3.1 Production of PS microspheres
The tertiary amine methacrylate containing PDPA-b-PDMA, PDEA-b-PDMA and PDMA-b-PMEMA diblock copolymers each served as a good dispersing agent in the production of PS spheres and enabled the production of monodisperse PS spheres (Table 1). In PS latex stabilization using this block copolymer, the less soluble PDPA, PDEA or PMEMA block are adsorbed on the latex surface, while the more soluble PDMA blocks are responsible for the stabilization of latexes. The polymer chains belonging to the PDMA block are located in the form of fringes in the shell of PS spheres, just like spherical brushed polymers.
Polymeric spheres stabilized with block copolymers have been preferred by polymer scientists to produce more monodisperse or environmentally sensitive spherical particles [29–33]. The resulting spherical particles exhibit changes in swelling-shrinkage behavior or surface properties with external stimuli such as temperature and pH [29–33]. In other words, interactions are established between block copolymers and polymeric spheres used as stabilizers in emulsion and dispersion polymerization techniques. These interactions are more stronger in emulsion polymerization, but some of these block copolymers remain on the surfaces of latex after their synthesis via dispersion polymerization as well [29, 33, 34].
As a result of DLS studies, hydrodynamic radius (Rh) values and polydispersity index values (𝜇2/Γ2) of PS spheres stabilized with different block copolymers are given in Table 1. According to these results, it can be said that PS spheres are produced as monodisperse with a diameter of 1–2 µm. There are many studies showing that PS spheres can be produced in planned diameters by changing many factors such as heterogeneous polymerization technique, stabilizer type, stabilizer amount, mixing speed and solvent type [29–35]. When the previous studies are examined, if the amount of stabilizer increases or the mixing speed increases, the diameter becomes smaller. Comonomer ratios in the block copolymer have a significant effect on the diameter. The type of solvent and solvent mixtures are also very effective on diameter change. Since the comonomer ratios and molecular weights of the stabilizers used in the production of each PS sphere are different, it will be very difficult to compare with each other. However, it can be easily said here that the change in PS diameters is due to the stabilizer content.
Table 1
Experimental conditions in the synthesis of the PS latexes with various size and DLS measurements (styrene 5.0 mL, 1000 rpm and at 60 oC)
Code
|
Stabilizer Type
|
Stabilizer Amount
|
AIBN
|
Media
(50 mL)
|
Diameter
(nm)
|
𝜇2/Γ2
|
PS1
|
aPDPA0.17-b-PDMA0.83
b(Mn: 25500 g mol-1, PDI: 1.08)
|
1.0 g
|
60 mg
|
H2O/MeOH
(1/9)
|
2150
|
0.02
|
PS2
|
aPDMA0.86-b-PMEMA0.14
b(Mn: 45600 g mol-1, PDI: 1.13)
|
0.6 g
|
45 mg
|
1-butanol
|
1050
|
0.08
|
PS3
|
aPDEA0.30-b-PDMA0.70
b(Mn: 14900 g mol-1, PDI: 1.06)
|
0.6 g
|
45 mg
|
H2O/MeOH (1/12)
|
1400
|
0.06
|
a Mole% content determined by proton NMR spectroscopy.
b GPC results (THF eluent, PMMA standards).
3.2 Preparation of metal oxide structures
In the previous section, it was mentioned that block copolymers used as stabilizers in dispersion (or emulsion) polymerization adhere to the surface [29, 33, 34]. The polymer fringes with this DMA unit provided a suitable environment for the absorption of metal ions. However, in this way, the metal oxide precursor salt can be deposited or adsorbed homogeneously on the structure used as a hard template. Incidentally, it is also known that PS spheres are frequently used as a hard template in the coating of polymeric cores with an inorganic layer [1, 2]. PS spheres are preferred because the phenyl ring is modifiable, easy to prepare, and is a low cost polymer that is easily available commercially. In addition, poly(methylmethacrylate) and formaldehyde resin are other common polymers used for this purpose [1, 2].
Together with our previous studies [17–19], it will be very useful for the reader to compare diblock copolymer stabilized PS spheres which is used as a hard template with other polymeric rigid templates in terms of functionality and production technique in this pioneering work. Inorganic species must have a surface charge (or functionality) in order to adsorb to the surface of PS spheres. This can only be achieved with stabilizing agent [29–33], anionic radical (ammonium persulfate and potassium persulfate) and cationic radical [2,2'-azobis(2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride] initiators used in the emulsifier-free polymerization method [10, 11], various modifications made on the phenyl ring in PS spheres [2, 10, 12], and spherical polymeric brush polymers, which are surface initiated polymerization products [13–16]. In addition, the fact that PS spheres have a charged surface is important in that it allows the coating of PS spheres with inorganic species with the layer-by-layer coating (LbL) technique [36]. Polymeric spheres stabilized with block copolymers contain polymer fringes around them, just like brush polymers, can be produced quite simply compared to brush polymers which are surface-initiated polymerization products that require special monomers or various modifications [13–16]. It is worth to mention that these polymeric spherical brushes are frequently used in the production of inorganic nanoparticles (NP) rather than the production of hollow spheres [13–16]. On the other hand, it is quite common to use anionic PS spheres formed by the sulfonation of the polystyrene surface with the H2SO4 treatment, but it can still be said that the PS spheres stabilized with the block copolymers used in this study are more functional [2, 10, 12]. It can be said that the polymer fringes on the surface of the PS spheres stabilized with block copolymers will contribute to the prevention of the adsorption of inorganic species and their separation from the surface and to ensure a completely homogeneous coating, by forming a steric barrier for the polymer fringes during the nucleation and growth stages of inorganic species [13–16].
In this study, it was thought that the mechanism of action of the diblock copolymer used to stabilize PS spheres was to establish interaction with metal ions, increase the concentration of metal ions on the PS surface with adsorption, form nuclei on the surface of the inorganic species in the basic medium, and the growth of the crystals of metal oxide precursor salts on the PS surface thanks to the polymer fringes. The fact that tertiary amine methacrylate based polymers and many other polymers have already been discussed in many studies as metal ion adsorbents [37, 38]. However, it should be kept in mind that many different types of block copolymers can be designed and used for this purpose [37, 38]. It is also important that the polymer to be selected for this purpose has to have high metal ion adsorption capacity, low cost and easy availability.
Using the controlled precipitation technique as in this study, many metal oxide hollow spheres and bowl-like structures such as CuO, ZnO, SnO2, CeO2, MgO, α-Fe2O3, Cr2O3, In2O3, Co3O4, NiO, CoFe2O4, NiFe2O4 and other [6, 39] can be produced for different applications. To summarize briefly, urea added to the reaction mixture slowly decomposes to NH3 at 80 oC, that is, the hydroxide ion concentration in the mixture increases and metal hydroxides begin to precipitate in the PDMA fringes on the PS surface. In other words, Fe(OH)3/Co(OH)2 and Mn(OH)2/Ni(OH)2 crystals are grown in a controlled manner on the PS surface. It is then converted to CoFe2O4 and NiMn2O4 by thermal decomposition (calcination) and polymeric compounds are removed at this time [9, 23–27].
According to the results of thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), it was observed that 26.0-28.6 wt% residue remains at 650 oC (Table 2). Considering that PS spheres did not leave any residue at the same temperature, almost all of the structures formed after the calcination of polymer-inorganic hybrid structures belonged to CoFe2O4 and NiMn2O4 residues (Fig. 4). Of course, by adding higher proportions of precursor metal salts, these residue amounts can be further increased, and this change causing an increase in the shell thickness contributes to the hollow spheres remaining unbreakable.
Table 2
Experimental conditions in the synthesis of the inorganic-PS hybrid spheres (in 200 mL water, at 80 oC)
Code
|
PS Spheres
(0.2 g)
|
Urea
|
Fe(NO3)3
(0.20 M)
|
Co(NO3)2
(0.20 M)
|
Residue at 650 oC (wt%)
|
P-CoFe1
|
PS1
|
2.0 g
|
4.0 mL
|
2.0 mL
|
26.3
|
P-CoFe2
|
PS2
|
2.0 g
|
4.0 mL
|
2.0 mL
|
28.6
|
Code
|
PS Spheres
(0.2 g)
|
Urea
|
Ni(NO3)3
(0.20 M)
|
MnCl2
(0.20 M)
|
Residue at 650 oC (wt%)
|
P-NiMn1
|
PS3
|
3.0 g
|
2.0 mL
|
4.0 mL
|
26.7
|
P-NiMn2
|
PS3
|
4.0 g
|
2.0 mL
|
4.0 mL
|
26.0
|
Determination of the crystal phase identification of the synthesized CoFe2O4 and NiMn2O4 structures was done with XRD analysis. After 1 hour of calcination at 700 oC, it was determined that CoFe1 and CoFe2 were iron cobalt oxide (CoFe2O4) with cubic (ICDD: 04-006-6582) and rhombohedral (ICDD: 04-015-9870) crystal structure, respectively (Fig. 5). After 2 hours of calcination at 600 oC, it was determined that nickel manganese oxide (NiMn2O4) was formed in cubic (ICDD: 04-008-6983) crystal structure. As seen in Fig. 5, there is no other peaks related to cobalt oxide, nickel oxide, manganese oxide, iron oxide or other phases which indicate that we have pure CoFe2O4 [25] and NiMn2O4 [40].
It can be easily understood by comparing the light microscope images of PS spheres and inorganic-PS hybrid spheres that the surfaces of all PS spheres are successfully homogeneously coated with Fe(OH)3/Co(OH)2 and Ni(OH)2/Mn(OH)2 (Fig. 6). Again, these images showed that no other precipitate structures were formed except for the PS surface (Fig. 6). By taking SEM images of metal oxide structures, both their homogeneity and more detailed morphological structures were revealed. SEM images of the metal oxide structures taken after calcination also indicated that the PS spheres were coated homogeneously (Fig. 7). From the SEM images of CoFe1 and CoFe2, it was seen that the inorganic-PS hybrid spheres fused with each other after calcination process to form larger structures (Fig. 7a and b). Magnetic CoFe2O4 hollow bowl-like structures were obtained in the outer layer of this structure, and hollow spheres were obtained in the inner layers. The diameters of the bowl-like structures formed on the surface were, as expected, ~ 1.85 µm for CoFe1 and ~ 0.80 µm for CoFe2, in relation to the diameters of the PS spheres used. In another study where polymeric spheres were used as a rigid template and similar metal oxide type was also similar, structures with similar morphological properties were obtained, which revealed the effect of temperature [41]. Although the first structure planned to be produced is metal oxide hollow spheres, the obtained bowl-like structures can be related to the nature of the metal oxide as well as the calcination temperature and time. It is possible to produce metal oxide hollow spheres by experimenting with different calcination temperature and time. SEM images of NiMn1 and NiMn2 samples showed that NiMn2O4 hollow spheres with a diameter of ~ 2.50 µm were successfully produced (Fig. 7c and d). The reason why both have similar diameters is, of course, because they are produced using the same PS template. The difference between NiMn1 and NiMn2 is the amount of urea and a change in the color of the resulting inorganic-PS hybrid sphere was observed. There were nano-sheets on the surface of both NiMn2O4 hollow spheres. It has been emphasized in previous studies that the presence of nano-sheets has an effect on increasing the surface area of the structure [42].
The iron cobalt oxide (CoFe2O4) is an important type of metal oxide that has applications in various fields such as sensor [43], photocatalysts [8, 9], electrocatalyst [44], cancer therapy [45], batteries [24, 26], magnetic optical behavior [46] and supercapacitors [47]. It is n-type semiconductor, highly stable, small optical band gaps (~ 2.6 eV) making them active under visible light treatment [48]. The nickel manganese oxide (NiMn2O4) has been widely studied and applied in many fields such as sensor [49], negative temperature coefficient thermistors [50], photocatalysts [51], electrocatalyst [52], supercapacitors [27, 49], and batteries [53] owing to its various advantages, such as low cost, resource abundance, good stability, environmental friendliness, convenience in use and excellent electrochemical performance [54]. The effectiveness of the materials also depends on their morphology, size and composition of the materials. In this respect, it is undoubted that reproducible and uniform metal oxide structures with varying diameters depending on the choice of polymeric sphere used as template can be used in many similar applications with the positive effect of high surface area.