Identification of Novel Gene Mutations in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Using Whole Exome Sequencing in Chinese Population

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-41775/v2

Abstract

Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) is a common lumbar disease requiring surgery. Previous studies indicate that genetic mutation may play a part in DLSS. However, there is scarcely specific study regarding the genetic study for DLSS. Whole exome sequencing (WES) is an effective strategy to search for disease-causing genes. To identify probable susceptible genes, we performed a WES in a cohort of 50 patients and 25 controls with DLSS. By bioinformatics analyses, we successfully identified several novel variants including HLA-DRB1, PARK2, ACTR8, AOAH, BCORL1, MKRN2, NRG4, NUP205, etc. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first genetic study of susceptibility genes with DLSS by WES in Chinese patients. In conclusion, our findings revealed that deleterious mutations in these genes may contribute to the development of DLSS.

Introduction

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is defined as any type of narrowing of the lumbar spinal canal, the lateral recesses, or the intervertebral foramina. It may be congenital and acquired or degenerative (1, 2). Congenital stenosis is rare and typically caused by achondroplasia and hypochondroplasia. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) is usually attributable to degenerative changes in the intervertebral discs, facet joints, and ligamentum flavum, spondylolisthesis. DLSS typically affects subjects over 50 years of age, as one of the most common spinal conditions worldwide that often requires surgery. Neurogenic claudication is the classic clinical manifestation associated with lumbar spinal stenosis causing diminished function and impaired quality of life (3, 4).

To date, the etiology and pathomechanism of DLSS remain unclear, and previous studies indicate that genetic factors may play a part in DLSS. A previous Finnish study identified a splice site variant in COL9A2 was associated with DLSS (5). Seung-Jae Hyun reported a COL9A2 haplotype (HAP2) was significantly associated with DLSS in the Korean population, whereas another haplotype (HAP4) may play a protective role against DLSS development (6). However, there is inadequate study regarding the susceptibility gene mutation for DLSS. It is urgent to identify pathogenic genes to provide novel approaches for future investigation and intervention of DLSS.

Whole-exome sequencing (WES) represents a cost-effective, reproducible, and robust strategy for the sensitive and specific identification of variants causing protein-coding changes in individual human genomes. Previous genetic studies were limited to implementing one or several candidate genes approach rather than the more established measure of WES study, whereby hundreds of thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) can be screened (7). For the population with pathogenic gene mutations, preventive measures such as lifestyle modification, and better monitoring for stenosis development may be applied. In this study, we analyzed data of WES on fifty DLSS patients and twenty-five healthy controls to attempt the identification of pathogenic genes. We used DNA sequencing to validate the variants disclosed by WES. Single nucleotide polymorphisms were analyzed by bioinformatics analysis. Our study reported several pathogenic variants in genes associated with DLSS in the Chinese population.

Materials And Methods

Study population

A total of 50 unrelated Chinese patients with symptoms consistent with DLSS and 25 unrelated healthy controls were consecutively recruited between the year 2016 January and 2017 December from the Orthopaedic Department in China-Japan Friendship Hospital. This study was conducted with the approval of the ethics committee of the China-Japan Friendship Hospital Institutional Review Board. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients whose specimens and clinical information were used for this study. All patients were examined both clinically and radiologically to confirm the degenerative nature of the stenosis. All DLSS patients met the all following three criteria: (1) diagnosis of DLSS by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); (2) conservative treatment and monitoring for more than 3 months by spinal surgeons; and (3) a history of typical LSS symptoms, consisting of self-reported intermittent neurogenic claudication, stenotic symptoms extending to the lower extremities upon extension of the lumbar spine, or numbness or weakness of the lower extremities. Patients with neurological disorders, spinal fracture, spondylolisthesis, spinal tumor, presentation with trauma, and diagnosis with an infectious disease were excluded. 25 biologically unrelated healthy individuals, with a similar ethnic background, were enrolled as the control group.

Whole exome sequencing

Genome DNA was extracted from whole blood with TIANamp Blood DNA kit (TIANGEN BIOTECH,Beijing, China). Exome capture was performed using Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon V6 kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. A whole exome sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq Xten platform. Sequencing‑derived raw image files were processed by Illumina base calling Software with default parameters, and sequence data for each individual were generated as paired-end reads, defined as ‘raw data’. The experiment was performed according to manufacturer’s protocol. One sample was loaded per flow cell lane to obtain a minimum of 10× read depth across ~96% of the target regions.

Exome data analysis

Bioinformatics analysis started with the raw sequencing data from the Illumina pipeline. Raw data were processed and filtered and low-quality reads were discarded. Low-quality sequencing reads were filtered by the following criteria:1) removal of reads containing the abnormal sequencing adapter, 2) removal of reads with a low-quality base ratio (base quality less than or equal to 5 that was more than 50%; 3) removal of reads with an unknown base (‘N’ base) ratio that was more than 10%. Variants located in exon regions or alternative splicing regions were retained. Variant frequency was compared with the 1000G SNP database (http://www.1000genomes.org/). Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) (http://exac.broadinstitute.org;) Analysis for potential deleterious mutations was performed using various algorithms, such as PolyPhen2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/) (8), SIFT (http://sif.jcvi.org/) (9), Mutation Taster (http://www.mutationtaster.org/) (10) as well as CADD (Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion). We used the identification of rare combined with at least two of the four algorithms above to prioritize potential pathogenic variants. R software (http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/maftools.html) was used to perform the clustering analysis to determine statistical significance in genotype and allele frequencies between patients and controls (FDR, false discovery rate < 0.05). Phenolyzer (Phenotype Based Gene Analyzer, http://phenolyzer.wglab.org/) was used to discover genes based on user-specific disease/phenotype terms.

Read Mapping to reference sequences

All single nucleotide variants (SNVs) of 75 samples were obtained by comparing the valid sequencing data with the human reference genome (UCSC Genome Browser hg19) using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) software to gain the primary mapping results. And then, the aligned data were sorted by SAMtools to select the best mapping positions, and the duplicated reads were marked by Picard (http://sourceforge.net/ projects/picard/) so that they could be used in the next analysis.

In addition, the functional annotation was conducted to find the genetic variation associated with DLSS. First, all variants were annotated using the ANNOVAR software tool. Then, the normal population variant databases, including 1000g2015aug_all, 1000g2015aug_Chinese,esp6500siv2_all,NovoDb_WES_SNP and ExAC database, were performed to exclude the common variations occurring with no more than 1% minor allele frequency (MAF).

Candidate susceptible variants and gene selection

The SIFT, PolyPhen-2 and MutationTaster were performed to predict whether the substitution of amino acid affected the function of the protein. The mutation was selected as candidate susceptible variant if one of the three software showed it was pathological.

Gene function enrichment analysis

Toppgene suite was used for gene list enrichment analysis and candidate gene prioritization based on functional annotations and protein interactions network (https://toppgene.cchmc.org/). A web-based portal named Metascape (http://metascape.org/) was used to do Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis. GSEA software (version 3.0) with “c2.cp.kegg.v6.1symbols.gmt” gene sets database was used to do Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) (http://www.broadinstitute.org/gsea/index.jsp), to identify significantly enriched or depleted genes that show statistically significant, concordant differences between two given clusters.

Statistical analysis

A Fisher's exact test was used for evaluating the association between rare variants and disease phenotype (case/control data) with Benjaminiand-Hochberg method, which is a type of false discovery rate (FDR) test and is used in multiple hypothesis testing to correct for multiple comparisons.

Results

Patient cohort

Twenty-one male and 29 female patients were included in this study, with an average age of 52.4 years ranging from 46 to 70 years. There are 10 male and 15 female controls in this study, with an average age of 52.4 years ranging from 29 to 70 years. After Principal Component Analysis (PCA), three records were obviously outliers. Without the three outliers, all the 72 cases are in random distribution. The outliers three (bijinfang, bijinfen, bijinhua) have closer genetic relationship. (Supplementary Figure 1 and Figure 2)

Variant identification

We performed WES on seventy-five DNA samples from the Illumina Hiseq Xen sequencer. To filter potential pathogenic variants, we focused on the identification of rare 1000G_EAS≤ 0.005, based on BGI database) and damaging variants predicted by at least two of four algorithms (i.e. SIFT, Polyphen2, Mutation Assessor, Mutation Taster, and CADD). Detrimental variants are classified into missense_mutation, frame_shift_del, nonsense_mutation, frame_shift_ins, splice_site, in_frame_ins, in_frame_del, nonstop_mutation. The basic variant status in the 75 cases were shown in Supplementary Figure 3 and Figure 4.

Genes related to LDSS by clustering analysis by R software. We filtered allele mutations in controls to retain only mutations in patients and got multiply SNPs on thirty-four genes. (FDR, false discovery rate < 0.05.) (Figure 1 and Table 1)

To decipher the specified characteristics between patients and control groups, we analyzed the differences by Gene Ontology (GO) and pathway analysis. (Figure 2 and Supplementary Table 1)

Fifty cases and 2245 control cases (Novegene database) were used to do the sites-based association. (Figure 3) Forty-three genes were filtered up to P-value ≤ 0.001, FDR_BH_Allele ≤ 0.01. After toppgene test, the top two genes were HLA-DRB1 and PRKN. The top four SNP related to lumbar disease were shown in Table 2. We perform pathway and Phenolyzer to discover genes based on lumbar disease. Genes related to LDSS (Phenolyzer score ≥ 0.01) were showed in Supplementary Figure 5.

After filtering the data by 1000G_EAS ≤ 0.005 and damaging variants predicted by at least two of four algorithms (i.e. SIFT, Polyphen2, Mutation Assessor, Mutation Taster, and CADD), there are 322 SNP on 60 candidate genes which P-value ≤ 0.001. We perform pathway and Phenolyzer to discover genes based on lumbar disease. As ‘lumbar degeneration’ is not in the disease item, we input lumbar disc degeneration as the disease item in Phenolyzer. Genes related to LDSS (Phenolyzer score ≥ 0.01) were showed in Table 3 and Supplementary Figure 6.

As there are genetic relations among bijingfang, bijinfen, and bijinhua, not all the patients are sporadic cases. We tried to find SNPs that not only in the three cases but also in the other 47 cases as more as possible. Six genes were identified to have relations with LDSS with high possibility. (Table 4 and Table 5)

Discussion

To date, several lines of evidence have shown that genetic factors may play a part in DLSS. We performed a WES study design on 50 patients and 25 controls to detect genes contributing to DLSS. In our study, we discover several novel candidate genes that have not been previously identified in relation to DLSS.

Prior studies have identified several candidate genes in association with lumbar disc degeneration. Jason et al. carried out a genome-wide association study, and multiple SNPs identified suggested a multi-factorial origin of DLSS (11). HLA-DRB1 genotyping was reported to increase the risk of developing pain after surgery or lumbar disc herniation (12). A variant in the PARK2 gene associated with Lumbar disc degeneration by influencing methylation of the PARK2 (13). In this study, HLA-DRB1 and PARK2 are identified as susceptibility genes associated with a predisposition to DLSS. Lumbar disc degeneration causes intervertebral collapse, which may accelerate the development of DLSS. Obviously, there could be some overlapped mechanism between the two degenerative processes. To some extent, our results are in accordance with the previous studies. The specific mechanism of the two genes contributing to DLSS needs further investigation.

In this study, ACTR8, AOAH, BCORL1, MKRN2, NRG4, NUP205 were novel genes reported in correlation with DLSS. ACTR8 is located on chromosome 3p21.1 and has 14 exons. Mutation in the ACTR8 was associated with lineage-specific expression in primates (14). AOAH is on chromosome 7p14.2, encoding both the light and heavy subunits of acyloxyacyl hydrolaseregion. AOAH polymorphisms have been reported to associate with asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis, and bronchial hyperreactivity (15, 16). Located on chromosome Xq26.1, BCORL1 encoding a transcriptional corepressor that is found tethered to promoter regions by DNA-binding proteins. Pathogenic variants in BCORL1 underlie a newly identified X-linked epigenetic syndrome (17). MKRN2, on chromosome 3p25.2, encodes a probable E3 ubiquitin ligase containing several zinc finger domains. MKRN2 is involved in the regulation of inflammatory response, non-small-cell lung cancer (18, 19). NRG4 is located on chromosome 15q24.2. NRG4 is a member of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) family of extracellular ligands, highly expressed in adipose tissues, enriched in brown fat, and markedly increased during brown adipocyte differentiation (20). NUP205 on chromosome ch7q33 encoding a nucleoporin, which is a subunit of the nuclear pore complex that functions in the active transport of proteins, RNAs, and ribonucleoprotein particles between the nucleus and cytoplasm. Mutations in NUP205 are associated with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (21).

Several other candidate genes associated with DLSS were identified including GPRIN2, MYOT, PDE4DIP, etc. Some pathways were enriched through analysis of the differentially expressed genes between the patient and control groups. These genes had never been reported to be associated with DLSS,

We recognize several limitations of this study. First, the number (50) is still inadequate for genetic study. Concerning the inadequate number, we enroll three family cases in this study. Numerous candidate genes identified in this study warrant further investigation. Functional study should be conducted to determine the mechanism and pathways in which the genes involved affect the development of the disease. As a next step, we will continue increasing the sample size to reveal more susceptible genes.

In conclusion, in this study, we identifed mutations with DLSS in Chinese patients for the first time using WES. From our analysis, we found two potential pathogenic loci for DLSS on HLA-DRB1 and PARK2, which have previously been reported to be associated with lumbar disc degeneration, and SNPS on several novel genes including ACTR8, AOAH, BCORL1, MKRN2, NRG4, NUP205, etc, which had not previously been reported to be DLSS. Further replication and functional studies are required to confirm these positive findings, helping to detect early and to provide novel therapeutic approaches of DLSS.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Not applicable

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval and consent details

The clinical study was approved by the ethics committee of China-Japan Friendship Hospital and was conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Data availability statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Funding

Not applicable

Authors’ contribution statement

Xin Jiang and Dong Chen Conceived, coordinated, designed, drafted and edited the manuscript.

References

  1. J. M. Sheehan, C. I. Shaffrey and J. A. Jane, Sr.: Degenerative lumbar stenosis: the neurosurgical perspective. Clin Orthop Relat Res(384), 61-74 (2001)
  2. J. M. Spivak: Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 80(7), 1053-66 (1998) doi:10.2106/00004623-199807000-00015
  3. P. S. Issack, M. E. Cunningham, M. Pumberger, A. P. Hughes and F. P. Cammisa, Jr.: Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 20(8), 527-35 (2012) doi:10.5435/jaaos-20-08-527
  4. R. Kalff, C. Ewald, A. Waschke, L. Gobisch and C. Hopf: Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in older people: current treatment options. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 110(37), 613-23; quiz 624 (2013) doi:10.3238/arztebl.2013.0613
  5. N. Noponen-Hietala, E. Kyllönen, M. Männikkö, E. Ilkko, J. Karppinen, J. Ott and L. Ala-Kokko: Sequence variations in the collagen IX and XI genes are associated with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Ann Rheum Dis, 62(12), 1208-14 (2003) doi:10.1136/ard.2003.008334
  6. S. J. Hyun, B. G. Park, S. C. Rhim, C. W. Bae, J. K. Lee, S. W. Roh and S. R. Jeon: A haplotype at the COL9A2 gene locus contributes to the genetic risk for lumbar spinal stenosis in the Korean population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 36(16), 1273-8 (2011) doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820e6282
  7. S. B. Ng, E. H. Turner, P. D. Robertson, S. D. Flygare, A. W. Bigham, C. Lee, T. Shaffer, M. Wong, A. Bhattacharjee, E. E. Eichler, M. Bamshad, D. A. Nickerson and J. Shendure: Targeted capture and massively parallel sequencing of 12 human exomes. Nature, 461(7261), 272-6 (2009) doi:10.1038/nature08250
  8. I. A. Adzhubei, S. Schmidt, L. Peshkin, V. E. Ramensky, A. Gerasimova, P. Bork, A. S. Kondrashov and S. R. Sunyaev: A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods, 7(4), 248-9 (2010) doi:10.1038/nmeth0410-248
  9. N. L. Sim, P. Kumar, J. Hu, S. Henikoff, G. Schneider and P. C. Ng: SIFT web server: predicting effects of amino acid substitutions on proteins. Nucleic Acids Res, 40(Web Server issue), W452-7 (2012) doi:10.1093/nar/gks539
  10. J. M. Schwarz, D. N. Cooper, M. Schuelke and D. Seelow: MutationTaster2: mutation prediction for the deep-sequencing age. Nat Methods, 11(4), 361-2 (2014) doi:10.1038/nmeth.2890
  11. J. P. Y. Cheung, P. Y. P. Kao, P. Sham, K. S. E. Cheah, D. Chan, K. M. C. Cheung and D. Samartzis: Etiology of developmental spinal stenosis: A genome-wide association study. J Orthop Res, 36(4), 1262-1268 (2018) doi:10.1002/jor.23746
  12. C. A. Dominguez, M. Kalliomäki, U. Gunnarsson, A. Moen, G. Sandblom, I. Kockum, E. Lavant, T. Olsson, F. Nyberg, L. J. Rygh, C. Røe, J. Gjerstad, T. Gordh and F. Piehl: The DQB1 *03:02 HLA haplotype is associated with increased risk of chronic pain after inguinal hernia surgery and lumbar disc herniation. Pain, 154(3), 427-33 (2013) doi:10.1016/j.pain.2012.12.003
  13. F. M. Williams, A. T. Bansal, J. B. van Meurs, J. T. Bell, I. Meulenbelt, P. Suri, F. Rivadeneira, P. N. Sambrook, A. Hofman, S. Bierma-Zeinstra, C. Menni, M. Kloppenburg, P. E. Slagboom, D. J. Hunter, A. J. MacGregor, A. G. Uitterlinden and T. D. Spector: Novel genetic variants associated with lumbar disc degeneration in northern Europeans: a meta-analysis of 4600 subjects. Ann Rheum Dis, 72(7), 1141-8 (2013) doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201551
  14. S. H. Choe, S. J. Park, H. M. Cho, H. R. Park, J. R. Lee, Y. H. Kim and J. W. Huh: A single mutation in the ACTR8 gene associated with lineage-specific expression in primates. BMC Evol Biol, 20(1), 66 (2020) doi:10.1186/s12862-020-01620-9
  15. K. C. Barnes, A. Grant, P. Gao, D. Baltadjieva, T. Berg, P. Chi, S. Zhang, A. Zambelli-Weiner, E. Ehrlich, O. Zardkoohi, M. E. Brummet, M. Stockton, T. Watkins, L. Gao, M. Gittens, M. Wills-Karp, C. Cheadle, L. A. Beck, T. H. Beaty, K. G. Becker, J. G. Garcia and R. A. Mathias: Polymorphisms in the novel gene acyloxyacyl hydroxylase (AOAH) are associated with asthma and associated phenotypes. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 118(1), 70-7 (2006) doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2006.03.036
  16. Y. Zhang, L. M. Endam, A. Filali-Mouhim, L. Zhao, M. Desrosiers, D. Han and L. Zhang: Polymorphisms in RYBP and AOAH genes are associated with chronic rhinosinusitis in a Chinese population: a replication study. PLoS One, 7(6), e39247 (2012) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039247
  17. F. Damm, V. Chesnais, Y. Nagata, K. Yoshida, L. Scourzic, Y. Okuno, R. Itzykson, M. Sanada, Y. Shiraishi, V. Gelsi-Boyer, A. Renneville, S. Miyano, H. Mori, L. Y. Shih, S. Park, F. Dreyfus, A. Guerci-Bresler, E. Solary, C. Rose, S. Cheze, T. Prébet, N. Vey, M. Legentil, Y. Duffourd, S. de Botton, C. Preudhomme, D. Birnbaum, O. A. Bernard, S. Ogawa, M. Fontenay and O. Kosmider: BCOR and BCORL1 mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes and related disorders. Blood, 122(18), 3169-77 (2013) doi:10.1182/blood-2012-11-469619
  18. C. Shin, Y. Ito, S. Ichikawa, M. Tokunaga, K. Sakata-Sogawa and T. Tanaka: MKRN2 is a novel ubiquitin E3 ligase for the p65 subunit of NF-κB and negatively regulates inflammatory responses. Sci Rep, 7, 46097 (2017) doi:10.1038/srep46097
  19. J. Jiang, Y. Xu, H. Ren, M. Wudu, Q. Wang, X. Song, H. Su, X. Jiang, L. Jiang and X. Qiu: MKRN2 inhibits migration and invasion of non-small-cell lung cancer by negatively regulating the PI3K/Akt pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 37(1), 189 (2018) doi:10.1186/s13046-018-0855-7
  20. G. X. Wang, X. Y. Zhao, Z. X. Meng, M. Kern, A. Dietrich, Z. Chen, Z. Cozacov, D. Zhou, A. L. Okunade, X. Su, S. Li, M. Blüher and J. D. Lin: The brown fat-enriched secreted factor Nrg4 preserves metabolic homeostasis through attenuation of hepatic lipogenesis. Nat Med, 20(12), 1436-1443 (2014) doi:10.1038/nm.3713
  21. D. A. Braun, C. E. Sadowski, S. Kohl, S. Lovric, S. A. Astrinidis, W. L. Pabst, H. Y. Gee, S. Ashraf, J. A. Lawson, S. Shril, M. Airik, W. Tan, D. Schapiro, J. Rao, W. I. Choi, T. Hermle, M. J. Kemper, M. Pohl, F. Ozaltin, M. Konrad, R. Bogdanovic, R. Büscher, U. Helmchen, E. Serdaroglu, R. P. Lifton, W. Antonin and F. Hildebrandt: Mutations in nuclear pore genes NUP93, NUP205 and XPO5 cause steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Nat Genet, 48(4), 457-65 (2016) doi:10.1038/ng.3512

Tables

Table 1. Candidate genes by clustering analysis by R software. 

GENE

Feature_1

Feature_2

N_of_Feature1

N_of_Feature2

FDR

GPRIN2

Patient

Normal

45 of 50

0 of 25

2.70983E-15

MYOT

Patient

Normal

45 of 50

0 of 25

2.70983E-15

PDE4DIP

Patient

Normal

45 of 50

0 of 25

2.70983E-15

EPPK1

Patient

Normal

44 of 50

0 of 25

1.40008E-14

SYT15

Patient

Normal

39 of 50

0 of 25

1.14246E-11

CGREF1

Patient

Normal

31 of 50

0 of 25

3.2011E-08

IRF5

Patient

Normal

25 of 50

0 of 25

3.3725E-06

SIRPB1

Patient

Normal

24 of 50

0 of 25

9.2172E-06

HLA-DQA1

Patient

Normal

23 of 50

0 of 25

1.06146E-05

MUC6

Patient

Normal

19 of 50

0 of 25

0.000141694

PROSER3

Patient

Normal

18 of 50

0 of 25

0.000315482

IGFN1

Patient

Normal

17 of 50

0 of 25

0.000375298

PABPC1

Patient

Normal

16 of 50

0 of 25

0.000728519

KRT79

Patient

Normal

9 of 50

0 of 25

0.02508378

FLNA

Patient

Normal

9 of 50

0 of 25

0.02508378

PHRF1

Patient

Normal

9 of 50

0 of 25

0.02508378

ALS2CL

Patient

Normal

10 of 50

0 of 25

0.025483837

KNSTRN

Patient

Normal

10 of 50

0 of 25

0.025483837

COL6A5

Patient

Normal

8 of 50

0 of 25

0.046170366

TSHZ2

Patient

Normal

8 of 50

0 of 25

0.046170366

AADAC

Patient

Normal

8 of 50

0 of 25

0.046170366

ADAT1

Patient

Normal

8 of 50

0 of 25

0.046170366

CMA1

Patient

Normal

8 of 50

0 of 25

0.046170366

DEAF1

Patient

Normal

8 of 50

0 of 25

0.046170366

DLAT

Patient

Normal

8 of 50

0 of 25

0.046170366

DST

Patient

Normal

8 of 50

0 of 25

0.046170366

FLG

Patient

Normal

8 of 50

0 of 25

0.046170366

KIAA0556

Patient

Normal

8 of 50

0 of 25

0.046170366

LPA

Patient

Normal

8 of 50

0 of 25

0.046170366

P2RX5

Patient

Normal

8 of 50

0 of 25

0.046170366

PANK2

Patient

Normal

8 of 50

0 of 25

0.046170366

RASSF4

Patient

Normal

8 of 50

0 of 25

0.046170366

WARS

Patient

Normal

8 of 50

0 of 25

0.046170366

ZNF572

Patient

Normal

8 of 50

0 of 25

0.046170366

Frequency of allele mutations were zero in controls and FDR < 0.05.


 

Table 2. Top four SNP filtered related to lumbar disc degeneration.

Chromosome ID

Ref

Alt

Alt

Case

Alt

Control

Ref

Case

Ref

Control

P-value

Function

6

rs113663708

G

T

14

199

78

4151

0.0001

exonic

6

rs201219028

G

A

29

724

63

3616

0.000602

splicing

6

rs9269955

G

C

40

1110

58

3328

0.000883

exonic; splicing

6

rs12190823

G

A

42

1179

50

3289

0.000109

intronic


 

Table 3. Top 6 genes filtered from 60 Genes by Phenolyzer analysis.

Gene

Alt_Case

Ref_Case

Alt_Control

Ref_Control

P-value

PLEC

9

91

0

4490

7.69E-16

SHC4

5

95

31

4459

0.000979097

NRG4

3

97

4

4486

0.00033

TNKS

2

98

0

4490

0.00047

DKK4

2

98

0

4490

0.00047

RHPN1

2

98

0

4490

0.00047

Phenolyzer score ≥ 0.01


 

Table 4. The screening procedures to find the six genes excluding family influence.

 

 

 

bijinfang

 

 

bijinfang

bijinfen

 

bijinfang

bijinfen

bijinhua

nonsynonymous cSNP,splice site variatant or coding indel(NS/SS/I)

1060

657

87

NS/SS/I not dbSNP

133

76

30

NS/SS/I not 1000g2015aug_all

133

76

30

NS/SS/I not 1000g2015aug_Chinese

133

76

30

NS/SS/I not esp6500siv2_all

133

76

30

NS/SS/I not NovoDb_WES_SNP

113

63

19

NS/SS/I not ExAC

113

63

19

 

29

15

6


 

Table 5. Six novel genes identified to have relations with LDSS with high possibility.

 

47 Case

50 case

Gene

1000g2015aug_all < 0.01

ExAC_ALL< 0.01

1000g2015aug_all < 0.01

ExAC_ALL< 0.01

ACTR8

13

1

16

4

AOAH

13

10

16

13

BCORL1

3

3

6

6

MKRN2

3

3

6

6

NRG4

6

6

9

9

NUP205

2

2

5

5