Characteristics of the population
As is shown in table 1, among the 5,120 individuals, 49.5% were male, and 50.5% were female, with a mean age of 50.0± 17.2 years. The overall prevalence of depression was 7.8%, with prevalence rates of 6.2% and 9.3% among males and females respectively. Compared to the group without depressive symptoms, the depression group tends to be female, middle education level, living alone, lower income levels and higher BMI, HbEO levels, serum cotinine levels and medical conditions(P<0.001).
Table S.1 shows the baseline characteristics of the population following stratification into quartiles based on EO levels. Based on log2-transformed HbEO
Variables
|
No-depression
(n = 4722)
|
Depression
(n = 398)
|
p
|
Gender n (%)
|
|
|
< 0.001
|
Male
|
2375 (50.3)
|
158 (39.7)
|
|
Female
|
2347 (49.7)
|
240 (60.3)
|
|
Age(years), Mean ± SD
|
50.0 ± 17.2
|
50.4 ± 16.9
|
0.634
|
Race/ethnicity, n (%)
|
|
|
0.164
|
Mexican American
|
642 (13.6)
|
47 (11.8)
|
|
Other Hispanic
|
472 (10)
|
47 (11.8)
|
|
Non-Hispanic White
|
1814 (38.4)
|
167 (42)
|
|
Non-Hispanic Black
|
1036 (21.9)
|
88 (22.1)
|
|
Other Race
|
758 (16.1)
|
49 (12.3)
|
|
Education level, n (%)
|
|
|
< 0.001
|
< 9
|
372 (7.9)
|
41 (10.3)
|
|
9–12
|
1599 (33.9)
|
185 (46.5)
|
|
>12
|
2751 (58.3)
|
172 (43.2)
|
|
Marital status, n (%)
|
|
|
< 0.001
|
Living with partner
|
2899 (61.4)
|
182 (45.7)
|
|
Living alone
|
1823 (38.6)
|
216 (54.3)
|
|
PIR, n (%)
|
|
|
< 0.001
|
Low
|
1352 (28.6)
|
196 (49.2)
|
|
Medium
|
1807 (38.3)
|
142 (35.7)
|
|
High
|
1563 (33.1)
|
60 (15.1)
|
|
BMI(kg/m2), Mean ± SD
|
29.5 ± 7.1
|
31.6 ± 9.0
|
< 0.001
|
Sleep duration on weekdays (hours),Mean ± SD
|
7.4 ± 1.5
|
7.5 ± 5.0
|
0.351
|
DM, n (%)
|
|
|
< 0.001
|
No
|
4076 (86.3)
|
313 (78.6)
|
|
Yes
|
646 (13.7)
|
85 (21.4)
|
|
CHD, n (%)
|
|
|
< 0.001
|
No
|
4558 (96.5)
|
371 (93.2)
|
|
Yes
|
164 (3.5)
|
27 (6.8)
|
|
Stroke, n (%)
|
|
|
< 0.001
|
No
|
4547 (96.3)
|
362 (91)
|
|
Yes
|
175 (3.7)
|
36 (9)
|
|
Cancer, n (%)
|
|
|
0.015
|
No
|
4272 (90.5)
|
345 (86.7)
|
|
Yes
|
450 (9.5)
|
53 (13.3)
|
|
Hypertension, n (%)
|
|
|
< 0.001
|
No
|
3367 (71.3)
|
225 (56.5)
|
|
Yes
|
1355 (28.7)
|
173 (43.5)
|
|
Asthma, n (%)
|
|
|
< 0.001
|
No
|
4044 (85.6)
|
281 (70.6)
|
|
Yes
|
678 (14.4)
|
117 (29.4)
|
|
Liver disease, n (%)
|
|
|
< 0.001
|
No
|
4531 (96)
|
348 (87.4)
|
|
Yes
|
191 (4)
|
50 (12.6)
|
|
Cotinine, Median (IQR)
|
0.0 (0.0, 4.6)
|
0.5 (0.0, 183.0)
|
< 0.001
|
log2EO, Median (IQR)
|
4.4 (4.0, 5.3)
|
4.8 (4.1, 7.1)
|
< 0.001
|
Sedentary time (hours), Median (IQR)
|
6.0 (4.0, 8.0)
|
6.0 (4.0, 8.0)
|
0.006
|
cognitive/emotional score, Median (IQR)
|
0.0 (0.0, 1.0)
|
8.0 (6.0, 10.0)
|
< 0.001
|
Somatic score,
Median (IQR)
|
1.0 (0.0, 2.0)
|
6.0 (5.0, 8.0)
|
< 0.001
|
Table.1 Characteristics of participants.
Abbreviations: PIR:Ratio of family income to poverty;MI:body mass index;DM:diabetes mellitus;CHD:coronary heart disease;log2EO:log2-transformed ethylene oxide.
Levels, we divided participants equally into 4 groups: group Q1 (2.536 pmol/g Hb ≤ log2 HbEO < 3.991 pmol/g Hb , n = 877), group Q2 (3.994 pmol/g Hb ≤ log2 HbEO < 4.459 pmol/g Hb, n =880), Q3 group (4.461 pmol/g Hb≤log2 HbEO<5.423 pmol/g Hb), and Q4 group (5.429 pmol/g Hb≤log2 HbEO<10.512 pmol/g Hb). Higher HbEO levels were primarily observed in the youngers, males, living alone, lower PIR, a history of stroke, hypertension, asthma, liver disease, and patients with high cotinine levels. The study also revealed elevated depression scores, cognitive/emotional scores and somatic scores in the group with higher HbEO levels.
Relationship between ethylene oxide hemoglobin adducts and depression
Multiple logistic analysis (Table S.2) showed that as a continuous variable, HbEO levels were positively associated with the risk of depression, (Crude ratio OR 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.19~1.34, p<0.001). This relationship persisted after different model adjustments, Model I (OR=1.19, 95% CI 1.12~1.27, p<0.001), Model II (OR=1.23, 95% CI 1.12~1.35, p<0.001), and Model III (OR=1.19, 95% CI 1.09~1.31, p<0.001). Model I was adjusted for socio-demograph-ic characteristics including gender, age, race, education level, marital status, and annual family income (PIR). Model II was further adjusted for BMI, serum cot-inine, sedentary time, and log2-transformed HbEO was categorized into four groups, the adjusted OR for ethylene oxide adducts and depression were 1.09(95%CI:0.78~1.51),1.02(95%CI:0.72~1.43),2.11 (95%CI:1.49~2.97) for Q2, Q3, and Q4 respectively, when compared to Q1, the group with low level of ethylene oxide in model II.
Furthermore, we performed regression analyses to examine the association between HbEO levels and various aspects of depression, including PHQ total scores, individual symptom phenotypes of depression, as well as cognitive/emotional scores and somatic score.In the linear regression analysis with the total score of PHQ-9 as a continuous variable, it was observed that HbEO levels show a positive correlation with PHQ-9 scores. As HbEO levels increase, there is a corresponding increase in PHQ-9 scores(β=0.36,95%CI:0.25~0.46 in Model II). This relationship persists even after stratifying ethylene oxide levels into quartiles and adjusting the model accordingly(β=1.25,95%CI:0.85~1.63 in Model II)(Table.2).Moreover, cognitive/emotional scores and somatic scores also increase with the elevation of EO levels.This result maintains its robustness, even EO as a continuous or categorical variable.(Table S.3,Table S.4)
The results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis indicate that with the increase in HbEO levels, the risk for 1 (lack of pleasure), 2 (depressed mood), 3 (sleep disturbance), 4(fatigue), 5(appetite changes), 6(low self-esteem), 7(difficulty concentrating), 8 (psychomotor agitation/retardation) increases, while PHQ-9-suicidal ideation does not show a corresponding increase(Table S.5-S.13). The results of cubic spline curve indicate a linear relationship between EO and depressed mood,sleep disturbance,fatigue,low self-esteem,difficulty concentrating, psychomotor agitation/retardation(Figure S.1-S.8).Additionally, there is a curvilinear relationship between HbEO levels and two item-- lack of pleasure and appetite changes, with inflection points at 4.08 and 4.71, respectively. (Table S.14-S.15).
Table 2.Association between log2-transformed HbEO and total score of PHQ-9.
Variable
|
Crude
|
p-value
|
Model I
|
p-value
|
Model II
|
p-value
|
Model III
|
p-value
|
Log2HbEO
|
0.36 (0.28~0.44)
|
<0.001
|
0.3 (0.22~0.38)
|
<0.001
|
0.36 (0.25~0.46)
|
<0.001
|
0.3 (0.2~0.41)
|
<0.001
|
Q1 group
|
1(Ref)
|
|
1(Ref)
|
|
1(Ref)
|
|
1(Ref)
|
|
Q2 group
|
0.09 (-0.24~0.42)
|
0.596
|
0.09 (-0.23~0.42)
|
0.576
|
0.1 (-0.22~0.43)
|
0.531
|
0.08 (-0.24~0.4)
|
0.611
|
Q3 group
|
0.01 (-0.32~0.34)
|
0.956
|
0.07 (-0.26~0.4)
|
0.683
|
0.16 (-0.17~0.49)
|
0.337
|
0.08 (-0.25~0.4)
|
0.642
|
Q4 group
|
1.32 (0.98~1.65)
|
<0.001
|
1.12 (0.78~1.46)
|
<0.001
|
1.24 (0.85~1.63)
|
<0.001
|
1.08 (0.7~1.46)
|
<0.001
|
p for trend
|
|
<0.001
|
|
<0.001
|
|
<0.001
|
|
<0.001
|
Notes: Crude model adjusted for none.
Model I :Adjust for gender, age, race, education, marital status, and PIR.
Model II:Adjust for the variables in Model I plus BMI, Cotinine, sedentary time and sleep duration on weekdays .
Model III:Adjust for the variables in Model II plus hypertension, CHD,stroke,cancer,DM,asthma,liver.
The cubic spline curve between blood EO levels and depression showed a linear relationship (p for nonlinearity >0.05) (Figure.2). Subgroup analyses were used to test
the consistency of the relationship between HbEO levels and depression in different groups of the population. As is shown in the figure 3, no significant interactions were found in any subgroups after stratification by gender, age, race, education level, marital status, household income, BMI, alcohol consumption, and smoking. Given multiple calibration issues, p-values less than 0.05 for the gender interaction may not be statistically significant.