We examined the trends in physical fitness of children in Slovenia across more than 3 decades of systematic surveillance and found that weight-based disparities in physical fitness have mostly increased, even though the difference in body composition has decreased. The increase in disparities was generally larger in boys than in girls, and older age groups compared to the youngest children. The pattern of change in weight-based disparities was dependent on the fitness component, but most of the increase in disparities in health-related fitness accumulated during the 2010s, while the 1990s were predominantly responsible for the increase in disparities for skill-related fitness. During these periods fitness improved much less, or not at all, in children living with excess weight. Finally, we found that weight-based disparities in muscular and skill-related fitness were more pronounced in the least developed region, while the opposite was true for CRF.
Fitness trends over the last 3 decades reported here are in line with trends on the both global and European levels noted in several recent systematic reviews.22–24 Similar to what we found, global trends also emphasized indications of reversal of the decline in fitness, especially in more recent studies. Our findings align with previous studies that have indicated a worsening trajectory in body composition and with the generally reported stable trends in CRF as of recently.22–24,56 This stability in the CRF trends is in line with the findings from several other studies published after the systematic reviews were conducted27,36,57 and specifically with several studies also based on Slovenian children.43,58 Irrespective of weight status, several recent systematic reviews provided an update on general trends in relative muscle strength and handgrip strength and showed a general increasing trend,23,59 either small negative quadratic trend or stability in muscle power proxies and for speed a small-to-medium increase in recent years no differences between sexes.23,27,59 Some more recent individual studies showed declines such as the study among Brazilian youth in almost all tests related to MF37 and adolescents from the United Kingdom.30 We found an interesting trend in body core strength (i.e., the number of sit-ups in 60s) which increased on average, certainly presenting a challenge in terms of explaining the background of these findings. It seems that the trends in body core strength in the majority of the published studies are showing improvements,24,27,36,60 while several other Slovenian studies showed similar results.43,46,61 On the other hand, the strength of the arms and shoulder belt as measured by a variety of tests and over several continents and countries, showed declining trends which is in line with the results of our study.22–24 The same trend was also seen in other studies on Slovenian children43,46 even though for the post-2010 period most age groups in Slovenia improved in terms of upper body strength. In terms of lower body power, our research aligns with the majority of previous studies.22,24 At the same time, global trends in speed were less uniform with several large systematic reviews showing a recent improvement22–24 which is further supported by other studies that were published after the systematic review.27,36,43,45
We observed growing disparities in fitness between children with excess weight and their peers with normal weight over the last 3 decades. Available data from previous studies also point to a growing divide between the fit and the unfit children as well as between those with normal weight and those with excess weight.26–28,30 We have shown that in the face of the widening disparities in BMI, trends in TSF responded contrastingly, highlighting the fact that children with normal weight are going through a worse period, characterized by a negative body recomposition. Notably, there is limited data available regarding fitness trends among children with excess weight, making it challenging to thoroughly examine the evolution of weight-based disparities over an extended period. Some studies from other countries reported similar results in terms of BMI,27,28,37 but Nebiker et al.28 found that the trends may depend on the baseline fitness level and anthropometric characteristics. Existing evidence points towards larger decrements in health-related fitness components, particularly CRF, among children and adolescents with excess weight compared to those with normal weight.26,31–35 However, certain studies report conflicting results, indicating the need for further investigation and systematic data collection in this area. In a study from Switzerland, children with overweight improved slightly by 0.4% each year while a < 0.1% per year decline was identified for children with normal weight, overall showing that trends in CRF tended to diverge related to weight status.28 Another study showed worse results for children with normal weight also based on the 20-m shuttle run, but on only 2651 adolescents aged 13–14 years measured yearly from 2014 to 2019.30 Worryingly, due to the noted negative trends in several fitness components, it is argued in the literature that the recent decrease in the prevalence of children with overweight might be more because of lean mass loss rather than fat mass.43 The coincident decline in fitness performance and rise in BMI, a consideration of mechanisms, correlational data and temporal trends suggest a causal connection between the two.34 Physical activity, specifically exposure to high-intensity exercise may also be important as well as probably complex interactions among biological maturation, secular change in body size and shape and psychosocial factors.34 Tying the findings and relating them to body composition, it could be hypothesized that children with normal weight in this study tended to collect more body fat on the extremities, shown by the uptick in median TSF values, while also improving in terms of body core strength. This could prove more beneficial in terms of health since it is shown that measures of central adiposity are positively and significantly associated with a higher all-cause mortality risk.62 It would certainly be interesting to connect these findings to those based on the rest of MF components, where upper and lower body strength generally decreased in all children but was more pronounced in those with excess weight and especially in boys. Slight decreases in BMI in children with normal weight and no changes in children with excess weight during the 2010s might explain the growing disparities in terms of upper body strength. This is relevant since children with normal weight might not necessarily be better off in terms of absolute strength but solely regarding relative strength being supported by lower BMI values. Even though we noted initially large weight-based disparities for gross-motor coordination and speed, but not for neuromuscular coordination, these disparities only enlarged over time for all skill-related fitness components in all age and sex groups. This increase in the gap between weight groups was the largest for speed, especially among boys. That could be because although over the whole study period, children in all age, sex and weight groups improved their gross-motor and neuromuscular coordination, only children with normal weight improved globally in terms of speed. On the other hand, the increase in disparities for gross motor coordination and neuromuscular coordination also were not trivial over 30 years.
Our investigation into the fitness trends of various age and sex groups revealed a complex scenario, with notable disparities across different fitness components. While the literature suggests a declining trend in overall physical fitness, specific dimensions such as strength, flexibility, and speed showcase varied trajectories, with reports of both increase and stagnation across different age and sex groups in different studies.22–24 Similar to our results, gender and age-specific differences in these trends appear to be relatively small. The sex and age-related differences in trends that we acknowledged are also in line with findings from previous studies conducted in Slovenia.43,46,61 This could be explained by results from previous studies which indicate that age-related changes in body composition during childhood may be associated with the stage of maturation while there are sex differences in the timing and magnitude of these changes. In terms of CRF, a recent systematic review reported larger declines for boys although it was not as pronounced in our study.23 Sex differences were also found for upper body strength which has increased more among girls while for lower body strength the gap between weight groups increased much more for boys than for girls. However, in terms of upper and lower body strength, we have also found some positive trends in specific age groups and time periods, which is consistent with a small number of previous studies.63
Related to the patterns of trends over the last 3 decades, our study revealed that there was an initial increase in BMI during the 1990s and 2000s, followed by a decrease in the 2010s among normal-weight children. CRF initially decreased, stabilized, and then improved after 2010, predominantly in normal-weight children, widening the gap between weight groups. Skill-related fitness showed initial improvements, intermittent declines, and subsequent improvements, with disparities emerging in the early 1990s and remaining stable or slightly decreasing by 2019. Particularly, a systematic review by Fuhner et al.23 highlighted a significant increase and subsequent decrease in CRF from 1986 to 2010s, followed by a stabilization period for all children until 2015. This decline was more pronounced for boys than for girls, emphasizing the gender-specific nuances in these trends. Increasing trends of subcutaneous fat and deterioration of most fitness components in the late 1990s and 2000s correspond to the escalation of the ‘Western’ style, nutrient dense food, and inflation of screen-pressure environment with high access to rich cable TV programming and internet. Slovenia declared its independence in June 1991 after a long process of working towards economic and political independence. The country had to restructure its economy and trade relationships to integrate with Western Europe after breaking away from its former partners in the Balkans and Eastern Europe. Slovenia was successful in achieving economic recovery and has become an integrated part of the Western European market.64 After the transition period that Slovenia was experiencing the trends were in part reversed in the 2010s with an effective school-based national physical activity programme “Healthy Lifestyle”,65 and an aggressive media campaign about proper diet and media consumption. Therefore, as Slovenia has been facing negative lifestyle changes in recent decades, it seems that implementing several nationwide initiatives and curriculum updates, especially within the educational system, could have led to the improvements in fitness witnessed during the 2010s in this study and earlier studies from Slovenia.43,61 Still, this study showed that the benefits of these policies have not been equally evident in children with excess weight, especially for CRF, upper body strength, and speed. This urges for modified physical activity policies that should be designed in a way to decrease inequalities in fitness.
Recent studies that have primarily focused on children and adolescents from high-income countries, emphasized the need for a broader global perspective to comprehensively understand the dynamics of fitness trends among diverse populations.27,28,30,36,37 It is generally reported that children and adolescents from high SES families tend to have higher mean fitness values and are less likely to have poor fitness.66 Furthermore, individuals with lower SES tended to have reduced motivation to engage in healthy behaviours and a higher likelihood of experiencing negative health outcomes related to metabolic and cardiovascular disease risk factors when compared to those with higher SES.66 To that end, we have seen that more developed regions had better health-related physical fitness outcomes, although children from the least developed region generally performed better in muscular fitness and skill-related fitness. Since the fitness level of children seems to be determined partly by SES, it is important to note that inequalities of income in Slovenia, assessed by the Gini index, have been decreasing during the study period.67 This probably resulted in similar trends of fitness changes between the most and the least socioeconomic developed regions. Still, for at least some of the age and sex groups, we have found that weight-based disparities in most fitness components increased more in the less developed region. According to a recent global study, the benefits of living in cities for growth and development have decreased in the 21st century in many parts of the world.5 The countries that showed significant convergence over the last three decades were primarily in Central and Eastern Europe, such as Slovenia or Croatia. These findings underscore the need for policies that strive to reduce socioeconomic inequalities and point to a need for a stronger focus of physical activity programmes on least developed regions. Still, given all the limitations of SES-based analyses in our study, further work that will include SES indicators at the individual level is needed to obtain more robust estimates of the effect of SES on trends in weight-based disparities in children’s physical fitness.
It is important to highlight that skill-related fitness components are generally under investigated, even though they have been shown to promote physical activity participation in children.68 It would also be advisable to focus more on these components of fitness as they improve health-related physical fitness, which is often studied in isolation.45 We reported on overall positive trends in skill-related fitness which are supported by several recent studies among Slovenian children and adolescents.43,45,46 Some studies have shown that having high levels of CRF is linked to lower levels of body fat and better overall health while both CRF and MF have been associated with established and emerging cardiovascular disease risk factors, bone health, depression, anxiety, mood status, and self-esteem, overall mental health, and also with a higher academic performance during school years.6 Furthermore, motor competence development is crucial for children's overall well-being. Substantial evidence shows that it's linked to healthy weight, self-esteem, physical fitness, and cognitive development.69 Early childhood is therefore a critical time to develop fundamental movement skills that promote an active lifestyle and good health habits for life.69 It was demonstrated that exercise and physical activity interventions can assist children with excess weight to enhance their motor competence compared to those with normal weight.70 This is important because our and some previous studies provide evidence for an increasingly widening gap between children differing by weight status in terms of skill-related fitness and motor competence across developmental time in the absence of targeted initiatives.71 Hence, it is important to focus on children with excess weight, particularly those who are not part of a sports club, to improve their motor skills and encourage regular physical activity.71
For childhood physical activity, fitness and health promotion, schools were shown as an important setting as the sole place that can reach all children regardless of their characteristics.65,72 Obesity and physical fitness management at a younger age may also have a greater effect for several reasons such as easier motivation generation and maintenance, less resistance to treatment stigmatization, easier control and modification of behaviour as well as implementation of possible innovative strategies.30,73,74 As an example of these newer strategies, involving communication through the Internet, better involvement of adolescents in their own management programmes and peer support strategies, could all be explored. Encouraging participation in a range of sports, specifically participating more regularly in enjoyable activities during the week, persisting for longer than three years and, experiencing higher levels of sports practice and/or competition could also be viable interventions to ensure the stability and improvement in physical fitness of children and young people.2,75–78 Parental modelling is another successful intervention strategy that could be relevant for children's physical activity.79,80 Given divergent trajectories of fat mass accrual and different levels of movement behaviours between boys and girls, physical activity interventions may further benefit from a sex based approach.81 Embracing a bottom-up approach and introducing policies which involve schools, consider differences between SES areas, encourage physical activity, engage the whole family, encourage sports participation, cut down sedentary time, and fight excess weight could all be successful in reducing weight-based disparities in physical fitness.65,75–77,79,80,82
We would like to note several strengths of our study. Firstly, through SLOfit, fitness was systematically assessed yearly over more than 3 decades by trained personnel, i.e., physical education teachers, while data were checked and cleaned at several time points providing trust in the collected data and adding to the robustness of the conclusions. Furthermore, this enabled a near-census sample of more than 135,000 individuals per year from all regions of Slovenia. Thirdly, along with examining children of different ages and sex, we also considered different weight status groups and explored trends across communities characterised by different level of economic development, features that were previously rarely studied.
Our study was not without limitations, and firstly, we considered but were not able to gather information on various other factors that might have influenced disparities in physical fitness based on weight, such as changes in physical activity, diet, sleep, or sedentary behaviour. Second, we didn’t manage to fully examine the individual's pubertal status and maturation tempo which could have had an impact on the outcomes. Irrespectively, we assessed 7–9-year-olds in our study where pubertal status shouldn’t have impacted the results, lessening the impact of this limitation. Third, we examined trends in average fitness across groups, and did not attempt to quantify trends in the variability of physical fitness which could provide additional insights into the inequalities between the fit and unfit children. Future research should at least include some measure of asymmetry (such as skewness) or variability (such as standard deviations). Fourth, we relied on normative standards and not raw values to estimate the disparities to be able to compare the magnitude of disparities between age and sex groups, making it difficult to judge the clinical relevance of our findings. Fifth, in the analyses considering SES, we included only the regions with the highest and lowest developmental index while excluding most of the population. We considered only two regions because the heterogeneity of the developmental index was very low, and only these two regions stood out at each end, thereby increasing the resolution, and making it possible to examine how trends in weight-based disparities in fitness differed with respect to SES. This also means that we only used a measure of area-based SES, while we had no individual level or municipality level data on SES. Sixth, we choose to restrict the analyses to the period until 2019, the year when in December an outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic started and caused unprecedented and abrupt changes in children’s fitness levels. Therefore, this study ignores trends after 2019 although presently those results could be of particular importance. Still, as this was a period of abrupt changes in fitness that would distort segmental analysis, we reported these trends in a recent analysis83 and felt it would be inappropriate to include it here. Finally, in terms of comparability of our results with other studies, it is important to note that differences in trends between children included in studies conducted in Slovenia and those from other studies might be related to the specifics of the tests used, which varied between countries and were not always consistent between boys and girls.24