2.1 Animals and experiment design. 50 Wide-type C57BL/6J Male mice, weighting 18-20g (eight weeks), were purchased from Guangdong Medical Laboratory Animal Center (Guangdong, China), and were allowed free access to food and water in a restricted specific pathogen-free room with controlled temperature (25℃) under 12 h light/12 h dark cycle. All animal experiments were performed according to the Criteria of the Medical Laboratory Animal Administrative Committee of Guangdong and the Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of Guangzhou Medical University. And the protocols were approved by Ethic Committee for Experiment Research, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University (2015-041). At the same time, we declare that the content of this study complies with the ARRIVE guidelines. The mice were randomly divided into five groups: control group, CS group, CS plus digoxin groups (0.02mg/kg and 0.1mg/kg) and digoxin (0.02mg/kg) group, 10 mice per group. To establish the COPD mouse model, mice were exposed to CS that were produced by 9 filtered cigarettes (Plum brand, Guangdong Tobacco Industry Co., Ltd., Guangdong, China) for 4 h per day, 6 days per week, 24 weeks together in a whole-body exposure chamber. After 16-week CS exposure, mice in the CS plus digoxin groups were intragastrically treated with different doses of digoxin (Sigma, D6003) once a day, 6 days a week, 8 weeks together before exposure to CS. Meanwhile, mice in the CTL and CS groups were given an equal amount of CMC-Na (0.5%), which as a suspending agent for digoxin. After 8-week digoxin or CMC-Na administration, all mice were sacrificed and used to study the effects of digoxin on COPD.
2.2 Cell culture and treatment. A549 cells were cultured in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 mg/L penicillin, and 100 mg/L streptomycin in a humidified incubator at 37℃with 5% (v/v) CO2. When cell abundance reached 60%-70%, A549 cells were treated with digoxin or S7959 (a Smad3 inhibitor) for 2 h before 48-h CSE (2%) treatment. Each cell experiment was repeated five times. Digoxin or S7959 was dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 50nM or 100μM. CSE was freshly prepared from Plum brand filtered cigarettes within 30 min prior to CSE treatment according to a described protocol (22). And prepared fresh CSE was regarded as 100%. All other culture reagents used in our study were purchased from Gibco (Carlsbad, CA, United States).
2.3 Assessment of lung function.Pulmonary function was evaluated just as reviously
described (23). The total lung capacity (TLC), functional residual capacity (FRC), forced vital capacity (FVC), resistance index (RI) and forced expiration volume at 50 ms (FEV50) were obtained according to the Buxco resistance/compliance application manual.
2.4 Western blot analysis. Western blot analysis was performed as described by Li et al. (23). After PVDF membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit secondary antibodies, western blotting images were obtained by Tanon 5200 chemiluminescence imaging system (Shanghai Tanon Science & Technology, Shanghai, China). Semi-quantitative analyses of immunoblots were performed by using the Image J. The primary antibodies used in our study were as follows: mouse-anti-β-actin antibody (sc-47778, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX), rabbit-anti-HIF-1α antibody (NB100479, Novus Biologicals, Littleton, Colorado, USA), mouse anti-Ecadherin antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, CA, United States), rabbit anti-Vimentin antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, CA, United States), rabbit anti-ZO-1antibody (RA231621, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, CA, United States), rabbit anti-phospho-Smad3 antibody (9523S, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, CA, United States), and rabbit-anti-Smad3 (9520T, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, CA, United States). β-actin was used as the internal control.
2.5 Real-time PCR analysis. Total RNA was extracted from lung tissues or A549 cells using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) and reversely transcribed into cDNA using the PrimeScript RTreagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (TAKARA, Japan). Primer sequences for target genes (HIF-1α, TGF-β1, Smad3, IL-6, IL-1β and TNF-α) were as follows: Mouse HIF-1α (Fwd 5’-GATGACGGCGACATGGTTTAC-3’ and Rev 5’-CTCACT GGGCCATTTCTGTGT-3’); Mouse TGF-β1 (Fwd 5’-ATCTCGATTTTTACCCTGG TGGT-3’ and Rev 5’-CTCCCAAGGAAAGGTAGGTGATAGT-3’); Mouse Smad3 (Fwd 5’-AGATGACAGTGCAGCAGTGGGT-3’ and Rev 5’-CAGCAGAGGAGAA GGGGTAAAGAG-3’); Mouse IL-1β (Fwd 5’-GCCTCGTGCTGTCGGACCCATA T-3’ and Rev 5’-TCCTTTGAGGCCCAAGGCCACA-3’); Mouse IL-6 (Fwd ’-TCA CAGAAGGAGGGCTAAGGACC-3’and Rev 5’-TCACAGAAGGAGTGGCTAAG GACC-3’); Mouse TNF-α (Fwd 5’-CCCTCCTGGCCAACGGCATG-3’ and Rev 5’-T CGGGGCAGCCTTGTCCCTT-3’); mouse 18S (Fwd 5’-GCAATTATTCCCCATGA ACG-3’and Rev 5’-GGCCTCACTAAACCATCCAA-3’); Human HIF-1α (Fwd 5’-T GCTTGGTGCTGATTTGTGAACC-3’ and Rev 5’-CTGTCCTGTGGTGACTTGTC C-3’) ; Human TGF-β1 (Fwd 5’-AAGGACCTCGGCTGGAAGTG-3’ and Rev 5’-CC GGGTTATGCTGGTTGTA-3’); Human Smad3 (Fwd 5’-GAGTGAAGATGGAGAA ACCAGTGAC-3’ and Rev 5’-GTAGTAGGAGATGGAGCACCAGAAG-3’); Human GAPDH (Fwd 5’-TGACTTCAACAGCGACACCCA-3’ and Rev 5’-CACCCTGTTG CTGTAGCCAAA-3’). 18S and GAPDH were used as an internal control in mouse lung tissue and A549 cells, respectively. And all the primers were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China)
2.6 Bronchial alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) analysis. Mice were sacrificed with 1% pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg, i.p). Then the lungs underwent lavage with 0.6 ml saline for three times. BALF was collected and centrifuged (800 g, 5 min, 4 ℃). Then the sediment cells were resuspended with 1ml saline for cell classification and counting. The cells were subjected to Giemsa staining for differential counting of neutrophils, macrophages and lymphocytes. The supernatant was stored at -80°C for pro-inflammatory cytokine detection by ELISA.
2.7 Lung pathological analysis. Left lungs were perfused with 10% buffered formalin and then immediately immersed and fixed in this fixative solution for 24 h. The lung tissues were embedded in paraffin, cut into 3-mm-thicksections and then stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS, Shanghai Sun Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) for histological examination.
Goblet cells were identified by PAS staining. PAS-positive cells were quantified by a previously-described semi-quantitative method with slight modification(24). Briefly, PAS-positive and total epithelial areas were measured by Image Pro-Plus, and the goblet cell metaplasia score was calculated as the percentage of the PAS-stained area to the total epithelial area after scoring 3 or 4 different areas per slide from 5 slides in each treatment group. Moreover, the average alveolar intercept of the lungs was measured by Image Pro-Plus.
2.8 Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). BALF and cell supernatant were prepared for ELISA. The concentration of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), TGF-β1 and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) was measured using the ELISA kit following the manufacturer’s protocol (eBioscience Affymetrix, Santa Clara,CA, United States). The levels of Muc5ac and Muc5b in BALF were also measured according to Lu et al. (25).
2.9 Measurement of body weight and liver, spleen, kidney indices. All mice were weighed once a week during the first 16 weeks of CS exposure and twice a week during digoxin treatment. In addition, the liver, spleen, and kidney were blotted dry and weighed at the terminal of CS exposure. The ratios of liver, spleen and kidney weight to the body weight were counted as liver, spleen and kidney indices, respectively.
2.10 Hematocrit (HCT) measurement. Briefly, at the terminal of chronic CS exposure, whole blood was collected into capillary tubes (0.5 mm outside diameter, VWR Scientific, Radnor, PA) via right ventricle puncture with K2EDTA as an anticoagulant and centrifuged at 7,000 rpm for 5 min, and read on a hematocrit chart (VWR Scientific).
2.11 Data statistics. Data were analyzed with ANOVA or two-tailed Student’s t-test. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test was used for comparisons between more than two groups. Data were presented as mean ± SD, and difference with p-value <0.05 was regarded significant. “n” means the number of animals or repeats in cell experiments.