Leptin controls chloride homeostasis in vitro.
Our first aim was to determine whether leptin directly acts on hippocampal cells to control Cl- homeostasis in the neonatal rat. We used acute postnatal (P) day 5 rat hippocampal slices and stimulated presynaptic GABAergic neurons while gramicidin perforated patch-clamp recordings were made from CA3 pyramidal neurons in the presence of the glutamatergic receptor blockers NBQX (5µM) and D-APV (40µM). GABAA receptor-mediated postsynaptic currents (eGABAA-PSCs) were evoked at different holding potentials, before and during the application of leptin (100 nM, 20 min), to determine the impact of the adipocyte hormone on their reversal potential (EGABA). We found that leptin induced an average depolarizing shift of EGABA (ΔEGABA) of 5.4+1.7 mV (from -48.2+2.8 mV to -42.8+3.7 mV, n=10, z=-2.5,p=0.005, Fig. 1A1 and B). In control experiments in which leptin was omitted EGABA did not change over the same recording duration (from -45.6+3.8 mV to -45.2+3.8 mV, n=8, z=-1.2, p=0.21, ΔEGABA= 1.3+0.5 mV, U=16.5, p =0.03 vs leptin 100 nM response, Fig. 1A2 and B). Leptin applied at a concentration of 20 nM for 20 min had no effect on EGABA(from -53.6+2.4 mV to -54.8+3.1 mV, n=6, z=-1.5, p=0.5, ΔEGABA= -0.5+1.6 mV, U=11, p=0.09 vs control experiment, Fig. 1B). We next determined whether the depolarizing shift of EGABA induced by leptin was associated with increased neuronal excitation. To this end we recorded action potentials in loose patch mode in the presence of NBQX (5µM) and D-APV (40µM). After a baseline period (10 min), leptin (100 nM) was added to the perfusion medium for 20 minutes. We assessed the effect of leptin on action potential firing at the end of the leptin application (15-20 min) versus the baseline period (-10-0 min, Fig. 1C). Leptin led to a significant increase in the frequency of action potentials (from 0.46+0.14 Hz to 1.02+0.32 Hz, n=7, z=-2.1, p=0.03, Fig. 1C and D). In interleaved control experiments in which leptin was omitted the spike firing remained constant (from 0.32+0.12 Hz to 0.43+0.16 Hz, n=7, z=-1.1, p=0.29 vs baseline and U=16, p=0.04 vs leptin 100 nM response, Fig. 1C and D). In agreement with the lack of effect of leptin at 20 nM on EGABA (Fig. 1B), bath applied leptin at the same concentration (20 nM, 20 min) had no effect on the firing frequency of CA3 pyramidal neurons (from 0.47+0.14 Hz to 0.44+0.16 Hz, n=6, z=-0.5, p=0.68 vs baseline and U=17, p=0.12 vs control experiment, Fig. 1B). Altogether these data show that bath applied leptin shifts EGABA towards depolarizing values and increases the neuronal excitation of P5 CA3 pyramidal neurons on rat hippocampal slices.
Leptin controls KCC2 activity in vitro.
Chloride homeostasis and the strength of GABAA-mediated synaptic inhibition are mainly controlled by the activity of two cation-chloride cotransporters: the Na+-K+-2Cl− (NKCC1) co-transporter that accumulates Cl− intracellularly and the K+-Cl− (KCC2) co-transporter that lowers intracellular Cl− concentration (33,34). We therefore asked whether leptin acts on KCC2 and/or NKCC1 activity. We found that the diuretic bumetanide at a concentration of 100µM, to block both NKCC1 and KCC2 had no effect on EGABA (from -51.4+2.9mV (n=20) to -55.6+4.2 mV, (n=15), U=135, p=0.6, Fig. 2B) but prevented the depolarizing shift of EGABA induced by leptin (100 nM, 20 min) (from -54.7+4.4 mV to -54.6+5.7 mV, n=10, z=-0.02, p=0.85, ΔEGABA= -0.1+2.0 mV, U=22.5, p=0.03 vs leptin 100 nM response, Fig. 2A). However, bumetanide at 20µM to block NKCC1 shifted EGABA toward hyperpolarizing values (from -51.4+2.9mV (n=20) to -75.4+4.4 mV (n=10), U=23.5, p=0.009, Fig. 2B) but failed to prevent the effect of leptin (100 nM, 20 min) on EGABA(from -75.4+5.8 mV to -67.4+6.2 mV, n=7, z=-2.1, p=0.04, ΔEGABA= 8.2+2.9 mV, U=28, p=0.51 vs leptin 100 nM response, Fig. 2A). These results suggest that leptin down-regulates KCC2 activity. Accordingly, the selective KCC2 blocker VU0463271 (20 µM) led to a non-significant depolarizing shift of EGABA (from -57.5+6.1mV to -42.3+4.0 mV, n=6, z=-1.9, p=0.06, Fig. 2B) and prevented the effect of leptin (100 nM, 20 min) (from -43.8+3.2 mV to -44.7+3.8 mV, n=7, z=-0.6, P=0.65, ΔEGABA= -0.8+1.2 mV, U=9.5, p=0.01 vs leptin 100 nM response, Fig. 2A).
To determine whether the increase in spike firing induced by bath applied leptin (Fig. 1 C and D) also resulted from a down regulation of KCC2 activity and a modification of GABAergic strength, the same experiment was repeated in the continuous presence of the selective GABAA receptor antagonist Gabazine (5µM) or in the presence of the selective KCC2 blocker VU0463271. We found that Gabazine (5µM) completely abolished the leptin-induced (100 nM, 20 min) increase in firing. The frequency of action potential was respectively 0.81+0.22 Hz and 0.85+0.28 Hz before and during the application of leptin (n=8, z=-0.07, p=0.96 vs baseline and U=7, p=0.01 vs leptin 100 nM response, Fig. 2C). Likewise, the selective KCC2 blocker VU0463271 (20µM) also prevented the effect of leptin (100 nM, 20 min) (from 0.23+0.06 to 0.21+0.04 Hz before and during the application of leptin, n=6, z=-0.4, p=0.72 vs baseline and U=6, p=0.03 vs leptin 100 nM response, Fig. 2C). Altogether, these data show that leptin down-regulates KCC2 activity shifting EGABA towards depolarizing values in P5 rat hippocampal slices.
The action of leptin in vitro on chloride homeostasis is developmentally regulated
Previous studies reported that the responsiveness of leptin is regulated during development (29,35–37). We therefore asked whether the leptin-induced depolarizing shift of EGABA is developmentally regulated. We found a non-linear bell-shaped relationship between the age of the rats and the responsiveness of leptin. Thus, while bath applied leptin (100nM, 20 min) led to a significant depolarizing shift of EGABA at P5 (Fig. 1B), the same application had no effect on the reversal potential of GABAA-PSCs evoked on hippocampal slices at P2 (from -45.6+7.1 mV to -47.6+6.4 mV, n=5, z=-0.9, p=0.43, ΔEGABA=-0.7+2.1 mV, U=7, P=0.02 vs leptin 100 nM response at P5, Fig. 3A) and P10 (from -70.8+2.1mV to -70.3+2.7 mV, n=6, z=-0.1, p=0.99, ΔEGABA=0.5+1.6 mV, U=14, p=0.08 vs leptin 100 nM response at P5, Fig. 3A). Of note, the effect of leptin on EGABA was not correlated to the initial polarity of the GABAergic responses (Fig. 3B). Likewise, leptin (100 nM, 20 min) failed to increase the firing frequency of CA3 pyramidal neurons when applied at P10 (from 0.55+0.13 to 0.64+0.13 Hz before and during the application of leptin, n=11, z=-1.8, p=0.1 and U=16, p=0.9 vs baseline leptin 100 nM response at P5, Fig. 3C). We were unable to test the effect of leptin at P2 because of a sparse action potentials and low frequency discharge. Altogether, these data show that the effects of leptin on chloride homeostasis in vitro are restricted to a narrowed developmental window.