Socio-demographics Characteristics of the Respondents
A total of 205,691 data were collected from the 30 selected facilities from available registry. The detail of information is presented below in Table 1.
Table 1
Total participants visited health facility for VCT as collected from the registration book from 2002–2008 E.C (2010 to 2016 G.C)
Facility Name | Year | Total |
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 |
Asella Hospital | 7624 | 6532 | 4643 | 3527 | 3432 | 3767 | 1411 | 30936 |
Assela HC | 5505 | 6111 | 8261 | 9748 | 8036 | 8410 | 1997 | 48068 |
Abomsa Hospital | | 140 | 802 | 484 | 1070 | 772 | 612 | 3880 |
Shirka HC | - | - | 218 | 1508 | 1176 | 1356 | 1220 | 5478 |
Eteya HC | 1241 | 1008 | 0 | 297 | 463 | 864 | 172 | 4045 |
Bele HC | - | - | 394 | 138 | 145 | 119 | 131 | 927 |
Abajema HC | 4182 | 2151 | 1787 | 482 | 353 | 138 | 100 | 9193 |
Sire HC | 1182 | 763 | 826 | 587 | 734 | 1507 | 287 | 5886 |
Sagure HC | - | - | - | 142 | 861 | 617 | 172 | 1792 |
Abomsa HC | - | - | 668 | 1473 | 86 | 241 | 425 | 2893 |
Diksis HC | 1931 | - | 1774 | 324 | 258 | 312 | 196 | 4795 |
Arboye HC | - | - | 960 | 1394 | 453 | 1410 | 1625 | 5842 |
Bokoji HC | 3884 | 4495 | 2476 | 1048 | 463 | 991 | 960 | 14317 |
Dera HC | 1660 | 1447 | 2702 | 1635 | 2197 | 2881 | 2024 | 14546 |
Bokoji Hospital | | | | | | | 308 | 308 |
Siltana HC | - | - | 399 | 448 | 600 | 1344 | 60 | 2851 |
Robe HC | 81 | - | 2741 | 1618 | 0 | 690 | 157 | 5287 |
Meraro HC | 1591 | 310 | 1833 | 732 | 1246 | 760 | 169 | 6641 |
Robe Hospital | | | 1018 | 926 | 478 | 576 | 258 | 3256 |
Ticho HC | - | - | 644 | 300 | 107 | 170 | 70 | 1291 |
Kersa HC | 1411 | 1580 | 1233 | 831 | 515 | 271 | 433 | 6274 |
Kula HC | 215 | - | - | 660 | 89 | - | - | 964 |
Huruta HC | 360 | 562 | 1278 | 1036 | 816 | 634 | 423 | 5109 |
Ogolcho HC | - | - | - | - | - | 81 | 63 | 144 |
Aseko HC | - | - | 794 | 712 | - | - | - | 1506 |
Gonde HC | - | - | - | 1816 | 1852 | 1788 | 473 | 5929 |
Chancho HC | - | - | - | - | 48 | 67 | 144 | 259 |
Chole HC | 688 | 270 | 834 | 124 | 462 | 212 | 463 | 3053 |
Seru HC | 41 | 947 | 850 | 1309 | 1339 | 561 | 249 | 5296 |
Adele HC | 1243 | - | 325 | 1524 | 1538 | 262 | 32 | 4924 |
Total | 32839 | 26317 | 37460 | 34823 | 28817 | 30801 | 14634 | 205691 |
N.B: shaded part indicates the test not done |
The mean age of the VCT attendants was 26.3 ± 9.9. Majority (57.1%) of the participants found in the group of 35 to 49 years old. Fifty five percent were male participants. Concerning marital status, data was recorded only for 38,390 participants, of these participants, more than half of the participants (54.2%) were single and about 40% of were married. More than three quarters of the participants were orthodox and 3346(22.6%) were Muslims (Table 2).
Table 2
Socio-demographic characteristics of VCT attendants in Arsi Zone from 2008–2008 E.C (2010 to 2016 G.C).
Variable | Frequency | Percentage |
Age | | |
<20 | 53,141 | 25.8 |
20–34 | 117,494 | 57.1 |
35–49 | 26,940 | 13.1 |
50–64 | 6,628 | 3.2 |
>=65 | 1,488 | .7 |
Mean ± SD | 26.3 ± 9.9 | |
Sex | | |
Male | 113034 | 55.0 |
Female | 92657 | 45.0 |
Marital Status | | |
Single | 20, 994 | 54.2 |
Married | 15332 | 39.6 |
Widowed | 341 | 0.9 |
Divorced | 1504 | 3.9 |
Separated | 560 | 1.4 |
Religion | | |
Orthodox | 10073 | 68.0 |
Muslim | 3346 | 22.6 |
Protestant | 1329 | 9.0 |
Other | 69 | 0.5 |
Occupation | | |
Student | 14755 | 43.5 |
Employed | 2263 | 6.7 |
Farmer | 5305 | 15.6 |
Housewife | 3472 | 10.2 |
Merchant | 1467 | 4.3 |
Driver | 466 | 1.4 |
Daily Worker | 2121 | 6.3 |
CSW | 77 | .2 |
Other | 3991 | 11.8 |
Overall Trends of HIV infection in Arsi Zone
As shown in Table 3 below, small numbers (14634) of participants were screened in 2008 and large numbers were screened in 2004 and in 2005.
Table 3
Overall Trends of HIV infection in Arsi Zone from 2002–2008 E.C (2010 to 2016G.C)
| Year- | Total |
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 |
Total tested | 32839 | 26317 | 37460 | 34823 | 28817 | 30801 | 14634 | 205691 |
Male | 18699 | 14097 | 20320 | 18906 | 16066 | 16882 | 8064 | 113034 |
Female | 14140 | 12220 | 17140 | 15917 | 12751 | 13919 | 6570 | 92657 |
Total HIV + | 1109(3.4) | 542(2.1) | 634(1.7) | 622(1.8) | 557(1.9) | 478(1.6) | 358(2.4) | 4300(2.1) |
The prevalence of HIV was high (3.4%) in 2002, mean while a gradual drop has been observed in the next five consecutive years, almost which was less than 2% prevalence and in 2008 the prevalence was raised to 2.4% compared to 2007 and before.
As depicted in the Fig. 1 above, the proportion of the overall trends of HIV showed that a moderate declining from 2002 to 2004 and was almost similar fashion in the next three consecutive years until 2006 and somewhat decreased in 2007 and raised in 2008.Overall, the incidence the infection is constant as observed in the figure.
Trend of HIV/AIDs among by sex
There was consistent discrepancy of trend of HIV infection with regard to sex. In general, the magnitude of the HIV infection was higher among females, which was more than 2% as the trend reflects (i.e. in 2002 (4.5%), in 2003(2.6), in 2004(2.1%)) as displayed in Table 4 and in Fig. 2 below.
Table 4
Trends of HIV infection in Arsi Zone from 2002–2008 E.C ( 2010 to 2016 G.C)by sex
| Year | Total |
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 |
Total HIV + | 1109(3.4) | 542(2.1) | 634(1.7) | 622(1.8) | 557(1.9) | 478(1.6) | 358(2.4) | 4300(2.1) |
Sex | | | | | | | | |
Male | 477(2.6) | 225(1.6) | 266(1.3) | 237(1.3) | 240(1.5) | 190(1.1) | 168(2.1) | 1803(1.6) |
Female | 632(4.5) | 317(2.6) | 368(2.1) | 385(2.4) | 317(2.5) | 288(2.1) | 190(2.9) | 2497(2.7) |
Trends of HIV/AIDS prevalence in relation to Age
Comparing the trends of HIV infection by considering age, it shows inconstant prevalence of HIV infection. It dint show constantly decreasing for example for age group 35–49, the prevalence was in 2002 and decreased to 5.4% in 2003, 3.8% in 2004 and slightly increased by 0.2% from immediate previous years and decreased by 0.4 in the next two years in 2006 and 2007 struck by 1.6% in 2008. But in the age group of 20–34, the prevalence was 3.6% in 2002 and decreased to 2.3% in 2003 it was dropped by half in 2004 and static magnitude was observed for three years which was 1.6%. It is also substantial proportion of age above 64 were affected by the epidemic in the last seven years (Table 5).
Table 5
Trends of HIV infection in Arsi Zone from 2002-2008E.C (2010 to 2016 G.C) by Age
| Year | Total |
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 |
Total HIV + | 1109(3.4) | 542(2.1) | 634(1.7) | 622(1.8) | 557(1.9) | 478(1.6) | 358(2.4) | 4300(2.1) |
Age group | | | | | | | | |
< 20 | 179(1.7) | 79(0.8) | 58(0.6) | 73(0.9) | 72(1.2) | 47(0.8) | 51(1.9) | |
20–34 | 604(3.6) | 295(2.3) | 349(1.6) | 322(1.60 | 286(1.60 | 244(1.3 | 162(1.8) | |
35–49 | 240(6.3) | 136(5.4) | 178(3.8) | 186(4.0) | 157(3.6) | 148(3.2) | 116(4.8) | |
50–64 | 69(5.6) | 25(3.00 | 42(3.7) | 37(3.5) | 31(3.6) | 35(3.5) | 21(4.1) | |
>=65 | 17(5.8) | 7(4.7) | 7(2.7) | 4(2.0) | 11(4.6) | 4(2.0) | 8(6.1) | |
Figure 3 shows the pattern of HIV occurrence among VCT attendants in relation to age. The patterns in HIV incidence in various age-groups were not well defined, which showed a decreasing a among young ages until 2007 and raised in 2008 and among older group the incidence as general high and showed a mixture of peak and down at different years but in all peaked in 2008.
Association of HIV infection with Socio-demographic factors
Socio-demographic characteristics like marital status, sex, occupation and age were included in bivariate and multiple logistic regressions to see the association with HIV/AIDS infection. All these characteristics showed that significantly associated with HIV infection in the bivariate analysis, meanwhile to control confounding effect all these variables were entered together in the multiple logistic regression they were also significantly associated.
With regard to gender relation with HIV infection, in this report females were more likely to be HIV positive than male (AOR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.24,1.64). When we see marital status as independent factor, the risk of HIV infection was higher among formerly married (widowed/divorced/separated) (AOR = 2.43, 95%CI = 1.99, 2.98) compared to single. Though the strength of association is moderate, the likelihood of HIV positive was 1.43 times more likely among currently married and in union compared to unmarried ones (AOR = 1.43, 95%CI = 1.21, 1.70).
Occupation showed that an association with the HIV positivity. A significantly strong association of HIV positive was observed among commercial sex workers. The odds of acquiring HIV infection was more than 3 times more likely among commercial sex workers (AOR = 3.30, 95%CI = 1.52, 7.16). There was also significantly association with daily workers and house wife; the risk of infection was two times higher among daily workers (AOR = 1.95, 95%CI = 1.52, 2.50) and 1.6 times higher among housewife (AOR = 1.62, 95%CI = 1.28,2.05).
The odds of being infected by HIV/AIDS infection was higher among older people compared to younger age group. Participants found in age above 35 were more than 3 times more likely to get HIV/AIDS compared to younger age group, the AOR with 95% is as following (age 35–49, AOR = 3.17, 95%CI = 2.49,4.02); age 50–64,AOR = 3.35, 95%CI = 2.43,4.63); age > = 65,AOR = 3.20, 95%CI = 1.78,5.77)(Table 6).
Table 6
Association of HIV infection with some of Socio-demographic characteristics at Arsi Zone
Characteristics | HIV test Result | Odds Ratio |
Negative | Positive | COR95%CI | AOR95%CI |
Marital Status | | | | |
Single | 20575(98.0%) | 419(2.0%) | 1 | 1 |
Married | 14755(96.2%) | 577(3.8%) | 1.92(1.70,2.20) | 1.43(1.21,1.70) |
Widowed/divorced /separate | 2178(90.6) | 227(9.4) | 5.12(4.33,6.05) | 2.43(1.99,2.98) |
Sex | | | | |
Male | 111231(98.4) | 1803(1.6) | 1 | |
Female | 90160(97.3) | 2497(2.7) | 1.71(1.61,1.82) | 1.42(1.24,1.64) |
Occupation | | | | |
Student | 14471(98.1) | 284(1.9) | 0.53(0.43,0.65) | 0.90(0.71,1.14) |
Employed | 2168(95.8) | 95(4.2) | 1.18(0.91,1.54) | 1.18(0.89,1.56) |
Farmer | 5083(95.8) | 222(4.2) | 1.18(0.95,1.46) | 1.08(0.86,1.36) |
Housewife | 3181(91.6) | 291(8.4) | 2.46(2.00,3.02) | 1.62(1.28,2.05) |
Merchant | 1403(95.6) | 64(4.4) | 1.23(0.91,1.66) | 1.04(0.75,1.44) |
Driver | 451(96.8) | 15(3.2) | 0.90(0.52,1.54) | 1.17(0.66,2.06) |
Daily Worker | 1979(93.3) | 142(6.7) | 1.93(1.52,2.45) | 1.95(1.52, 2.50) |
CSW | 69(89.6) | 8(10.4) | 3.12(1.47,6.61) | 3.30(1.52,7.16) |
Other | 3848(96.4) | 143(3.6) | 1 | 1 |
Age Group | | | | |
<20 | 52582(98.9) | 559(1.1) | 1 | 1 |
20–34 | 115232(98.1) | 2262(1.9) | 1.85(1.68,2.03) | 1.52(1.25,1.84) |
35–49 | 25779(95.1) | 1161(4.3) | 4.24(3.84,4.69) | 3.17(2.49,4.02) |
50–64 | 6368(96.1) | 260(3.9) | 3.84(3.31,4.46) | 3.35(2.43,4.63) |
>64 | 1430(96.1) | 58(3.9) | 3.82(2.90,5.03) | 3.20(1.78,5.77) |
Facility (district) disparity of HIV infection in Arsi zone
Logistic regression was performed to see facility (district) disparity of the prevalence of HIV infection taking Adele health center as reference. As displayed in table – below high prevalence was observed at the following facilities; Robe hospital(P-value = 0.0001, OR = 10.55,95%CI = 3.70.2,15.85), Abomsa Hospital(p-value = 0.0001, OR = 7.24,95%CI = 4.80, 10.94), Assela Hospital(P-value < 0.0001, OR = 8.85,95%CI = 6.04,12.96), Bokoji Hospital (P-value = 0.0001, OR = 7.99, 95%CI = 4.08, 15.65), Bele health center(P-value = 0.0001,OR = 8.39, 95%CI = 5.14,13.71), Ogolcho Health center((P-value = 0.0001, OR = 6.52,95%CI = 2.48,17.19), Eteya Health center(P-value = 0.0001, OR = 5.74,95%CI = 3.78,8.72), Dera Health center (P-value = 0.0001, OR = 4.47, 95%CI = 3.02,6.62), Huruta Health center(P-value = 0.0001, OR = 4.18,95%CI = 2.74,6.36), Bokoji Health Center(P-value = 0.0001, OR = 3.63,95%CI = 2.44,5.40), Kersa health center(P-value = 0.0001, OR = 5.14,95%CI = 3.42,7.73), Robe Health center(P-value = 0.0001, OR = 3.26, 95%CI = 2.26,5.31), Aseko Health center(P-value = 0.0001, OR = 3.31, 95%CI = 1.94,5.66),Assela Health center(P-value < 0.0001, OR = 3.18, 95%CI = 2.16,4.66).
No significant difference was observed like Shirka Health Center, Abajema Health center, Meraro Health Center, Kula Health center, Gonde Health Center, Chanco Health Center and Cholle Health Center(Table 7).
Table 7
The proportion of HIV infection among VCT attendants at specific facilities from 2002–2008 E.C (2010 to 2016 G.C) .
Facility Name | HIV Test Result | P-value | Odds ratio | 95%CI |
Negative | Positive | Lower | Upper |
Asella Hospital | 29497(95.3) | 1439(4.7) | .0001 | 8.85 | 6.04 | 12.96 |
Assela HC | 47241(98.3) | 827(1.7) | .0001 | 3.18 | 2.16 | 4.66 |
Abomsa Hospital | 3731(96.2) | 149(3.8) | .0001 | 7.24 | 4.80 | 10.94 |
Shirka HC | 5457(99.6) | 21(0.4) | .218 | .70 | .39 | 1.24 |
Eteya HC | 3921(96.9) | 124(3.1) | .0001 | 5.74 | 3.78 | 8.72 |
Bele HC | 886(95.6) | 41(4.4) | .0001 | 8.39 | 5.14 | 13.71 |
Abajema HC | 9139(99.4) | 54(0.6) | .770 | 1.07 | .67 | 1.70 |
Sire HC | 5826(99.0) | 60(1.0) | .007 | 1.87 | 1.18 | 2.95 |
Sagure HC | 1771(98.8) | 21(1.2) | .009 | 2.15 | 1.21 | 3.81 |
Abomsa HC | 2857(98.8) | 36(1.2) | .001 | 2.29 | 1.39 | 3.77 |
Diksis HC | 4720(98.4) | 75(1.6) | .0001 | 2.88 | 1.85 | 4.48 |
Arboye HC | 5821(99.6) | 21(0.4) | .146 | .65 | .37 | 1.16 |
Bokoji HC | 14036(98.0) | 281(2.0) | .0001 | 3.63 | 2.44 | 5.40 |
Dera HC | 14196(97.6) | 350(2.4) | .0001 | 4.47 | 3.02 | 6.62 |
Bokoji Hospital | 295(95.8) | 13(4.2) | .0001 | 7.99 | 4.08 | 15.65 |
Siltana HC | 2820(98.9) | 31(1.1) | .009 | 1.99 | 1.19 | 3.35 |
Robe HC | 5188(98.1) | 99(1.9) | .0001 | 3.46 | 2.26 | 5.31 |
Meraro HC | 6600(99.4) | 41(0.6) | .631 | 1.13 | .69 | 1.83 |
Robe Hospital | 3077(94.5) | 179(5.5) | .0001 | 10.55 | 7.02 | 15.85 |
Ticho HC | 1274(98.7) | 17(1.3) | .005 | 2.42 | 1.32 | 4.45 |
Kersa HC | 6101(97.2) | 173(2.8) | .0001 | 5.14 | 3.42 | 7.73 |
Kula HC | 955(99.1) | 9(0.9) | .165 | 1.71 | .80 | 3.65 |
Huruta HC | 4994(97.7) | 115(2.3) | .0001 | 4.18 | 2.74 | 6.36 |
Ogolcho HC | 139(96.5) | 5(3.5) | .0001 | 6.52 | 2.48 | 17.19 |
Aseko HC | 1479(98.2) | 27(1.8) | .0001 | 3.31 | 1.94 | 5.66 |
Gonde HC | 5902(99.5) | 28(0.5) | .578 | .86 | .51 | 1.46 |
Chancho HC | 255(98.5) | 4(1.5) | .053 | 2.85 | .99 | 8.19 |
Chole HC | 3035(99.4) | 18(0.6) | .811 | 1.08 | .59 | 1.96 |
Seru HC | 5281(99.7) | 15(0.3) | .040 | .52 | .27 | .97 |
Adele HC | 4897(99.5) | 27(0.5) | 000 | 1(constant) |
Trends of HIV infection by specific Health facility (Area).
Under this section, Analysis was performed to see trends of HIV infection at specific health facilities. We tried to categorized health centers with good record keeping and weak registration system (unviability of full registration book for some years).
Facilities having data(Good data handling system) from 2002 to 2008 E.C (2010–2016 G.C)
Assela Referal and Teaching Hospital, Assela Health Center, Dera Health Center, Kersa Health center, Sire Health Center, Abomsa Hospital, Robe Hospital, Seru Health Center, Chole Health Center, Bokoji Health Center, Huruta Health Center, Abomsa Hospital, Abajema Health Center, Meraro Health Center, Gonde Health Center, Bokoji Hospital. As displayed in the graphs in the majority of health facilities the incidence of HIV infection showed an increasing, except in few health facilities like Seru Health Center and Gonde Health Center where it reflected decreasing ,and in the other facilities it indicated variable incidences, it peaks in some year and fall in the other years. Badly the incidence of the disease is increasing at facilities like Robe Hospital, Abomsa Hospital, Huruta Health Center and Kersa Health Center. More than 3% of prevalence is observed in Assela Referral and Teaching Hospital, Robe Hospital, Abomsa Hospital and Kersa Health Center. In opposite of these facilities, low incidence, which was almost a constant 0.6% was observed at Abajema Health center(Guna Woreda).
(Detailed trend for each facility is presented under supplementary document)
Facilities with poor data handling system
More than 50% of the sampled health facilities have some problem of handling the recoded data properly. Especially from the following Health Facilities, Ogolcho Health Center from Ziway dugda wored, Kula Health center from Sude Woreda, Chancho Health center from Gololcha Health Center, Aseko Health Center from Aseko Woreda have less three years data during the assessment. Health centers like Hamda Diksis, Adele Health center and Eteya health Center have no data for one year. Other health centers such as; Robe Health center, Bele Health center, Shirka Health center, Siltana Health Center, Sagure Health center, Ticho Health Center, Arboye Health center and Abomsa Health center have no data from 2 to 3 years.
High prevalence of the infection was seen at Eteya, Robe and Bele Health centers which was more 2% and in majority of facilities the epidemic curve showed a steady increasing, but in contrast of this at Sagure Health center, the incidence of HIV infection is decreasing. For detail, the information for each health facility is presented as follow separately in tables to show the magnitude of problem (under supplementary information).