LncRNA HOTAIR, EZH2 and H3K27me3 are highly expressed and E-cadherin is poorly expressed in NPC patients
The expression of lncRNA HOTAIR, EZH2 and E-cadherin in NPC tissues and chronic nasopharyngeal mucosal inflammatory tissues were detected by RT-qPCR. HOTAIR and EZH2 expression in the cancer tissues increased in contrast to the normal tissues (both P < 0.05), while E-cadherin expression decreased (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1A-C).
Western blot analysis was conducted to detect EZH2, H3K27me3 and E-cadherin expression in NPC tissues and chronic nasopharyngeal mucosal inflammatory tissues to reveal that of EZH2 and H3K27me3 expression in the cancer tissues increased in contrast to the normal tissues (both P < 0.05) but E-cadherin protein expression decreased (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1D).
Immunohistochemical SP method was conducted to observe the expression of E-cadherin and H3K27me3 in NPC tissues and chronic nasopharyngeal mucosal inflammatory tissues. It was found that positive expression of H3K27me3 was located at nucleus with light yellow to brown, and the number of the positive cells in the cancer tissues was much more than the normal tissues (P < 0.05). The positive expression of E-cadherin was appeared in the cell membrane with brown linear continuous expression. The number of the positive cells in the cancer tissues was less than that in the normal tissues (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1E,F).
The NPC tissue and chronic nasopharyngeal mucosal inflammatory tissue were sectioned and treated with HE staining. Microscopically, it was found that in the normal tissues, cells were manifested with neat arrangement, intact structure, uniform staining, and infiltration of secondary lymphoid follicles and their follicular dendritic cells. However, cells in the cancer tissues were demonstrated with damaged structure, evident vacuoles, a small amount of follicular dendritic cells resulting in inflammatory infiltration (Fig. 1G).
Relationship of lncRNA HOTAIR and EZH2 with the clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with NPC
Low expression group and high expression group were structured dependent on the mean value of the relative expression of lncRNA HOTAIR. The effect of HOTAIR expression on survival and prognosis of NPC patients was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and the results explained the difference in survival time between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05), and the poorer prognosis appeared among patients with high expression of HOTAIR rather than patients with with low expression (Fig. 1H,I).
With the same grouping way, the link connecting the effect of HOTAIR and EZH2 mRNA expression with the clinicopathological features of NPC patients was analyzed. The results showed that NPC patients in stage III-IV and stage N2 + 3 and with LNM occupied the increased proportion of high expression of HOTAIR and EZH2 mRNA (all P < 0.05), that was, TNM stage, N stage, and LNM were associated with HOTAIR and EZH2 mRNA expression (all P < 0.05), while age and gender were irrelevant to the expression of HOTAIR and EZH2 mRNA (all P > 0.05) (Table 2).
Table 2
Relationship between relative expression of lncRNA HOTAIR and EZH2 mRNA and clinicopathological features of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Clinicopathological data
|
n
|
HOTAIR expression
|
P
|
EZH2 expression
|
P
|
|
|
Low expression group (n = 37)
|
High expression group (n = 46)
|
|
Low expression group (n = 39)
|
High expression group (n = 44)
|
|
Age (years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
≥ 54
|
53
|
23
|
30
|
0.773
|
21
|
32
|
0.074
|
< 54
|
30
|
14
|
16
|
|
18
|
12
|
|
Gender
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Male
|
47
|
20
|
27
|
0.672
|
18
|
29
|
0.070
|
Female
|
36
|
17
|
19
|
|
21
|
15
|
|
TNM stage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I-II
|
28
|
17
|
11
|
0.035
|
21
|
7
|
0.000
|
III-IV
|
55
|
20
|
35
|
|
18
|
37
|
|
N stage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N0
|
25
|
17
|
8
|
0.002
|
19
|
6
|
0.002
|
N1
|
9
|
3
|
6
|
|
4
|
5
|
|
N2 + 3
|
49
|
17
|
32
|
|
16
|
33
|
|
Lymph node metastasis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
58
|
21
|
37
|
0.020
|
20
|
38
|
0.001
|
No
|
25
|
16
|
9
|
|
19
|
6
|
|
Note: The data in this table is the enumeration data, using the chi-square test. |
LncRNA HOTAIR, EZH2 and H3K27me3 are highly expressed and E-cadherin is poorly expressed in NPC cells
The expression of lncRNA HOTAIR, EZH2 and E-cadherin in human normal rhinitis epithelial cells NP69 and human NPC cells 6-10B, S18, CNE2, HONE1 and C666-1 were detected by RT-qPCR while EZH2 and H3K27me3 and E-cadherin protein expression by Western blot analysis. The experiments results indicated that in contrast to NP69 cells, the expression of HOTAIR, EZH2 and H3K27me3 increased in 6-10B, S18, CNE2, HONE1 and C666-1 cells (all P < 0.05) and the expression of E-cadherin decreased (P < 0.05). The highest levels of HOTAIR, EZH2 and H3K27me3 and the lowest levels of E-cadherin were in S18 cells which had the greatest difference with NP69 cells. The opposite story was in 6-10B cells which had the smallest difference with NP69 cells (Fig. 2A,B). Therefore, S18 and 6-10B cells were selected for subsequent experiments.
The expression of lncRNA HOTAIR, EZH2 and E-cadherin in S18 cells was detected by RT-qPCR and the protein expression of EZH2, H3K27me3 and E-cadherin by Western blot analysis. In relative to sh-NC group, the expression of HOTAIR, EZH2 and H3K27me3 decreased (all P < 0.05), and the expression of E-cadherin increased (P < 0.05). Versus the sh-Ctr group, the change of HOTAIR expression in the sh-EZH2 group was not significant (P > 0.05), and EZH2 and H3K27me3 protein expression decreased (both P < 0.05), together with increased E-cadherin expression (P < 0.05). In contrast to the sh-HOTAIR + Oe-Ctr group, HOTAIR expression changes were not obvious (P > 0.05) in the sh-HOTAIR + Oe-EZH2 group, EZH2 and H3K27me3 expression increased (both P < 0.05), and E-cadherin expression decreased (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2C,D).
The expression of lncRNA HOTAIR, EZH2 and E-cadherin in 6-10B cells was detected by RT-qPCR whereas the protein expression of EZH2, H3K27me3 and E-cadherin by Western blot analysis. By comparison to the Oe-NC group, the expression of HOTAIR, EZH2 and H3K27me3 increased (all P < 0.05), and the expression of E-cadherin decreased (P < 0.05) in the Oe-HOTAIR group. Versus the Oe-Ctr group, HOTAIR expression changes in the Oe-EZH2 group was not significant (P > 0.05), the expression of EZH2 and H3K27me3 increased (both P < 0.05), and the expression of E-cadherin decreased (P < 0.05). Compared with the Oe-HOTAIR + sh-Ctr group, HOTAIR expression changes in the Oe-HOTAIR + sh-EZH2 group was insignificant (P > 0.05), EZH2 and H3K27me3 expression decreased (both P < 0.05), and E-cadherin expression increased (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2E,F).
Down-regulation of HOTAIR or down-regulation of EZH2 suppresses cell viability, colony formation ability and cell cycle progression in NPC cells
In the S18 cell line, the viability, colony formation ability, as well as cell cycle distribution in each group was detected by MTT assay, colony formation assay and flow cytometry, respectively. It was found that the suppressed cell viability at 24th h, 48th h and 72th h, inhibited colony formation ability, more cells arrested at G0/G1 phrase and fewer cells at S and G2/M phases were found in the sh-HOTAIR group and the sh-EZH2 group compared to sh-NC group and the sh-Ctr group (all P < 0.05). Compared with the sh-HOTAIR + Oe-Ctr group, in the sh-HOTAIR + Oe-EZH2 group, there showed promoted cell viability at 24th h, 48th h and 72th h, induced colony formation ability, fewer cells arrested at G0/G1 phrase and more cells at S and G2/M phases (all P < 0.05) (Fig. 3A, C, D, G and H).
In the 6-10B cell line, the viability, colony formation ability, as well as cell cycle distribution in each group was detected by MTT assay, colony formation assay and flow cytometry, respectively. It was found that the promoted cell viability at 24th h, 48th h and 72th h, induced colony formation ability, fewer cells arrested at G0/G1 phrase and more cells at S and G2/M phases were found in the Oe-HOTAIR group and the Oe-EZH2 group compared to Oe-NC group and the Oe-Ctr group (all P < 0.05). Compared with the Oe-HOTAIR + sh-Ctr group, in the Oe-HOTAIR + sh-EZH2 group, there showed suppressed cell viability at 24th h, 48th h and 72th h, inhibited colony formation ability, more cells arrested at G0/G1 phrase and fewer cells at S and G2/M phases (all P < 0.05) (Fig. 3B, E, F, I and J).
Down-regulation of HOTAIR or down-regulation of EZH2 promotes apoptosis in NPC cells
Flow cytometry and Hoechst33342 staining were conducted to determine the apoptosis rate of S18 and 6-10B cells in each group. The apoptosis rate of cells in the sh-HOTAIR group and sh-EZH2 group was escalated by comparison to sh-NC group and sh-Ctr group respectively (both P < 0.05). Relative to the sh-HOTAIR + Oe-Ctr group, the apoptosis rate of cells in the sh-HOTAIR + Oe-EZH2 group was decreased (P < 0.05) (Fig. 4A,B and E,F). The apoptosis rate of cells in the Oe-HOTAIR group and the Oe-EZH2 group was decreased compared respectively with the Oe-NC group and the Oe-Ctr group (P < 0.05). Versus the Oe-HOTAIR + sh-Ctr group, the apoptosis rate of cells in the Oe-HOTAIR + sh-EZH2 group was increased (P < 0.05)(Fig. 4C,D and G,H).
Down-regulation of HOTAIR or down-regulation of EZH2 inhibits cell migration and invasion of NPC cells
Transwell assay was applied to determine the migration and invasion abilities of S18 and 6-10B cells in each group. The cell migration and invasion abilities in the sh-HOTAIR group and the sh-EZH2 group were decreased compared with the sh-NC group and the sh-Ctr group group (all P < 0.05). Relative to the sh-HOTAIR + Oe-Ctr group, the migration and invasion abilities in the sh-HOTAIR + Oe-EZH2 group were increased (both P < 0.05) (Fig. 5A,B and E,F). The migration and invasion abilities in the Oe-HOTAIR group and the Oe-EZH2 group were increased in contrast to the Oe-NC group and the Oe-Ctr group individually (all P < 0.05). Versus the Oe-HOTAIR + sh-Ctr group, the migration and invasion abilities in the Oe-HOTAIR + sh-EZH2 group were decreased (both P < 0.05) (Fig. 5C,D and G,H).
Down-regulation of HOTAIR or down-regulation of EZH2 inhibits tumor growth and tumor volume in nude mice with NPC
The length and width of subcutaneous tumors in nude mice were measured after tumor tumorigenesis so that the tumor volume was calculated to draw the tumor growth curve. It was obvious that after 6 days of S18 cell tumorigenesis, the tumors in each group of nude mice grew to varying degrees with time. After 9 days, the tumor volume in the sh-HOTAIR group and the sh-EZH2 group were suppressed in contrast to the sh-NC group and the sh-Ctr group respectively (both P < 0.05). Versus the sh-HOTAIR + Oe-Ctr group, the tumor volume in the sh-HOTAIR + Oe-EZH2 group was reduced (P < 0.05) (Fig. 6A). After 6 days of 6-10B cell tumorigenesis, the tumor volume in the Oe-HOTAIR group and the Oe-EZH2 group were increased compared with the Oe-NC group and the Oe-Ctr group (both P < 0.05). Relative to the Oe-HOTAIR + sh-Ctr group, the tumor volume in the Oe-HOTAIR + sh-EZH2 group was decreased (P < 0.05) (Fig. 6B).
On the 21st day after S18 and 6-10B cell tumorigenesis when the subcutaneous tumors being more obvious, the nude mice were euthanized to obtain the subcutaneous tumors (Fig. 6C and E). The tumor weight in the sh-HOTAIR group and the sh-EZH2 group were decreased compared with the sh-NC group and the sh-Ctr group (both P < 0.05); compared to the sh-HOTAIR + Oe-Ctr group, the tumor weight in the sh-HOTAIR + Oe-EZH2 group was elevated (P < 0.05) (Fig. 6D). The tumor weight in the Oe-HOTAIR group and the Oe-EZH2 group were enhanced in contrast to the Oe-NC group (both P < 0.05). In comparison to the Oe-HOTAIR + sh-Ctr group, the tumor weight in the Oe-HOTAIR + sh-EZH2 group was decreased (P < 0.05) (Fig. 6F).
HOTAIR recruits histone methylase EZH2 to mediate trimethylation of H3K27 and to regulate E-cadherin expression
RIP was performed to obtain intracellular RNA from S18 and 6-10B cells. After co-precipitation of proteins with S18 and 6-10B intracellular RNA by EZH2 antibody, the enrichment degree of EZH2 and HOTAIR was detected by RT-qPCR to find that HOTAIR and EZH2 were highly enriched (Fig. 7A,B). To further demonstrate that EZH2 can mediate H3K27 trimethylation binding to the promoter region of E-cadherin and exert its biological effects, ChIP was employed to confirm that EZH2 bound to the E-cadherin promoter region (Fig. 7C,D). Once knocking down HOTAIR, the binding degree of EZH2 to the E-cadherin promoter region was reduced (Fig. 7E,F).