: Ethiopia embarked on combating malaria with an aim to eliminate malaria from low transmission districts by 2030. This involves malaria vector interventions by implementing mainly indoor residual spraying (IRS) and long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) against endophilic and endophagic female Anopheles mosquitoes. Limited published reports are available about the status of malaria in areas under malaria elimination program in Ethiopia. This study intended to assess the prevalence of malaria in selected areas with a long history of implementing malaria prevention and elimination strategies.
Methods: A cross-sectional parasitological survey was conducted in two selected malaria endemic areas in Dembiya District, Northwest Ethiopia. Thin and thick blood smears collected from 735 randomly selected individuals were microscopically examined for malaria parasites. Six years retrospective malaria data was also collected from the medical records of the health centres. Structured questionnaires were prepared to collect information about the socio-economic data of the population. The data were analysed using SPSS version 20 and p ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results: The six-year retrospective malaria prevalence trend indicates an overall malaria prevalence of 22.4%, out of which Plasmodium falciparum was the dominant species. From a total of 735 slides examined for the presence of malaria parasites, 3.5% (n=26) were positive for malaria parasites, in which P. falciparum was more prevalent (n=17; 2.3%), P. vivax (n=5; 0.7%), and mixed infections (n=4; 0.5%). Males were 2.6 times more likely to be infected with malaria than females (AOR = 2.6; 95% CI: 1.0, 6.4), and individuals with frequent outdoor activity were 16.4 times more vulnerable than individuals with limited outdoor activities (AOR= 16.4, 95% CI: 1.8, 147.9). Furthermore, awareness about malaria transmission was significantly associated with the prevalence of malaria.
Conclusions: Malaria is still a public health problem in Dembiya district irrespective of the past and existing vector control interventions. A malaria elimination plan might not be successful unless other alternative intervention tools targeting outdoor malaria transmission are included. For this, continuous monitoring of vectors’ susceptibility, density, and behaviour is very important in such areas.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Loading...