1. The arrangement of the perioral muscles and the modiolus re-evaluated
The present study revealed novel and important findings on the structure of the perioral muscles, which would provide fundamentally new interpretation of the functional role in movement of the lips. As for the first point, the fascicles of the SOOr-IM and the IOOr-IM continued directly from the BC-MT and arose from the pterygomandibular raphe. On the other hand, the fascicles of the SOOr-OL and the IOOr-OL were connected at the modiolus with the other perioral muscles of different directions and origins. Those of the SOOr-OL were connected at the modiolus almost in vertical direction with the DAO arising from the lowest region of the mandible, whereas those of the IOOr-OL were almost in transverse direction either directly continuous with BC-MT or connected at the modiolus with the BC-UO and the BC-LO. (Fig. 5)
Among the modern textbooks of anatomy, the perioral muscles were most thoroughly described by Standring [20] and Tillmann and Töndury [24]. According to their descriptions, the BC inserted into the modiolus and connected to the SOOr and the IOOr in a complicated manner. In short, in the middle portion of the BC, the vertical decussation at the angle of mouth, and their upper and lower halves were inversely connected to the IOOr and the SOOr, repectively, while highest and lowest portions of the BC were connected without decussation to the SOOr and the IOOr, respectively. In addition, the SOOr was connected also with the DAO, and the IOOr was connected also with the Zmj and the levator anguli oris (LAO). The depicted arrangement was symmetrical vertically to the modiolus and was hypothesized to be the location of the modiolus at the level of the angle of mouth. On the other hand, the present study clarified that the modiolus was located lower in the mandibular region, and that the perioral muscles were arranged asymmetrical vertically. Indeed, the SOOr-OL was connected at the modiolus with the DAO in the vertical direction, whereas the IOOr-OL (including the ILI) was either connected or continuous with the BC horizontally.
2. Historical background of the BC and OOr anatomy
The current understanding of the arrangement of perioral muscles was formed substantially following the classical anatomy textbooks in the 19th and 20th centuries. In the older textbooks, such as Gegenbaur [5], Gray and Lewis [6], Merkel [13], Poirier, [15], Schäfer and Thane [18], Testut [23], OOr and BC were regarded to be continuous with each other and arranged vertically symmetrical to the angle of mouth between the upper and lower halves. (Online Resource 1)
Isolated muscle specimens of the facial muscles were depicted in the anatomical atlases of Bonamy et al. [3] and Spalteholz [19]. In these figures showing the deep aspect of the perioral muscles, the continuation of the muscle bundles between the BC-MT and the IOOr is beautifully depicted. It is noteworthy that the illustration of Spalteholz [19] clearly shows the branching and continuation of the BC-MT into the SOOr-IM and the IOOr-IM and into the lower bundles of the IOOr-OL, which is a point consistent with the present study. Since then, however, these observations were not well appreciated, and gradually forgotten. (Online Resource 2)
The classical concept of perioral muscle architecture hypothesizing the continuation of the OOr and the BC had to be completely reconsidered by the study of Lightoller [12] on the modiolus, which had been known by German anatomists as the “Knoten” indicating a dense compact mass near the angle of mouth. Lightoller reported that a number of perioral muscles converge towards the modiolus, and that the modiolus extended from the apex at the muscular surface to the base adjacent to the oral mucosa, implying that the fascicles of the BC and the OOr were completely interrupted at the modiolus [12]. Thereafter, the modern English and German textbooks [20, 24] emphasized the modiolus as a connecting focus for the perioral muscles, and admitted the interruption of the fascicles between BC and OOr. The present findings reappraised the classical concept of continuation of the fascicles between the OOr and the BC, and revealed that the fascicles were in part directly continuous and in part indirectly connected at the modiolus.
The location of the modiolus was not precisely evaluated by Lightoller [12], and thus roughly assigned near the angle of mouth following the classical scheme admitting decussation of the perioral muscles at the angle of mouth. Modern anatomy textbooks [20, 24] admitted the location of the modiolus to be at the angle of mouth in general. The location of the modiolus was analyzed so far by identifying firm core of the modiolus in cadaveric dissection, and was reported to be 10-20 mm lateral and 0-10 mm below the oral commissure [1, 4, 8, 27]. However, since the modiolus was a dense compact fibromuscular mass of considerable size, in the present study we employed another approach to identify the location and dimensions by defining the modiolus area where the perioral muscles adhered with each other around the modiolus core. It was thus shown that the modiolus area was not localized near the angle of mouth, but extended from the level of angle of mouth downward about one third to the base of mandible. The downward extension of the modiolus area from the angle of mouth was favorable to linking the BC-UO and the BC-LO to the IOOr-OL, and was related to the vertical asymmetry of the perioral muscles discovered in the present study.
The ILS may be regarded as an accessory muscle of the SOOr [20]. Since the ILS arose from the incisive fossa of the maxilla and its fascicles blended into the SOOr-OL and the LAO to insert into the modiolus [10], it would be functionally different from the SOOr-OL and could elevate the modiolus. The ILI may be regarded as an accessory muscle of the IOOr [20], that is attached laterally to the modiolus and medially to the incisive fossa of mandible near the origin of MN. The ILI would functionally almost equivalent to the IOOr-OL. The fascicles of the BC-LT were observed in at least 35% of the cases and were continuous with the ILI, according to Hur et al. [9].
3. Predicted actions of perioral muscles on the lip
The open and closed positions of the oral fissure should be seen as frequently linked with jaws. The action of the perioral muscles on the lips can be reasonably predicted on the basis of the anatomy of the BC and the OOr as revealed in the present study, either with moving jaws or with stationary jaws. (Table 2, Fig. 6)
During the movement of the jaws, the lips can open or close easily by following the jaws, without active shortening or passive extension of the perioral muscles (Case 1, Fig. 6a). When the jaws are to open with the lips closed, the height of both the lips should increase and the lip width should be decreased, and layer 1 (the SOOr-OL, the DAO) would be extended passively, while in layer 2, the IOOr-OL would shorten actively and the BC-UO and the BC-LO would be extended passively (Case 2, Fig. 6b). When the opened jaws are to close again with the lips closed, the three layers of muscles would be relaxed (Case 3, Fig. 6c). (Table 2)
During stationary position of jaws, the lips may open and close, and the lip width may widen or narrow. When the lips are to open with stationary jaws, the upper lip should be elevated by active shortening of the LLS and the lower lip should be depressed by active shortening of the DLI, whereas the three layers of muscles would be relaxed (Case 4, Fig. 6d). When the lips are to close lightly with stationary jaws, the upper lip margin should be lowered and the lower lip margin should be raised slightly by active shortening of Layer 3 including the SOOr-IM and the IOOr-IM, whereas both the LLS and the DLI would be relaxed (Case 5, Fig. 6e). When the lips are to close strongly associated with the deformation of lips, the whole upper lip should be depressed and the whole lower lip should be elevated powerfully by active shortening of the SOOr-OL in layer 1, IOOr-OL in layer 2 and layer 3, whereas the DAO in layer 1 and the BC-UO and the BC-LO in layer 2 should be statically tensed, and the LLS and the DLI should be extended passively (Case 6, Fig. 6f). When the lip width is to be widened, the modiolus should be abducted by active shortening of the BC-UO and the BC-LO in layer 2 and of the Zmj and the PL with static tension of the MN, whereas the IOOr-OL in layer 2 should be passively extended (Case 7, Fig. 6g). When the lip width is to be narrowed, the modiolus should be adducted by active shortening of SOOr-OL in layer 1 and the IOOr-OL in layer 2, whereas the BC-UO and the BC-LO in layer 2 as well as the Zmj and the PL should be passively extended, and the DAO in layer 1 and the MN should be tensed statically (Case 8, Fig. 6h). (Table 2)
4. What we can learn from the new scheme of perioral muscle architecture
We proposed a unique scheme for the architecture of the perioral muscle based on the study of isolated muscle specimens. This scheme was different from the conventional views of their architecture at several points, and could provide a new functional relevance of the actions of these muscles.
In the first place, we revealed that the SOOr-IM and the IOOr-IM were structurally distinct and functionally different from the SOOr-OL and the IOOr-OL. The fascicles of the SOOr-IM and the IOOr-IM were continuous with the BC-MT and arose from the pterygomandibular raphe. Thus the SOOr-IM and the IOOr-IM are able to close the oral fissure lightly, whereas the SOOr-OL and the IOOr-OL arose from the modiolus, and would impose upon both lips to deform them.
The second point concerned the connection of the SOOr-OL with the other perioral muscles. Our findings revealed that the SOOr-OL was connected with the DAO in the vertical direction, and did not connect with the BC as previously supposed. Thus the SOOr-OL together with the DAO could pull the modiolus upward (elevation) or downward (depression) as well as medially (adduction), and as a whole depress the whole upper lip downward to close the oral fissure.
The third point concerned the coupling of the IOOr-OL with the BC in the horizontal direction and its mixed population of fascicles. We revealed that the fascicles of the IOOr-OL were either continuous directly with the BC-MT or connected indirectly with the BC-UO and the BC-LO at the modiolus. Thus the IOOr-OL together with the BC-UO and the BC-LO could pull the modiolus laterally (abduction) or medially (adduction) depending on the relative strength of tension and as a whole elevate the oral fissure to close it.
Taken together the findings of the present study clarified the architecture of the perioral muscles around the central hub of modiolus as a unified functional system, and made it possible to specify the function of individual component muscles within the system. It also became evident that the upper lip and the lower lip with the SOOr and the IOOr as the active functional components were neither symmetrical vertically nor equivalent, in contrast to the classical view of the OOr in previous anatomy studies and textbooks hypothesizing the vertical symmetry and similarity between the upper and the lower lips [20, 24].