Table (1) shows the demographic criteria of the study participants. No statistically significant difference between both groups.
Table (2) shows the difference in laboratory data between patients with mild and severe PE. Apart from serum bilirubin level, there was statistically significant difference in all results between both groups.
Regarding ANXA4, there was statistically significant decrease in mean ANXA4 among cases compared to controls. Additionally, there was statistically significant decrease in mean MXRA5 among cases compared to controls (p < 0.001 for both). However, there was no statistically significant difference in mean TIMP2 between cases and controls (Table 3).
There was statistically significant decrease in mean MXRA5 among patients with severe PE compared to mild PE (p < 0.001). On the other hand, there was no statistically significant difference in mean ANXA4 and TIMP2 between mild and severe PE (Table 4).
Table 5 shows statistically significant moderate positive correlation between ANXA4 and MXRA5 (r = 0.571, p < 0.001) in total sample, and the degree of correlation increased to 0.732 among cases when stratified the groups to cases and controls. No statistically significant correlation between TIMP2 in relation to ANXA4 and MXRA5
Table 6 shows no statistically significant correlation between ANXA4, MXRA5, TIMP2 and other characteristics of patients with preeclampsia (age, systolic, diastolic BP, weight, height, and BMI).
Table 7 shows the correlation between studied genes (ANXA4, MXRA5 and TIMP2) and other laboratory data in patients with PE. Regarding ANXA4, there were statistically significant moderate negative correlation between ANXA 4, PT (r =-0.439, p = 0.002), INR (r= -0.475, p = 0.001), urea (r=-0.482, p = = 0.001), strong negative correlation in creatinine (r=-0.871, p < 0.001). Moreover, there were statistically significant positive moderate correlation between ANXA4, total protein (r = 0.407, p = 0.004), mild in PC (r = 0.313, p = 0.030), and albumin (r = 0.351, p = 0.015).
Regarding MXRA5, there were statistically significant moderate negative correlation between MXRA5, PT (r= -0.410, p = 0.008), INR (r= -0.471, p = 0.001), urea (r=-0.524, p < 0.001), strong correlation negative in creatinine (r=-0.802, p < 0.001), ALT (r=-0.401, p = 0.006), and AST (r=-0.401, p = 0.011). Moreover, there were statistically significant positive moderate correlation between MXRA5, PC (r = 0.539, p < 0.001), platelets (r = 0.450, p = 0.001), total protein (r = 0.421, p = 0.003), and albumin (r = 0.467, p = 0.001).
There was a statistically significant lower mean difference of pAKT-ELIZA among PE patients (0.29 ± 0.04) compared to controls (0.56 ± 0.14, p < 0.001). Moreover, there was statistically significant positive moderate correlation among patients with PE between pAKT serum level and ANXA4 (r = 0.407, p = 0.004), and MXRA5 (r = 0.430, p = 0.005) (Fig. 1).
Figure (2) shows the ROC curve for ANXA4, MXRA5 and TIMP2 for prediction of pre-eclampsia in comparison to controls. Regarding ANXA4, it has an accuracy of 81.5%, sensitivity 95.8%, specificity 66.7%, positive predictive value 74.2% and negative predictive value 94.1% for prediction of PE (p < 0.001). Regarding MXRA5, it has an accuracy of 94.0% sensitivity 91.7%, specificity 95.8%, positive predictive value 95.7% and negative predictive value 92.0% for prediction of PE (p < 0.001) (Table 8).
Additionally, figure (3) shows the ROC curve of ANXA4, MXRA5 and TIMP2 for prediction of severe PE in comparison to mild PE. ANXA4 had an accuracy of 75.5%, sensitivity 73.3%, specificity 77.8%, positive predictive value 84.6% and negative predictive value 63.9% in prediction of severe PE (p < 0.001). While MXRA5 had an accuracy of 95.5%, sensitivity 96.7%, specificity 94.4%, positive predictive value 96.7% and negative predictive value 94.4% in prediction of severe PE (p < 0.001) (Table 9).