The XRD pattern of the as-obtained MnO-LiF composite is shown in Fig. 1. The standard powder diffraction patterns of LiF phase (card No. 72-1538) and MnO phase (card No. 89-2804) from inorganic crystal structure database are also shown in the bottom of Fig. 1 as references, respectively. The diffraction peaks of MnO-LiF sample in Fig. 1 can be indexed to cubic LiF and cubic MnO, respectively, and no other common impurities such as MnF2, Li2O, and Li2CO3 have been detected, indicating that the target product was successfully obtained at a moderate temperature of 550°C in very short time (5 minutes). The fast reaction kinetics in annealing process is attributed to the solution based on spontaneous intimate mixing of precursor salts being converted into to a remarkably homogeneous intermediate product by spray drying. There were no typical diffraction peaks of KB probably due to its amorphous nature [23]. The lattice parameters of MnO and LiF in the composite, refined with the MDI Jade program, are listed in Table 1, well consistent with the JCPDS 89-2804 and 72-1538, respectively.
Table 1
Lattice parameters of MnO and LiF in the composite determined from XRD
sample | a/Å | b/Å | c/Å |
JCPDS 89-2804 | 4.4440 | 4.4440 | 4.4440 |
MnO | 4.4463 | 4.4463 | 4.4463 |
JCPDS 72-1538 | 4.0280 | 4.0280 | 4.0280 |
LiF | 4.0314 | 4.0314 | 4.0314 |
Figure 1
Table 1
Typical FESEM images of the MnO-LiF composite and its corresponding EDS elemental mapping are shown in Fig. 2. FESEM image (Fig. 2a) shows that the sample is composed of regular and uniform sphere-like primary particles with an average size of about 50 nm that form bigger agglomerates. The EDS elemental mappings of MnO-LiF composite shown in Fig. 2b confirm that Mn, F, O and C elements are quite uniformly dispersed within the composite, firmly demonstrating that MnO and LiF are integrated into a KB matrix and well-interconnected by conductive networks, while the overlap of Mn and F mapping proves compact contact between LiF phase and MnO phase. Therefore, intimate contacts among all three subcomponents of C, MnO and LiF are expected.
Figure 2
To further analyze the structure of the composite, the nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms were measured. Figure 3 shows the N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms for KB and the MnO-LiF samples. Each sample exhibits a pronounced hysteresis loop between the adsorption and desorption isotherms and an obvious turning point, which are adsorption-desorption characteristics of the porous materials. Nevertheless, the turning point in the isotherm for MnO-LiF sample displays a shift to a smaller relative pressure, meaning that the mesopore of KB is filled or blocked by MnO and LiF particles, bringing about a respective decline in surface area and pore volume. A comparison of pore structure parameters calculated from the results of nitrogen adsorption between KB and the MnO-LiF sample is recorded in Table 2. As shown in Table 2, the BET surface area and the pore volume fell from 1290 m2 g− 1 and 2.47 cm3 g− 1 for KB to 408 m2 g− 1 and 0.78 cm3 g− 1 for the MnO-LiF sample, respectively, which ulteriorly prove MnO and LiF particles fill or block the pores of KB.
Table 2
Pore volumes and BET surface areas of KB and the MnO-LiF sample
Sample | SBET (m2 g− 1) | Pore volume (cm3 g− 1) |
KB | 1290 | 2.47 |
MnO-LiF composite | 408 | 0.78 |
Figure 3
Table 2
Figure 4 shows the typical charge − discharge curves of MnO-LiF composite at various cycling periods with C/20 rate (1C = 273 mAh g− 1) in the voltage window of 1.5–4.8 V. The first cycle curve of the MnO-LiF composite displayed an initial charge specific capacity of 245 mAh g− 1, which is slightly smaller than its theoretical specific capacity of 273 mAh g− 1 (corresponding to the electrochemical reaction ), and a first discharge specific capacity of 170 mAh g− 1, higher than that for MnO-1.5LiF composite (130 mAh g− 1 with a current density of 5 mA g− 1) prepared by high-energy ball mill [22]. A large irreversible specific capacity loss of 75 mAh g− 1 was observed during the first cycle, indicating a low coulombic efficiency of 69.4%, which is probably associated with the decomposition of the electrolyte at the high charge voltage. Similar phenomena have often been observed with cells using CoO-LiF, NiO-LiF, NiMn2O4-4LiF and MnO-1.5LiF composites as positive materials in lithium-ion batteries [10–12, 21]. Nonetheless, subsequent testing demonstrated that this low coulombic efficiency was restricted primarily to the initial cycle because coulombic efficiency was gradually increased to 89.7% in the 10th cycle and 89.0% in the 20th cycle from 69.4% in the first cycle. A similar observation has been made on the NiMn2O4-4LiF composite by Tomita and co-workers [12]. They found that the coulombic efficiency in the first cycle was 84%, and the efficiency after 100 cycles was 95%. It is worth mentioning that the first charge exhibited a higher charge voltage than that of the subsequent every one, closely associated with the electrochemical activation of MnO via the splitting of LiF to produce a new active phase, most likely “Mn3+-O-F” type species, which is in agreement with previous observations [14, 21].
Figure 4
The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) tests were conducted on the electrodes over charge–discharge cycles (Fig. 5). We observed in Fig. 5 that compared with the first cycle, the diameter of the semicircle, equivalent to the integrative effect of the electrode charge transfer impedance and the electrode/electrolyte interface impedance, significantly increase after 50 cycles, which results in growth in polarization upon cycling and great decrease in capacity, as shown in Fig. 4.
Figure 5
To measure the cycle performance of MnO-LiF composite, galvanostatic charge-discharge cycles were carried out at a charge-discharge rate of C/20 in the voltage range 1.5–4.8 V, as shown by Fig. 6. It can be found from Fig. 6 that the composite delivers respectively a specific capacity of 170, 190, 189, 179, 159, 145, 138 and 137 mAh g− 1 in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 10th, 20th, 30th, 40th and 50th cycle. The capacity retention rate was 80.6% after 50 cycles, comparable with the values found for NiO-LiF composite milled for 72 h and the NiMn2O4-4LiF composite [11, 12]. Similar observations of cycle capacity fading were reported by Tomita team in the NiO-LiF and NiMn2O4-4LiF systems [11, 12]. The capacity decay of the composite may be directly relative with the decomposition of the electrolyte, dissolution of manganese oxide and the growth of polarization on increase in the number of cycle, as shown in Figs. 4 and 5. As well known, capacity losses of manganese-based cathode materials, such as LiMn2O4 and Li1.9Mn0.95O2.05F0.95, have been partly ascribed to the dissolution of Mn ions into the electrolyte, which in turn gives rise to loss of active material from the cathode and increment in impedance of the Li metal anode due to deposite of Mn-containing species [24–26].
Figure 6
Figure 7 displays the rate capability of MnO-LiF composite at different rates from C/20 to C/5. It can be observed that MnO-LiF sample shows a significant decrease in specific capacity from 169 mAh g− 1 to 104 mAh g− 1 as the rate increases from C/20 to C/5. We suggest that the sluggish conversion reaction kinetics of MnO-LiF composite may be attributed to the following two major factors : one is bigger MnO-LiF agglomerate particles in comparison with the previously reported FeO-LiF, NiO-LiF, and MnO-LiF composites [10, 11, 19], which were highly dispersed using long time high-energy mechanical milling, suggestive of rise in diffusion path for electrons and lithium ions in sample grains during charge and discharge; and another is that not all the MnO and LiF grains are in close contact with KB, resulting in difficulty of the charge transport in areas with less KB. The future researches will focus on the fabrication of smaller active material particles and the application of more effective conductive additives.
Figure 7
Figure 8 shows the CV of the MnO-LiF composite electrode after the electrode activation. The CV curve was gentle on the whole, and broad peaks were observed. In the oxidation process, a broad anodic peak, ranging from ~ 2.55 to 3.59 V Li/Li+, and a weak anodic peak at ~ 3.81 V Li/Li+ were observed, which could be associated to manganese redox reaction (Mn2+→Mn3+→Mn4+). We found our CV observations were almost consistent with those reported by Jung et al [10] in the case of LiF-MnO nanocomposite, in which the oxidation reaction appeared mainly at 2.5V and 3.75V Li/Li+. In the subsequent reduction process, only one main reduction peak at ~ 3.13 V vs Li/Li+ and a very gently downward slope from 3.92 to 3.59 V were observed, different from that of the previous report for the LiF-MnO nanocomposite by Jung group [10]. In their work, two reduction peaks respectively at 2.5 and 3.75 V were detected during the lithiation, whereas the intensity of the high potential peak is much weaker than that of the low high potential peak. As far as we know, this reductive feature in our CV experiment is not clear.
Figure 8