Within the project year, a total of 979 patients were introduced to digital recovery counseling by the nursing staff in the five stations (ref. Table 1). During these introductions, patients received basic information about the offering.
Table 1
Number of patients at different points in time during the study
| Number of patients |
Patients being asked during the hospital stay | 979 |
Interest in the offer (agreed to clarification) | 329 |
Written consent to participate in the study | 247 |
Written consent to the anonymous donation of chat history data | 246 |
Use of the platform | 15 |
Following the initial information, patients were asked if they wished to participate in the study. A conspicuous portion of refusals (650 patients) to participate in the study occurred prior to the information session (ref. Figure 1). The reasons voluntarily given by the patients were as follows:
-
Lack of interest due to too much study information material (27.19%)
-
Absence of a personal computer or lack of computer skills. (66,86%)
-
Cognitive limitations on the part of the patient. (19,30%)
During the patient education process, the study documented the patients' birthdates, revealing that many affirmative responses were within the age group of 51–70 years (ref. Figure 2).
This result is somewhat surprising, as there was an assumption that patients under 50 years old would be more motivated to use such digital service. However, an examination of the fundamental interest revealed that there were few individuals under the age of 30 admitted to all units during the year, limiting the pool of candidates who could have been informed about the program.
In total 247 patients have consented to participate in this study (ref. Figure 3). Therefore, there seems to be a general interest in the program.
Except for one patient, all patients consented to donate their chat data (ref. Figure 4). This can be attributed to the comprehensive clarification provided, including details regarding the chatbot. Patients are well-informed about how their data will be processed, and they have the assurance that no personally identifiable information will be used for the training of the chatbot.
Based on Fig. 5, it is evident that only a fraction of the participating patients (15 patients) registered on the platform. One reason for the limited patient registration might be that within the brief timeframe (seven days post-discharge), patients were unable to recognize their potential needs. This limitation is not solely temporal; rather, patients often lack awareness of the extent of nursing expertise. A user comment illustrates this: "Upon discharge, I was asked to try out this chat, even though I felt I didn't need it. Out of curiosity, I tried it, and I was pleasantly surprised. The personalized interaction in the chat, along with the prompt and competent responses to my questions, I find very beneficial, especially because I could tell that the chat partner was familiar with my condition/operation. I would gladly use this type of recovery counseling again." (cite of study participant).
The next step involves a detailed analysis of each pilot station, with the previously mentioned statistics now specific to each respective unit. In total, 342 patients in Neurosurgery, 251 in Trauma Surgery, 302 in Orthopedics, and 84 patients in Oncology were addressed regarding the post-hospitalization nursing consultation service offering.
As depicted in Fig. 6, patients in Neurosurgery express the highest level of interest in the offered service and utilize it most frequently. Contrary to expectations, in the field of Oncology, despite the high demand in everyday ward activities, there is limited interest in utilizing such a service. The low interest on this specific unit can be attributed to the fact that patients in this group are already informed about many aspects upon admission to the hospital, supported by a substantial amount of informational material. Consequently, although initial interest was shown, it quickly decreased upon encountering the volume of informational materials. A transition into the care routine could address this issue.
To assess the willingness of nursing professionals to engage in digital practices, two surveys were conducted with recovery counselors through semi-structured guideline interviews (one at the beginning and one at the end of the study [see supplementary files]). This approach was chosen to allow counselors the flexibility to freely express their opinions while focusing on specific areas. The key themes included the counselors' fundamental attitudes towards "digitalization" and their assessments of:
-
Their own digital competencies, and
-
What changes they deemed necessary in the structure of the service.
Regarding their understanding of digitalization and prior exposure to the topic, all counselors consistently stated that they had no previous experiences with such digital tools or services. Nevertheless, they collectively recognized clear advantages, especially for nursing, citing increased speed, modernization, and simplified communication. According to their initial self-assessments of digital competencies, improvements were observed (to varying degrees) over the course of the project year. Counselors reported feeling much more confident in their virtual counseling activities alongside with progress of the study activities.
Furthermore, counselors were queried about the challenges they faced in digital counseling. One challenge identified was that patient questions often tended to be highly specialized, and the counselors occasionally struggled to align their respective expertise with the specific focus of the nursing professional. This discrepancy was highlighted as one of the challenges. The recovery counselors continuously reflected on the boundaries between nursing and medical advice, expressing concerns about potentially overstepping these boundaries. Another challenge raised by counselors who were not from the pilot stations was the perceived anonymity of the digital platform, resulting in a lack of familiarity that could impact interactions with patients. Lastly, it was noted that patients sometimes preferred to express their concerns rather than directly answer the counselors' questions.
For the chatbot, there were a total of 21 chat logs available. In addition to interpersonal interactions, patients primarily posed nursing-related questions, such as those regarding positioning, wound care, or challenges with daily activities. Other than their medical history, patients did not disclose any additional personally identifiable information, which is noteworthy in a positive manner. Due to the diverse nature of the offering, covering multiple specialties, the chatbot would have needed access to an extensive array of questions. Unfortunately, with only 21 chat logs available, training the chatbot uniformly across different specialties proved to remain challenging.