This preprint is under consideration at The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research Article
Cengiz Görkem Dengiz
Ondokuz Mayıs University
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1308-3223
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
In this study, different techniques using for modeling of bimetallic sheets by finite elements method has been compared. Sheets modeled with 5 different assumptions were compared with each other and experimental datas, to determine the FE model that gives the most realistic result. FE models were created with the assumption that the adhesion was excellent or separable, and with the case that the solidified adhesive in the intermediate layer was modeled and not modeled. As a result, the closest values to the experimental results were obtained with the model created with the assumption that there is a solidified adhesive layer in the middle layer and there is an adhesion interface between this layer and metallic layers. On the other hand, when the adhesive is not modeled in the intermediate layer, it has been observed that the CPU time is reduced by 2 times while the results are seen small changes.
Keywords
bimetallic sheets, FEM, deep drawing, cohesive zone model, Columb friction
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Review
Version 1
Posted 11 Jun, 2021
No community comments so far
Reviews received
Received 01 May, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 07 Apr, 2021
First submitted
On 28 Dec, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Mechanical Engineering
Learn more about our company.
This preprint is under consideration at The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research Article
Cengiz Görkem Dengiz
Ondokuz Mayıs University
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1308-3223
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Review
Version 1
Posted 11 Jun, 2021
No community comments so far
Reviews received
Received 01 May, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 07 Apr, 2021
First submitted
On 28 Dec, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Mechanical Engineering
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
In this study, different techniques using for modeling of bimetallic sheets by finite elements method has been compared. Sheets modeled with 5 different assumptions were compared with each other and experimental datas, to determine the FE model that gives the most realistic result. FE models were created with the assumption that the adhesion was excellent or separable, and with the case that the solidified adhesive in the intermediate layer was modeled and not modeled. As a result, the closest values to the experimental results were obtained with the model created with the assumption that there is a solidified adhesive layer in the middle layer and there is an adhesion interface between this layer and metallic layers. On the other hand, when the adhesive is not modeled in the intermediate layer, it has been observed that the CPU time is reduced by 2 times while the results are seen small changes.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Loading...