Table 1 presents the results on demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of surveyed adolescents in Ebonyi state. From 1045 usable questionnaires, 50.7% adolescents reside in urban areas of Ebonyi state whereas 49.3% reside in rural areas. Surveyed adolescents comprised 57.2% females and 42.8% males. At the time of the survey most adolescents 92.4% were currently in school, only 7.6% where out of school adolescents. With respect to employment status, out of 502 who reported that they had ever worked for pay, 52.5% were currently employed while 47.5% were not employed.
Table 1: Demographic and Socioeconomic characteristics of respondents surveyed in Ebonyi state
Variables
|
N
|
Frequency
|
Weighted percent
|
Place of residence
|
|
|
|
- Urban
|
1045
|
551
|
50.7
|
- Rural
|
1045
|
494
|
49.3
|
Gender
|
|
|
|
- Female
|
1045
|
598
|
57.2
|
- Male
|
1045
|
447
|
42.8
|
Schooling
|
|
|
|
- In-school
|
1045
|
966
|
92.4
|
- Out-of-school
|
1045
|
79
|
7.6
|
Employment
|
|
|
|
- Employed
|
502
|
262
|
52.5
|
- Unemployed
|
502
|
240
|
47.5
|
Wealth index
|
|
|
|
- Q1 (poorest)
|
1045
|
224
|
21.9
|
- Q2
|
1045
|
211
|
20.6
|
- Q3
|
1045
|
214
|
20.1
|
- Q4
|
1045
|
198
|
18.8
|
- Q5 (richest)
|
1045
|
197
|
18.6
|
Table 2 summarizes results of adolescents’ utilization of health facility for SRH information and other services in Ebonyi state. It was revealed that among 1045 surveyed adolescents, only 9.8% had ever visited a health facility for SRH information whereas 90.2% never visited a health facility for SRH information. Amongst those who had ever visited health facility, majority 33.5% visited Patent Medicine Vendor (PMV) shops. Also, among 1045 surveyed adolescents, only 2.8% of them reported that they have ever visited a health facility for other SRH services.
Table 2: Utilization of Health Facility for SRH information and other SRH services among respondents in Ebonyi State
Variables (N=1045)
|
N
|
Frequency
|
Weighted percent
|
Visit to health facility for SRH information
|
1045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Ever visited health facility for SRH information
|
|
105
|
9.8
|
- Never visited health facility for SRH information
|
|
940
|
90.2
|
|
|
|
|
*Type of facility visited for SRH information
|
105
|
|
|
- Patent medicine vendor shop
|
|
36
|
33.5
|
- Primary health centre
|
|
29
|
29.1
|
- General hospital
|
|
15
|
13.6
|
- Teaching hospital/Mission/Private hospitals
|
|
8
|
7.6
|
- Youth friendly centre
|
|
5
|
4.3
|
- Others (school clinic, outreach tent)
|
|
12
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
|
Visit to health facility for other SRH services
|
1045
|
|
|
- Ever visited health facility for other SRH services
|
|
29
|
2.8
|
- Never visited health facility for other SRH services
|
|
1015
|
97.1
|
- Refused to say
|
|
1
|
0.1
|
*Type of facility visited for SRH services
|
29
|
|
|
- Chemist or patent medicine vendor
|
|
16
|
55.6
|
- Primary health centre
|
|
6
|
20.7
|
- General hospital
|
|
3
|
10.2
|
- Mission/ Private Hospital
|
|
3
|
10.5
|
- Youth friendly centre
|
|
1
|
3.0
|
*Multiple response allowed
The results of demographic and SES correlates of health facility visit for SRH information and other services is shown in table 3. There are statistically significant associations between schooling and adolescents’ utilization of health facilities for SRH information (p= 0.001) and other services (p= 002), with out-of-school adolescents having higher utilization rates than in-school adolescents. The difference in utilization of health facilities for SRH information among adolescents in different wealth quintiles was not statistically significant (p= 0.28). The difference in their utilization of other SRH services did not vary significantly (p= 0.63).
Table 3: Demographic and SES correlates of health facility visit for SRH information and other SRH services
Variables
|
N
|
Ever visited a health facility for SRH information
|
Ever visited a health facility for SRH services
|
|
|
n (%)
|
n (%)
|
Place of residence
|
|
|
|
- Urban
|
494
|
51 (10.3)
|
18 (3.6)
|
- Rural
|
551
|
54 (9.3)
|
11 (1.9)
|
ꭓ2 (p-value)
|
|
0.34 (0.56)
|
1.90 (0.15)
|
Gender
|
|
|
|
- Female
|
598
|
57 (9.2)
|
18 (3.0)
|
- Male
|
447
|
48 (10.6)
|
11 (2.4)
|
ꭓ2 (p-value)
|
|
0.57 (0.45)
|
0.83 (0.43)
|
Schooling
|
|
|
|
- In-school
|
966
|
89 (8.9)
|
22 (2.3)
|
- Out-of-school
|
79
|
16 (20.4)
|
7 (9.1)
|
ꭓ2 (p-value)
|
|
10.83 (0.001)*
|
6.23 (0.002)*
|
Employment
|
|
|
|
- Employed
|
262
|
33 (12.5)
|
14 (5.4)
|
- Unemployed
|
240
|
30 (12.3)
|
8 (3.3)
|
ꭓ2 (p-value)
|
|
0.05 (0.94)
|
1.13 (0.32)
|
Wealth index
|
|
|
|
- Q1 (poorest)
|
224
|
22 (9.6)
|
6 (2.7)
|
- Q2
|
211
|
20 (9.3)
|
5 (2.4)
|
- Q3
|
214
|
29 (13.3)
|
9 (4.3)
|
- Q4
|
198
|
14 (6.9)
|
5 (2.4)
|
- Q5 (richest)
|
197
|
20 (9.7)
|
4 (2.1)
|
ꭓ2 (p-value)
|
|
1.26 (0.28)
|
0.76 (0.63)
|
*P<0.05
Table 4 presents logistic regression analysis of demographic correlates of utilization of health facilities for SRH information among adolescents. The odds of utilizing health facilities for SRH information was 3.29 times less among in-school adolescents compared to out-of-school adolescents. This shows that out-of-school adolescents are 3.29 times more likely to utilize health facilities for SRH information (AOR = 3.29, C.I = 0.14, 0.64).
Table 4: Logistic regression analysis of demographic correlates of utilization of health facilities for SRH information
Variables
|
Ever visited a health facility for SRH information
|
|
Odds ratio
|
SE
|
t
|
P-value
P > (t)
|
C.I
|
Place of residence
|
0.706
|
0.21
|
-1.17
|
0.241
|
0.39-1.27
|
Gender
|
1.178
|
0.346
|
0.56
|
0.577
|
0.67-2.10
|
Schooling
|
0.304
|
0.115
|
-3.16
|
0.002*
|
0.14-0.64
|
Employment
|
1.022
|
0.286
|
0.08
|
0.938
|
0.59-1.77
|
Wealth index
|
1.031
|
0.097
|
0.32
|
0.745
|
0.86-1.24
|
95% conf. interval, *p<0.01
Table 5 shows the logistic regression analysis of demographic correlates of utilization of health facilities for other SRH services. Schooling was found to statistically significantly explain utilization of health facilities for other SRH services. Out-of school adolescents were 4.41 times more likely to utilize health facilities for other SRH services (AOR = 4.41, C.I 0.08, 0.61). However, other demographics were not found to statistically correlate with utilization of health facilities for other SRH services.
Table 5: Logistic regression analysis of demographic correlates of utilization of health facilities for other SRH services
Variables
|
Ever visited a health facility for other SRH services
|
|
Odds ratio
|
SE
|
t
|
P-value
P > (t)
|
C.I
|
Place of residence
|
0.700
|
0.337
|
-0.74
|
0.460
|
0.27-1.80
|
Gender
|
0.603
|
0.263
|
-1.16
|
0.247
|
0.26-1.42
|
Schooling
|
0.227
|
0.115
|
-2.94
|
0.003*
|
0.08-0.61
|
Employment
|
1.993
|
0.858
|
1.60
|
0.110
|
0.86-4.64
|
Wealth index
|
0.891
|
0.127
|
-0.81
|
0.417
|
0.67-1.18
|
95% conf. interval, *p<0.01