Aim
This study investigated at 4 stages in a time-line related fashion the effect of GE treatment on insulin m-RNA transcription in the pancreas, liver, bile duct and GSM, and related detected changes to any corresponding plasticity of insulin producing cells and serum and tissues insulin concentrations in an early STZ-DM type-1 rat model.
This study was carried in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines.
Animals
The animals used in this study were healthy male Sprague-Dawley rats (HR, b.wt. = 160-180 g, ancestors procured from Harlan Laboratories - UK). The rats were housed in the Animal Care Facility under regular ambient conditions (temperature = 22-24 °C, humidity = 30-35%, natural light/dark cycle) and provided with standard rodent diet (Special Diet Services, UK) and tap water ad libitum. The rats were handled, maintained and experimented on according to the ‘Instructions Guide’ for ‘The Care and Use of Laboratory Animals’, ‘National Research Council’ [28].
Diabetic rats
Type-1 DM was induced chemically in the required number of HR rats by injecting intraperitoneally each rat with a single dose of STZ solution (60 mg/kg/0.5 ml 0.01M sodium citrate buffer, pH 4.5) after 2 h fast as described previously [29]. A group of normal rats was established by injecting intraperitoneally each of the required number of HR rats with only 0.5 ml of citrate buffer solution.
Fasting blood glucose
Fasting blood glucose (FBG) of all rats was measured in a drop of tail-blood using a portable glucometer (OneTouch UltraEasy – LifeScan, UK) after an overnight fast at day-6 post-injection (basal level = BL) with either STZ or citrate buffer and at the end of weeks 1, 4 and 8 of treatment. At BL, rats injected with STZ and had FBG concentration ³ 16 mmol/l were taken as Type-1 diabetic rats (DR, n = 80), while rats that received only citrate buffer solution and had FBG concentration ≤ 7 mmol/l were taken as normal rats (NR, n = 48).
Garlic aqueous extract
Garlic (Allium sativum L.) aqueous extract (GE) was prepared, stored and used as previously described [30]. GC-MS analysis showed that the GE preparation composition was stable before and after different times of storage at -20ºC as previously reported [31]. The garlic cloves used were purchased form the local market at Kuwait City (commercially available - no permission in required) and the species of this garlic was identified by Dr. Majed A. Alnaqeeb (Associate Professor), the Department of Biological Sciences – Kuwait University. The voucher specimen number of the garlic species used is ALNAQEEB MA/001/1998 KTUH and the sample is kept at the Kuwait University Herbarium (KTUH).
Oral treatment
A group of NR (n = 36) was treated with normal saline (NR-NS, 0.5 ml/kg). Alternatively, a group of DR (n = 72) was divided into two subgroups: one group (n = 36) was treated with normal saline (DR-NS, 0.5 ml/kg) while the other group (n = 36) was treated with GE (DR-GE, 500 mg/ml/kg). The dose of garlic used was found to be most effective and safe. Treatments with either NS or GE were delivered to each rat at mid-morning as a single-oral daily-dose and continued for each group as shown in Fig. 1. A group of NR (n = 8) and a group of DR (n = 8) did not receive any treatment and their data represented BL biophysical and biochemical measurements as shown in Fig. 1.
body weight, food and water intake and urine output
The body weight, food and water intake and urine output for each rat were measured gravimetrically and volumetrically using metabolic cages at these times: day-7 post injection [BL - no treatment was given, NR (n = 8) + DR (n = 8)] and then at the end of the following weeks of treatment: week 1 [W1, NR-NS (n = 12) + DR-NS (n = 12) + DR-GE (n = 12)], week 4 [W4, NR-NS (n = 12) + DR-NS (n = 12) + DR-GE (n = 12)] and week 8 [W8, NR-NS (n = 12) + DR-NS (n = 12) + DR-GE (n = 12)] as shown in Fig. 1.
Rats sacrifice and collection of samples
Following induction of anesthesia (0.2 ml/100 g b.wt.) with a mixture of ketamine (9 ml, 10%, Dutch farm Nedar, Host den berg - Holland) plus xylazine (1 ml, 10 %, Interchemie, Vernary – Holland) each group of rats were sacrificed at the end of the designated time of treatment as shown in Fig. 1 and blood and tissue samples were collected for the following analyses:
i- Serum insulin concentration
Blood was collected via cardiac puncture from each rat at BL and then at the end of each time of treatment (W1, W4 and W8 - as shown in Fig. 1) and allowed to stand at room temperature. Serum was collected and stored at -20 ºC and later analyzed for insulin (SI) concentration using ELISA analysis kit following the manufacturer’s instructions (SPI bio, bertin pharma, France).
ii- Tissue insulin m-RNA expression:
Pancrease, liver, bile duct and left gastrocnemius skeletal muscle (GSM) were collected and stored at -20 ºC for later analysis of insulin m-RNA expression at BL (day-7 post injection – no treatment) and the end of W1, W4 and W8 of treatment as shown in Fig. 1. Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy Plus Universal Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany). Subsequently, reverse transcription of m-RNA to c-DNA was performed using SuperScript IV First-Strand Synthesis System (Life Technologies, Lithuania). Insulin m-RNA expression was estimated with qRT-PCR using TaqMan gene expression assay following the manufacturers’ instructions (Applied Biosystems, USA).
iii- Immunohistochemical localization and intensity numerical estimation of tissue insulin
Pancreas, liver, bile duct and GSM were collected and analyzed for tissue insulin immunohistochemical localization (IHC) and intensity numerical estimation at BL (day-7 post injection – no treatment) and the end of W1, W4 and W8 of treatment as shown in Fig. 1. Each tissue sample was washed in PBS (pH 7.4 - Sigma, USA), fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde (Merck, Germany), and then carried through routine histological preparation ending with embedding into paraffin wax (Leica Histo-embedder, Germany). Four-μm thick sections were cut, dewaxed and rehydrated then permeabilized with 1% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich, Netherlands). Antigen retrieval was performed using Tris-EDTA (Sigma, USA) for 60 min. To prevent endogenous peroxidase activity, tissue sections were blocked using a peroxidase blocking solution (DAKO Envision peroxidase system, DAKO). Additional blocking with 2% blocking buffer (Roche, Germany) in PBS was carried out to inhibit non-specific binding. Different tissue sections were then incubated overnight with rabbit anti-insulin-1 antibody (AbCam, UK), rabbit anti-C-peptide antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, USA) or mouse anti-insulin/proinsulin antibody (Invitrogen, USA) diluted in blocking buffer at 4˚C. After several washes with PBS, tissue sections were incubated with species specific peroxidase labelled secondary antibody. The signal was detected using the 3,39 Diaminobenzidine (DAB) substrate-chromogen kit specific for mouse or rabbit (Dakocytomation Envision System/HRP, DAKO, USA) followed by counterstaining with haematoxylin then mounting. To show localization (immuno-tagging) of insulin, immune-stained tissue sections were examined using light microscope equipped with a camera (ECLIPSE Ti2-E, Nikon, Japan) and images were captured. Insulin immunolocalizations intensity was also estimated by analyzing 3 images from each of 3 slides for each of 3 rats for each time of sacrifice for each group using a special software (NIS-Elments BR4.6) and following Nikon Image Analysis procedures.
iv- Determination of tissue-insulin concentration
Pancreas samples collected and stored at -20 ºC were analyzed for insulin (PI) concentration at BL (day-7 post injection - no treatment) and the end of W1, W4 and W8 of treatment as shown in Fig.1 using ELISA analysis kit following the manufacturer’s instruction (SPI bio, Bertin pharma, France).
v- Data presentation and statistical analyses
The readings of body weight, food and water intake, urine output, FBG, SI and PI concentration, m-RNA and IHC numerical intensity are presented in graphs as mean ± SEM. Images of PI-IHC are collated into 3 sets of imges as x4 illustrations. The readings were compared using two-way ANOVA with LSD post-hoc test (IBM SPSS - V.22) and difference were taken as significant when P <0.05.