Habitat environment
Our transect counts showed that C. s. akitanus was recorded only the semi-natural grassland and did not appear in the forest area, indicating that the species is undoubtedly grassland species. We could not find any individuals of the grasshopper in the unmown area around Site A and B within the grassland. In addition, local populations of C. s. akitanus were confirmed in each study area, which corresponds to two study sites (Fig. 1 Site A and B). Both populations area limited a narrow space such a ridge in the studied grassland. No other populations were found in the grassland.
Feeding behavior and food plants
Three examples of the feeding behavior of C. s. akitanus were observed in the study area. First, at Site A on (11:14) 21 August 2016, an adult female fed a leaf of Trifolium repens. Second, at Site B on (14:38) 13 August 2017, an adult female fed a leaf of Artemisia japonica withered on the ground surface. In this example, feeding marks were observed at both living (fresh) and dead (dry) leaves. Third, at Site B on (11:35) 26 August 2017, an adult female fed a radical leaf of Ixeridium dentatum.
Our cage experiment showed that food plants of C. s. akitanus is not single species, whereas it was limited family and species, especially, the family Asteraceae and Fabaceae (Table 1). The pteridophyte, P. aquilinum and the monocotyledon, M. sinensis and A. hirta were not fed by C. s. akitanus. To test whether this species feeds the monocotyledon plant, we introduced leaves of Setaria viridis (the family Poaceae) to reared individuals. Although this plant doesn’t grow in the studied grassland, C. s. akitanus fed it well (Table 1).
Table 1
Food preferences of Celes skalozubovi akitanus in the cage experiment
| | 14–16 July 2017 | | 17–19 July 2017 |
Family | Species | Last instar nymphs (five individuas) | | Last instar nymphs (four individuals) | Only adult male |
Fabaceae | Pueraria lobate | I | | I | I |
| Lespedeza bicolor | I | | I | I |
| Desmodium podocarpum | II | | II | IV |
Asteraceae | Artemisia japonica | I | | I | I |
| Artemisia princeps | II | | - | - |
| Solidago virgaurea var. asiatica | - | | III | III |
| Aster ageratooides | IV | | III | IV |
Rosaceae | Potentilla freyniana | III | | IV | IV |
| Persicaria conspicua | - | | II | II |
Primulaceae | Lysimachia clethroides | - | | III | III |
Violaceae | Viola mandshurica | IV | | IV | IV |
Poaceae | Miscanthus sinensis | IV | | IV | IV |
| Arundinella hirta | IV | | IV | IV |
| Setaria viridis* | I | | I | II |
Dennstaedtiaceae | Pteridium aquilinum | IV | | IV | IV |
*non-native plant species in the studied grassland I, prefer to feed; II, feed on subsidiary; III, only take a bite but not feed; IV, not feed; -, did not provide |
Mating
We observed only two mating behaviors of C. s. akitanus in the field. First case, on (11:45) 23 August 2016 in the study route of Site B, a pair of the species have mated on a dead grass of bare ground, and the male twisted his abdomen to left side of the female abdomen. The time of this mating process was unknown. The other, on (16:50) 7 August 2017 in the study route of Site B, this mating form was the same as first case, and the time of mating process was unknown. In our MRR survey, some females were found in pairs with males. We didn’t observed males mounting on females other than the mating described above.
We observed only one mating behavior in our rearing experiment. In this case, firstly, a male recognized visually a female and the male moved his antenna up and down, and then rubbed his wings and hind legs (this may be stridulation of the species). The female, however, didn’t react to this male’s behavior and consequently the mating was not occurred. Subsequently, when the female walked pass the male, a mating occurred after the male mounted the female. The male twisted his abdomen to right side of the female abdomen.
Oviposition
In the study field, two female oviposition behaviors were observed. In the first case, on (14:50) 1 September 2015 at the place adjacent to Site A, when it was rainy, the researcher found a female walking on asphalt with doing an oviposition behavior which open and close the beaked tip of the abdomen toward the ground surface. The female was moved to Site A by the researcher, in order to avoid roadkill. At 15:00, the female had dug the ground for 3 minutes, and then started walking. At 17:48, the female had laid eggs in the ground, and continued until 18:25. After that for 3 minutes, the female buried again the oviposition site using her hind legs skillfully.
The latter case, on (12:20) 16 September 2017, a female ovipositing in Site B was found. We didn’t find even the same female in Site B when we investigated at 10:55 of the same day. Thus, this female oviposition should be begun after that. At 12:42, the female finished egg laying, and infilled and beat using her hind legs the oviposition site for 3 minutes.
Additionally, on (15:45) 16 September 2015, a female digging in the ground was found at Site A, but its oviposition was not observed. On 6 September 2017, moreover, we focused on the investigation of female oviposition under bad (rainy) weather condition, assuming that in such weather female may lay eggs in softy and moist soil. However, we didn’t observe not only oviposition behavior but also the existence of female adult.
Flying behavior
C. s. akitanus male escaped into grassland after vertically jumping with spreading hindwings height of 1.0–1.2 m from the ground. Females also took such behavior similar to male, but often jumped with no spreading hindwings, and the height of jumping is less than 0.5 m. The observation of jumping with spreading hind legs were 37 examples for males and 29 examples for females (Fig. 2a). In contrast, the observation of flying with flexing hind legs was only one male (Fig. 2b). When C. s. akitanus jumps without spreading hindwings, it takes frequently with facing up posture (Fig. 2c).
Population demographics
In Site A, we marked C. s. akitanus adults of 14 individuals (male: 7 and female: 7) in 2016 and 22 individuals (male: 12 and female: 10) in 2017 (Table 2). The recapture rate at Site A was 100% in 2016 and 77.3% (male: 75% and female: 80%) in 2017. In Site B, we marked C. s. akitanus adults of 50 individuals (male: 30 and female: 20) in 2016 and 82 individuals (male: 49 and female: 33) in 2017 (Table 2). The recapture rate at Site B was 76% (male: 76.7% and female: 75%) in 2016 and 68.3% (male: 67.3% and female: 69.7%) in 2017. There was no significant difference in the captured individuals between male and female (Wilcoxon rank sum test, Site A, 2016: P = 0.7664, 2017: P = 0.6908, Site B, 2016: P = 0.2719, 2017: P = 0.1077).
Table 2
Number of marked individuals, recaptured individuals, recapture events and recapture ratio of Celes skalozubovi akitanus on Site A and B
Site | Year | Sex | Number of marked | Number of recaptured | Recapture events | Recapture ratio (%) |
A | 2016 | Male | 7 | 7 | 48 | 100 |
Female | 7 | 7 | 49 | 100 |
Total | 14 | 14 | 97 | 100 |
2017 | Male | 12 | 9 | 17 | 75 |
Female | 10 | 8 | 14 | 80 |
Total | 22 | 17 | 31 | 77.3 |
B | 2016 | Male | 30 | 23 | 80 | 76.7 |
Female | 20 | 15 | 62 | 75 |
Total | 50 | 38 | 142 | 76 |
2017 | Male | 49 | 33 | 115 | 67.3 |
Female | 33 | 23 | 91 | 69.7 |
Total | 82 | 56 | 206 | 68.3 |
In the study area, the total population size estimated by the best model at Site A was 13.6 individuals in 2016 and 30.0 individuals in 2017 (Table 3). At Site B, the total population size estimated by the best model was 128.8 individuals in 2016 and 92.4 individuals in 2017 (Table 3). The estimated population size of males was relatively higher than that of females at Site A in 2017 and Site B in both years 2016 and 2017. At Site A in 2016, the estimated population size of both males and females were approximately the same. The daily population size estimated by the best model has decreased from the peaks in early or mid-August to October of 2016 and 2017 (Fig. 3).
Table 3
The best models and the estimates of total population size for each study site
Site | Year | Best models | AICc | No. Par | Male (± SE) | Female (± SE) | Total |
A | 2016 | φ(.) p(.) Pent(g*t) N(g) | 349 | 7 | 6.9 (0.69) | 6.7 (0.61) | 13.6 |
2017 | φ(.) p(.) Pent (t) N(g) | 245 | 7 | 16.4 (2.91) | 13.6 (2.61) | 30 |
B | 2016 | φ(t) p(t) Pent (t) N(g) | 650 | 34 | 77.6 (0.00) | 51.2 (0.00) | 128.8 |
2017 | φ(t) p(t) Pent (t) N(g) | 897 | 39 | 56.5 (2.84) | 35.9 (2.16) | 92.4 |
life span
To understand the life span of C. s. akitanus adult, we calculated the mean days and max day between first captured and last recaptured in both years. As a result, there were no significant differences among sexes and studied years (Table 4). At Site A, the max day between first captured and last recaptured were 48 days for male and 37 days for female in 2016, and 44 days for male and 45 days for female in 2017. At Site B, the max day between first captured and last recaptured were 32 days for both male and female in 2016, and 43 days for male and 64 days for female in 2017. The maximum life span which is counted from the day of adult emerging in rearing was 64 days for male and 92 days for female.
Table 4
Mean days and max day between first capture and last recaptured of Celes skalozubovi akitanus in Site A and B
Site | Year | Sex | Mean days between first capture and last recaptured (mean ± SE) | Max day between first capture and last recaptured |
A | 2016 | Male | 30.86 ± 14.02 | 48 |
Female | 23.71 ± 12.30 | 37 |
| P = 0.4015 | |
2017 | Male | 19.56 ± 11.95 | 44 |
Female | 20.38 ± 15.70 | 45 |
| P = 0.795 | |
B | 2016 | Male | 12.91 ± 9.40 | 32 |
Female | 16.07 ± 9.98 | 32 |
| P = 0.3464 | |
2017 | Male | 18.64 ± 13.33 | 43 |
Female | 18.30 ± 17.27 | 64 |
| P = 0.6049 | |
P-values show the result of Wilcoxon rank sum test between sexes in each Site and year |
C. s. akitanus phenology in our study area is summarized as follows. The adults emerged from late June to July and decreased after peaking in early to mid-August (see Fig. 3). Although most adults were dead in late-September, some individuals, especially females, survived until mid-October.
Adult mobility
Our MRR showed that most adults were recaptured within the study sites. In 2017 at Site A where is very narrow, two males moved approximately 40 m outside of the site. The maximum distances in 6.3% of males and 66.7% of females was ≦ 5 m in Site A (Fig. 4a). The maximum distances in 42.9% of males and 44.7% of females were ≦ 5 m in Site B (Fig. 4b). At Site A, adults moved 5 to 15 m was 50% and at Site B, adults moved 15 to 30 m was less than 10%. In both years, some individuals moved 40 to 60 m were recorded (Fig. 4a, b). The mean distance between successive captures was significant difference between the sexes at Site A in 2016 (Wilcoxon rank sum test, P < 0.0001) and at Site B in 2017 (Wilcoxon rank sum test, P < 0.05), showing that females moved short distance, whereas males moved to relatively long distance per capture (Table 5). No individuals dispersed between Site A and B in both years.
Table 5
The movement distance of Celes skalozubovi akitanus
Site | Year | Sex | Mean distance between captures (m) (mean ± SE) | Longest distance between captures (m) |
A | 2016 | Male | 4.7 ± 1.0 | 25.0 |
Female | 0.4 ± 0.3 | 9.4 |
| P < 0.0001 | |
2017 | Male | 14.0 ± 3.0 | 40.0 |
Female | 7.8 ± 2.5 | 28.6 |
| P = 0.59 | |
B | 2016 | Male | 4.9 ± 1.4 | 86.2 |
Female | 2.9 ± 0.6 | 20.0 |
| P = 0.97 | |
2017 | Male | 9.3 ± 1.3 | 57.9 |
Female | 5.2 ± 0.7 | 28.9 |
| P < 0.05 | |
P-values show the result of Wilcoxon rank sum test between sexes in each Site and year |