4.1 Factors controlling plant and soil δ13C along the transect
The utilization of δ13C in plants and soil has become an invaluable technique for evaluating the scale and spatial patterns of plant productivity, water use efficiency, and soil carbon (C) turnover rate. (McDowell et al. 2010; Wu et al. 2018). Plant δ13C values are different among various plant species (Zheng and Shangguan 2007) and photosynthetic pathways (C3, C4,CAM). Generally, δ13C values of C3 species vary between −35‰ and −20‰, averaging −27‰ (O'leary 1981). As C3 plants, plant δ13C values of Astragalus are -26.14±0.61 with few fluctuations.
The unique geographical characteristics of the TP, characterized by high cold and high altitude, have a significant impact on the δ13C composition of plants, surpassing the effects observed in other ecosystems. Our results showed that δ13C are negatively correlated with altitude (Fig. 4). Altitude usually indirectly affects the composition of δ13C in the TP by changing factors such as temperature, pressure, and soil moisture. In this study, by establishing an SEM model, we found altitude affect δ13C indirectly through its control over MAT, and MAP exerts its control over δ13C as an independent variable (Fig. 5). Our results are consistent with previous regional-scale which have reported that plant δ13C are positively correlated with MAT induced by rising altitude. Notably, a study revealed that the average δ13C value of plant leaves in high-altitude areas (average altitude: 2500m-5600m) was 2.7 ‰ higher than that in low-altitude areas (average altitude: 900m or below). The increase in δ13C with altitude is primarily attributed to temperature and pressure fluctuations (Korner et al. 1988). Furthermore, investigations have identified a positive relationship between plant δ13C and altitude beyond a certain threshold, suggesting temperature limitation as a key factor in high-altitude regions (Liu et al. 2007). The positive relationship between plant δ13C and MAT are most likely due to the balance between stomatal conductance and carbon assimilation. In arid and semi-arid regions, plants tend to close some stomata to conserve water, resulting in reduced stomatal conductance and lower CO2 content in the leaves, thus decreasing plant δ13C values (Welker et al. 1993). Additionally, higher MAT often signifies that plants are closer to their optimal photosynthetic temperature, leading to increased photosynthetic rates and consequently higher leaf δ13C values (Schleser et al. 1999).
At global scale, the relationship between precipitation gradients and plant δ13C has generally shown either a negative correlation or no correlation (Craine et al. 2009). We found plant δ13C is positively correlated with MAP, and is supported by some other studies from the TP. Specifically, in the northern TP, a study (Guo and Xie 2006) observed an increase in δ13C with higher precipitation, with a rate of 0.46‰/100 mm. Similarly, in the eastern TP, a similar trend was also found (Li et al. 2009). However, this positive relation can be explained as follow: MAT as a driving factor for δ13C pattern is positively correlated with MAP, thus creating the illusion of a significant positive correlation between δ13C and MAP. Notably, we did not observe such a relationship between MAP and MAT in our study. Hence, further investigation is required to uncover the reasons behind the independent influence of MAP on plant δ13C. Overall, our findings suggest that MAT, influenced by altitude, and MAP as an independent variable, jointly determine the patterns of plant δ13C in the southwestern TP, where high altitudes prevail.
Soil primarily originates from plants through leaf and root litter as well as rhizodeposition (Peri et al. 2012). As a result, soil δ13C exhibits correlation with soil C, soil C:N ratio and plant δ13C (Wu et al. 2018; Yang et al. 2015). In this study, soil δ13C showed no correlation with Astragalus δ13C, because semiarid systems are usually covered by C4 plants, and soil δ13C patterns cannot be successfully represented by a single C3 plant. However, soil δ13C of our study was correlated with soil C, soil C:N ratio (C was originated from plants) as other studies, and therefore, soil δ13C is independent of vegetation type and climate.
4.2 Factors controlling plant and soil δ15N along the transect
The responses of N isotope discrimination to various climate factors exhibit complexity (Feng et al. 2020; Luo et al. 2018). At global scale, C4 plants have higher values of δ15N than C3 plants. Plant δ15N values demonstrate a negative correlation with MAP due to the gradual functional group transitions from C4 to C3, resulting in a decrease in plant δ15N values as MAP increases. (Craine et al. 2009). Additionally, when soil nitrogen serves as the dominant nitrogen source for a plant community, plant δ15N values can exhibit a positive correlation with soil δ15N values. This is because the process of plant nitrogen uptake from the soil does not cause significant isotopic fractionation (Wu et al. 2022). In this study, we choose Astragalus to eliminate the differences of δ15N among C3 and C4 species. As a genus from legume, Astragalus can provide an important alternative N source due to their capability for biological N2 fixation under limited N conditions. If the N source is sufficient, the N uptake will be controlled by MAT, resulting in a relatively lower plant δ15N compared with soil δ15N. However, neither MAT nor soil δ15N showed correlation with plant δ15N, indicating Astragalus obtain N from atmosphere. N fixation causes plant δ15N values closer to δ15N of atmosphere (0‰). The mean value of plant δ15N in this study was -0.55, which demonstrate that Astragalus tended to fix N from the atmosphere instead of direct acquisition from the soil. The relatively low plant δ15N deepened the idea that the Tibetan alpine regions are suffering from progressive N limitation (Kou et al. 2020).
Soil δ15N is a valuable and non-invasive indicator that provides an efficient means to assess and monitor N dynamics within an ecosystem (Kahmen et al. 2008; Wang et al. 2014). Its application holds potential for advancing our understanding of the larger-scale nitrogen cycle within ecosystems (Yang et al. 2013). Generally, soil δ15N values fluctuate within the range of -6‰ to 16‰ (Piccolo et al. 1994). In our study, the average soil δ15N was determined to be 7.75, which aligns with the global range. To be specific, our results showed that soil δ15N in south-western TP is higher than that of grasslands across China, even much higher than mean values on TP 10 or 20 years ago (Table 2).
Soil δ15N values are influenced by multiple processes, including as gaseous N loss, net plant N uptake, N leaching, atmospheric N deposition and biological N fixation (Högberg 1997; Robinson 2001). Among these processes, gaseous N loss (16—30‰) and net plant N uptake (5—10‰) affect soil δ15N values most, comparing to N leaching (1‰), atmospheric N deposition and biological N fixation (-2—0‰) (Houlton and Bai 2009; Wang et al. 2014) and was confirmed to be the key processes determining soil δ15N values on TP (Kou et al. 2020). Among our study sites, desert steppes with sparse vegetation are scattered throughout south-western TP and thus net plant N uptake is an unimportant process compared to gaseous N loss. Processes of NH3 volatilization and denitrification control gaseous N loss from the system. As a rule, denitrification is important under anaerobic conditions such as aquatic systems and wet terrestrial systems and is sensitive to temperature (Högberg 1997). However, we observed there is no correlation between soil δ15N and MAT and a study also showed that in arid and semiarid systems, denitrification is usually less important than NH3 volatilization (Xu, 2007). On the other hand, precipitation is one of the most important factors that determine plant production and N uptake and assimilation in arid and semiarid ecosystems (Cheng et al. 2009). Less productive ecosystems have a lower capability to immobilize available N sources and there by NH3 volatilization can easily occur instead of letting N immobilized into plants. Studies also indicate that vegetation can take up air NH3 so that net loss of N through NH3 volatilization can be bring back to soil-plant system under high vegetation-density systems (Frank et al. 2004). This can potentially explain the negative correlation between MAP and soil δ15N values along the transect.