Before analyzing the factors influencing on the quality of final rolled product, a symmetrical RFT is first developed based on the geometric size of corrugated channels, see Fig. 2(a). Namely, the number of all the forming passes is divided into three sets, the middle channel 4 is first performed in the first set, then the channels 3 and 5 or 2 and 6 are simultaneously rolled into shape in turn in other two sets.
Correspondingly, the number of rolls and bending angle each of sets can be determined by Eqs. (1) and (2), which are derived by Ona et al. [7] through comparing the relationship between the shape factor and molding passes, see Table 2.
Φ = nW1h/W2 (1)
Cosθi = 1+(1-cosθ0)[2(i/n)3-3(i/n)2] (2)
where Φ is shape factor; W1 is half width of strip; n, h and W2 are the number, height and half width of corrugated channels, respectively; θi is bending angle of roll; i is the forming pass order and θ0 is the final bending angle of roll.
Figure 2(b) shows the flower pattern design of corrugated channels, correspondingly. With this symmetric RFT, the quality of final rolled product are ensured through the center line o4 of middle channel 4 moving down continuously, and the initial center lines o31, o51 or o21, o61 toward their final ones o3, o5 or o2, o6 of channels 3, 5 or 2, 6, respectively.
Table 2
Number of forming passes and bending angle of each set
Sets
|
1#
|
2#
|
3#
|
Passes
|
1st
|
2nd
|
3rd
|
4th
|
5th
|
6th
|
7th
|
8th
|
9th
|
(o)
|
43
|
75
|
90
|
43
|
75
|
90
|
43
|
75
|
90
|
2.1 Finite element model
FE is often used to determine main and interaction effects between controllable process settings and uncontrollable variation of incoming material properties with respect to the product defects [8, 9]. The materials used for simulation in this paper is aluminum sheet 6061-T6 with width of 76mm and thickness of 0.25mm, of which performance parameters are given in Table 3. Although the length of aluminum sheet is infinite, in order to improve the simulation efficiency, only 800mm pre-cut sheet more than 3 passes (roll station distance 300mm) is hereby fed into the rolls. And the roll is set as the shell element S4R and discrete rigid body. Then, the assembly model of the corrugated channels is established in FE, see Fig. 3.
Table 3
Mechanical properties of Aluminum Alloy (6061-T6)
E
(Mpa)
|
µ
|
σs
(Mpa)
|
σb ρ
(Mpa) ༈Kg/m3༉
|
69000
|
0.33
|
275
|
355.8 2700
|
2.2 Strain simulation
When the aluminum sheet is bitten into the first forming pass, if the corresponding center line o4 of channel 4 deviates from that of the roll contour, two edges 1 or 7 of the final rolled corrugated channels could be too large or small, which both deteriorate the quality of sleeve. Therefore, the first pass plays a vital role during the whole forming process. Also because the quality of the final rolled product is guaranteed by the last pass in each set of rolls, only the sheet strain behaviors of four passes will be simulated in the following section.
The friction coefficient is first set 0.1 between the sheet and roll. Then the time is set 28s in the STEP module according to the distance between the first and ninth passes about 2800mm. After the display dynamics algorithm is adopted, the sheet is fed into the rolls at a forming speed of 100mm/s whereby both the top and bottom rolls are driven. Figure 4 shows the sheet strain behaviors of four forming passes. And the abscissa scope represents the sheet initial width 76 mm, of which the cross section is subdivided from the start node 459 to the end 307. Thus, the sheet strain behavior can be described by corresponding node in roll forming of the corrugated channels.
It is seen from Figs. 4 (a) and (b) that the channel 4 roll forming is performed with three passes in the first set. Before the sheet is completely bitten by the first pass, only smaller plastic strain is produced in its trough and the maximum PS is just 0.012. However, the plastic strains of four bending angles increase significantly in the peaks and troughs of channel 4 after it undergoes three passes in turn. Meanwhile, due to the asymmetry of the corrugated channels, the center lines between the roll contour and bitten sheet are not coincide along the forming direction, which causes the peak strains of these four bending angles incompletely symmetrical to the center line of the channel 4. Thus, the PS of the trough is larger than that of the peak, of which maximum value about 0.248 occurs on the right bending angle of the trough.
Although the peak strains of all the bending angles also occur for other four channels, the ones of the narrow channels 2 and 3 are significantly larger than those of the wide 5 and 6 even though both the channels 2 and 6 or 3 and 5 are rolled at the same time, see Figs. 4 (c) and (d). Meanwhile, since the channel 3 is close to the middle channel 4 and is rolled earlier than the channel 2, a larger contact between its flange and the roll results in a larger friction during the contraction and slippage of the sheet. Correspondingly, the maximum PS of the channel 3 is greater than that of the channel 2, which is about 0.225 on the right of the bending angle of the trough.
Moreover, the channel 4 only plays a guiding role in the forming stages of other channels, but influenced by their roll pressures, its original strain still causes a slight slippage towards two sides, which leads to its PS smaller than the one in the first stage. However, the PS of the channel 4 remains stable after the sixth pass, which thus ensures its final rolled accuracy.
2.3 Peak strain behavior analysis
Through the simulation above, the maximum PS of sheet occurs on the right of the bending angle of the channel 3 trough. Therefore, this region easily produces defects like hardening, tearing and excessive redundant deformation. In order to further study the strain behavior of this region and better control those defects in roll forming process of the corrugated channels, a unit 17287 of this region is used for the subsequent work. This can simplify the research without loss of generality.
The stress history of this unit is relatively complex caused by the extrusion, stretching and shearing forces. It is seen from Fig. 5(a) that the whole process is roughly divided into three stages according to the RFT. The channel 4 is performed in the first stage, next is the channels 3 and 5 in the second, and the rest are in the third. Although the channel 3 is not rolled in the first stage, since influenced by the roll forming of the channel 4, the unit still produces a certain stress. However, its maximum PS is lower than the yield limit stress of materials, hence only the pure elastic strain is produced, which disappears after the channel 4 is finally formed for without any roll pressures.
However, the unit stress increases abruptly from about 121 to 275MPa in the forming direction 1100mm. This indicates that the unit has entered the second stage and obviously, its stress law presents three cycles. In the first cycle, its maximum PS is about 321.9MPa in the forming direction 1252mm between the third and fourth passes. Whereas, the PS becomes small, instead and is only 194.9MPa at the contact point between the sheet and the fourth roll in the direction 1312mm, see Fig. 6. To demonstrated this issue, Bhattacharyya et al. [10] defined the deformation length and derived the relationship between the deformation length and the metal strip thickness, flange width, and increment angle by using the minimum energy method. On the other hand, it can also well be illustrated by similar force law of the cantilever beam, in which the beam stress changes with the distance from its end under a force.
When the unit goes through the fifth and sixth passes in turn, a similar law is also produced. However, the one between the fourth and fifth passes is the largest among three maximum peak stresses, which is about 352MPa. This is mainly because the change of roll bending angle between these two passes is greater than that of others, which hence results in a large force exerted on the unit. With respect to the effect of bending angle, it will be further studied in Sect. 4. Surprisingly, although the unit stress varies periodically, the corresponding strain increases like a step with the forming passes, instead.
Although the channel 3 has been performed in the last stage, the unit is still subject to three periodic stress under the roll forming of the channels 2 and 6. Since its PS does not exceed the yield limit of material all the long, its strain remains basically constant on the basis of the second stage, correspondingly.
3.Main factors influence
The effects of parameters on the PS has been done a lot based on the single channel roll forming to control the quality of the final rolled product [11, 12], however, the strain behavior of the corrugated channels is also distinguished from the single one due to their different RFT even under the same operating conditions. Here only three factors of the forming speed, friction coefficient and bending angle are studied according to the actual situation with the unit 17287, respectively.
3.1. Forming speed
Fig. 7(a) shows the strain behavior of the unit under four different forming speeds in three stages. The unit strain increases with the forming speed for the final rolled product. However, the difference of their peak strains is very small and the biggest difference is only 0.006 between the maximum and minimum forming speeds 100 and 200mm/s. This shows that the effect of the forming speed is smaller on the PS of the corrugated channels under the given range, and the result from simulation agrees with the conclusion obtained by Shirani et al [13]. Through investigating the effects of some parameters on the bending defects and longitudinal strain of the symmetrical channel products, they achieved that the contact friction between the roll and the sheet and the forming speed of the roll have no effect on the longitudinal strain of the side.
3.2. Friction coefficient
The corrugated channels roll forming is mainly dependent on the contraction and slippage of the sheet between the multi-section contour of roll and thus is affected by the friction, inevitably. For analyzing the effect of friction, the strain behavior of the unit 17287 is also used to simulate in roll forming under the friction coefficients 0.1 ~ 0.25.
It is seen from Fig. 7(b) that the larger the friction coefficient, the greater the unit PS. The difference of PS between the minimum and maximum friction coefficients is 0.035, which indicates the PS of the corrugated channels is significantly influenced by the friction. And a larger friction coefficient easily leads to the sheet tearing and thus affects the forming quality of the product. In order to better analyze the effect of friction, the peak strains of the final rolled corrugate channels are fitted under different friction coefficients, correspondingly, as shown in Fig. 8(a).
A nonlinear relationship is presented in Fig. 8(a) between the unit PS and the friction coefficient. Under the friction coefficient less than 0.15, the unit PS increases gradually with the friction coefficient, of which range is smaller than 0.005. However, it increases drastically after the friction coefficient greater than 0.15. This indicates that the friction coefficient has a great effect on the quality of the corrugate channels within this scope. Unfortunately, the result from simulation is contradicted with the conclusion which is obtained based on the single contour roll forming by Bidabadi et al [14]. This is mainly because the RFT of the corrugated channels are more complex. Although the forming of their middle channel is similar to the single one, the forming of both sides are mainly dependent on the strip sliding between multi-section contour of the roll and thus, a greater friction is produced inevitably.
3.3. Bending angle
The bending angle is the most important parameter in roll forming process, which has a major effect on the quality of the formed product [15, 16]. However, in the current production stage, the traditional RFT still arbitrarily sets the bending angle of each pass to produce the cross-section shape of the desired product based on production experience.
With respect to the effect of bending angle θ on the PK of corrugated channels, here four groups of bending angles are first determined according to the formula Eq. (2) and then their increment is designed to be equal in each group of rolls to simplify the design complexity, as shown in Table 4.
Table 4
Bending angle and increment of four groups
Groups
|
First
|
Second
|
Third
|
Fourth
|
θ(o)
|
43
|
75
|
90
|
50
|
77
|
90
|
57
|
79
|
90
|
64
|
81
|
90
|
Δθ(o)
|
43
|
32
|
15
|
50
|
27
|
13
|
57
|
22
|
11
|
64
|
17
|
9
|
As can be seen from Fig. 7(c), although four groups of final bending angles are all 90°, the corresponding peak strains are significantly distinguished due to their different increments, instead. For the bending angles 43o and 64o of the first pass, respectively, the difference of their peak strains of the final rolled products is about 0.085, which is surprisingly about 67.8% of the PS of 64o. Therefore, the bending angle increment of the first pass has a great effect on the rolled quality of the corrugated channels. The smaller the bending angle increment of the first pass, the smaller the maximum PS of the final rolled product and thus the defects like tearing and redundant deformation are not easily produced.
In order to further analyze the effect of bending angle of the first forming pass, the maximum peak strains of four group final rolled products are fitted, correspondingly. It is seen from Fig. 8(b) that the maximum PS is smaller and changes smoothly under the bending angle smaller than 52o. However, when the bending angle changes between 52 ° and 60 °, the curve slope becomes greater, which makes the PS change drastically. Hence, the channel is prone to tearing in roll forming. Also the curve slope is small after the bending angle larger than 60° and the PS changes smoothly, whereas the corresponding maximum PS is bigger, thus the bending angle of the first pass is not recommended in this range.