Post-operative complications following surgical hemorrhoidectomy commonly include pain and delayed wound healing. These issues, affecting the majority of patients, result from a combination of thermal, mechanical, and chemical factors [8]. The genesis of postoperative pain involves various factors such as the surgical incision, spasm of the internal anal sphincter, incarceration of smooth muscle fibers and mucosa in the transfixed vascular pedicles, epithelial denudation of the anal canal, and edema caused by tissue inflammation around the wound [9,10]. Despite efforts to manage post-hemorrhoidectomy pain and expedite wound healing through various pharmacotherapies, the outcomes have been unsatisfactory. While the benefits of using topical agents to aid in the wound healing process have been observed, there is a lack of clinical studies. Presently, most surgeons do not incorporate topical agents to alleviate pain following hemorrhoidectomy [11,12].
In the last few years, variations in the surgical technique of hemorrhoidal dissection have been described with the aim of minimizing pain as well as several medical strategies are increased to avoid delayed wound healing which is recognized as the leading cause of pain after open hemorrhoidectomy [2, 12].
Brusciano L and Colleagues [13] recently proposed laser hemorrhoidoplasty to reduce post-operative pain and complications rate. They retrospectively analyzed fifty patients (28 males and 22 females) underwent laser treatment for II- and III- degree hemorrhoids with a 3-columns treated of 84%. No significant complications were occurred with a mean VAS score of 2 after four post-operative pain. These results are certainly promising, despite the small sample size and the short term follow – up, it deserves consideration and multicenter study. In our case series with showed a comparable VAS at the end of the follow – up, despite diathermy does not allow to reach it after 4 days and it should be also emphasized that we have treated patients with III- and IV- degree hemorrhoids.
In a recent randomized trial Vejdan AK [14] investigated the effects of sucralfate ointment on wound healing (epithelialisation) and postoperative pain after open hemorrhoidectomy. The trial involves two groups of randomly collected forty patients undergone OH and a 10% topical sucralfate ointment was applied to the investigated group's wounds, while the control group patients used Vaseline as a placebo.
At the end of the postoperative phase, the Authors demonstrated that the mean VAS was 3.70 for the investigated group and 6.90 for the control group. On the average, the completion of epithelialisation for the investigated group was on day 13 as opposed to day 20 for the control group. Despite these promising results, the trial has the “age-limitation”, in fact the Authors included patients between 25 and 45 y-o, it is known that the wound healing may be slower in older patients. Despite a slower wound healing in our study group (mean days 18.8), we achieved the same results in terms of VAS and complete wound healing with a bigger sample size and a mean age of 47 y-o (range, 21–73).
In addition, Gallo G and Colleagues enrolled 50 patients and investigated the effectiveness of Polycarbophil and Propionibacterium acnes lysate gel on pain control after OH. The Authors achieved complete wound healing at last follow-up (40 days), compared to only 17 (68%) in the control group (p = 0.004). Again, the patients in the study group had a significantly lower mean VAS score at the 20th post-operative day (1.44 (standard deviation, 1.16), compared to 2.12 (0.93) in the control group; p = 0.045).
In our sample size, we reached comparable results although the topic ointment was used up to thirty days after surgery with a faster return to normal activities, despite we did not achieve the same VAS score at the end of the follow – up (Table 3).
In the last systematic review published by Lohsiriwat V et al [15], a total of 157 RCTs and 15 meta-analyses were analyzed in terms of post operative pain and wound healing after OH. Although the quality and the number of sample size of all the RCTs included were various and it was difficult to compare the treatment effects among type of OH, ointment and other therapies; several topical agents were associated with a significant reduction in post-operative pain and faster wound healing although no evidence among these was pointed out.
Table 3
Summary of recent studies. Pts Patients; FU Follow up; VAS Visual Analog Scale [at the end of the follow-up
Author [ref] | Pts | FU (days) | VAS (range) | Wound Healing (day) | Overall Complications (%) |
Present study | 70 | 30 | 2 (2–6) | 18.8 (14–28) | 5 (3.5) |
Gallo et al. [9] | 25 | 40 | 0 | - | 3 (0.7) |
Vejdan et al. [14] | 20 | - | 3.7 | 13 | - |
This study has several limitations. Firstly, there is not a control group with no power analysis, but the aim of this study was to focus on technical aspects of the Anonet® Crema after OH, comparing our case series with the international experience. Secondly, it is not a randomized trial and it is an observational design. For a better assessment of the functional outcome, wound healing and pain evaluation, a prospective randomized study with more patients may be required.
Despite those limitations some consideration can be made. In literature there are few studies that investigated on the effectiveness of topic ointments in terms of faster wound healing and lower post-operative pain, and surely the present one analyzed a great number of consecutive patients. In addition, the study was performed in a single center with the same senior surgeon, with no bias regarding the operator and surgical technique. Our results suggest that the use of Anonet® Crema benefited all patients receiving the product in terms of wound healing at 30 days after surgery with better pain control at 30 days after surgery.