Antithrombotic therapy at discharge and prognosis in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation who underwent PCI: a real-world study

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3803622/v1

Background: This study aimed to describe the status of antithrombotic therapy at discharge and prognosis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods: This was an observational, prospective study. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism or ischemia-driven revascularization. Bleeding events were collected according to the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) criteria.

Results:Between 2017 and 2019, a cohort of 546 patients (mean age 65.78, [SD 8.73], of whom 18.3% were female) with AF and CCS who underwent PCI were evaluated, with a median followed-up time of 36 months (Interquartile range: 22-45). MACE events occurred in 13.0% of the patients, while the TIMI bleeding events were observed in 17.4%. Utilization of oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy increased from 23.2% in 2017 to 51.0% in 2019 (p<0.001).

History of heart failure (HF) (Hazard ratio [HR], 1.744; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.011-3.038) and TAT (HR, 2.708; 95%CI, 1.653-4.436) had independent associations with MACE events. OAC (HR, 10.378; 95%CI, 6.136-17.555) was identified as a risk factor for bleeding events. A higher creatine clearance (HR, 0.986; 95%CI, 0.974-0.997) was associated with a lower incidence of bleeding events.

Conclusions: Antithrombotic therapy has been improved among patients with AF and CCS who underwent PCI these years. History of HF and TAT were independently associated with MACE events. Higher creatine clearance was protective factors of bleeding events, while OAC was a risk factor for TIMI bleeding events.

atrial fibrillation

chronic coronary syndrome

antithrombotic therapy

anticoagulant therapy

A previous study demonstrated that coronary artery disease (CAD) is more prevalent among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), ranging from 15–50% [1]. Chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) is a manifestation of CAD, which may necessitate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to improve anginal symptoms or reduce the risk of subsequent myocardial infarction and death, often occurring concurrently with AF [2, 3]. Regarding AF, anticoagulant therapy crucial for reducing adverse outcome [4]. In terms of CCS post-interventional treatment, antiplatelet therapy, specifically double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) consisting of aspirin and clopidogrel was recommended [5, 6]. Updated guidelines suggest that patients with AF undergoing PCI should receive triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) at discharge based on randomization clinical trials involving patients with CCS and AF undergoing PCI [7]. However, the combination of anticoagulation therapy and antiplatelet therapy as combined antithrombotic therapy increases the risk of bleeding [8]. In the AFIRE trial, anticoagulant monotherapy resulted in 1.62% safety endpoints (major bleeding) compared to 2.76% in the combination therapy group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39 to 0.89; p = 0.01) [9]. The WOEST trial, which involved patients requiring OAC therapy after PCI and provided both double therapy (OAC and clopidogrel) and triple therapy (OAC, clopidogrel and aspirin), revealed that double therapy (19.4%) was associated with a lower incidence of bleeding episodes compared to triple therapy (44.4%, HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.26–0.50, p < 0.000) [10]. In our study, MACE events occurred in TAT and DAT, 20.0% and 12.0%, respectively, with no statistic difference was detected. The higher events rate could be attributed to the status of undertreatment with OAC therapy.

Moreover, Asian patients have been observed to have a higher bleeding risk compared to other races [11, 12]. In the COMPASS analysis, Asians exhibited higher rates of intracranial haemorrhage (0.63% vs. 0.29%, P = 0.01) and minor bleeding (13.61% vs. 6.49%, P < 0.001) [13].

On the contrary, undertreatment with antithrombotic therapy might lead to ischemic stroke and recurrent PCI [14, 15]. Accordingly, finding the balance between stroke prevention and bleeding risk with an appropriate antithrombotic regimen remains a challenge, especially for Asian patients. The AVIATOR 2 prospective registry revealed that TAT was prescribed in 66.5% of patients with AF and PCI, DAPT in 20.7% and dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) in 12.8% [16].Nevertheless, limited data was available in Asian populations. Therefore, our research aimed to describe the current status of antithrombotic therapy at discharge, focusing on Chinese patients with CCS and AF who underwent PCI, and identify underlying predictors affected prognosis.

Study design and Participants

This study was an observational, prospective, single center study of adults with AF and CCS who underwent invasive treatment from 2017 to 2019 in Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, China. Participants aged over 18 with AF and CCS who underwent invasive treatment were able to get eligibility. Patients who died in the hospital, discharged without coronary angiography (CAG) or antiplatelet therapy, or were diagnosed with mid-to-severe mitral stenosis or mechanical valves were excluded. A total of 546 participants were included, all of whom possessed at least one risk factor for stroke, aside from gender, as determined by the CHA2DS2-VASc score. (Fig. 1) The study design and protocol have been approved by the Ethics Committee of Fuwai Hospital (Approved No. 2017 − 923) and conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki. All the patients had signed consent to participate in this study.

Definitions:

AF diagnosis relied on electrocardiography (ECG), Holter monitoring, and clinical symptoms. CCS was characterized by the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) confirmed through CAG and stable anginal symptoms [17]. Patients deemed at high risk of ischemic thromboembolism had a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 1, excluding sex, while a high risk of bleeding was defined as HAS-BLED score ≥ 3 [18]. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as composite endpoint of all-cause death, stroke or transient ischemic attach (TIA) or systemic embolism (SE), myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemic driven revascularization [19]. Bleeding events were recorded following the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) criteria [10]. Definitions of medical history were provided in supplementary material.

Antithrombotic regimens

Antithrombotic regimens were documented at the time of discharge, encompassing both antiplatelet and oral anticoagulant (OAC). The combination of two types of antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulant therapy was referred to as TAT. OAC combined with only one type of antiplatelet therapy was classified as DAT. OAC were further categorized into non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC, e.g. rivaroxaban) and warfarin (vitamin K anticoagulants).

Data collection

Data collection included demographic information, prior comorbidities, and medication usage at discharge. The median follow-up time was 36 months (Interquartile range :22–45). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, stroke or transient ischemic attach or systemic embolism, myocardial infarction and ischemic driven revascularization. Bleeding events were assessed using the TIMI criteria. Risk scores were calculated by their treating physicians and confirmed by computer using medical records. The follow-up outcomes were recorded at 1, 6 and 12 months after index events and then annually until the end of 2021. This information was gathered through telephone calls, re-hospitalization, and outpatient visits facilitated by trained research personnel. During the follow-up period, 30 patients withdrew the consent.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or as median with lower and upper quartiles and tested by using ANOVA test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Wilcoxon Mann Whitney or t test, while categorical variables are presented as counts and percentages and tested with χ2 test. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to appraisal the independent factors which are able to predict the prescription of OAC, with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model was used to adjust confounding factors and found out factors associated with MACE events and TIMI bleeding events. Details of adjusted confounding factors were presented in supplementary table 3 and 4, respectively. The results expressed as a hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% CI. All the analyses were performed using software packages SPSS (version 25.0, IBM Corporation, New York, NY, USA) and GraphPad Prism 9.0. All statistical tests were two-sided and a value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.

From January 2017 to December 2019, 546 patients with CCS and AF who had undergone PCI and were indicated to use OAC based on CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥1, excluding sex, were included in the final analysis. During the follow-up period, 30 patients withdrew their consent. Consequently, the analysis of the prognosis of CCS with AF patients who had undergone PCI comprised 519 patients. The median follow-up time was 36 months (interquartile range:22-45).

Baseline characteristics, organized by the year of enrollment, were presented in Table 1. The average age was 65.83±8.73 and 103 (18.7%) were female. Those enrolled in 2018 exhibited a slightly higher prevalence of hyperlipidemia. However, other demographic information and the history of comorbidities showed no difference among groups.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics according to enrolled years

Variables	2017 (n=210)	2018 (n=181)	2019(n=155)	Total (n=546)	P value^*
Age Female	65.96±9.14 42（20.0%）	65.08±8.67 35（19.3%）	66.37±8.23 23（14.8%）	65.78±8.73 100（18.3%）	0.376 0.411
BMI	25.96±3.55	26.15±3.27a	25.69±3.25	25.94±3.37	0.471
SBP	131.95±16.63	132.64±17.48	134.91±17.34	132.02±17.13	0.247
DBP	78.07±10.94	78.36±12.05	77.64±10.67	78.04±11.23	0.842
LVEF	59.87 ±7.72	58.71±9.24	59.39±7.84	59.35±8.29	0.387
CrCl	81.75 (68.42-95.93)	79.39 (70.61-91.54)	75.26 (64.80-89.02)	79.31 (67.57-92.20)	0.019
HAb1c	6.1 (5.8-7.0) ^b	6.2 (5.9-7.0)	6.3 (5.9-7.1)	6.2 (5.6-7.0)	0.193
Current smoker	54（25.7%）	42（23.2%）	26（16.8%）	122（22.3%）	0.121
HAS-BLED score≥3	64（30.5%）	61（33.7%）	57（36.8%）	182（33.3%）	0.447
CHA2DS2-VASc score	3 (2-4)	3 (2-4)	3 (2-4)	3 (2-4)	0.535
Medical history
MI	44（21.0%）	47（26.0%）	46（29.7%）	137（25.1%）	0.155
PCI	66（31.4%）	48（26.5%）	40（25.8%）	154（28.2%）	0.412
DM	87 (41.4%)	68 (37.6%)	63 (40.6%)	218 (39.9%)	0.771
HT	165 (78.6%)	147 (81.2%)	124 (80.0%)	436 (79.9%)	0.808
HF	33 (15.7%)	23 (12.7%)	30 (19.4%)	86 (15.8%)	0.249
CAD	161（76.7%）	133（73.5%）	106（68.4%）	400（73.3%）	0.209
PAD	32（15.2%）	30（16.6%）	23（14.8%）	85（15.6%）	0.896
CKD	10 (4.8%)	7 (3.9%)	6 (3.9%)	23 (4.2%)	0.880
CABG	11 (5.2%)	7 (3.9%)	12 (7.7%)	30 (5.5%)	0.293
TIA/stroke	52 (24.8%)	44 (24.3%)	39 (25.2%)	135 (24.7%)	0.984
Bleeding	13 (6.2%)	9 (5.0%)	8 (5.2%)	30 (5.5%)	0.850
Hyperlipidemia	156（74.3%）	153（84.5%）	111（71.6%）	420（76.9%）	0.010
Hyperthyroidism	22（10.5%）	14（7.7%）	10（6.5%）	46（8.4%）	0.361
AF type
New-onset AF	10（4.8%）	15（8.3%）	10（6.5%）	35（6.4%）	0.365
PAF	121（57.6%）	101（55.8%）	93（60.0%）	315（57.7%）	0.739
PeAF	79（37.6%）	65（35.9%）	52（33.5%）	196（35.9%）	0.725

a-1 patient missing; b-2 patients missing

Data are presented as number(percentage), mean ± SD or median (interquartile range)

BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; DM, diabetes mellitus; HT, hypertension; HF, heart failure; CAD, stable coronary artery disease; PAD, peripheral arterial disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; TIA, transient ischemic attack; CrCl, creatine clearance; HAb1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; AF, atrial fibrillation; PAF, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; PeAF, persistent atrial fibrillation and permanent atrial fibrillation.

^*p value was based on χ2test, ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test as appropriate.

Status of antithrombotic therapy

The status of antithrombotic therapy according to the years of enrollment were presented in supplementary table 1. The utilization of clopidogrel and ticagrelor remained stable across the years without any significant differences. The prescription of aspirin showed a slight decrease. There was a notable increase in the usage of OAC (p<0.001), primarily attributed to the rising trend of NOAC usage. In contrast, the usage of warfarin showed no significant difference among the groups. DAT showed an increasing trend (p=0.022). Similarly, there was a significant increase in the group recieving TAT (p<0.001).

Figure 2 illustrated a decreasing trend in MACE events, stroke/TIA, MI and SE, while TIMI bleeding events showed an increasing pattern.

Subgroup analysis by antithrombotic therapy and OAC usage

The characteristics of patients according to antithrombotic therapy were presented in Table 3. Patients with lower creatine clearance (CrCl, p=0.046) preferred DAT. Those with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) tended to be prescribed with TAT (p=0.042). Besides, non-OAC therapy was more likely to be utilized in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF, p<0.001) and hyperlipidemia (p<0.001). On the other hand, patients with persist or permanent AF (PeAF, p<0.001), diabetes mellitus (DM, p=0.011) or heart failure (HF, p=0.023) were more likely to be prescribed with OAC. Therefore, higher HAb1c (p=0.016) was also observed in the combination therapy groups. In the comparison between the TAT and non-TAT groups, a higher BMI was associated with TAT therapy.

Details of the proportion of OAC usage in patients prescribed with TAT were shown in Figure 3, with rivaroxaban divided into five parts according to the daily prescription dose. Dabigatran was administered at 220mg daily, and the dose of VKA was tailored for individual patients. Overall, only 46.7% used the standard dose for stroke prevention.

Figure 4 depicted the percentage of events according to antithrombotic therapy during the follow-up period. MACE events showed differences between TAT and antiplatelet therapy. TIMI bleeding events presented differences between combined therapy (antiplatelet therapy plus OAC) and antiplatelet therapy. Similar results were detected in ischemia-driven revascularization.

As demonstrated in the supplementary table, OAC therapy was more likely to be administered to patients with a history of DM (p=0.003), a diagnosis with HF (p=0.006), and less likely in those diagnosed with hyperlipidemia (p<0.001). In addition, patients with PAF (p<0.001) were favored of non-OAC treatment, while patients with peAF (p<0.001) exhibited the opposite preference. Furthermore, peak cardiac troponin I (cTnI, p<0.001) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP, p<0.001) also presented an association with OAC usage.

Subsequently, the multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess independent factors capable of predicting the prescription of OAC therapy (Figure 5). After adjustment for multivariate factors, peak cTnI and NT-proBNP showed no influence on OAC choice. However, patients with a history of DM (OR=2.033; 95%CI, 1.357-3.046), HF (OR=2.177; 95%CI, 1.295-3.659) and HT (OR=2.110; 95%CI, 1.256-3.545) were favored of OAC therapy. Notably, HF emerged as the strongest predictor of OAC prescription. Conversely, hyperlipidemia (OR=0.308; 95%CI, 0.194-0.490) and PAF (OR=0.294; 95%CI, 0.197-0.437) were associated with a preference for non-OAC therapy.

Table 3 Characteristics of patients according to antithrombotic therapy regimen

	Non-TAT (n=381)		TAT (n=165)	P value^#	P value^*
	Antiplatelet (n=356)	DAT (n=25)
Age	65.61±9.15	69.72±7.63	65.56±7.82	0.683	0.069
Female	66（18.5%）	8（32.0%）	26（15.8%）	0.309	0.145
BMI	25.78±3.35	25.12±3.75	26.43±3.33	0.031	0.062
SBP	133.84±17.69	133.88±17.47	131.12±15.73	0.074	0.212
DBP	78.45±11.61	73.44±10.77	77.87±10.32	0.808	0.095
CrCl	80.81 (70.25-93.59）	74.85 (67.59-89.14)	76.03 (65.81-90.74)	0.137	0.046
LVEF	60.02±7.69	59.16±9.31	57.94±9.20	0.029	0.029
HAb1c	6.16(5.80-6.90)	6.20(5.90-7.05)	6.40(5.90-7.40)	0.005	0.016
AF type
New-onset	22 (6.2%)	1 (4.0%)	12 (7.3%)	0.588	0.787
PAF	243 (68.3%)	14 (56.0%)	58 (35.2%)	<0.001	<0.001
PeAF	91（25.6%）	10（40.0%）	95（57.6%）	<0.001	<0.001
Medical history
HT	276 (77.5%)	23 (92.0%)	137 (83.0%)	0.223	0.104
HF	45（12.6%）	5（20.0%）	36（21.8%）	0.010	0.023
DM	126 (35.4%)	11 (44.0%)	81 (49.1%)	0.004	0.011
Hyperlipidemia	298 (83.7%)	16 (64.0%)	106 (64.2%)	<0.001	<0.001
Stroke/TIA	79 (22.2%)	8 (32.0%)	48 (29.1%)	0.120	0.163
Bleeding	20（5.6%）	0（0.0%）	10（6.1%）	0.702	0.457
HAS-BLED score≥3	111 (31.2%)	12 (48.0%)	59 (35.8%)	0.429	0.165

Data are presented as number(percentage), mean ± SD or median (interquartile range)

DAT, double antithrombotic therapy; TAT, triple antithrombotic therapy; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; CrCl, creatine clearance; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; HAb1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; HT, hypertension; HF, heart failure; DM, diabetes mellitus; PAF, paroxysm atrial fibrillation; PeAF includes persist atrial fibrillation and permanent atrial fibrillation; TIA, Transient ischemic attack

^# p value was based on χ2 test, t test and Wilcoxon Mann Whitney as appropriate between non-TAT and TAT.

^* p value was based on χ2 test, ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test as appropriate among antiplatelet, DAT and TAT.

Prognosis of patients with CCS and AF underwent PCI

Regarding the prognosis, we conducted separate analyses for MACE events and TIMI bleeding events, respectively. After adjusting for potentially confounding variables through multivariate Cox regression, a history of HF (HR, 1.744; 95%CI, 1.011-3.038) and TAT (HR, 2.708; 95%CI, 1.653-4.436) showed an independent association with MACE events, as detailed in Table 4.

In terms of bleeding events, there was a decrease in the risk of bleeding with an increase in CrCl (HR, 0.986; 95%CI, 0.974-0.997). On the other hand, OAC therapy (HR, 10.378; 95%CI, 6.136-17.555) emerged as a risk factor for TIMI bleeding events. (Table 4)

Table 4 Predictors with hazard ratio (HR) and 95%CI for MACE events and TIMI bleeding events

Variates	HR	95%CI	P value
MACE events
HF	1.744	1.011-3.038	0.050
TAT	2.708	1.653-4.436	<0.001
TIMI bleeding events
CrCl	0.986	0.974-0.997	0.014
OAC	10.378	6.136-17.555	<0.001

CI, confidential interval; HF, heart failure; TAT, triple antithrombotic therapy

MACE events included all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism or ischemia-driven revascularization.

CrCl, creatine clearance; OAC, oral anticoagulant

TIMI bleeding events included minor, minimal and major TIMI bleeding events based on TIMI criteria.

In the present study, the principal findings could be summarized as followed, a) The utilization of TAT therapy in patients with CCS and AF who underwent PCI had increased over years, as did the use of NOACs. b) Anticoagulant therapy was underutilized in patients with CCS and AF, both in terms of limited usage rates and non-standard dosage. c) Patients with a history of DM, HF and HT were favored of OAC therapy, while patients with hyperlipidemia and PAF preferred non-OAC therapy. d)History of HF and TAT were independently associated with MACE events. Higher CrCl was protective factors for bleeding events, while OAC usage increased the risk of bleeding.

Anticoagulant therapy has been demonstrated to be effective in preventing stroke and SE among AF patients, whereas antiplatelets have proved no such benefits in recent decades [20]. The management of antithrombotic therapy in patients with PCI and AF is a challenging dilemma between bleeding and stroke risk and the choice between antiplatelet and anticoagulant [18, 19, 21]. A Japanese research indicated that the use of direct oral anticoagulants, rising from 15% in 2014 to 100% in 2018, and the utilization of TAT increased from approximately 10% to over 75% in 2018 in patients with AF undergoing PCI [22]. In our study, we observed an increase in the use of TAT as the antithrombotic regimen at the index of discharge from 2017 to 2019. The use of OACs, particularly NOACs, also shown a significant increase over the years. Despite the recommendation to prescribe OAC based on the CHA2DS2-VASc score, a substantial number of patients were not receiving OACs, likely due to concerns about bleeding events in real-world scenarios. Although our study observed an increasing proportion of OAC therapy over the years, only 34.8% received OAC therapy, and 30.2% received TAT among our participants. Additionally, undertreated OAC therapy prescription was also noted in our study. The 2020 ACC Expert Consensus Decision recommended standard doses for rivaroxaban (20mg once daily) or dabigatran (110mg twice daily). Patients with CrCl ≤ 50 mL/min or those using adjunctive P2Y₁₂ inhibitors were deemed suitable for a reduced dose of rivaroxaban (15mg once daily) [23]. In our study, around half of patients prescribed with OAC were undertreated, potentially resulting in less effective prevention of TAT on MACE events. Therefore, there is still a need for improvement in antithrombotic therapy regimens.

A cohort included patients with non-valvular AF and a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2 or more who were not receiving OAC therapy, suggesting evidence on patients of PAF. One of the top 5 reasons for non-OAC therapy in AF was low AF burden [24], aligning with our findings that patients with PAF were less likely to be treated with OAC. However, when CAD is considered as a cardiovascular risk factor in combination with AF, it is believed to lead to a worse prognosis [25]. KP-RHYTHM study investigated the relationship between AF burden and thromboembolism in PAF patients not receiving OAC therapy. This study demonstrated that a greater burden of PAF was associated with a significantly higher rate of thromboembolism [26], emphasizing the importance of OAC usage even in patients with PAF. Hyperlipidemia is commonly viewed as a risk factor for atherosclerosis [27]. Considering the potential for significant cardiovascular outcomes resulting from unstable plaque, practitioners were more inclined to select antiplatelet therapy [28].This inclination may clarify our preference for non-OAC treatment in patients with hyperlipidemia. Furthermore, our limited data could have introduced bias in our evaluation of patients with hyperlipidemia. Nevertheless, hyperlipidemia has been proven to be a risk factor associated with unfavorably altered fibrin clot properties, linked to an increased cardiovascular risk, including stroke [29]. Despite the preference for non-OAC therapy in patients with PAF or hyperlipidemia, those conditions still pose a risk for stroke and should be evaluated carefully. On the contrary, consistent with our study, previous studies have also proved that HF, DM and HT were predictors of ischemic stroke in AF patients [18, 30–32], highlighting the essentiality of OAC usage in such cases.

The predictive model for MACE events in our study comprised a history of HF and TAT. Numerous studies have demonstrated that patients with both HF and AF face an increased risk of adverse events, including MACE events [33] [34]. Our study further confirmed that HF remained a predictor in patients with AF and CCS undergoing PCI, indicating an elevated risk of MACE events. Apart from the undertreatment with OAC, subgroup analysis revealed that patients with lower LVEF, a heavier burden of AF, a history of HF, and DM were more likely to be treated with TAT, potentially leading to poorer prognosis.

An observational study conducted in Taiwan revealed that higher CrCl was associated with a lower trough concentration of OAC [35], contributing to bleeding prevention. Consistent with this perspective, our study also supported the notion that higher CrCl served as a protective factor against bleeding events.

Current clinical analyses involved with both ACS and CCS undergoing PCI [10, 36]. Although current guidelines recommending similar treatment regimens for those patients [7], ACS and CCS represented distinct cardiac risks [17]. To our knowledge, our study was the first to describe the status of antithrombotic therapy specifically focusing on patients with CCS undergoing PCI.

Our real-world analysis revealed that the percentage of OAC usage was still relatively low, highlighting the undertreated status. This issue should be addressed by enhancing awareness among physicians and patients regarding the importance of OAC usage in preventing stroke.

Evidence on antithrombotic therapy and the prognosis of patients with AF undergoing PCI was limited in Asian population. Our study aimed to fill this gap by describing the changes in antithrombotic therapy over the years and identifying predictors affecting prognosis. Additionally, Asian patients with AF are at a high risk of stroke, and our study focused on patients whose CHA2DS2-VASc score was ≥ 1, excluding sex from the risk assessment. We selected patients based on this criterion, divided them according to realistic OAC regimens, and identified underlying factors influencing OAC usage. It's worth noting that current clinical researches enrolled both ACS and CCS patients undergoing PCI with AF, while our research focused on CCS patients undergoing PCI with AF.

However, our study also has some limitations. Data were collected from a single center limiting the generalizability of our findings to the overall population of patients with CCS and AF undergoing PCI in China. Secondly, we didn’t involve patients’ over-time antithrombotic regimens and dynamic CHA2DS2-VASc scores over the follow-up period. Hence, future study should consider these dynamic changes of antithrombotic therapy and explore the possible antithrombotic therapy tailored to Asian patients. Long-term real-world follow-up, including the assessment of over-time antithrombotic therapy, is needed to guide future decision-making.

In line with current guidelines, the percentage of patients using TAT therapy in those with CCS and AF undergoing PCI has increased, so has the usage of NOAC therapy in our study. Patients with a history of DM and HF were favored of OAC therapy, while patients with hyperlipidemia and PAF preferred non-OAC therapy. History of HF and TAT were independently associated with MACE events. Higher CrCl was a protective factor against bleeding events, and OAC therapy increased the risk of bleeding events.

Ethical Approval: The study was approved by the Ethics Board of Fuwai Hospital and obeyed the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent has been acquired from all participants.

Funding: Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials: Not applicable.

Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contribution

Writing - original draft preparation：Yimeng WangData collection：Lulu Wang； Yuyuan ShuWriting - review and editing:：Yanmin Yang；Han Zhang；Jiangshan Tan

Mekhael M, et al. The relationship between atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease: Understanding common denominators. Trends Cardiovasc Med; 2022.
Cartlidge T, et al. Role of percutaneous coronary intervention in the modern-day management of chronic coronary syndrome. Heart. 2023;109(19):1429–35.
Oancea AF et al. Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Coronary Ischemia: A Challenging Vicious Circle. Life (Basel), 2023. 13(6).
Romiti GF, et al. Adherence to the Atrial Fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway and the risk of major outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: A post-hoc analysis from the prospective GLORIA-AF Registry. EClinicalMedicine. 2023;55:101757.
Neumann FJ, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. EuroIntervention. 2019;14(14):1435–534.
Lawton JS, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022;145(3):e4–e17.
Collet JP, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(14):1289–367.
Greco A, et al. Antithrombotic Therapy for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;82(15):1538–57.
Yasuda S, et al. Antithrombotic Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation with Stable Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(12):1103–13.
Dewilde WJ, et al. Use of clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9872):1107–15.
Tse HF, et al. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation–an Asian stroke perspective. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10(7):1082–8.
Hori M, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin: effects on ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes and bleeding in Asians and non-Asians with atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 2013;44(7):1891–6.
Hori M, et al. Rivaroxaban and aspirin vs. aspirin alone in Asian compared with non-Asian patients with chronic coronary artery disease or peripheral arterial disease: the COMPASS trial. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(37):3542–52.
Krittayaphong R, et al. Adherence to Anticoagulant Guideline for Atrial Fibrillation Improves Outcomes in Asian Population: The COOL-AF Registry. Stroke. 2020;51(6):1772–80.
Fanaroff AC, et al. Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease: A Long-Term Perspective on the Need for Combined Antithrombotic Therapy. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(12):e011232.
Chandrasekhar J et al. Antithrombotic strategy variability in atrial fibrillation and obstructive coronary disease revascularised with percutaneous coronary intervention: primary results from the AVIATOR 2 international registry. EuroIntervention, 2022. 18(8): p. e656-e665.
Bax JJ, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(3):407–77.
Chao TF et al. 2021 Focused Update Consensus Guidelines of the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society on Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: Executive Summary. Thromb Haemost, 2022. 122(1): p. 20–47.
Mo R, et al. Implications of bleeding on subsequent cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation after acute coronary syndrome or PCI. Thromb Res. 2023;229:243–51.
Stuart J, Connolly JE, Joyner C, Diener H-C, Hart R, Golitsyn S, Flaker G, Avezum A, Stefan H, Hohnloser R, Diaz M, Talajic J, Zhu S, Lewis W, Van Mieghem, Gregory YH, Lip JH, Kim. Fernando Lanas-Zanetti, Antonio Gonzalez-Hermosillo, Antonio L Dans, Muhammad Munawar, Martin O'Donnell, John Lawrence, Gayle Lewis, Rizwan Afzal, Salim Yusuf; AVERROES Steering Committee and Investigators, Apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation. New England Journal of Medicine, 2011. 364(9): p. 806–817.
Gibson CM, et al. Prevention of Bleeding in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing PCI. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(25):2423–34.
Nakano Y, et al. Temporal Trends in Antithrombotic Therapy for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention From 2014 to 2022 in Japan. Circ Rep. 2023;5(7):282–8.
Kumbhani DJ et al. 2020 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation or Venous Thromboembolism Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2021. 77(5): p. 629–658.
Cannon CP, Lee KJ. JJ, Patients and Their Physician's Perspectives About Oral Anticoagulation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Not Receiving an Anticoagulant. JAMA Netw Open 6(4): p. e239638.
Hindricks G et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J, 2021. 42(5): p. 373–498.
Go AS, et al. Association of Burden of Atrial Fibrillation With Risk of Ischemic Stroke in Adults With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: The KP-RHYTHM Study. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3(7):601–8.
Ridker PM, et al. Inflammation and cholesterol as predictors of cardiovascular events among patients receiving statin therapy: a collaborative analysis of three randomised trials. Lancet. 2023;401(10384):1293–301.
Virani SS et al. 2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation, 2023. 148(9): p. e9-e119.
Zabczyk M, Ariens RAS, Undas A. Fibrin clot properties in cardiovascular disease: from basic mechanisms to clinical practice. Cardiovasc Res. 2023;119(1):94–111.
Chou YL, et al. The association of ischaemic stroke in patients with heart failure without atrial flutter/fibrillation. Heart. 2020;106(8):616–23.
Bassand JP, et al. Oral anticoagulation across diabetic subtypes in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation: A report from the GARFIELD-AF registry. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023;25(10):3040–53.
Mosenzon O, et al. Diabetes and Stroke: What Are the Connections? J Stroke. 2023;25(1):26–38.
Rivera-Caravaca JM, et al. Adverse Clinical Outcomes and Associated Predictors in Rivaroxaban-Treated Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Renal Impairment. Am J Cardiol. 2023;203:122–7.
Lin SM, et al. Risk of heart failure in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation and diabetes taking different oral anticoagulants: a nationwide cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023;22(1):1.
Lin SY, et al. Impact of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Concentration on Clinical Outcomes in Asian Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023;114(1):230–8.
Uwe Zeymer OL, Stefan H, Hohnloser PG, Steg J, Oldgren G, Nickenig RG, Kiss. Zeki Ongen, Jose Navarro Estrada, Ton Oude Ophuis, Gregory Y H Lip, Matias, Dual antithrombotic therapy with dabigatran after PCI in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(5):1513–24.

No competing interests reported.

Supplementarytable.docx

Antithrombotic therapy at discharge and prognosis in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation who underwent PCI: a real-world study

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Methods

Study design and Participants

Definitions:

Antithrombotic regimens

Data collection

Statistical analysis

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Declarations

Author Contribution

References

Additional Declarations

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1