In the present investigation, we delineate a previously uncharacterized maternally-derived variant, c.661delC (p.Leu221Phefs*41), in the FOXP2 gene within a Chinese family exhibiting speech and language impairments. The clinical phenotype and trajectory of disease progression in our proband were commensurate with extant case reports of individuals afflicted with Speech-Language Disorder. Our insights contribute to a nuanced understanding of the genetic underpinnings of the proband's condition, augment the known mutational landscape of the FOXP2 gene, and serve as a foundational basis for future explorations into genotype-phenotype correlations. These inferences may furnish novel avenues for both prophylactic and therapeutic interventions in the domain of speech impairment, thereby aiding clinicians in the differential diagnosis, which encompasses both acquired and hereditary etiologies.
FOXP2 functions as a transcriptional modulator, possessing the capability to either activate or repress specific genomic loci, herein referred to as target genes. These target genes are ubiquitously localized within the basal ganglia neurons and the subcortical strata of the frontal lobe[16–20], thereby playing pivotal roles in neurodevelopment, neurotransmission, and synaptic formation and propagation—elements that are intrinsically associated with speech-related neurodevelopmental disorders[21]. Structurally, the FOXP2 gene is comprised of four discrete domains: a fork-head DNA binding region, a zinc-finger motif, a leucine zipper, and a poly-Q tract. The fork-head domain primarily facilitates transcriptional initiation and activation, while the zinc finger and leucine zipper motifs function as DNA-binding domains, enhancing the affinity between the transcription factors and the genomic DNA. The poly-Q tract, a glutamine repeat region localized within the N-terminal of the FOXP2 protein, does not have a documented association with the etiology of speech-language dysfunction[22]. Intriguingly, the p.Leu221Phefs*41 variant delineated in this study is situated within the poly-Q domain. This localization is conjectured to result in the loss of the downstream zinc finger, leucine zipper, and fork domains, potentially obfuscating the native DNA binding affinity of FOXP2, and consequently leading to transcriptional dysregulation. Such perturbations likely culminate in dysfunctional FOXP2 proteins, thereby attenuating the transcription of FOXP2 target genes and manifesting as clinical symptoms pertinent to the disorder.
The FOXP2 gene encodes the presumptive transcription factor fork-head box P2, comprising a polypeptide chain of 715 amino acids encoded by 17 exons [9]. Amongst the documented variations of FOXP2, sequence variants account for approximately 49%; large, non-recurrent contiguous gene deletions involving FOXP2 constitute roughly 40% (inclusive of maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 7 involving the FOXP2 gene); structural variants (e.g., chromosomal translocation, inversion) disrupting FOXP2 make up around 11% [13]. Given these distributions, it is manifest that aside from sequence variants, gross deletions are disproportionately represented, predominantly impacting the entire FOXP2 gene and Uniparental Disomy (UPD). Consequently, in instances where Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) tests yield negative results, the deployment of Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) or Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) targeting FOXP2 is strongly advocated to preclude diagnostic inaccuracies.
Given the heterogeneity in evaluative metrics and methodologies across medical institutions, the present discourse is confined to a cursory analysis. A review of extant literature reveals that patients manifesting gross deletions or complex chromosomal rearrangements often display additional variable phenotypes encompassing facial dysmorphia, dystonia, growth retardation, and ocular lesions. The ostensible etiology underlying these phenotypic variances is the impact of these gross deletions or complex rearrangements on a substantially larger genomic region. Importantly, Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) was ubiquitously observed across all FOXP2 mutational spectra. While direct evidence linking FOXP2 mutations to ASD is elusive, several Neurodevelopental Disorders (NDDs) genetic studies corroborate FOXP2 as a risk-associated gene for ASD[23, 24]. However, the potential for a genomic segment within the 7q31.2 locus to harbor ASD-related genetic information cannot be categorically dismissed. Hence, a comprehensive assessment buttressed by an expanded clinical dataset is imperative for delineating the relationship between FOXP2 and ASD.
Moreover, clinical heterogeneity relative to FOXP2 gene variants is saliently evident, even within nuclear families. For instance, a family harboring the c.484delC(p.Q162Nfs*100) variant of FOXP2 displayed striking discrepancies in clinical manifestations and severity levels between genotype-identical mothers and offspring. The proband and the mother both exhibited craniosynostosis; however, the extent of language impairment diverged substantially, and the proband's sister displayed only progressive language retardation[25]. An analogous pattern of disparity in linguistic and intellectual faculties was observed in the family subject to the present study; the affected mother exhibited far less severe linguistic and cognitive impairments than the proband and was capable of regular educational engagement, whereas the proband was markedly compromised in communicative abilities. These observed phenotypic divergences are postulated to emanate either from underlying genetic dissimilarities or from the interaction with as-yet unidentified associated genetic loci.
In summation, the findings of the current study substantiate the involvement of the novel c.661delC (p.Leu221Phefs*41) FOXP2 variant in the etiology of speech and language disorders. Further inquiries into the mechanisms by which this FOXP2 variant engenders alterations in protein functionality and its subsequent ramifications on speech-language neural substrates are warranted. Such elucidations hold the potential to significantly impact both the prophylaxis and diagnostic paradigms of Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS) or Developmental Verbal Dyspraxia (DVD).