Metal-containing zeolite composites with separated phases as catalysts for hydroisomerization of linear hexane

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3796081/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Metal-containing zeolite composites with separated phases as catalysts for hydroisomerization of linear hexane

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3796081/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 12 Mar, 2024

Read the published version in Journal of Porous Materials →

You are reading this latest preprint version

In this work, composite catalytic systems of natural mordenite and synthetic MFI-type zeolite containing Pd and Ni nanoparticles (0.5–1.5% by weight in total) were prepared by mechanical mixing (1:1), optionally with the addition of α- or γ-Al₂O₃ as a binder. The samples were examined using IR spectroscopy, X-ray diffractometry, transmission electron microscopy, low-temperature nitrogen ad(de)sorption, and tested in the model reaction of n-hexane hydroisomerization in a micro-pulse mode to determine the effect of composition on the peculiarities of linear alkane transformation.

It has been shown that in the obtained catalytic systems, modifications of aluminum oxide used as a binder affect the effectiveness of catalysts in the conversion of n-hexane. This is explained by the different dispersity of α- and γ-Al₂O₃ particles, which causes different porosity of the result composites, and possibly by the interaction of zeolite acid sites with binder acid sites, which leads to changes in their characteristics depending on the modification of aluminum oxide. In this respect, α-Al₂O₃ proved to be better than γ-Al₂O₃.

Synergy between the two zeolite components in the formation of isomers has been found out, which was more effective in samples with an isotropic distribution of zeolite phases. In the applied micro-pulse reaction mode, the composite catalyst prepared without a binder was the best, showing a significantly lower temperature of the maximum yield of isomerization products and a high yield of dimethyl-branched isomers, and having selectivity for n-hexane isomers at the level of high selectivity of the Pd-containing component.

Natural mordenite

MFI-type zeolite

Aluminum oxides

Bi-zeolite composite catalysts

Porosity

Alkane hydroisomerization

Traditionally, zeolites are widely used as a basis of catalysts for various types of reactions. One of the ways to increase their effectiveness is to change the properties of the zeolite component. In particular, different combinations of zeolites can be used. The combination of zeolites of various types and other materials into composite catalytic systems allows of optimal use of their structural and acid-base characteristics, thus regulating the content and strength of active sites and their availability in the resulting material, which opens broad prospects for the use of such systems in catalysis.

Composite materials are an example of such bi-zeolite systems. In the literature, various methods of synthesizing composites are described, one of which is co-crystallization. The production of composites in this way by varying the conditions during synthesis is possible only for a small number of zeolites with similar structures, such as FAU (X) and LTA, MFI and MEL, FAU and EMT, STF and SFF [1], and BEA and MOR [2, 3]. Instead, by combining structure-directing agents and/or zeolite grains as a seed, or using them sequentially, as well as by recrystallization of zeolite under hydrothermal conditions in the presence of a structure-directing agent, it is possible to obtain composites of structures of a wider range: MFI and MEL [4], MWW and FER [5, 6], MFI and FAU [7–9], MOR and MFI [10], MFI and CHA [11]. In co-crystallized zeolites, the phases can be spaced much closer than in a physical mixture, and some parts of the composite can be fused [6], resulting in improved acidic properties and catalytic activity of the composites compared to individual pure phases [5] or their mechanical mixtures [2, 3, 12]. However, composites can also demonstrate intermediate behavior between the two forming structures in various reactions [4, 10, 11].

Many publications are devoted to the synthesis and study of the properties of composites with a core-shell structure containing various combinations of zeolites: FAU/BEA [13], MOR/BEA [14], MOR/MFI [15], ZSM-5/SAPO-34 (/SAPO-5, /SAPO-11) [16–19], etc. They are obtained by a two-step procedure that involves the synthesis of zeolite, whose crystallites serve as the core, and the overgrowth of the shell onto modified core crystallites. Due to their optimized acid and porosity characteristics, such composites also demonstrate full or partial advantage in a number of catalytic reactions: oil refining [13], conversion of 1, 3, 5-TMB [14], conversion of methanol to aromatics [16], aromatization of isobutane [18].

As a component in composites of various structures, including those prepared by mechanical mixing [20], mesoporous materials are widely used: oxides Al₂O₃–SiO₂ [21], hierarchical МСМ-41 [22, 23], silica SBA-15 [24, 25]. Such composites are useful in reactions involving macromolecules, as they are characterized by shape-selectivity and the ability to ease the diffusion of target products from the channels, which simultaneously prevents the formation of coke deposits and prolongs the stable operation of the catalyst. The positive effect of using micro-mesoporous composites as catalysts was noted in the reactions of catalytic cracking of crude oil [21] and soybean oil [20], liquid-phase alkylation of benzene with long-chain olefins [22], conversion of heavy reformate to xylenes [23], nitration of benzenes [24], and hydroisomerization of n-hexadecane [25]. Composite materials can contain a variety of natural minerals along with the zeolite component, which significantly reduces the final cost of the catalyst [26, 27]. Using natural materials, effective and inexpensive composite FCC catalysts [12, 28] and catalysts for glucose transformation into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural [29] based on kaolin, bentonite/zeolite-P catalyst of high stability for transesterification of palm oil [30], perlite- and obsidian-based catalysts for the process of 1,1-diethoxyethane production from acetaldehyde and ethanol [31].

As follows from the analysis of literature sources, composite catalytic systems obtained by mechanical mixing of components are relatively poorly studied, but often approach the effectiveness of "true" composites [7, 11, 17, 19]. In addition, the mechanical mixing method makes it possible to combine zeolite components modified with different metals, which expands the possibilities for adjusting the properties of the composite. At the same time, the procedures for the synthesis of "true" zeolite composites are quite complex. In view of this, the aim of this work was to evaluate the catalytic action of metal-containing bi-zeolite composites with separated phases prepared by mechanical mixing in the conversion of linear alkanes. The hydroisomerization of n-hexane was chosen as a model reaction.

2.1 Catalyst preparation

The choice of zeolite components for obtaining composites was based on the analysis of the results of previous studies [32–35]. Synthetic MFI type powdered zeolite with a ratio of SiO₂/Al₂O₃ = 41 and a static capacity for water and heptane vapors of 0.07 cm³/g and 0.18 cm³/g, respectively, was used as a base of the first component. A base for the second component was Transcarpathian mordenite-containing rock with a mordenite content of 72 wt%, a ratio of SiO₂/Al₂O₃ = 9.5, and a molar content (mmol/g): Na₂O – 0.18, K₂O – 0.22, CaO – 0.52, Al₂O₃ – 1.16, SiO₂ – 10.97, H₂O – 6.1.

The H-form of the zeolites was obtained by calcining the NH₄-form at 873 K for 3 h. To do this, first, cations of the initial forms of zeolites (0,5–1 mm fraction) were exchanged for NH₄⁺ cations from a 3 mol/L NH₄NO₃ solution. Then, the MFI-component was obtained by introducing 1 wt% Pd into the HMFI zeolite, and the MOR-component was obtained by introducing 2 wt% Ni into the dealuminated H-form of rock (HR). Metals were introduced by the incipient wetness impregnation technique. Air-dry zeolite samples were dehydrated in a muffle furnace (653 K, 2 h), impregnated with a calculated amount of PdCl₂ solution in 0.5 mol/L HCl or Ni(NO₃)₂ aqueous solution, and dried in air at room temperature. Dealumination aimed at adjusting the silicate modulus (SiO₂/Al₂O₃) of rock was carried out by modifying the samples (0,5–1 mm fraction) with a 5 mol/L HCl solution according to [35]. The degree of dealumination determined by chemical analysis has amounted to 40%.

Catalysts obtained from the above components are listed in Table 1. The L-series samples are catalytic systems consisting of separate layers of the MFI- and MOR-components with a fractional composition of 0.063-0.1 mm. The samples of C-series are composite catalytic systems with isotropic component distribution prepared by mechanical mixing. To do this, the MFI- and MOR-components were thoroughly grinded in an agate mortar in a 1 : 1 ratio, pressed and crushed to a fraction of 0.063-0.1 mm. In some cases, 30 wt% α-Al₂O₃ or γ-Al₂O₃ was added to the mixture as a binder, which is indicated in the sample name as "Bα" or "Bγ", respectively. The reduction of metals in the composites was carried out in a flow of hydrogen (50 cm³/min) at a temperature of 653 K for 6 h.

Table 1

Two-phase composite catalysts for linear hexane hydroisomerization; the number in parentheses for the L-series samples indicates the order in which the reagent enters the corresponding layer during the reaction
Catalyst	MFI-component	MOR-component	Total content of a metal component, wt%
#L1	(I)HMFI-1Pd	(II)HR	0,5Pd
#L2	(I)HMFI-1Pd	(II)HR-2Ni	0,5Pd/1Ni
#L3	(II)HMFI-1Pd	(I)HR-2Ni	0,5Pd/1Ni
#C	HMFI-1Pd	HR-2Ni	0,5Pd/1Ni
#C-Bα	HMFI-1Pd	HR-2Ni	0,35Pd/0,7Ni
#C-Bγ	HMFI-1Pd	HR-2Ni	0,35Pd/0,7Ni

2.2 Characterization

The synthetic zeolite was investigated on a D8 ADVANCE diffractometer (Bruker) in filtered (Ni) CuKα radiation (λ = 1.542 nm) in the Bragg–Brentano focusing geometry; 2θ angle range: 5–60°, step width: 0.05°, exposure: 3 s. Powder diffraction patterns of the rock-based samples were obtained on a MiniFlex600 X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku) in CuKα radiation with the step width of 0.02° in the same 2θ interval. The scan speed, accelerating voltage, and anode current were set to 5 deg/min, 40 kV, and 15 mA, respectively. Phase analysis was performed according to [36].

Micrographs of the samples were obtained using a JEM-1230 transmission electron microscope (JEOL) with a resolution of 0.2 nm at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV. Before that, the samples were suspended in water with ethyl alcohol for 20 min using an ultrasonic bath.

FTIR spectra of the catalysts in the field of framework vibrations (400–1400 cm^-1) were recorded on the IRAffiniti-1s Fourier spectrometer (Shimadzu) with a single-reflection ATR accessory Specac Quest GS 10801-B. Spectra were taken relative to air.

Isotherms of low-temperature (77 K) nitrogen ad(de)sorption were measured on a NOVA 1200e automatic sorbtometer (Quantachrome Instruments) after evacuating the samples in situ at a temperature of 573 K for 3–7 h. NovaWin software was used to calculate the parameters of a porous structure of the catalysts. The zeolite specific surface area S^BET was calculated using the multipoint BET method in a p/p₀ range of 0.02–0.1; the specific external surface area S^t and the volume of micropores V_micro – by the t-method, using the de Boer equation; the specific surface area of micropores – by the formula S_micro = S^BET – S^t; the total pore volume V – by the volume of adsorbed nitrogen at p/p₀ ~ 0.99; the average pore size R – from the assumption of their cylindrical shape. The pore size distribution was determined by the DFT method using the N₂ at 77 K on silica (cylindrical pore, NLDFT equilibrium model) calculation model.

2.3 Catalyst testing

The catalytic properties of the samples in the reaction of n-hexane hydroisomerization were tested using a micro-catalytic setup. The chromatographic unit of the setup consisted of a copper capillary column (50 m long and 0.20 mm in inner diameter, squalane stationary phase) and a flame ionization detector. Chromatographic peaks were recorded using a Multyspektr-1 chromatographic attachment.

A catalyst (100 mg sample weight) was loaded into the microreactor of the setup and activated in a hydrogen flow of 20 cm³/min at 653 K for 1 h. Then the temperature in the reactor was lowered to 473 K and the reaction was carried out at atmospheric pressure by injecting 1.0 µl of n-hexane into the H₂ carrier gas using a syringe. The products of the reaction were captured at a temperature of 77 K and transferred to the chromatographic column by heat shock (~ 610 K). Analysis conditions were as follows: the temperature in the column thermostat – 323 K; hydrogen flow – 50 cm³/min; hydrogen and air flow rates through the detector – 30 and 300 cm³/min, respectively. After completing the analysis, the temperature was raised by 25 degrees, and the reaction was carried out again, and so on up to 623 K.

The conversion X (wt%) and selectivity for a j-product Sj (%) were calculated as:

$$\text{X}=100-{\text{Y}}_{n\text{C}6}$$

$${\text{S}}_{\text{j}}=\frac{{\text{Y}}_{\text{j}}}{\text{X}}$$

where Y_nC6 is the yield of unreacted n-hexane (wt%), and Y_j is the yield of j-product (wt%). The yield of hexane isomers Y_iC6 was calculated as the sum of the yields of 2-methylpentane (2-MP), 3-methylpentane (3-MP) and dimethylbutanes (DMB). The yield of cracking products Y_C1–5 was calculated as the sum of the yields of methane, ethane, propane, isobutane, butane, isopentane, and pentane.

3.1 Characteristics of initial zeolite materials

Figure 1 represents the powder diffraction patterns of the zeolite components of the composites. The diffractogram of the MFI-component (Fig. 1a) contains only maxima characteristic for this type of zeolite, while the MOR-component consists of the mordenite phase as well as the clinoptilolite phase with the predominance of the former (Fig. 1b). In the acid-modified rock (Fig. 1c), the crystallinity of the mordenite phase remains intact, whereas the degree of crystallinity of the clinoptilolite phase decreases slightly and amounts to 73% of that in original rock. The degree of crystallinity has been evaluated by the relative intensity of the analytical diffraction maxima I₃₃₀ (d = 0.453 nm) and I_{151 + 350} (d = 0.297 nm) for mordenite and clinoptilolite, respectively. It can be assumed that partial destruction of clinoptilolite may contribute to the formation of mesoporosity in the MOR-component.

Micrographs of the components for the composites (Fig. 2) indicate the formation of nanosized particles of the metal phase. The Pd-impregnated MFI-component contains nanoparticles with a size of 7–12 nm, while in the MOR-component, Ni nanoparticles with an average size of ~ 5 nm were recorded.

The infrared spectra of the MFI and MOR-components of composite catalysts in the region of framework vibrations are shown in Fig. 3. Assignments of the main absorption bands (a.b.) are made according [37, 38]: 420 cm^-1 – O − T−O bending vibration (T = Si, Al), 550–580 cm^-1 – vibrations of secondary building units (SBU), 690 and 790–800 cm^-1 – symmetric stretching internal and external vibrations of tetrahedra, respectively, 1025–1060 cm^-1 – asymmetric stretching vibrations of bonds of tetrahedra, 1220–1225 cm^-1 – asymmetric stretching vibrations of external bonds between tetrahedra.

Spectra of the samples based on MFI zeolite (Fig. 3a) are not affected by the modification procedure: all a.b. characteristic of the zeolite are well defined, retain their position in the spectra, and their intensity remains unchanged.

As in the case of synthetic MFI-based samples, the spectra of samples of natural origin (Fig. 3b), both initial and modified, contain all characteristic a.b., the intensities of which remain intact. Thus, we can speak about the preservation, on the whole, of the crystalline structure of the rock components. However, in the spectrum of dealuminated rock, the appearance of a shoulder at 920 cm^-1 is observed, which is often associated with various types of structural defects [39]. This indicates insignificant amorphization of the sample, which is apparently due to the partial destruction of the clinoptilolite phase during the dealumination. Dealumination also causes a high-frequency shift of the a.b. at 1025 cm^-1 in modified samples.

In the spectrum of original rock, a broadened a.b. at 550 cm^-1 is observed, which narrows and shifts in the modified samples. The same was observed for another rock by Voloshyna et al. [40] and explained by the diversity of cationic composition of native rock and its homogeneity in the H-form of samples. The effect of cationic composition on the frequency of SBU vibrations in mordenite and clinoptilolite can be noticeable due to the high concentration of cationic sites in their free space. On the other hand, metal particles in the zero-valent state can also affect the SBU vibrations, restricting their motion, which leads to a high-frequency shift of this a.b. in the spectrum of the HR-2Ni sample.

3.2 Porous structure characteristics of initial materials and composite systems

The porous structure of the samples was estimated from the isotherms of low-temperature nitrogen ad(de)sorption (Fig. 4).

The shape of the isotherm of the MFI-based samples is typical for microporous adsorbents according to the IUPAC classification [41]. The proportion of micropores in these samples is > 80% (Table 2). A minor hysteresis is observed on the isotherms, the occurrence of which is explained by the slight destruction of the porous structure during the obtaining of the protonic form.

Table 2

Porous structure parameters of the samples
Samples	S^BET (m²/g)	S^t (m²/g)	S_miсro (m²/g)	V_micro (cm³/g)	V (cm³/g)	V_micro/V (%)	R (nm)	R^DFT (nm)
MFI-based
HMFI	371	14.5	356	0.150	0.183	82	0.99	0.97
HMFI-1Pd	332	11.3	321	0.136	0.164	83	0.99	0.97
Rock-based
HR	345^a)	19.1	326	0.113	0.205	55	1.38	1.17
HR-2Ni	330	19.3	310	0.126	0.223	57	1.35	1.17
Binder
α	78.3	66.9	11.4	0.005	0.230	2.0	5.88	4.56
γ	243	211	32.7	0.013	0.651	2.0	5.35	2.55
Composite catalytic system
#С	247	15.6	232	0.097	0.133	73	1.08	1.17
#С-Bα	291	56.9	234	0.096	0.217	44	1.49	1.13
#С-Bγ	219	53.2	165	0.071	0.170	42	1.56	1.17
^a)The specific surface area for this sample was calculated using the Langmuir equation

The isotherms of the rock-based samples have a character intrinsic to sorbents that combine micro- and mesoporosity. This is evidenced by a sharp rise at low relative pressures and the presence of a hysteresis loop at higher p/p₀, respectively. The proportion of micropores in these samples is about 55%. The reason for the appearance of hysteresis with a pronounced rise in the region of high relative pressures is obviously the appearance of mesopores inside the crystallites during the dealumination procedure due to partial destruction of the structure.

The pore size distribution (Fig. 5) for the zeolite samples has three maxima: about 1 nm, 1.2 nm, and 2.6 nm. Accordingly, one can distinguish pores with a radius of 1 nm, which are classified as supermicropores [41] and predominate in the MFI-based samples, as well as narrow mesopores with a radius of about 1.2 nm, which predominate in the rock-based samples. The volume of mesopores with a radius of 2.6 nm is insignificant in both zeolites. Therefore, the secondary porosity of both zeolite components can be considered similar.

As a result of modification with metals, the parameters of the porous structure of the samples decrease compared to the original materials. At the same time, a decrease in the specific surface area of the HR-2Ni sample is accompanied by an increase in the volume of micropores and the volume of pores with a radius of ~ 1.2 nm prevailing in the rock. In this case, this increase may be imaginary and can be explained by an increase in the amount of adsorption under the influence of nickel particles, which serve as additional adsorption sites. Palladium atoms, due to their larger radius, have greater polarizability, which leads to a stronger van der Waals interaction of palladium particles with the zeolite surface [42]. Therefore, for nitrogen molecules, they are unlikely to create additional adsorption sites. For this reason, the calculation of the pore volume from the N₂ adsorption isotherms in the case of palladium seems to be more adequate. The above mentioned indicates the location of metal particles in the nanopores that predominate in a particular zeolite, but in the rock-based samples, nickel is also present in zeolite micropores.

Both modifications of aluminum oxide, which were used as binders in the preparation of samples #C-Bα and #C-Bγ, show isotherms with a wide hysteresis loop. They are characteristic of mesoporous adsorbents with a small number of micropores. γ-Al₂O₃ has a threefold higher specific surface area compared to α-Al₂O₃. The average pore radius for these samples is 5–6 nm. Pores size distribution gives a wide maximum near 5 nm for α-Al₂O₃, and for γ-Al₂O₃ – a dispersion of radii in the range of 2–10 nm with a predominance of 2.5 nm radius.

Interestingly, the composite catalyst #C has worse porosity parameters than its components. The addition of a binder in the #C-Bα sample is reflected in a significant increase in the external surface area and total pore volume. The latter increases due to the addition of nanopores with radii of 2–10 nm to the porous structure (Fig. 5). In the #C-Bγ sample, the size distribution of nanopores resulting from the addition of the binder is much narrower with a maximum of about 2 nm. The larger pores present in γ-Al₂O₃ are obviously formed by the inter-particle space that is destroyed during the mixing process. With that, γ-Al₂O₃ loses a significant portion of its pore volume, which is not the case with α-Al₂O₃ when added to a mixture of zeolites. The observed phenomenon is explained, on the one hand, by the much higher dispersion of γ-Al₂O₃ compared to the dispersion of zeolite components of the composites and, on the other hand, by the close particle sizes of zeolites and α-Al₂O₃ [43]. The former is also the reason for the somewhat reduced micropore surface area of the #C-Bγ composite, which is due to the blockage of pore openings on the external surface of zeolite crystallites.

3.3 Catalysis

The catalysts were tested in the isomerization of linear hexane in a micro-pulse mode, and the activity was evaluated by the degree of conversion of the reagent.

The conversion of n-hexane on catalysts of the L-series, in which the zeolite components are separate layers, begins at 473 K (Fig. 6a). The lowest conversion is observed for the monometallic sample #L1, but thanks to Pd it is the most selective for C₆ isomers (Fig. 6b). With increasing temperature, the isomerization selectivity on all three catalysts decreases. The addition of Ni to the MOR component (samples #L2 and #L3) obviously promotes the activation of cracking, which is reflected in the increase in conversion over these samples comparing to the #L1 sample and, accordingly, a decrease in their selectivity. In addition, there is a tendency to decrease the temperature of the maximum yield of hexane isomers (Fig. 6c) without reducing the maximum value. The effect of the addition of nickel differs depending on which catalyst layer is first exposed to hexane. Since the #L2 catalyst, which has a Pd-containing layer first, is more efficient than the other Ni-containing catalyst in this series, it can be assumed that the role of palladium is to provide initial effective dehydrogenation of alkanes, which facilitates further isomerization. Hydrogenation of the formed isomers to the final products can occur on less effective hydrogenating-dehydrogenating sites, such as nickel nanoparticles. This approach provides a basis for minimizing the content of expensive metals in composite catalysts.

As can be seen from Fig. 6c-d on the example of the formation of hexane isomers, the total effect of the two layers is not additive and exceeds their average value.

To further determine the effect of the arrangement of catalyst layers on the hexane transformation, samples #C, #C-Bα and #C-Bγ with an isotropic distribution of zeolite phases were prepared and their catalytic properties were studied (Fig. 7).

First of all, it should be noted that these catalysts, with the exception of sample #C-Bγ, showed significantly better results in the isomerization of n-hexane compared to sample #L2, the most effective catalyst of the L-series. This may indicate that the above-mentioned positive effect of the initial more efficient dehydrogenation of reagent molecules on palladium can occur not only at the macro level in the case of layering of Pd- and Ni-containing components of the composite catalyst, but also under conditions of isotropic distribution of the corresponding zeolite components in the catalyst. In the latter case, it is even more effective.

As is well known, γ-Al₂O₃ is widely used as a catalyst carrier and can also serve as an active catalyst due to the presence of Lewis acid sites (LAS) and a developed specific surface area, while α-Al₂O₃ is characterized by an order of magnitude lower concentration of LAS on the surface [43]. At the same time, in α-oxide, LAS are weak [44] and porosity is three times less developed than in γ-Al₂O₃ (Table 2). However, the #C-Bα sample obtained using α-aluminum oxide is significantly superior in all respects to the #C-Bγ catalyst, in which γ-Al₂O₃ was used as a binder (Fig. 7). Obviously, the acidic properties of γ-Al₂O₃ are not an advantage for hydroisomerization and hydrocracking reactions, since in these reactions the active sites are above all acidic Brønsted sites (BAS). The advantage in porosity is also lost during the preparation of the #C-Bγ composite (see subsection 3.2). Instead, this composite has a 30% smaller micropore surface area, where the active sites are located. This reduces the degree of conversion on this catalyst, as well as its selectivity (Fig. 7e), since in the micropores isomerization would be facilitated by a longer stay of the reagents in contact with the active surface.

On the composite catalyst #C-Bα, with increasing temperature, the yield of C₆ isomers begins to increase, which at a maximum at a temperature of 548 K approaches the highest value for the tested catalysts – 40%. (Fig. 7b). Obviously, with an increase in the reaction temperature, there is a gradual increase in the strength of the BAS. At a temperature of 573 K, a sharp increase in the yield of cracking products С_1-5 is observed (Fig. 7c), indicating the appearance of sufficiently strong sites and acceleration of the cracking reaction. On the #C-Bγ sample, these processes are much less pronounced, which cannot be explained only by the smaller micropore surface in this catalyst compared to #C-Bα. Thus, the effect of aluminum oxide modification that was used to prepare the composite catalyst may also spread to the characteristics of the acid sites of the zeolite components, probably through their interaction with the acid sites of the binder.

The maximum yield of C₆ isomers on samples #C and #C-Bα (samples of the C-series with isotropic distribution of zeolite components, except for #C-Bγ) remains as high as on their Pd-containing component, sample HMFI-1Pd, but is observed at a lower temperature (Fig. 7b). At the same time, the yield of valuable dimethyl branched isomers on the composites increases by an order of magnitude compared to this component, exceeding the high yield of DMB on its other component, the HR-2Ni sample (Fig. 7d). Both composite catalysts, despite the lower Pd content and the presence of Ni, retain high selectivity for C₆ isomers of their Pd-containing component (Fig. 7e). It can be concluded that such factors as Ni content and the presence of a binder in the composition affect only the activity of the catalyst, as evidenced by the divergence of the curves of the temperature dependence of the selectivity. (Fig. 7f). The highest effectiveness in the formation of hexane isomers in general, as well as dimethyl branched isomers, is demonstrated by sample #C, obtained without the use of a binder. This composite in terms of the iC₆ yield is close to the bimetallic monozeolite catalyst with a similar cationic composition (0.5 wt% Ni and 0.5 wt% Pd, [33]), but, unlike the composite, the latter almost does not form DMB.

Composite catalytic systems with separated zeolite phases were prepared by mechanical mixing (1:1), optionally with the addition of a binder. They included the synthetic MFI zeolite component, the natural mordenite component, and hydrogenating-dehydrogenating metal component. The MFI-component contained Pd nanoparticles with a size of 7–12 nm, and Ni nanoparticles with an average size of ~ 5 nm were formed in the MOR-component. The MFI-component of the catalysts had a microporous structure, and the MOR-component was micro-mesoporous due to partial destruction of the clinoptilolite phase of rock. The use of a binder significantly increased the external surface of the catalysts and contributed to the appearance of nanosized pores with a radius of 2–10 nm. The composite obtained without a binder remained mostly microporous.

Different modifications of aluminum oxide, when used as a binder, affect differently the effectiveness of the obtained catalytic systems in the conversion of n-hexane. This is explained by the different dispersity of α- and γ-Al₂O₃ particles, which causes different porosity of the result composites. In addition, the acid sites of the binder can interact with the acid sites of the zeolite, which changes their characteristics depending on the modification of aluminum oxide. In this respect, α-Al₂O₃ is more favorable than γ-Al₂O₃.

The results obtained indicate that composite catalytic systems with separated zeolite phases are promising for use as catalysts for the hydroisomerization of linear alkanes. Synergy between the two zeolite components in the formation of hexane isomers is observed for the obtained composites. The synergy is more effective in the case of an isotropic distribution of zeolite phases. The catalysts demonstrate selectivity for n-hexane isomers at the level of high selectivity of the Pd-containing component, having higher effectiveness in the formation of hexane isomers in general, as well as valuable dimethyl-branched isomers.

Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial or non-financial interests or personal relationships that could impart bias on the work submitted for publication.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to O.V. Shvets (L.V. Pysarzhevskyi Institute of Physical Chemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine) and M.M Filonenko (University of State Fiscal Service of Ukraine) for their help in obtaining the powder diffraction patterns of the samples, and S.M. Shcherbakov (M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine) for assistance in obtaining the micrographs of the samples. The authors also express their gratitude to the European Chemistry School for Ukrainian (https://ecpsfu.org) for providing an overview of current trends in European chemical science.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Lyubov K. Patrylak; Methodology: Yuliya G. Voloshyna, Olexandra P. Pertko; Investigation: Olexandra P. Pertko, Angela V. Yakovenko, Volodymyr A. Povazhnyi; Validation: Olexandra P. Pertko, Angela V. Yakovenko; Formal analysis: Yuliya G. Voloshyna, Olexandra P. Pertko; Data Curation: Yuliya G. Voloshyna; Resources: Volodymyr A. Povazhnyi; Writing and visualization: Yuliya G. Voloshyna. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding: No funding was received for conducting this study.

Z. Liu, Y. Wang, Z. Xie, Chin. J. Catal. 33, 22–38 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/s1872-2067(10)60299-9
X. Qi, B. Li, S. Li, X. Liu, B. Lin, Chin. J. Catal. 27, 228–232 (2006)
Z. Xie, Z. Liu, Y. Wang, Q. Yang, L. Xu, W. Ding, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 11, 2152–2187 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms11052152
M.S. Francesconi, Z.E. Lopez, D. Uzcategui, G. Gonzalez, J.C. Hernandez, A. Uzcategui, A. Loaiza, F.E. Imbert, Catal. Today. 107–108, 809–815 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2005.07.013
X.L. Niu, Y.Q. Song, S.J. Xie, S.L. Liu, Q.X. Wang, L.Y. Xu, Catal. Lett. 103, 211–218 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-005-7156-4
S. Xie, S. Liu, Y. Liu, X. Li, W. Zhang, L. Xu, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 121, 166–172 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2009.01.027
H. Chen, B. Shen, H. Pan, Chem. Lett. 32, 726–727 (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1246/cl.2003.726
A.S. Kovo, E. Opuama, M.O. Edoga, M. Abdulkadir, A.G. Isah, I.A. Mohammed, Chem. Eng. Sci. 4, 1–4 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.12691/ces-4-1-1
Y.-H. Kang, X.-Y. Wei, G.-H. Liu, Y. Gao, Y.-J. Li, X.-R. Ma, Z.-F. Zhang, Z.-M. Zong, Fuel. 269, 117326 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117326
A.A. Al-Shammari, S.A. Ali, N. Al-Yassir, A.M. Aitani, K.E. Ogunronbi, K.A. Al-Majnouni, S.S. Al-Khattaf, Fuel Process. Technol. 122, 12–22 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.01.021
L. Li, X. Cui, J. Li, J. Wang, J. Braz Chem. Soc. 26, 290–296 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-5053.20140279
Y. Ghrib, N. Frini-Srasra, E. Srasra, J. Martínez-Triguero, A. Corma, Catal. Sci. Technol. 8, 716–725 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CY01477E
Q.Q. Zhao, B. Qin, J.J. Zheng, Y.Z. Du, W.F. Sun, F.X. Ling et al., Chem. Eng. J. 257, 262–272 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.07.056
X. Dai, X. Qi, Y. Guo, D. Kong, Chem. Reaction Eng. Technol. 27, 385–392 (2011)
D.J. Kong, J.L. Zheng, X.H. Yuan, Y.D. Wang, D.Y. Fang, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 119, 91–96 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.10.001
X. Chen, Chem. Reaction Eng. Technol. 34, 36–42 (2018). https://doi.org/10.11730/j.issn.1001-7631.2018.01.0036.07
L. Zhang, Z.-X. Jiang, Y. Yu, C.-S. Sun, Y.-J. Wang, H.-Y. Wang, RSC Adv. 5, 55825–55831 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra10296k
R. Zhang, J. Wang, L. Han, J. Wang, L. Zhao, J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 157, 110194 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2021.110194
X. Wang, S. Guo, Z. Niu, RSC Adv. 13, 2081–2089 (2023). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D2RA07499K
T. Sontisawate, H. Nasu, T. Hashimoto, A. Ishihara, J. Jpn Petrol. Inst. 59, 184–196 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1627/jpi.59.184
Z.S. Qureshi, M.A. Siddiqui, A. Tanimu, A. Aitani, A.C. Akah, Q. Xu, M. AlHerz, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 166, 105621 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2022.105621
A. Bordoloi, B.M. Devassy, P.S. Niphadkar, P.N. Joshi, S.B. Halligudi, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 253, 239–244 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2006.03.045
S.A. Ali, F.M. Almulla, B.R. Jermy, A.M. Aitani, R.H. Abudawoud, M. AlAmer, Z.S. Qureshi, T. Mohammad, H.S. Alasiri, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 98, 189–199 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2021.04.003
V.S.P. Ganjala, C.K.P. Neeli, C.V. Pramod, M. Khagga, K.S.R. Rao, D.R. Burri, Catal. Commun. 49, 82–86 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2014.02.006
M. Fedyna, A. Żak, K. Jaroszewska, J. Mokrzycki, J. Trawczyński, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 305, 110366 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110366
K. Okada, Y. Kameshima, C.D. Madhusoodana, R.N. Das, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 5, 479–484 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stam.2004.03.001
H. Katsuki, S. Furuta, S. Komarneni, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 83, 1093–1097 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1151-2916.2000.TB01336.X
L. Patrylak, R. Likhnyovskyi, V. Vypyraylenko, R. Leboda, J. Skubiszewska-Zięba, K. Patrylak, Adsorp Sci. Technol. 19, 525–540 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1260/0263617011494376
L.K. Patrylak, S.V. Konovalov, A.V. Yakovenko, O.P. Pertko, V.A. Povazhnyi, Y.G. Voloshyna, O.V. Melnychuk, M.M. Filonenko, Appl. Nanosci. 13, 4795–4808 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-022-02620-5
M.R. Abukhadra, S.M. Ibrahim, S.M. Yakout, M.E. El-Zaidy, A.A. Abdeltawab, Energy Convers. Manag. 196, 739–750 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.06.027
M.M. Kurmach, K.M. Konysheva, K.O. Filatova, S.O. Sotnik, K.S. Gavrilenko, O.V. Andreev, O.V. Shvets, Theor. Exp. Chem. 57, 451–457 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11237-022-09715-8
L.K. Patrylak, M.M. Krylova, O.P. Pertko, Y.G. Voloshyna, J. Porous Mater. 26, 861–868 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-018-0685-1
L. Patrylak, O. Pertko, Y. Voloshyna, A. Yakovenko, V. Povazhnyi, O. Melnychuk, K. Zlochevskyi, Chem. Chem. Technol. 15, 330–335 (2021). https://doi.org/10.23939/chcht15.03.330
Y.G. Voloshyna, O.P. Pertko, L.K. Patrylak, A.V. Yakovenko, Vopr. Khimii i Khimicheskoi Tekhnologii. 6, 26–32 (2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.32434/0321-4095-2020-133-6-26-32. [in Ukrainian]
Y.G. Voloshyna, O.P. Pertko, V.A. Povazhnyi, L.K. Patrylak, A.V. Yakovenko, Appl. Nanosci. 13, 4863–4872 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-022-02632-1
IZA Structure Commission, Database of Zeolite Structures. (editing status: fully revised 2017), http://www.iza-structure.org/databases/. Accessed 21 Dec 2023
F. Pechar, D. Rykl, Chem. Zvesti. 35, 189–202 (1981)
J.C. Jansen, F.J. van der Gaag, H. van Bekkum, Zeolites. 4, 369–372 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-2449(84)90013-7
S. Bordiga, C. Lamberti, F. Bonino, A. Travert, F. Thibault-Starzyk, Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 7262–7341 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CS00396B
Y. Voloshyna, O. Pertko, V. Povazhnyi, L. Patrylak, A. Yakovenko, Chem. Chem. Technol. 17, 373–385 (2023). https://doi.org/10.23939/chcht17.02.373
M. Thommes, K. Kaneko, A.V. Neimark, J.P. Olivier, F. Rodriguez-Reinoso, J. Rouquerol, K.S.W. Sing, Pure Appl. Chem. 87, 1051–1069 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2014-1117
J. Kim, S.W. Han, J.-C. Kim, R. Ryoo, ACS Catal. 8, 10545–10554 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b03301
S. Kiatphuengporn, A. Junkaew, C. Luadthong, S. Thongratkaew, C. Yimsukanan, S. Songtawee, T. Butburee, P. Khemthong, S. Namuangruk, M. Kunaseth, K. Faungnawakij, Green. Chem. 22, 8572–8583 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/D0GC02573A
A. Zecchina, S. Bordiga, G. Spoto, D. Scarano, G. Petrini, G. Leofanti, M. Padovan, C.O. Areàn, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 88, 2959–2969 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1039/FT9928802959

No competing interests reported.

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 12 Mar, 2024

Read the published version in Journal of Porous Materials →

Editorial decision: Revision requested
08 Feb, 2024
Reviews received at journal
30 Dec, 2023
Reviewers agreed at journal
28 Dec, 2023
Reviewers invited by journal
27 Dec, 2023
Submission checks completed at journal
26 Dec, 2023
Editor assigned by journal
26 Dec, 2023
First submitted to journal
23 Dec, 2023

You are reading this latest preprint version

Metal-containing zeolite composites with separated phases as catalysts for hydroisomerization of linear hexane

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

1 Introduction

2 Experimental

2.1 Catalyst preparation

2.2 Characterization

2.3 Catalyst testing

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Characteristics of initial zeolite materials

3.2 Porous structure characteristics of initial materials and composite systems

3.3 Catalysis

4 Conclusions

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1