Synthesis and Characterization of Nanocopolymers
Synthesis and Characterization of (Cs-co-HEMA)"
The synthesis of the (Cs-co-HEMA) material involves copolymerizing Cs (Copolymerizable surfactant) and HEMA (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) using HDODA (1,6-hexanediol diacrylate) as a crosslinking agent and 1-hydroxycyclohexyl phenyl ketone as a photoinitiator. The process begins by mixing Cs, HEMA, HDODA, and the photoinitiator in a reaction vessel, followed by stirring in a dark environment at room temperature. Nitrogen gas is then purged over the mixture for 30 min to remove any dissolved oxygen. The mixture is poured into polypropylene molds to give it the desired shape, and it is cured under a 365 nm UV light for 4 min. This UV light activates the photoinitiator, initiating the polymerization reaction and resulting in the formation of the (Cs-co-HEMA) material. The reaction is illustrated at Scheme 1.
FTIR Spectroscopy of (Cs-co-HEMA)
The FTIR spectrum of (Cs-co-HEMA) exhibits multiple absorption bands at specific wavenumbers, offering information about the molecular structure of the copolymer. Among these absorption bands, important features include an absorption band at 3348 cm-1, corresponding to the stretching vibration of the hydroxyl (-OH) groups present in the polymer. Additionally, absorption bands at 3292 cm-1 (N-H stretching of Cs), 2943 cm-1, and 2887 cm-1 (C-H stretching of the polymer backbone), 1728 cm-1 (C=O stretching, ester group), 1620 cm-1 (N-H-C=O), 1170 cm-1 and 1083 cm-1 (C-O-C stretching), 1033 cm-1 (-C-O of C-OH stretching), and 1170 cm-1 (C-N stretching) are observed [33-35].
1HNMR spectrum of (Cs-co-HEMA)
The 1H NMR spectrum of (HEMA-co-Cs) displayed in Figure 2 exhibits distinct peaks at various chemical shifts, providing insights into the composition and structure of the copolymer. These peaks include a singlet at 0.9δ ppm for 3H of CH3 groups from both HEMA and HDODA, a multiplet ranging from 1.23 to 1.8 δ ppm for 2H of CH2 groups from both HEMA and HDODA, a singlet at 2.1 δ ppm for 3H of the COCH3 group, a singlet at 3.4 δ ppm for 1H of the OH group in HEMA, a singlet at 3.58 δ ppm for 2H of the CH2OH group in HEMA, a multiplet ranging from 3.9 to 4.0 δ ppm for 2H of the COOCH2 group in HEMA, a multiplet ranging from 4.2 to 4.8 δ ppm for 2H of the COOCH2 group in HDODA, and a singlet at 5.58 δ ppm for 1H of the NH group in Cs [33-35].
Scanning Electron Microscopy
To examine the surface topography of the nanopolymer used in the study, a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis was performed. In this analysis, the SEM imaging was utilized to investigate the morphology and structure of the nanopolymer. The copolymerization of Cs and HEMA resulted in the formation of a porous framework. These pores play a significant role as they provide regions where water can permeate and interact with the hydrophilic groups of the graft copolymers in response to external stimuli. Figure 3 presents the SEM micrograph, capturing the detailed surface features and dimensions of the nanopolymer at two different magnifications, specifically 200 nm and 500 nm.
X– Ray Diffraction Analysis (XRD)
X-ray Diffraction (XRD) is a widely used analytical technique employed to determine the phase composition, crystal structure, and grain size of various materials. XRD analysis of the catalysts in this study was performed at room temperature, utilizing an X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation. The measurements were conducted within the Bragg angle range of 10° ≤ 2θ ≤ 90°, with a scan speed of 2° per min. The fundamental principle underlying XRD analysis is described by:
2d(hkl) sinθ = mλ
where λ represents the wavelength of the X-ray used, θ corresponds to the Bragg diffraction angle of the XRD peak measured in degrees (also known as the scattering angle), m is an integer representing the order of the diffraction peak, and d(hkl) denotes the inter-plane distance between atoms, ions, or molecules.
Figure 4 displays the XRD spectra of the (Cs-co-HEMA) nanocopolymer. The analysis of the patterns revealed that the compounds exhibit a crystalline crystal structure. The diffraction peaks were observed within the range of 10°-75° in 2θ. Notably, all the nanocopolymer samples exhibited distinct peaks, including those at 2θ values of 29.7728, 31.800, 32.2032, 34.014640.2146, 45.6535, 56.9997, 66.5896, and 75.6692. Additionally, a broad peak was observed in these compounds. The diffraction peaks observed in the nanocopolymer samples can be attributed to the monoclinic system crystalline structure and nanostructure of (Cs-co-HEMA). This is evident not only from the peak positions but also from the relative intensity of the characteristic peaks. The crystalline nature of the (Cs-co-HEMA) nanocopolymer was confirmed by the XRD analysis. The crystallite size (D) of the nanocopolymer was calculated using:
D = (0.94 λ) / (β cosθ)
The calculation involved determining the full width at half maximum (FWHM) (β) of the preferred orientation diffraction peak. The Debye-Sherrer's equation was utilized for this purpose. The calculated crystallite sizes are presented in Table 2. The obtained results are in good agreement with the analysis conducted, confirming the crystalline nature of the (Cs-co-HEMA) nanocopolymer.
Table (2): X-ray diffraction parameters for Cs-co-HEMA.
Pos. [°2Th.]
|
Height [cts]
|
FWHM [°2Th.]
|
d-spacing [Å]
|
Rel. Int. [%]
|
Tip width [°2Th.]
|
D(nm)
|
29.7728
|
51.06
|
3.0867
|
2.99840
|
8.35
|
3.7040
|
0.47372
|
31.8000
|
611.63
|
0.1465
|
2.81173
|
100.00
|
0.1758
|
9.9834
|
32.2032
|
435.57
|
0.2223
|
2.77744
|
71.21
|
0.2667
|
6.58
|
34.0146
|
34.28
|
0.2316
|
2.63356
|
5.60
|
0.2780
|
6.315
|
40.2146
|
8.54
|
1.5168
|
2.24068
|
1.40
|
1.8201
|
0.9640
|
45.6535
|
399.26
|
0.4222
|
1.98558
|
65.28
|
0.5066
|
3.4639
|
56.9997
|
56.67
|
2.1676
|
1.61435
|
9.27
|
2.6011
|
0.6745
|
66.5896
|
24.08
|
1.2299
|
1.40323
|
3.94
|
1.4759
|
1.1888
|
75.6692
|
51.55
|
1.4130
|
1.25582
|
8.43
|
1.6956
|
1.0348
|
Degree of swelling of Cs-co-HEMA as function of Cs: HEMA composition ratio
Figure 5 depicts the time-dependent swelling behavior of the hydrogel PHEMA at different pH levels. The introduction of chitosan into the hydrogel formulation results in an increase in water content. This can be attributed to the presence of hydroxyl (-OH) and amino (-NH) groups in chitosan, which have the ability to form hydrogen bonds with water molecules. Consequently, the hydrogel exhibits a higher capacity to absorb and retain water. The Swelling Ratio, which is a measure of the amount of water absorbed by the hydrogel, reaches a value of 356. This significant increase in the Swelling Ratio indicates a substantial improvement in the hydrogel's water absorption capability. The incorporation of hydrophilic monomers, such as chitosan, proves to be effective in enhancing the water uptake capacity of hydrogels [36].
Analysis of drug (5-Amino salicylic acid) (5-ASA)
In drug-related work, accuracy and precision in analytical techniques are of utmost importance. Therefore, an initial UV-visible method was developed to analyze the component 5-Amino salicylic acid (5-ASA) in drug loading and release media. 5-Amino salicylic acid is commercially available in a crystalline form. To prepare a stock solution, the compound (5-ASA) can be dissolved in an organic solvent that has been purged with an inert gas. Although it is insoluble in ethanol, (5-ASA) can be dissolved in organic solvents such as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and dimethyl formamide (DMF). The solubility of (5-ASA) in DMSO is approximately 4 mg/ml, while in DMF it is around 1.6 mg/ml. Upon dissolution in either of these solvents, (5-ASA) forms a yellow-colored solution [37].
The effect of pH on the release of drug (5-ASA)
The release rates of 5-Amino salicylic acid (5-ASA) from Cs/HEMA hydrogels were measured at different pH levels (2, 4, 7, and 8), as depicted in Figures 6. Notably, the highest release rate of 5-ASA was observed at pH 8, which can be attributed to the hydrogels' greater swelling ratio. This can be explained by the presence of a high concentration of H+ ions, which promotes the ionization of NH2 groups and increases the overall ion number concentration within the gel matrix. Consequently, the hydrogels exhibit an enhanced ability to interact with water molecules through increased solvation. On the other hand, at a low pH of 2, the amino groups of Chitosan undergo protonation. This protonation leads to repulsion between the polymer chains and subsequent release of the drug. The decrease in release observed at pH 2 can be attributed to the diminished swelling ratio of the hydrogels. This reduction is a result of the deprotonation of the amino groups, which leads to a decrease in repulsion between the polymer chains and causes the hydrogels to shrink [39].
The effect of temperature on the release of drug (5-ASA)
The influence of temperature on the release of 5-Amino salicylic acid (5-ASA) has also been investigated in this study. According to Figure 7, it has been observed that the release rate is higher at 39 °C compared to 37 °C. This temperature-dependent variation can be attributed to the hydrogen bonding interactions among the amino groups present in the Chitosan chains. As the temperature increases, the polymer chains tend to unwind, leading to the disruption of secondary interactions such as intramolecular hydrogen bonding. This allows for a greater penetration of water into the gel network. Consequently, the swelling ratio of all hydrogels increases with the rise in temperature. This increase in the swelling ratio can have a significant impact on the release rate of 5-ASA by expanding the diffusion pathways within the superabsorbent material. The combined effect of increased water penetration and expanded diffusion pathways is believed to enhance the release rate of 5-ASA as the temperature rises [39].
The effect of amount of loading on release of drug (5-ASA)
In this study, a porous Cs/HEMA hydrogel was loaded with varying amounts of 5-Amino salicylic acid (5-ASA), and its release profile was examined at different pH levels (2, 4, 7, and 8). The results, illustrated in Figure 8, indicate that the loading capacity of 5-ASA increases as the concentration of the active agent in the loading medium is increased. Additionally, the release profiles demonstrate that the amount of 5-ASA released also increases with higher loading of the active agent. The speed at which the solvent front enters the hydrogel surface, known as the release rate, increases as the loading of 5-ASA increases. This phenomenon can be attributed to the presence of empty spaces or voids within the hydrogel matrix, which act as diffusion barriers and restrict the transportation of 5-ASA molecules. As the loading of 5-ASA increases, these empty spaces become more pronounced, hindering the release of the drug. It's important to note that the release of drugs through microspheres, such as the porous Cs/HEMA hydrogel in this study, is influenced by multiple factors. These factors include particle size, polymer crystallinity, surface properties, molecular weight, polymer composition, swelling ratio, degradation rate, drug binding affinity, and hydrogel rate [40].