Cytoreductive radiotherapy combined with abiraterone in metastatic castration-resistance prostate cancer: a single center experience
Background: To investigate the potential benefit of cytoreductive radiotherapy (cRT) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients receiving abiraterone.
Methods: From February 2014 to February 2019, 149 mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone were identified. Patients receiving cRT before abiraterone failure (AbiRT group) were matched by one-to-two propensity score to patients without cRT before abiraterone failure (non-AbiRT group).
Results: The median follow-up was 23.5 months. Thirty patients (20.1%) were in the AbiRT group, whereas 119 patients (79.9%) were in the non-AbiRT group. The 2-year OS of patients managed by AbiRT and non-AbiRT were 89.5% and 73.5%, respectively (P = 0.0003). On multivariate analysis, only AbiRT (HR, 0.17; 95%CI, 0.05–0.58; P = 0.004) and prognostic index (HR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.37–5.35; P = 0.004) were significant factors. After matching, AbiRT continued to be associated with improved OS (median OS not reached vs. 44.0 months, P = 0.009). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients aged ≤65 years (HR, 0.09; 95%CI, 0.01–0.65; P = 0.018), PSA ≤20 ng/mL (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09–0.99; P = 0.048), chemotherapy-naïve upon abiraterone treatment (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06–0.66; P = 0.008) and in intermediate prognosis groups by COU-AA-301 prognostic index (HR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.57; P = 0.007) had improved OS with AbiRT.
Conclusions: cRT before resistance to abiraterone may improve survival in selected mCRPC patients: age ≤65 years old, chemotherapy-naïve, with a relatively low PSA level at the diagnosis of mCRPC and intermediate prognosis.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Posted 15 Dec, 2020
On 06 Jan, 2021
On 04 Dec, 2020
On 01 Dec, 2020
On 01 Dec, 2020
On 01 Dec, 2020
On 29 Oct, 2020
On 28 Oct, 2020
On 28 Oct, 2020
On 07 Oct, 2020
Received 30 Sep, 2020
On 22 Sep, 2020
Received 30 Jul, 2020
On 16 Jul, 2020
Invitations sent on 13 Jul, 2020
On 03 Jul, 2020
On 02 Jul, 2020
On 02 Jul, 2020
On 02 Jul, 2020
Cytoreductive radiotherapy combined with abiraterone in metastatic castration-resistance prostate cancer: a single center experience
Posted 15 Dec, 2020
On 06 Jan, 2021
On 04 Dec, 2020
On 01 Dec, 2020
On 01 Dec, 2020
On 01 Dec, 2020
On 29 Oct, 2020
On 28 Oct, 2020
On 28 Oct, 2020
On 07 Oct, 2020
Received 30 Sep, 2020
On 22 Sep, 2020
Received 30 Jul, 2020
On 16 Jul, 2020
Invitations sent on 13 Jul, 2020
On 03 Jul, 2020
On 02 Jul, 2020
On 02 Jul, 2020
On 02 Jul, 2020
Background: To investigate the potential benefit of cytoreductive radiotherapy (cRT) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients receiving abiraterone.
Methods: From February 2014 to February 2019, 149 mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone were identified. Patients receiving cRT before abiraterone failure (AbiRT group) were matched by one-to-two propensity score to patients without cRT before abiraterone failure (non-AbiRT group).
Results: The median follow-up was 23.5 months. Thirty patients (20.1%) were in the AbiRT group, whereas 119 patients (79.9%) were in the non-AbiRT group. The 2-year OS of patients managed by AbiRT and non-AbiRT were 89.5% and 73.5%, respectively (P = 0.0003). On multivariate analysis, only AbiRT (HR, 0.17; 95%CI, 0.05–0.58; P = 0.004) and prognostic index (HR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.37–5.35; P = 0.004) were significant factors. After matching, AbiRT continued to be associated with improved OS (median OS not reached vs. 44.0 months, P = 0.009). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients aged ≤65 years (HR, 0.09; 95%CI, 0.01–0.65; P = 0.018), PSA ≤20 ng/mL (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09–0.99; P = 0.048), chemotherapy-naïve upon abiraterone treatment (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06–0.66; P = 0.008) and in intermediate prognosis groups by COU-AA-301 prognostic index (HR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.57; P = 0.007) had improved OS with AbiRT.
Conclusions: cRT before resistance to abiraterone may improve survival in selected mCRPC patients: age ≤65 years old, chemotherapy-naïve, with a relatively low PSA level at the diagnosis of mCRPC and intermediate prognosis.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4