Family policies (referred to in this paper as family-friendly work conditions (FFWCs)) have emerged internationally as an incentivising instrument for increasing women’s paid work participation, especially among mothers, including in Malaysia (Economic Planning Unit [EPU], 1996; Elias, 2009; Ferragina, 2020; Hegewisch & Gornick, 2011). Yet, FFWCs have played an ambiguous role and can be categorised into two family policy expansion movements (Abramovitz, 2018; Ferragina, 2019). The first movement defines family policy expansion as another tool for promoting neoliberalism with its emphasis on individual autonomy and responsibility regarding family over state support, while the second advocates for a more gender-friendly environment for working parents with young children (Alonso et al., 2019; Ferragina, 2019; Heenan, 2021; Venugopal, 2015).
The first approach sees governments using FFWCs to increase women’s (notably mothers) paid work participation, which remains characterised by industrial and occupational segregation, gender precariousness and wage differentials (Chung, 2018; Ferragina, 2019; LeBaron, 2010). The second movement seeks to partially liberate mothers from household duties and caregiving, redistribute unpaid work between men and women, and is consistent with more egalitarian traditions in the household and labour market, such as those exemplified by Nordic countries (Alonso et al., 2019; Boeckmann et al., 2015; Ferragina, 2019; Kanas & Steinmetz, 2021; World Economic Forum, 2022). According to Ferragina (2019), the first movement is the dominant policy approach in 23 OECD countries (including Australia, the United Kingdom, Denmark and Switzerland). However, the positioning of Malaysia in terms of family policy expansion movements remains unclear.
The global findings demonstrate that FFWCs are characterised by a country’s welfare regime and/or family policy typologies and continue to influence women’s employment rates (Esping-Andersen, 1990; Ferragina, 2020; Ferragina & Seeleib-Kaiser, 2015; Thévenon, 2011). Additionally, there are intricate implications concerning gender assumptions underlying FFWCs which may impact women's paid work participation (Budig et al., 2015; Wall & Escobedo, 2013). Nonetheless, due to differences in household composition (cultural and religious) and conceptions of family structures and values (traditional), the applicability of this global evidence, which is primarily from Western and Nordic countries to the Malaysian context is limited.
There is little knowledge about the impact of welfare regime and gender assumptions underlying FFWCs documentation in Malaysia, particularly through document analysis. Furthermore, existing global and national findings were biased due to the exclusion of the role of other non-domestic determinants in Malaysia (private and international organisations) as well as discounting of country-specific and unique characteristics. This paper aimed to address these gaps by generating new knowledge about the interpretation of FFWCs in the context of gender and welfare regime, with a focus on Malaysia specifically, and by the inclusion of FFWCs documents from both private and international organisations alongside public sector in the analysis.
The overall aim of this paper was to explore which FFWCs have been documented and uncover FFWCs’ interpretation in the context of gender and welfare regime. Evidence from this paper contributes to the gender and welfare regime literature on documented FFWCs in Malaysia. The findings of this study may be used to develop relevant strategies to increase women’s equity in paid work participation which aligns with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 5 (Gender Equality) and 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth) (United Nations, n.d.). The research design for this study includes a document analysis of FFWCs documents from the government (state), private and international organisations (market).
How Welfare Regimes and Gendered Typologies Influence the Impact of Family-Friendly Work Conditions on Women’s Work Participation
In the global welfare regime literature, FFWCs implementation was influenced by the country’s welfare regime and/or family policy typologies (Esping-Andersen, 1990; Ferragina & Seeleib-Kaiser, 2015; Thévenon, 2011). The differences in countries’ family policy typologies continue to have an impact on women’s employment rates, particularly mothers (Daly & Ferragina, 2018; Ferragina, 2020; Ferragina & Seeleib-Kaiser, 2015). For example, there are two defined family policy typologies that describe institutional differences: the earner-carer model and the primary caregiver model (Fraser, 1994; Misra et al., 2007). The earner-carer model (e.g., Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Iceland) was developed to assist women and men in balancing employment and care by offering generous support for working parents: encouraging both women and men to take parental leave, and widely available high-quality childcare services (Fraser, 1994; Misra et al., 2007; Thévenon, 2011). Subsequently, these countries have the highest women's and mothers’ employment rates across the OECD area (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD], 2020).
The primary caregiver model was distinguished by explicitly rewarding and valuing women for their caregiving efforts and time: providing generous maternity and/or parental leave as well as part-time employment (Misra et al., 2007; Thévenon, 2011). Consequently, countries in the primary-caregiver model such as Austria, Germany, Luxembourg and the Netherlands have lower rates of women’s and mother’s employment rates than countries in the earner-carer model (Nordic countries) (OECD, 2020). The impact of Malaysia’s welfare regime on FFWCs remains unknown. Based on these existing findings, it is crucial to examine the impact of welfare regime on FFWC implementation in Malaysia, which may explain the persistence of gender disparities in paid work participation (Department of Statistics Malaysia [DOSM], 2022c).
There are gendered assumptions underlying FFWCs about care for children and men’s and women’s paid and unpaid work, which may partially explain FFWCs ineffectiveness in achieving the goal of equitable participation (Boeckmann et al., 2015; Budig et al., 2012, 2015; Wall & Escobedo, 2013). For example, Sweden, Iceland, Denmark, Slovenia, and Australia implement the gender-neutral concept of ‘parental leave’, with the reinforcement that both women and men (on sharing basis) can take parental leave to stay at home for the majority of their children’s first year of life (Wall & Escobedo, 2013; Workplace Gender Equality Agency [WGEA], 2019). A strong emphasis in FFWCs on parents of all genders (i.e., fathers and mothers) being equally accountable for children’s care has led to higher women’s paid work participation in these countries (OECD, 2020; Wall & Escobedo, 2013). Comparatively, childcare leave (e.g., extended) with low levels of benefits may support and emphasise maternal care of children at home (Budig et al., 2015; Wall & Escobedo, 2013). Extensive leave durations were argued to be associated with traditional breadwinner model, with women combining motherhood and work sequentially rather than concurrently (Pettit & Hook, 2005; Wall & Escobedo, 2013). Accordingly, the activity rates of women without or with children (aged six and below) differ significantly, and maternal employment levels are low in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Estonia and Poland (Wall & Escobedo, 2013).
Existing insights on the interaction between welfare regimes, gender and FFWCs in dominantly Western or Nordic countries are not easily applicable to the Malaysian context. This is because Malaysia's regime does not conform to Western or Nordic welfare state regimes due to the different conceptions of traditional family systems and values, as well as religious and cultural differences in family household compositions (Mohd, 2012; Park & Jung, 2008; Tonelli et al., 2021). Therefore, the interaction between welfare regime, gender and documented FFWCs in Malaysia remains unknown, leaving little opportunity to identify whether FFWCs implementation is enhancing or minimising equitable women’s paid work participation. The following section discussed about the Malaysian context in-depth.
The Malaysian Context
Malaysia is recognised as having a ‘productivist’ welfare regime, where the state subordinates social welfare to economic growth and upholds laissez-faire capitalism (Holliday, 2000; Mohd, 2012; Park & Jung, 2008). Tonelli et al. (2021) recently characterised Malaysia as a moderately ‘productivist’ welfare regime with minimal social protection, where the market is the primary provider of infrastructure for work-family life balance. In Malaysia's 'productivist' welfare regime, the traditional family system is also dominant. The traditional-conservative household/family composition of men, women, and children assigns each strong gender-based role (EPU, 1996; 2001). Malaysian women are discursively positioned as having primary reproductive responsibility, with family and caregiving expected to take precedence over paid work (Aziz, 2011; N. Noor & Mahudin, 2016; Ning & Nwanesi, 2018). The Khazanah Research Institute [KRI] (2019) reported that working women in Malaysia were responsible for most of the unpaid care and domestic work although they work approximately the same amount of time as men.
Furthermore, Malaysia’s policy construction and treatment of the notion of women’s roles, status and functions in policies differs from that of Western and Nordic countries. Gender in policy documents is frequently constructed in binary terms: male/man (father) and female/woman (mother) (EPU, 1996; 2001), making it less likely to undermine traditional family system conceptions and associated gender roles. A clear example is the provision of leave for childcare. In Malaysia, the provision of leave to care for children was referred to as childcare leave and it is strongly associated with gendered norms and conceptualisation of women (EPU, 2001). This inevitably can influence women’s full participation and gender parity within the workforce.
Expectations of women to fulfil family carer roles and associated responsibilities limit employment opportunities and decrease the nation’s maternal employment rate (Ferragina, 2020; Tonelli et al., 2021). Women in Malaysia continue to be far less likely than men to participate in paid work (55.8%; 26.3% with men) although they expressed the desire to work (56.8% out of 1,265 respondents) (DOSM, 2022c; Ministry of Women Family and Community Development & United Nations Development Programme, 2014). In Malaysia, FFWCs include the promotion of staggered work hours and telework/work from home, provision of workplace creches and a statutory requirement for maternity leave (EPU, 2001; 2006; ILO, n.d.). Recently, the Malaysian government has extended maternity leave duration (from 60 to 98 days) and introduced paid paternity leave (seven consecutive days) and flexible work arrangements in the Employment Act (Amendment) 2022 (Department of Labour Peninsular Malaysia, 2023).
Statement of the Research Problem
There is limited knowledge about the interplay between FFWCs, welfare regime and gender in Malaysia. Tonelli et al. (2021) classified 16 East and Southeast Asian countries, including Malaysia into four clusters based on institutional indicators, particularly on child-related policies (i.e., childcare services, leave programmes, and flexible work arrangements) and welfare regime. Nonetheless, Tonelli et al. (2021) convey an artificial sense of coherence because of the nature of the grouping technique used to categorise the included countries, thereby obscuring significant within-cluster variability. To address this issue, this paper focused on Malaysia as a single unit of country analysis given its historical, economic, cultural and institutional distinctiveness and uniqueness from other countries. Additionally, little is known about the interaction between gender, welfare regime when examining the availability of FFWCs documents in Malaysia (Aminah Ahmad, 2007; Omar & Ahmad, 2009; Tonelli et al., 2021). More detailed analyses of specific FFWCs in Malaysia are needed (Aminah Ahmad, 2007; Ferragina, 2020; Omar & Ahmad, 2009; Tonelli et al., 2021) to understand the significance of welfare regime and gender in the FFWCs implementation, which may partially explain the lack of impact of policy initiatives on gender equity in participation rates in Malaysia (Mat Pozian et al., 2022).
There has been a lack of document analysis research on the interaction between gender, welfare regime and FFWCs. Only two studies analysed FFWCs documents in the public sector and private organisations through document analysis (Aminah Ahmad, 2007; Omar & Ahmad, 2009). According to Bryman and Burgess (1994), documents can produce and reproduce particular constructions of reality by manipulating the knowledge’s nature and content and are created by powerful entities within a social, political and economic context. The small number of document analysis research on FFWCs documents could lead to an incomplete understanding of women’s constructions of reality, which potentially be affected by the policymakers. Therefore, it is important to examine FFWCs availability through document analysis as information gaps must be viewed as reflecting and potentially reinforcing societal power relations (Bryman and Burgess, 1994).
Existing studies were also limited by the exclusion of FFWCs documents from international organisations. International organisations' FFWCs documents may have affected women employees differently. Excluding FFWCs documents from international organisations from research on this issue may also perpetuate gender inequality in the workforce. Inclusion of FFWCs documents from international organisations may enhance their visibility and accountability, ensuring their FFWCs implementation minimises gender inequality both in paid and unpaid work participation. Hence, this paper was more inclusive than existing research since it examines 11 specific FFWCs in public, private and international organisations' documentation.
In summary, given the limited knowledge of the interaction between FFWCs, welfare regime and gender in Malaysia, this paper aims to explore which FFWCs have been documented, as well as uncover FFWCs’ interpretation in the context of gender concepts and welfare regime through a feminist lens. Using Frasers’ (2005) conceptual lens (recognition and redistribution of politic of justice) helps analyse political struggles or tensions which devalue women. This paper recognises the influence of the welfare regime on the recognition and redistribution of politics in feminist activism. From this stance, recognition entails addressing inequality by viewing women as a devalued group in need of recognition; and redistribution is eliminating the gender differences and contradictions between men and women (Fraser, 2005).
This original research in the Malaysian context was designed to meet existing needs to better understand the influence of the welfare regime and the gender concept on FFWCs documents. The understanding is to comprehend how the lack of impact of FFWCs in Malaysia might be understood in terms of its positioning within the dichotomised policy movement (Ferragina, 2019; Mat Pozian et al., 2022). This can be achieved by examining which FFWCs have been documented, and how documents related to FFWCs in Malaysia function in achieving women’s equitable paid work participation (Linders, 2007).