3.1. Retention of mechanical properties under accelerated aging tests (AAT)
The PBAT/PHA films were made from polymer blends prepared by a twin screw extrusion process, the films contain 80 wt.% PBAT and 20 wt.% PHA with or without stabilizing additives. The mechanical properties of these films before Accelerate Aging Test (AAT) are listed in Table 1. The data showed that adding a UV stabilizer (UVA) or a hydrolysis resistance additive (HA) to PBAT/PHA films slightly decreased both tensile strength (σ) and elongation at break (εb) of the biodegradable films, while adding an antioxidant (AO) led to a significant increase in tensile strength of the film (from 18 MPa to 35 MPa), which could be attributed to decreased thermal degradation of the film in the presence of the antioxidant during the melt extrusion blending process and subsequent film extrusion.
The retention ratios of mechanical properties of PBAT, PBAT/PHA, and PBAT/PHA with different additives under AAT are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Mechanical properties of PBAT/PHA films before AAT
Film Samples
|
PBAT
|
PBAT/PHA
|
PBAT/PHA
+UVA
|
PBAT/PHA
+AO
|
PBAT/PHA
+HA
|
Tensile strength (MPa)
|
26
|
18
|
21
|
35
|
16
|
Elongation at break (%)
|
607
|
603
|
521
|
618
|
472
|
The effects of adding PHA to PBAT on film properties are shown as Figs. 1a and 1b, the presence of only 20% PHA caused a sharp decrease in both the elongation at break and the tensile strength of PBAT/PHA film, as compared to pure PBAT film. A 77% reduction in elongation and 39% reduction in tensile strength were found respectively at 72 h. However, the difference became smaller at 100 h. The results suggest that PHA is more easily degradable than PBAT under the repeated UV exposure and water spray cycles under AAT conditions, this is in agreement with a previous study which found PHA degraded faster than other polymers in accelerated soil degradation [38]. This difference could be due to the fully aliphatic backbone of PHA versus aliphatic and aromatic copolymer backbone of PBAT as shown in Figure 2. Nevertheless, this also emphasizes the importance to stabilize PHA-containing PBAT blends in order to meet durability requirements for mulch film applications.
The retention behaviors of PBAT/PHA film as a control and thee PBAT/PHA films with stabilizing additives during AAT are shown as Figs. 1c and 1d. Adding an antioxidant (AO) and a hydrolysis resistance additive (HA) to the films apparently did not contributed to films’ stability at a short test time (e.g. 24 h.), however, these additives did provide stabilizing effects for elongation retention at extended exposure times (>48 h.), which showed 16%-24% improvement over the film without these additives.
This could be attributed to the fact that an antioxidant only reacts with peroxyl radical generated during oxidation [39-41], and hydrolysis resistance additive only reacts with carboxyl group generated during hydrolysis of the biodegradable polymers [42]. In the early stage of UV-induced photodegradation process, it is reasonable to assume that neither peroxyl radical nor carboxyl group are generated in sufficient amount for them to react with an antioxidant or a hydrolysis resistant additive. As a result, both AO and HA are only effective in improving the films’ stability after a relatively longer aging period, when more peroxyl radical and carboxyl group are produced in the films.
Among all the additives tested, the most effective stabilizer is the UV stabilizer, i.e. UVA. The εb decrease of the PBAT/PHA-UVA film was significantly less than the other thee films, and it retained the highest εb (46%) at 100 h. The retention of tensile strength of the PBAT/PHA-UVA film was also the best among all the films as well. The UV stabilizer in PBAT/PHA films can absorb UV radiation energy and undergo structural transformation [43] to provide a stabilizing effect. The above results demonstrated the importance of incorporating a UV stabilizer to provide protection against UV irradiation for the films.
3.2 Morphology change under AAT
The surface morphology images of PBAT/PHA films at different aging times were studied by SEM. In Fig. 3a, the surface of PBAT/PHA film before aging was smooth with clear orientation marks along the machine direction formed during blown film process. The orientation helps to improve mechanical properties of films [44, 45]. After 24 hours of aging, as shown in Fig. 3b, the surface began to show some roughness, some small protrusions appeared on surface, which may be formed after partial surface degradation of the film and degraded material was washed away by sprayed water. After 72 hours of accelerated aging (Fig. 3c), several small cavities can be clearly observed on the surface. Surprisingly, a large hole with a diameter of approximately 10 μm (in Fig. 3d), was formed at 100 h.
As a result, it seemed that due to UV irradiation, the surface of PBAT/PHA film underwent partial erosion of the outer layer at first, followed by formation of small cavities, and finally large cavities were formed. Also, it is noticed that surface orientation of PBAT/PHA became less distinct after aging, which may be due to the gradual destruction and wash away of the surface layer after extended UV exposure.
For comparison, the SEM images of PBAT/PHA-UVA at different aging times are shown in Fig. 4. After 24 hours of aging, there were no significant defects or holes observed on the surface (Fig. 4b). After 72 hours, the surface started to appear coarse (Fig. 4c). Moreover, surface orientation became less distinct for PBAT/PHA-UVA after 100 h aging, but still no formation of cavities or large holes were observed.
As a result, it can be concluded that adding UVA can effectively slow down the photodegradation process for PBAT/PHA films. As a result, the PBAT/PHA-UVA had a much higher retention of εb after 100 hours of accelerated aging as compared to all other additives.
3.3. Thermal properties and crystalline structures
The thermal properties of PBAT/PHA films before and after AAT were studied by DSC. In Figs. 5A and 5B, as aging time increases from 0 to 50 h and 100 h, both the crystallization temperature (Tc) and melting temperature (Tm) of PBAT component in PBAT/PHA films shifted to lower temperatures, indicating a decrease of crystal size [34], the peaks also lost sharpness and became broader than the peak at 0 h. This could be resulted from chain scission taking place during the photodegradation process in AAT, PBAT tends to partially transform from ordered crystalline structure to amorphous form.
Moreover, after 100 hours of aging, the most significant broadening of Tc peak was observed, and this also provides support for chain scission could have happened during degradation. This is in agreement with a study by Souza et. al. [35], they reported that chain scission in the photodegradation process was predominant in PBAT while studying accelerated aging of PBAT films with added carbon black and light stabilizers.
For the PBAT/PHA film with 0.5% UV stabilizer (Fig. 5c), the Tc peak location and shape only had slight changes. This shows the UV stabilizer provided protection for PBAT/PHA against chain scission under UV radiation.
The quantitative changes of crystallization peak temperatures (Tc) of PBAT, PBAT/PHA, and PBAT/PHA films with different stabilizers as a function of aging time are summarized in Fig. 6. Fig. 6a shows that adding 20% PHA to PBAT caused pronounced decreases of Tc as compared to pure PBAT, i.e. making PBAT more prone to photodegradation. This could be resulted from the PHA degradation products having carboxyl groups at chain ends, the acidic carboxyl groups would have a catalytic or accelerating on the hydrolytic degradation of PBAT.
Fig. 6b shows the relative effects of different additives on protecting PBAT/PHA films from photodegradation. The data proved that the different types of additives all had positive effects on protecting the polymers under UV radiation. The change in Tc of PBAT/PHA with UV stabilizer (UVA) was the least, providing the best protection among the three additives, a similar effect was also reported in a previous finding [46]. For the PBAT/PHA films with antioxidant and hydrolysis resistant additives, the Tc firstly decreased from 0 to 48 h aging, and then it kept relatively unchanged. Interestingly, this trend of Tc is similar to the trend of mechanical properties discussed in the Section 3.1, where εb of PBAT/PHA films with AO and HA additives initially decreased and then remained relatively unchanged.
In order to further study the crystallinity change of PBAT/PHA films after photodegradation, X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was performed and the results are shown in Fig. 7. There are three distinct diffraction peaks at 22.5o, 23.4o, and 25.2o respectively, which coincides with the characteristic diffraction peaks of PBAT (shown in Fig. S1) [47]. These were attributed to the Phase II crystals as reported by Chen [48]. For aging from 0 to 48 hours, the diffraction peaks of PBAT/PHA films remained relatively stable. However, after 100 h of aging, the intensities all thee specific diffraction peaks were drastically reduced. This indicates that under accelerated aging test, a large fraction of crystalline region of PBAT in PBAT/PHA films was transformed into amorphous region.
In comparison, the intensities of diffraction peaks of PBAT/PHA film with the UVA additive remained almost unchanged after 24, 48 and 100 h of aging (Fig. 7b), however, the peak location of the peaks were shifted slightly to the right by 0.19o after 100 h of aging.
The crystallinity study provides a structural interpretation for the trend of mechanical properties previously discussed. The results strongly support that the deterioration of the mechanical properties of PBAT/PHA films after accelerated aging is closely related to the change of crystallinity of PBAT in the films. Nevertheless, it should be noted that the change of crystalline structure during degradation is highly dependent on the backbone structure of polymer involved. For example, crystallinity of PLA film actually increased after degradation [42, 49].
3.4. FT-IR and XPS spectroscopy
ATR-FTIR helps to provide more structural information for studying the photodegradation mechanism of PBAT/PHA films. As shown in Fig. 8a, the intensities of multiple bands of ester groups decreased after degradation. In particular, C=O stretch band is found at 1710 cm-1 [26], and C-O stretch bands are located at 1269 cm-1 and 1019 cm-1 [36, 40]. The observed weakening of these thee bands indicates breaking of ester groups during photodegradation. Meanwhile, as shown in Fig. 8d, the intensity of bands at 1685 cm-1 and 3435 cm-1 slightly increased, which belong to stretch absorption of carboxyl and hydroxyl groups of PHA respectively [39]. This provides evidence that hydrolysis happened during the photodegradation. The band at 667 cm-1 assigned to stretch vibration of C=C-H [46] increased after degradation (Fig. 8b). Moreover, the intensity of bands from 1578 to 1654 cm-1 due to C=C stretching [50] also increased. The increase of these bands suggests formation of C=C structures, which is typical of Norrish II photodegradation mechanism [51-53].
As a comparison, the FTIR spectra of PBAT/PHA with UV stabilizer before and after aging are shown as Fig. 8e. The respective bands did exhibit significant changes after AAT, indicating that the presence of the UV stabilizer in PBAT/PHA film has significantly improved the stability of the film during photodegradation process.
The C 1s XPS spectra of different PBAT/PHA films before and after AAT are shown in Fig. 9 to provide an in-depth understanding of the carbon binding states on the films’ surface. Detailed information on the deconvoluted peaks of C 1s is summarized in Table S3. For the PBAT/PHA film without additive (Fig. 9a and 9b), the sp2 carbon calculated from fitted curve increased from 26.7% before AAT to 36.3% after AAT, while the sp3 carbon decreased from 53.1% (before AAT) to 41.1% (after AAT). This suggests that about 10% sp3 carbon transformed to sp2 carbon during the photodegradation process, providing evidence supporting the Norrish II [50] photodegradation mechanism for PBAT/PHA film without additive.
The amount of C=O increased from 6.5% before AAT to 10% after AAT. This could be resulted from a photo-oxidation process which involves a classical hydrogen abstraction typically at a tertiary carbon in α-position of an ester group on a polymeric backbone, leading to formation of macroradicals [49, 54, 55] (see scheme 1).
For the PBAT/PHA film with the UVA additive (Figs. 9C and 9D), amazingly, the sp3 carbon only decreased slightly from 47.4% before AAT to 46.8% after AAT, while C=O increased moderately from 9.4% to 12.4% before and after AAT, respectively. This indicates that adding UVA has effectively inhibited photodegradation and provided protection to PBAT and PHA during AAT.
3.5. Degradation mechanism of PBAT/PHA under AAT
There were basically two degradation mechanisms in the literature proposed for biodegradable polyesters under a UV accelerated test: 1) photo-oxidative reactions, and 2) Norrish I/II type photodegradative reactions. The photo-oxidation mechanism was widely used to explain PLA (polylactic acid) degradation under UV exposure [54-56]. J. Rychlý [55] discussed that the tertiary carbon in PLA is the predominant site for oxidation, which is the most unstable carbon as compared to primary and secondary carbons when reacting with a hydroperoxy radical.
Since the PHA used in this work is a poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-4-hydroxybutyrate) (P3HB4HB) and it is composed of 90% of 3HB and 10% of 4HB units (Fig. 1), the tertiary carbon in 3HB is most likely to undergo photo-oxidative reactions as illustrated in Scheme 1. This may also provide a mechanistic basis for the observed much worse deterioration of mechanical properties of PBAT/PHA film than PBAT film under UV exposure during AAT, the reactive tertiary carbon in 4HB of PHA led to extensive photo-oxidation of PBAT/PHA and this causes the mechanical properties to significantly decrease.
As shown in Scheme 1, the hydrogen at the tertiary carbon is abstracted by an alkyl radical, which further reacts with oxygen to form a peroxy radical, followed by coupling with hydrogen abstraction forming a hydroperoxide and then cleaving the O-C bond, and this breaks a PHA chain into two separate chains, one chain has a carboxylic acid chain end and the other chain has a methyl-keto chain end. This process generates one more carbonyl group which accounts for the increased C=O level as observed on the XPS of PBAT/PHA film after subjecting to AAT test.
Beside the photo-oxidation for 3HB of PHA, the Norrish I and II type degradative reactions can also occur on polymer chains under an accelerated UV test [35, 49, 57]. As illustrated in Scheme 2, for the butylene terephthalate structure of PBAT, the Norrish type II reaction can produce C=C bond as a terminal vinyl group after a chain is cleaved, this accounts for the increased Sp2 carbon level after degradation from the XPS results. The Norris I type reactions occur around the aromatic carboxyl ester group in three possible chain scission reactions, forming different chain end structures and even CO2 [52].
3.6. Soil degradation test
In the AAT test results discussed above, adding a UV stabilizer to PBAT/PHA film was shown to effectively reduce degradation under UV accelerated aging test conditions. A soil degradation test was carried out to test the effectiveness of different stabilizers for up to 30 days. The elongation at break (εb) retention results and tensile strength at break (σb) are presented in Fig. 10.
It clearly showed that the UV stabilizer is effective to protect the PBAT/PHA films by achieving the best retention of εb and σb, this finding is consistent with the best performance of UVA during AAT (Figure 2). Moreover, the retention of σb of PBAT/PHA-UVA film after 100 h of AAT is almost the same as that after 30 days of degradation in soil. This indicates the potential to use AAT to predict soil degradation results under certain soil test conditions, and our test was conducted in Pudong New district of Shanghai, China, from October to November.
However, the hydrolysis resistance additive (HA) did not exhibit consistent retention of both properties, and the film with AO additive had poorer retention than the PBAT/PHA control film without additive in soil test. This may result from biodegradation during the degradation test in soil, the cleavage of ester bonds by extracellular enzymes of microorganisms may have actually accelerated abiotic hydrolysis [42] which lead to more extensive degradation.