A. Selection of New Zealand White Rabbits
The research protocol obtained ethical clearance from the Institutional Ethical Committee of Government Nezamia Tibbi College, Hyderabad, affiliated with Kaloji Narayana University of Health Sciences, Warangal, Telangana State, under Registration No. 21315221008D. The investigation was carried out at the Rabbit Research Centre within the Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Veterinary Science, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana State. Two distinct groups, designated as "A & B," each group comprising 6 male NZW rabbits with an average weight ranging between 1.5-2kg, were systematically chosen and allocated numerical identifiers following precise weighing procedures. These rabbits were accommodated in a controlled environment devoid of pathogens, featuring hygienic surroundings, appropriate lighting, and ventilation facilities. Indoor conditions were regulated to maintain a temperature range of 24 to 28 ℃, alongside a relative humidity level between 50–70%, ensuring exposure to 12 hours of light per day. Formulaic feeding and unhindered access to water were provided to the rabbits on the day preceding and the day of the surgical intervention.
B. Induction of Fistula-in-ano (Nassor-e-Maqad)
The enclosures housing the rabbits were subjected to regular disinfection and individual maintenance protocols, ensuring provision of ample water and food resources. A mandatory 7-day acclimatization period within the enclosures preceded the commencement of experimental procedures. The weights of the rabbits were meticulously documented on the day of surgical intervention and subsequently at 7-day intervals, totaling six distinct time-points. The surgical induction protocol adhered to precise procedural guidelines, encompassing the administration of general anesthesia, aseptic preparation, identification of anal structures, delineation of the surgical site, and insertion of SSSW sized at 18G through the anal sphincter musculature to establish a persistent fistula tract (Fig. 1). Particular emphasis was placed on postoperative care measures aimed at minimizing the risk of secondary infections and ensuring the welfare of the experimental subjects. Elizabeth collar was applied to all animals post-operatively to avoid self-mutilation until removal of SSSW. An anal fistula was surgically induced in 12 rabbits, with radiographic imaging conducted on post-operative days 1st to confirm the accurate placement of the surgical steel wire (see Fig. 2), in the absence of chemical agents. Evaluation of the fistula formation and its progression was performed on the 20th and 40th post-induction days, followed by further assessment via radiography (fistulogram) (see Fig. 3 and Fig. 4) and perianal sonography (PUS) examination (see Fig. 5 and Fig. 6).
C. Surgical Procedures and Techniques
The experimental paradigm was instituted under the condition of general anesthesia via the implantation of SSSW to emulate anal fistulas in a rabbit model. A period of one week was designated for acclimatization of the experimental subjects prior to the commencement of the procedure. Following this, the rabbits were placed in a supine position and their extremities were appropriately immobilized. Prior to the initiation of the operative protocol, the experimental cohort was stratified into intervention groups denoted as A and B. The induction of perianal fistulas was achieved through a minor surgical intervention conducted under the influence of general anesthesia.
Preparation for the induction of perianal fistula involved initial measures of depilation of perianal hair and subsequent disinfection of the region using a povidone iodine solution. Following this, xylocaine 2% jelly mucilage was applied topically. The surgical procedure for the creation of an anal fistula commenced with the clamping of the designated area, augmented by the use of a retractor to facilitate the insertion of a surgical wire through the anal musculature. Specific target sites on the external surface of the anal canal were delineated, situated approximately 1.5 cm from the anal verge at the 5 and 7 o'clock positions. Subsequently, a SSSW No. 18 was punctured into the identified area, and tissue surrounding the puncture site was excised from the anal canal.
In cohorts designated as Group ‘A’ (comprising rabbits subjected to a 20-day induction period) and Group ‘B’ (comprising rabbits subjected to a 40-day induction period), the experimental procedure involved the insertion of a surgical wire into the anal canal at either the 5 o'clock or 7 o'clock position, each subgroup consisting of three rabbits. This subgroup classification was made in order to avoid possible distortions due to the choice of the location of the fistula site. The internal termination of the surgical wire within the anal canal was firmly secured using a needle holder forceps and subsequently extracted, with both extremities of the wire being loosely twisted to mitigate the likelihood of post-procedural removal by the animals.
D. Monitoring and Care of Experimental Animals
Postoperative management encompassed the application of an antiseptic solution to cleanse the procedural site, followed by individual housing of the rabbits for close monitoring and observation. Throughout the duration of the study, vital signs of the rabbits were consistently monitored through cage-site observation. Additionally, the rabbits were provided with unrestricted access to food and water. Regular daily assessments were conducted to ensure their well-being, with provisions made to replenish food and water as required.
E. Duration of Study and Follow-Up Protocols
Following a period of 20 days, a subgroup consisting of six rabbits from Group-A underwent perianal examination (see Fig. 7) to determine the Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI) both prior to and subsequent to the removal of the surgical wire. Following this assessment, these subjects underwent X-ray and perianal ultrasonography (PUS) procedures to evaluate the presence of fistulae before being euthanized. Tissue specimens were then collected for histopathological examination, with corresponding histological scores documented. The same investigative procedures were subsequently applied to the rabbits in Group ‘B’ after a duration of 40 days (see Fig. 8).
Model assessment
The process of clinical assessment involves careful observation and palpation techniques aimed at evaluating various parameters pertinent to perianal health in experimental animals. The observational phase entails a thorough scrutiny of daily behavioral patterns, food and water intake, fluctuations in body weight, and a detailed examination of the perianal region. Palpation, conversely, involves a comprehensive assessment protocol, encompassing the evaluation of discharge, pain thresholds, limitations in activities, constraints on sexual function, perianal disease classification, and the degree of tissue induration. Furthermore, the Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI) score is utilized to authenticate the presence of fistula formation, with regular surveillance of animal mortality. Morphological changes in the perianal region subsequent to SSSW induction are meticulously documented and graded, with subsequent assessments conducted at predetermined intervals. Animals in Group ‘A’ undergo examination 20 days post-SSSW insertion to confirm fistula formation, followed by comprehensive perianal evaluation and removal of SSSW prior to euthanasia. Conversely, animals in Group ‘B’ undergo periodic examinations to assess fistula formation, with specialized imaging modalities such as X-ray Fistulogram and perianal ultrasound (PUS) conducted by proficient radiologists and sonologists. The presence of epithelialization at external openings and fistula tracts is methodically recorded both before and after SSSW removal, ensuring a thorough assessment of Fistula-in-ano development in the rabbit model (see Fig. 7 and Fig. 8).
Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI):
The Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI) constitutes a pivotal tool for assess the activity of fistulas in perianal disease, serving as a comprehensive assessment framework. It encompasses the evaluation of five fundamental components: fistula discharge, pain and functional impairment, constraints on sexual activity, type of perianal disease, and extent of induration, delineated in Table 1 to Table 11. A PDAI score surpassing 4 indicates active fistula drainage or local inflammation, with an appreciable accuracy rate of 87%[16]. This scoring system has undergone rigorous validation in numerous clinical trials, thus fortifying its reliability and applicability in clinical settings.
A more straightforward approach to gauge fistula activity involves the "fistula drainage assessment," which relies on the examiner's direct observation of pus discharge upon digital compression. Clinical improvement or response is conventionally signified by a reduction of 50% or more in the number of draining fistulas over two consecutive examinations [17], while remission is affirmed in the absence of draining fistulas over two consecutive examinations. It is pertinent to note that external fistula openings may undergo healing while inflammatory changes persist within the fistula tracts, necessitating supplementary modalities for comprehensive monitoring.
In this context, the utilization of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or endoanal ultrasound is advocated for monitoring the progression of perianal fistulas [18]. A significant advancement in this domain was introduced by van Assche in 2003, who proposed an MRI-based scoring system. Despite its clinical validation, this scoring system demonstrates a modest correlation with the PDAI, indicating prospects for further refinement and optimization in assessing perianal disease activity.
Histological examination:
Histological analysis unveiled conspicuous epithelialization and granulation tissue formation, notably concentrated in the outer tract region. Noteworthy was the utilization of SSSW as an inflammatory agent, which demonstrated resilience and high tolerability in the rabbit subjects, manifesting no observable alterations throughout a 40-day observation period. However, the challenge in achieving complete epithelialization underscores the intricate progression of fistulas and its potential ramifications for treatment efficacy. Histological assessment revealed that Group ‘A’ (20 days) showed a small fistula tract with irregular patency (see Fig. 9), while Group ‘B’ (40 days) showed uniform patency and a larger area of the fistula tract (see Fig. 10).
The tissue damage index (TDI), employing a modified version of the grading system outlined [19], was employed for histological evaluation, as delineated in Table 3. The histological diagnosis of fistulae depended on specific criteria, including the identification of the internal opening within the rectal mucosa and the external opening on the perianal skin. Histological indicators of proctitis such as neutrophils, B and T lymphocytes and macrophages were also considered. The characterization of the fistulas is based on epithelialization, fibrillation and inflammation.
Following the formation of anal fistulas and subsequent cessation of SSSW application, experimental rabbit subjects in each group underwent PUS and X-ray Fistulogram for initial assessment. This encompassed a comprehensive examination of the inner and outer orifices, trajectory of the fistula tract, and surrounding mucosal inflammation. Follow-up PUS and X-ray Fistulogram assessments were performed on the 20th day post-operatively for group "A" and on the 40th day for group "B," respectively.