Exosomal miR-1290 promotes angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma via targeting SMEK1

doi:10.21203/rs.2.13182/v2

Download PDF

Research article

Exosomal miR-1290 promotes angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma via targeting SMEK1

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.13182/v2

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 2

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common primary liver cancer, rely on the formation of new blood vessel for growth and frequent intrahepatic and extrahepatic metastasis. Therefore, it is important to explore the underlying molecular mechanisms of tumor angiogenesis of HCC. Recently, microRNAs have been shown to modulate angiogenic processes by modulating the expression of critical angiogenic factors. However, the potential roles of tumor-derived exosomal microRNAs in regulating tumor angiogenesis remain to be elucidated.

Methods: MiRNome sequencing was performed to uncover the miRNAs that are dysregulated in HCC patient serum-derived exosomes. Expression levels of miR-1290 in tissues and cells were determined by quantitative real-time PCR. The effect of mir-1290 on proliferation was evaluated by CCK-8 assay. The angiogenic ability of cells were determined by transwell, wound-healing, tube formation and matrigel plug assays. SMMC-7721 xenograft tumor model was established in NOD-SCID nude mice using miR-1290 and NC antagomirs to determin the angiogenic effect of mir-1290 in vivo. Target protein expression was determined by western blotting. Dual luciferase reporter assay was performed to confirm the action of miR-1290 on downstream target genes including SMEK1. Results are reported as means ± S.D. and differences were tested for significance using 2-sided Student’s t-test.

Results: In this study, our miRNome sequencing demonstrated that miR-1290 was overexpressed in HCC patient serum-derived exosomes, and we found that delivery of miR-1290 into human endothelial cells enhanced their angiogenic ability. Our results further revealed that SMEK1 is a direct target of miR-1290 in endothelial cells. MiR-1290 exerted its pro-angiogenic function, at least in part, by alleviating the inhibition of VEGFR2 phosphorylation done by SMEK1.

Conclusions: Collectively, our findings provide evidence that miR-1290 is overexpressed in HCC and promotes tumor angiogenesis via exosomal secretion, implicating its potential role as a therapeutic target for HCC.

Cancer Biology

miR-1290

exosomes

angiogenesis

SMEK1

hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the fifth most common cancer and third-leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide.¹ HCC is a highly vascularized tumor with frequent intrahepatic and extrahepatic metastasis, which is responsible for the rapid recurrence and poor survival.² Therefore, it is urgent to explore the molecular mechanisms of tumor angiogenesis and metastasis, which would provide potential effective therapeutic approaches to improve the survival of HCC patients.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a family of non-coding RNAs, about 22 nt in length, which repress gene expression by pairing to the 3’-untranslated regions of target messenger RNAs (mRNAs).³ MiRNAs are involved and play critical roles in a variety of biological processes such as tumor progression.⁴ Deregulation of miRNAs contributes to angiogenesis and metastasis of various human cancers including HCC. ^5-7 For example, microRNA-26a has been reported to suppress angiogenesis in HCC by targeting HGF-cMet pathway⁸. Recently, emerging evidence has revealed that miRNAs can be secreted into tumor microenvironment via exosomes to mediate the crosstalk between cancer cells and tumor microenvironment.^9-12

Exosomes are small (40–100 nm) membrane vesicles released into the extracellular environment.¹³ It is reported that exosomes contain miRNAs selectively enriched from parent cells.¹⁴ Circulating exosomal miRNAs may have additional advantages as biomarkers over and above ‘free’ miRNAs. A number of plasma exosomal miRNAs are reported as diagnostic, prognostic, or even therapeutic biomarkers in cancer patients.^15-17 For example, exosomal miR-1290 and miR-375 are prognostic markers in castration-resistant prostate cancer.¹⁸ Exosomal miR-210 could be delivered into endothelial cells and directly inhibits the expression of SMAD4 and STAT6, resulting in enhanced HCC angiogenesis.¹⁹ However, the underlying mechanism of exosomal miRNAs in HCC development, especially in tumor angiogenesis of HCC, remains largely unknown.

In this study, by RNA sequencing and qRT-PCR verification, we revealed that miR-1290 was highly expressed in HCC patient serum-derived exosomes. Using gain- and loss-of-function analyses, we further demonstrated the pro-angiogenic function of miR-1290 in mediating the crosstalk between HCCs and tumor endothelial cells. Moreover, we found that SMEK1 was a bona fide target of miR-1290 in endothelial cells. MiR-1290 exerted its pro-angiogenic function, at least in part, by inhibiting the VEGFR2 signaling pathway in a SMEK1-dependent manner. Collectively, our findings suggest that exosomal miRNA-1290 might play an important role in the intercellular communication in tumor angiogenesis of HCC.

Clinical specimens

Primary HCC tumor samples, paired tumor adjacent tissues and serum samples of 49 HCC patients and serum samples of 28 healthy individuals were obtained from Tianjin First Central Hospital. Among them, serum samples from six HCC patients and two healthy individuals were subjected to miRNome sequencing. Serum samples and surgically removed tissues were frozen and transported in liquid nitrogen. All of the samples were obtained with written informed consent from patients and approval from the Ethics Committee of Tianjin First Central Hospital and Medical School of Nankai University.

Experimental animals

Adult male BALB/c and NOD-SCID mice were ordered form HuaFuKang Bioscience Co. (Beijing, China), housed under specific pathogen free environmental conditions. Mice were intraperitoneal injectied with 4% chloral hydrate (100 μl per 10 g mouse body weight) before surgery, and were sacrificed via intraperitoneal injection of fatal dose of 4% chloral hydrate after study.

Exosome purification

Exosome extraction from serum and cell supernatant samples using the exosome isolation reagent (Ribobio Co., China) were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For electron microscopy, the serum was pre-cleared by centrifugation at 300 × g for 5 min, 2000 ×g for 10 min, and then at 10000 × g for 60 min. Exosomes were isolated by ultracentrifugation at 100000 ×g for 130 min, followed by PBS washing under the same ultracentrifugation conditions. Exosomes were resuspended in 100 μl PBS, fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde, loaded on 200-mesh Formvar-coated grids, contrasted, and embedded for imaging.

Cell lines and reagents

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and human HCC cell lines Hep3B and HepG2 were obtained from ATCC. HCC cell line SK-Hep-1, SMMC-7721, PLC/PRF/5, and normal human hepatocyte cell line L-02 were purchased from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). Hep3B, HepG2, SK-Hep-1 and PLC/PRF/5 cells were cultured in MEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin, and 100 μg/ml non-essential amino acids. SMMC-7721 cells were grown in DMEM containing 10% FBS and 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin. L-02 and HUVECs were cultured in RPMI-1640 containing 10% FBS and 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin. MiR-1290 mimics and miR-1290 mimic-FAM were purchased from Ribobio Co.

Cell viability assays

For cell viability assays, HUVECs were seeded in 96-well plates in 100 μl of medium, followed by transfection with 50 nM miR-1290 mimics. Five parallel wells were assigned for each group. At 0, 24, 36, 48, and 60 h after transfection, CCK-8 solution (10 μl) was added to each well, and absorbance values were measured at 450 nm after incubation for 1.5 h at 37 °C.

RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)

Tissues were grinded using a homogenizer in Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA). Cells were collected, washed and lysed in Trizol reagent, and total RNA was isolated following the manufacturer’s instructions. qRT-PCR was performed using a standard SYBR-Green PCR kit protocol. Primers are listed in Table S1.

Western blotting

Western blotting was performed in accordance with a previous protocol.²⁰ Briefly, proteins were loaded on 5–12% tris-acrylamide gels and membranes were blotted with specific antibodies. The primary antibodies used in this study were SMEK1 (ab70635, Abcam), pVEGFR2 (#4991, Cell Signaling Technology), and VEGFR2 (#9698, Cell Signaling Technology) at a dilution of 1:1000. Bands were detected using a Gel imaging system (SYNGENE).

Plasmid construction and transfection

Human SMEK1 cDNA was cloned from HUVECs and ligated into pLV-EF1α-MCS-IRES-Bsd vector (Biosettia Inc.). SMMC-7721, Hep3B, and HUVECs (3 × 10⁵ cells/well) were seeded in 6-well plates, incubated overnight, and then transfected with miR-1290 mimics using Lipofectamine2000 (Invitrogen) and Opti-MEM (Corning) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Primers are listed in Table S2.

Cell migration assays

Cell migration was evaluated by performing wound-healing and transwell assays. For wound-healing assay, cells were seeded in 6-well plates at 2 × 10⁵ cells per well, and after 48 h transfection, the cell monolayer was scraped using a 10 μl tip. The initial gap length and the residual gap length after wounding were calculated based on photomicrographs using ImageJ software. For transwell assay, after transfection for 24 h, cells were plated in 24-well plates at 5 × 10⁴ in the upper 8-μm chambers (BD bioscience). Medium containing 10% FBS in the lower well and 2% FBS in the upper chamber served as the chemoattractant. After another 16 h incubation, cells on the upper surface of the membrane were scraped off and those on the bottom were stained with crystal violet. These cells were photographed using an optical microscope.

Tube formation and Matrigel plug assays

For tube formation assay, a pre-chilled 48-well plate was coated with 150 μl of Matrigel (BD bioscience) and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. HUVECs (3 × 10⁴ cells/well) were transfected with miR-1290 and then seeded on this plate. After 5 h, photographs were taken, and the tubes were counted.

For in vivo Matrigel plug assay, male BALB/c mice were administered a subcutaneous injection of 750 μl of mixture containing 500 μl Matrigel and 250 μl EBM2 medium with or without miR-1290 (3 mice for each group). After 10 days, the Matrigel plugs were imaged and snap frozen in the presence of optimum cutting temperature (OCT) medium before sectioning. Frozen Matrigel sections (8 μm) were fixed in cold methanol and immunostained with a CD31 antibody (ab28364, Abcam, USA).

Immunofluorescence staining

Slides were blocked with 2% BSA and then incubated with an anti-CD31 antibody (ab28364, Abcam) for 1 h. After fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody incubating and PBS washing, slides were incubated with DAPI (Invitrogen) for 2 min. Images were obtained using a microscope (Olympus IX73).

Dual luciferase reporter assay

HUVECs were cultured in 24-well plates at a density of 2 × 10⁵ cells/well overnight, which was followed by co-transfection with miR-1290 mimics, pmirGLO, and the pRL-TK plasmid. After 36 h of transfection, the inhibition of miR-1290 was quantified as the ratio of firefly luciferase activity to Renilla luciferase activity in each well.

Tumor xenografts

Male NOD-SCID mice (6-weeks-old) were separated randomly into two groups (n = 6 each), and 2 × 10⁶ SMMC-7721 cells were inoculated subcutaneously into each mouse, and tumors were allowed to grow for 10 days. Tumors were peritumorally treated with miR-1290 antagomir or miRNA antagomir negative control (NC), and tumor volume was measured with calipers once every 3 days. All mouse experiments were conducted in accordance with the standard operating procedures approved by the Institute Research Ethics Committee at the Nankai University.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

IHC staining was performed using paraffin-embedded human HCC tissues and mouse xenografts tumors. These tissues were probed separately with an antibody against Ki67 (ab16667, Abcam), cleaved-caspase 3 (#9664, Cell Signaling Technology), and CD31 (ab28364, Abcam) at a 1:100 dilution.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 23.0 software; the data from all experiments are presented as means ± SD and represent three independent experiments. A paired t-test was used to compare gene expression in tumor and adjacent non-tumor tissue samples. Where appropriate, a Student’s t-test for unpaired observations was applied. A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.

MiR-1290 is highly expressed in HCC patient serum-derived exosomes, tumor tissues and HCC cell lines

To uncover miRNAs that are dysregulated in HCC patient serum-derived exosomes, we collected serum exosomes from the healthy individuals and HCC patients to perform RNA-seq (Fig. 1A). We totally identified 599 differently expressed miRNAs. After filtering (|log2 fold change|≥1, p-value＜0.05), we acquired 5 upregulated and 72 downregulated miRNAs (Fig. 1B). Since upregulated miRNAs are convenient biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets for HCC, we moved on to validate the upregulated miRNAs, including miR-1290, miR-1246, miR-4497, miR-1261, and miR-7641. Among these up-regulated miRNAs, we pay our attention to miR-1290 because miR-1290 is the topmost up-regulated miRNA (Fig. 1C). To confirm the upregulation of miR-1290 in HCC patients, we further measured its expression in serum-derived exosomes from 28 healthy individuals and 49 HCC patients. The results revealed that the expression of miR-1290 was significantly increased in serum exosomes derived from 49 HCC patients as compared to those from 28 healthy individuals (Fig. 1D). We also detected the expression level of miR-1290 in these 49 frozen HCC tissues and paired cancer adjacent tissues. Our results demonstrated that miR-1290 expression was remarkably elevated in HCC tissues (Fig. 1E). In addition, we assessed the expression of miR-1290 in 5 HCC cell lines, including HepG2, Hep3B, SK-Hep1, SMMC-7721, and PLC/PRF/5, and their exosomes derived from the medium. An immortalized liver cell line LO2 was used as a control. Our results showed that the expression levels of miR-1290 were relatively higher in HepG2 and SMMC-7721 cells as well as their exosomes (Fig. 1F). Taken together, the above observations indicated that miR-1290 is overexpressed in HCCs and cancer-cell-secreted exosomes.

HCC-derived exosomal miR-1290 targets endothelial cells to promote tumor angiogenesis

Next, we moved to validate whether HCC-derived exosomal miR-1290 could remodel the tumor microenvironment through targeting the endothelial cells and tumor angiogenesis. To this end, we firstly detected the expression of miR-1290 in HepG2, SMMC-7721 and HUVECs. As shown in Figure 2A, the expression of miR-1290 was significantly increased in HepG2 and SMMC-7721 cells as compared to that in HUVECs (Fig. 2A). To further test whether the cancer cell-derived exosomes can be internalized by HUVECs, we collected exosomes from HepG2 and SMMC-7721 cells labeled by DiI and incubated them with HUVECs labeled by DiO. We observed a colocalization of DiI and DiO signals in HUVECs cocultured with HCC-derived exosomes, indicating that cancer cell-secreted exosomes can be internalized by endothelial cells (Fig. 2B). We also analyzed whether miR-1290 can be transported from cancer cells to HUVECs as an exosome cargo. To do so, we transfected SMMC-7721 cells with FAM-labeled miR-1290 mimic. Exosomes were then derived from the medium to incubate with HUVECs. The results confirmed that FAM-labeled miR-1290 mimic were detected in HUVECs (Fig. 2C), demonstrating that HCC-secreted miR-1290 can be transported from cancer cells to HUVECs via exosomes.

Additionally, we examined whether miR-1290 altered the function of HUVECs. Firstly, we performed CCK-8 assay to detect the cell viability of HUVECs in the presence of miR-1290 mimic and inhibitor, respectively. As shown in Fig. 2D, overexpression of miR-1290 mimic significantly enhanced cell viability at 48-60 h post-transfection; however, miR-1290 inhibitor performed the opposite effect to reduce cell viability. Moreover, we measured the tube formation ability of HUVECs in response to miR-1290 mimic or inhibitor transfection. We found that the capacity of HUVECs to form tube-like structures on the Matrigel was increased by miR-1290 mimic but decreased by miR-1290 inhibitor (Fig. 2E). Wound-healing and transwell assays further revealed that miR-1290 mimic significantly accelerated HUVECs migration, whereas miR-1290 inhibitor decreased this effect (Fig. 2F and 2G). These results collectively indicated that miR-1290 might promote endothelial function and tumor angiogenesis in vitro.

MiR-1290 promotes tumor angiogenesis in vivo

To determine whether miR-1290 is involved in tumor angiogenesis in vivo, Matrigel plug assays were performed in BALB/c mice. As shown in Fig. 3A, the numbers of newly generated blood vessels in Matrigel plugs were increased in mice treated with miR-1290 agomir, compared to the NC agomir group. Immunofluorescent staining of CD31 further revealed that treatment with miR-1290 agomir resulted in significantly increased microvessel density in the plug sections.

On the contrary, we established a SMMC-7721 xenograft tumor model in NOD-SCID nude mice using miR-1290 and NC antagomirs, respectively. The results indicated that tumor volumes and weights were significantly decreased in mice peritumorally injected with miR-1290 antagomir compared with those of mice injected with NC antagomir (Fig. 3B-D). Immunohistochemical analysis also revealed the downregulation of Ki67 and the upregulation of cleaved-caspase 3 in miR-1290 antagomir-treated tumors, indicating decreased cell proliferation and increased cell apoptosis (Fig. 3E). Importantly, reduced angiogenesis was observed in miR-1290 antagomir-treated tumors, as assessed by CD31 staining (Fig. 3F). Moreover, we divided 49 HCC patients into two groups based on their miR-1290 expression levels. Clinical association analysis showed that high level of miR-1290 was correlated with bigger tumor size and advanced clinical stages (Table 1). Notably, IHC staining for CD31 revealed that the microvessel density was increased in tumors with high miR-1290 expression compared to tumors with lower miR-1290 expression (Fig. 3G), which is consistent with our results showing that miR-1290 acts as an oncogene to promote tumor angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo.

SMEK1 is a direct target of miR-1290 in HUVECs

To investigate the potential target genes of miR-1290 in the angiogenic process, we performed a miRNA target gene prediction with Targetscan database and identified 10 candidate genes that have been reported to function in the regulation of angiogenesis (Fig. 4A and Table S3). We then performed qRT-PCR to detect the mRNA levels of these 10 candidate genes in HUVECs transfected with miR-1290 mimic. The results demonstrated that all of these miR-1290 potential targets were downregulated by miR-1290 mimic transfection (Fig. 4B). Moreover, we cloned the 3’UTR fragments of these genes into a pmirGLO luciferase reporter system, respectively. The results of luciferase assay showed a remarkable repression in the wild-type SMEK1 3’UTR reporter in response to miR-1290 mimic treatment in HUVECs (Fig. 4C). However, this effect was significantly abolished by using the mutant SMEK1 3’UTR (Fig. 4D-E). To further confirm the correlation between miR-1290 and SMEK1, we detected the expression of SMEK1 in HUVECs upon transfection with miR-1290 mimic. Our results demonstrated that transfection of miR-1290 mimic downregulated SMEK1 expression both at the mRNA and protein levels in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4F), suggesting that SMEK1 is a direct target of miR-1290.

SMEK1 reduces the angiogenic ability of endothelial cells

Considering that SMEK1 has been reported to function as an anti-angiogenic factor by suppressing the phosphorylation of VEGFR2 in HUVECs,²¹ we further examined the endothelial phenotypes in response to SMEK1 interference. qRT-PCR and western blotting assays showed reduced SMEK1 mRNA and protein levels in HUVECs transfected with two independent SMEK1 shRNAs (Fig. 5A-B). Notably, we found that the ability of HUVEC to form tube-like structures on the Matrigel was increased by SMEK1 knockdown (Fig. 5C). Wound-healing and transwell assays also revealed that depletion of SMEK1 significantly promoted the migration of HUVECs (Fig. 5D and 5E), confirming that SMEK1 might act as a tumor suppresser to inhibit the endothelial function in HCC.

SMEK1 mediates miR-1290-induced pro-angiogenic phenotypes

Next, to study whether miR-1290 exerts its pro-angiogenic function through SMEK1, we overexpressed SMEK1 lacking 3’UTR in HUVECs via lentiviral transfection. As shown in Fig. 6A and 6B, overexpression of SMEK1 in HUVECs could restore the mRNA and protein levels of SMEK1 in the presence of miR-1290 mimic. Moreover, rescue of SMEK1 expression significantly attenuated the phosphorylation of VEGFR2 upon treatment with miR-1290 mimic (Fig. 6B). Importantly, tube formation, wound-healing and migration assays further demonstrated that restoration of SMEK1 abolished miR-1290 mimic-induced endothelial functions in HUVECs (Fig. 6C-E). These results collectively implied that SMEK1 is a bona fide target of miR-1290 to mediate its role in promoting tumor angiogenesis and progression.

Tumor angiogenesis is responsible for growth, invasion and metastasis of HCC.² A growing body of evidence has been suggested that the dysfunction of miRNAs in HCC affects tumor angiogenesis.^22-25 In the present study, we demonstrate that miR-1290 exerts a pro-angiogenic function through SMEK1. We show that miR-1290 downregulates SMEK1 expression both at the mRNA and protein levels. Moreover, miR-1290 inhibits the luciferase activity of wild-type but not the mutant 3’UTR of SMEK1. By gain- and loss-of-function analyses, we further show that SMEK1 can reduce the angiogenic ability of endothelial cells. Moreover, restoration of SMEK1 expression significantly abolishes miR-1290-induced VEGFR2 phosphorylation and the angiogenic phenotypes of endothelial cells in HCC. According to our in vivo xenograft experiments, administration of the miR-1290 antagomir effectively reduced the tumor angiogenesis and progression, providing evidence that targeting miR-1290 might be a potential strategy for angiogenesis-based cancer therapy.

MiR-1290 has been reported to be a maker of several human cancers, including pancreatic cancer, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer.^26-30 These studies have shown that miR-1290 functions as an oncogene to promote tumor progression. For example, a miRNA array analysis indicates that the detection of elevated serum miR-1290 has the potential to improve the early detection of pancreatic cancer.³¹ Another study reveals that miR-1290 acts as a crucial driver for tumor initiation and progression in human non-small cell lung cancer.³² However, the function of miR-1290 in HCC remains largely obscure. In the present study, we extend the study that miR-1290 was highly expressed in HCC patient serum-derived exosomes, tumor tissues and HCC cell lines. Moreover, the ectopic miR-1290 was secreted from tumor cells into its surrounding microenvironment and delivered into endothelial cells via exosomes. In turn, miR-1290 downregulated SMEK1 expression and enhanced the phosphorylation of VEGFR2 in endothelial cells, eventually exacerbating HCC development by promoting tumor angiogenesis. Our results are consistent with the previous reports that SMEK1 controls endothelial cell function and subsequent angiogenesis by suppressing VEGFR2-mediated PI3K/Akt/eNOS signaling pathway.²¹

Given that VEGF functions as a critical factor to promote vascular abnormalities in HCC, numerous researchers have focused on the dysregulated miRNAs that can target VEGF or other genes that alter the VEGF expression. For example, miR-195 is reported to suppress angiogenesis of HCC by directly inhibiting the expression of VEGF.³³ Moreover, miR-29c targets VEGFA to inhibit tumor angiogenesis of lung adenocarcinoma.³⁴ In this study, we described a novel pathway that tumor cells facilitated angiogenesis via secretion of exosomes containing miR-1290 into the surrounding microenvironment. Mechanistically, miR-1290 packed in exosomes were uptaken by recipient endothelial cells and subsequently downregulated SMEK1, thus resulting in enhanced tumor angiogenesis through a VEGFR2-mediated action. In line with this, tumor-derived exosomes have been shown to remodel the tumor and its metastatic environment.^35-38 Tumor cells can use exosomes as a cargo to transfer angiogenic factors, including proteins and miRNAs.³⁹ Recently, it has been demonstrated that exosomes released from human renal cancer stem cells triggers angiogenesis and forms a pro-metastatic niche in lungs.⁴⁰ In line with these, our present study uncovered the function of secreted miR-1290 as a critical mediator in the crosstalk between HCCs and endothelial cells.

According to our data, mir-1290 is overexpressed in HCC patient serum-derived exosomes, the delivery of miR-1290 into human endothelial cells enhanced their angiogenic ability by inhibiting the VEGFR2 signaling pathway in a SMEK1-dependent manner. Our findings highlight the importance of exosomal miRNA-1290 in HCC angiogenesis, implicating miR-1290 as a potential therapeutic target for HCC.

HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma; qRT-PCR: quantitative real-time PCR; IHC: Immunohistochemistry; NC: Negative control.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All mouse experiments were conducted in accordance with the standard operating procedures approved by the Institute Research Ethics Committee at the Nankai University. Human samples were obtained with written informed consent from patients and approval from the Ethics Committee of Tianjin First Central Hospital.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Datasets generated and analysed for this work are not publicly available but are accessible upon request.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

This work is supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81472545) and the Tianjin Natural Science Foundation (No. 17JCZDJC36600).

Authors’ contributions

Study design: SY, RX, PQS; providing of study materials or samples: LJN, QSZ, HW; data generation, analysis and interpretation: QW, GWW, SRZ, JJL, ZZ, HMJ; manuscript writing: all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not Applicable.

Llovet JM, Bruix J. Molecular targeted therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2008; 48: 1312-27.
Fernandez M, Semela D, Bruix J, Colle I, Pinzani M, Bosch J. Angiogenesis in liver disease. Journal of hepatology. 2009; 50: 604-20.
Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009; 136: 215-33.
Lujambio A, Lowe SW. The microcosmos of cancer. Nature. 2012; 482: 347-55.
Cha ST, Chen PS, Johansson G, et al. MicroRNA-519c suppresses hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha expression and tumor angiogenesis. Cancer research. 2010; 70: 2675-85.
Ma L, Young J, Prabhala H, et al. miR-9, a MYC/MYCN-activated microRNA, regulates E-cadherin and cancer metastasis. Nature cell biology. 2010; 12: 247-56.
Fang JH, Zhou HC, Zeng C, et al. MicroRNA-29b suppresses tumor angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis by regulating matrix metalloproteinase 2 expression. Hepatology. 2011; 54: 1729-40.
Yang X, Zhang XF, Lu X, et al. MicroRNA-26a suppresses angiogenesis in human hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting hepatocyte growth factor-cMet pathway. Hepatology. 2014; 59: 1874-85.
Bhome R, Del Vecchio F, Lee GH, et al. Exosomal microRNAs (exomiRs): Small molecules with a big role in cancer. Cancer letters. 2018; 420: 228-35.
Zhang L, Zhang S, Yao J, et al. Microenvironment-induced PTEN loss by exosomal microRNA primes brain metastasis outgrowth. Nature. 2015; 527: 100-4.
Challagundla KB, Wise PM, Neviani P, et al. Exosome-mediated transfer of microRNAs within the tumor microenvironment and neuroblastoma resistance to chemotherapy. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2015; 107.
Fong MY, Zhou W, Liu L, et al. Breast-cancer-secreted miR-122 reprograms glucose metabolism in premetastatic niche to promote metastasis. Nature cell biology. 2015; 17: 183-94.
Johnstone RM, Adam M, Hammond JR, Orr L, Turbide C. Vesicle formation during reticulocyte maturation. Association of plasma membrane activities with released vesicles (exosomes). The Journal of biological chemistry. 1987; 262: 9412-20.
Guduric-Fuchs J, O'Connor A, Camp B, O'Neill CL, Medina RJ, Simpson DA. Selective extracellular vesicle-mediated export of an overlapping set of microRNAs from multiple cell types. BMC genomics. 2012; 13: 357.
Manier S, Liu CJ, Avet-Loiseau H, et al. Prognostic role of circulating exosomal miRNAs in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2017; 129: 2429-36.
Takahashi RU, Miyazaki H, Ochiya T. The Roles of MicroRNAs in Breast Cancer. Cancers. 2015; 7: 598-616.
Matsumura T, Sugimachi K, Iinuma H, et al. Exosomal microRNA in serum is a novel biomarker of recurrence in human colorectal cancer. British journal of cancer. 2015; 113: 275-81.
Huang X, Yuan T, Liang M, et al. Exosomal miR-1290 and miR-375 as prognostic markers in castration-resistant prostate cancer. European urology. 2015; 67: 33-41.
Lin XJ, Fang JH, Yang XJ, et al. Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell-Secreted Exosomal MicroRNA-210 Promotes Angiogenesis In Vitro and In Vivo. Molecular therapy Nucleic acids. 2018; 11: 243-52.
Zhang J, Zhou C, Jiang H, et al. ZEB1 induces ER-alpha promoter hypermethylation and confers antiestrogen resistance in breast cancer. Cell death & disease. 2017; 8: e2732.
Kim BR, Seo SH, Park MS, Lee SH, Kwon Y, Rho SB. sMEK1 inhibits endothelial cell proliferation by attenuating VEGFR-2-dependent-Akt/eNOS/HIF-1alpha signaling pathways. Oncotarget. 2015; 6: 31830-43.
Shih TC, Tien YJ, Wen CJ, et al. MicroRNA-214 downregulation contributes to tumor angiogenesis by inducing secretion of the hepatoma-derived growth factor in human hepatoma. Journal of hepatology. 2012; 57: 584-91.
Du C, Weng X, Hu W, et al. Hypoxia-inducible MiR-182 promotes angiogenesis by targeting RASA1 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR. 2015; 34: 67.
Zhou B, Ma R, Si W, et al. MicroRNA-503 targets FGF2 and VEGFA and inhibits tumor angiogenesis and growth. Cancer letters. 2013; 333: 159-69.
Ghosh A, Dasgupta D, Ghosh A, et al. MiRNA199a-3p suppresses tumor growth, migration, invasion and angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting VEGFA, VEGFR1, VEGFR2, HGF and MMP2. Cell death & disease. 2017; 8: e2706.
Frampton AE, Krell J, Kazemier G, Giovannetti E. Serum miR-1290 as a marker of pancreatic cancer--letter. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2013; 19: 5250-1.
Mao Y, Liu J, Zhang D, Li B. MiR-1290 promotes cancer progression by targeting nuclear factor I/X(NFIX) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie. 2015; 76: 82-93.
Endo Y, Toyama T, Takahashi S, et al. miR-1290 and its potential targets are associated with characteristics of estrogen receptor alpha-positive breast cancer. Endocrine-related cancer. 2013; 20: 91-102.
Ma Q, Wang Y, Zhang H, Wang F. miR-1290 Contributes to Colorectal Cancer Cell Proliferation by Targeting INPP4B. Oncology research. 2018; 26: 1167-74.
Kim G, An HJ, Lee MJ, et al. Hsa-miR-1246 and hsa-miR-1290 are associated with stemness and invasiveness of non-small cell lung cancer. Lung cancer. 2016; 91: 15-22.
Li A, Yu J, Kim H, et al. MicroRNA array analysis finds elevated serum miR-1290 accurately distinguishes patients with low-stage pancreatic cancer from healthy and disease controls. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2013; 19: 3600-10.
Zhang WC, Chin TM, Yang H, et al. Tumour-initiating cell-specific miR-1246 and miR-1290 expression converge to promote non-small cell lung cancer progression. Nature communications. 2016; 7: 11702.
Wang R, Zhao N, Li S, et al. MicroRNA-195 suppresses angiogenesis and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by inhibiting the expression of VEGF, VAV2, and CDC42. Hepatology. 2013; 58: 642-53.
Liu L, Bi N, Wu L, et al. MicroRNA-29c functions as a tumor suppressor by targeting VEGFA in lung adenocarcinoma. Molecular cancer. 2017; 16: 50.
Milane L, Singh A, Mattheolabakis G, Suresh M, Amiji MM. Exosome mediated communication within the tumor microenvironment. Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society. 2015; 219: 278-94.
Hoshino A, Costa-Silva B, Shen TL, et al. Tumour exosome integrins determine organotropic metastasis. Nature. 2015; 527: 329-35.
Peinado H, Aleckovic M, Lavotshkin S, et al. Melanoma exosomes educate bone marrow progenitor cells toward a pro-metastatic phenotype through MET. Nature medicine. 2012; 18: 883-91.
Suetsugu A, Honma K, Saji S, Moriwaki H, Ochiya T, Hoffman RM. Imaging exosome transfer from breast cancer cells to stroma at metastatic sites in orthotopic nude-mouse models. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2013; 65: 383-90.
D'Souza-Schorey C, Clancy JW. Tumor-derived microvesicles: shedding light on novel microenvironment modulators and prospective cancer biomarkers. Genes & development. 2012; 26: 1287-99.
Grange C, Tapparo M, Collino F, et al. Microvesicles released from human renal cancer stem cells stimulate angiogenesis and formation of lung premetastatic niche. Cancer research. 2011; 71: 5346-56.

Table 1. Correlation between the clinicopathological characteristics and miR-1290 expression in HCC.

Clinicopathologic features		n	Exosomal miR-1290		P value
Clinicopathologic features		n	High	Low	P value
Gender	Male	37	18	19	0.202
Gender	Female	12	7	5	0.202
Age	< 55	20	10	10	0.777
Age	³ 55	29	15	14	0.777
AFP	<400μg /L	23	10	13	0.157
AFP	³ 400μg /L	26	15	11	0.157
TNM Stage	I	16	6	10	0.004
TNM Stage	II + III	33	19	14	0.004
Tumor size (cm)	< 5	18	7	11	0.048
Tumor size (cm)	³ 5	31	18	13	0.048

Note: The median expression level was used as the cut-off. Low expression of miR-1290 in 24 patients was classified as values below the 50th percentile. High miR-1290 expression in 25 patients was classified as values at or above the 50th percentile. For analysis of correlation between miR-1290 expressions and clinical features, chi-square tests were used. Results were considered statistically significant at P <0.05.

Download PDF

Version 2

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Exosomal miR-1290 promotes angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma via targeting SMEK1

Status:

Version 2

Abstract

Figures

Background

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Tables

Supplementary Files

Status:

Version 2