Induction of liver transplant immune tolerance in an outbred rat strain model using tacrolimus Subtitle: Therapeutic effect of tacrolimus in rat orthotopic liver transplantation models

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-41932/v1

Background: Orthotopic liver transplantation is the only option for patients with end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Acute rejection occurs in 25–50% of all recipients after liver transplantation. Thus, post-transplant immunosuppressive therapy is important to prevent graft failure. Tacrolimus (FK506) is a main immunosuppressive drug used after liver transplantation.

Methods: FK506 and postoperative therapy were administered subcutaneously once or twice daily to transplanted rats. Histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses were conducted for all groups. The regulation of inflammatory cytokine signaling in the spleen was analyzed by flow cytometry.

Results: FK506 attenuated allograft rejection and increased survival in rat orthotopic liver transplantation models. The FK506-treated group had reduced serum levels of AST, ALT, and ALP. Furthermore, FK506 decreased the expression of inflammatory cytokines and the activation of pathogenic Th1 and Th17 cells in the liver.

Conclusions: These results indicate that the FK506 has potential as a therapeutic drug following liver transplantation.

Translational Medicine

Tacrolimus

Orthotopic liver transplantation

Rejection

Inflammatory cytokine

Th1 cell

Th17 cell

Immune tolerance

As the number of patients with liver disease increases, the frequency of liver transplantation (LT), which is the final treatment method, is increasing. LT is the treatment of choice for end-stage liver disease and acute liver failure, based on overall survival and quality of life [1, 2]. The success of LT and long-term survival depend on the use of immunosuppressant drugs. However, the long-term (lifetime) use of immunosuppressive drugs after transplantation has serious side effects, such as cancer, infection, inflammation, and destruction of the immune-defense system [3, 4]. Thus, a major goal in transplantation is to induce immunological self-tolerance and homeostasis.

LT is a complex procedure that involves the safe extraction and preparation of the donor liver, removal of the recipient's diseased liver, and then anastomosis of the blood vessels and biliary tract [5, 6]. In rats, the most common technique is orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), in which the native liver is removed and replaced by the donor organ in the same anatomic position [7, 8]. However, rat transplantation surgery requires a long training period to achieve a high success rate using the fast, accurate, and delicate surgical procedures required for small animals. The rat OLT model produces more clinically relevant and reliable data than does the mouse OLT model [6].

In animal LT, liver allografts are commonly accepted across fully mismatched major histocompatibility complexes (MHCs) without immunosuppression [9]. In inbred mice, liver grafts in many fully allogeneic combinations survive permanently without the administration of immunosuppressants [10]. Inbreeding depression and the lack of genetic diversity in inbred mice, however, could mask unappreciated causes of graft failure or remove barriers to tolerance induction. Human genes are not identical. In this study, we used outbred rats with genetic diversity in donors and the recipients to mimic the clinical situation.

Tacrolimus (FK506) has become the first-line immunosuppressant drug used after LT [11–13]. We determined the therapeutic efficacy of FK506 in an outbred rat LT model. This model, which features a strong immune response, contributed to our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the induction of liver transplant immune tolerance by FK506.

Animals

Six-week-old male Wistar and Sprague Dawley (SD) rats (male, 180–220 g at baseline) were purchased from Japan SLC Inc. (Shizuoka, Japan) by Central Lab Animal Inc. (Seoul, South Korea). A maximum of three animals per cage were housed in a room with controlled temperature (20–26°C) and light (12/12-h light/dark cycle) conditions. The rats had free access to a gamma ray–sterilized diet (TD 2018S; Harlan Laboratories Inc., IN, USA) and autoclaved R/O water. All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Catholic University of Korea.

Orthotopic liver transplantation

The animals were divided into three groups: a non-surgical control group and surgical groups with and without FK506 treatment (n = 5/group). LT recipients were premedicated with atropine sulfate [0.05 mg/kg, subcutaneous (SC) injection; JE IL Pharm. Co., Ltd., Korea], heparinized saline (100 ml/kg, intravenous injection; heparin 5000 IU/ml, JW Pharm. Co., Korea; 0.9% normal saline, Dai Han Pharm. Co. Ltd., Korea), ketoprofen (5 mg/kg, SC, 100-mg ketoprofen injection; SDC Pharm. Co., Korea), tramadol (5 mg/kg, SC, 50-mg tridol injection; YUHAN Co., Korea), and cefazolin (30 mg/kg, SC, 1-mg cefazolin injection; Chong Kun Dang Pharmaceutical Corp., Korea). Following surgery, normal saline (Dai Han Pharm. Co. Ltd.) or 5% dextrose saline (5% dextrose and sodium chloride injection, Dai Han Pharm. Co. Ltd.) was administered subcutaneously. Dexamethasone (5-mg/kg cortisol injection, SC; HanAll Biopharma, Seoul, S. Korea) was administered once during surgery, at the moment of reperfusion. Anesthesia was carried out using an anesthetic machine (Harvard, USA) and isoflurane (2–3.5%, ifran; Hana Pharm. Co. Ltd., Seoul, S. Korea) during the LT operation. All procedures performed in this study were OLTs based on a modified version of Kamada’s technique under a ×5-magnified surgical field using a surgical loupe [5, 8, 14]. The donor rat was placed in the supine position. Long midline and additional right transverse incisions were made to ensure adequate exposure. After inspection for the presence of perihepatic anomaly, the phrenic vein was ligated and divided using 7–0 silk sutures. All suspensory ligaments surrounding the liver were divided. The bile duct was dissected and transected in the supraduodenal area with enough length remaining after cuff insertion (24-gauge angiocatheter; Terumo, Tokyo, Japan). The retroperitoneal connective tissues were dissected, the right adrenal vein was ligated, and the infrahepatic inferior vena cava (IVC) was freed. The portal vein was prepared for perfusion, and the pyloric vein was ligated and divided to enable portal vein cuff manipulation. Simultaneous cross-clamping of the infrahepatic IVC and the portal vein was performed. The graft was perfused through the portal vein with minimal pressure using ~10 ml cold heparinized saline, and venting was performed through the right atrium using a transdiaphragmatic approach. The liver graft was retrieved from the cold-preservation saline solution, and bench surgery was performed in preserved saline solution. The attached diaphragmatic tissue was dissected, and the portal vein cuff (polyethylene tube, 6 FG, outside diameter 2.1 mm; Havard Apparatus, USA) was inserted. The total preservation time, including the bench procedure, was approximately 90 min. Immediately following the donor operation, a total hepatectomy was performed in the recipient in almost the same manner as the donor surgery. The main difference was that the transections were made close to the liver to secure sufficient lengths of the bile duct, portal vein, and IVC to perform the reconstruction. Following total hepatectomy, the preserved graft liver was implanted. The suprahepatic IVC was reconstructed using 8-0 monofilament nylon continuous sutures. The infrahepatic IVC was reconstructed in the same end-to-end manner using 8-0 monofilament nylon continuous sutures. Following portal vein reconstruction, the suprahepatic, infrahepatic, and portal cross-clamps were released to restore the systemic and hepatic circulation. At this point, 2 ml saline and dexamethasone were injected subcutaneously. The total vascular clamping time was 20–25 min. Following bile duct reconstruction using the cuff technique, the abdominal wound was closed using 5-0 monofilament nylon sutures. All surgical procedures were performed under aseptic conditions. After surgery, the recipients were observed closely in warmed cages for ~1 h.

Postoperative medications were administered and included analgesics (ketoprofen, 5 mg/kg, SC, twice a day; tramadol, 5 mg/kg, SC, once a day), antibiotics (cefazoline, 30 mg/kg, SC, once a day), a histamine H2 receptor blocker (ranitidine HCl, 5 mg/kg, twice a day; Alcon, Korea), and FK506 (1 mg/kg, SC, twice a day). For the fluid therapy, normal saline or 5% dextrose saline was given, depending on the recipient’s condition. After the LT operation, the animals were fed a gel-type recovery diet (Nutra-Gel, F5769-Kit; Bio Serv, USA).

Biochemical analysis

Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and free fatty acid (FFA) levels were measured using commercial kits (Asan Pharmaceutical Co., Hwangseong-gi, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea).

Histopathological analysis

Liver tissues were collected from each group. The tissues were fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin. Sections of 4–5 μm thickness were cut, dewaxed using xylene, dehydrated through an alcohol gradient, and then stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Masson’s trichrome (MT).

Immunohistochemistry

Paraffin-embedded sections were incubated at 4°C with the following primary monoclonal antibodies: anti–interleukin (IL)-1β, anti–IL-17, anti–IL-6, and anti–transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β). The samples were then incubated with the respective secondary biotinylated antibodies, followed by 30 min incubation with a streptavidin–peroxidase complex. The reaction product was developed using 3,3-diaminobenzidine chromogen (Dako, CA, USA).

Flow Cytometric Analysis

Mouse lymphocytes were immunostained using fluorescently conjugated antibodies against CD4, IL-17, IL-10, and IL-4. For intracellular staining, cells were first stimulated for 4 h with phorbol myristate acetate (25 ng/mL) and ionomycin (250 ng/mL) in the presence of BD GolgiStop (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Intracellular staining was performed using a BD Cytofix/CytopermPlus Fixation/Permeabilization Kit and BD GolgiStop Kit (BD Biosciences). Flow cytometry was performed using a cytoFLEX Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA).

Confocal staining

Spleen tissues were acquired from the liver-transplanted rats, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80°C. Tissue cryosections (7 μm thick) were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and stained using FITC-conjugated anti-CD4, and PE-conjugated anti–IL-17 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA). After incubation overnight at 4°C, the stained sections were analyzed using a confocal microscope (LSM 510 Meta; Zeiss, Gottingen, Germany). CD4⁺IL-17⁺T cells were enumerated visually at higher magnification (projected on a screen) by four individuals.

Statistical analyses

Data are expressed as means ± standard errors of the mean. One-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni’s post-hoc test was used to compare data among three or more groups. Statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using Prism (standard version 8; GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Effect of tacrolimus on rat liver transplantation in an outbred model

In previous studies, OLT was performed using inbred rats; in this study, it was performed in outbred rats who were treated with FK506 to increase survival and reduce organ rejection (Figure 1A, B). Drug therapy was administered before and after surgery to increase the operation success rate. The treatment given to recipient rats included antibiotics, painkillers, and FK506 (Table 1). Metabolic index assays were conducted to measure liver function. The FK506-treated group showed reduced serum levels of AST, ALT, ALP, and TG. Moreover, the recipient rats showed reduced levels of LDL cholesterol and FFAs, and increased levels of HDL cholesterol (Figure 1C).

Table 1. Pre-and post- management for liver transplantation

Animals

Treatment

Donor

Recipient

Pre-Operation

Post-Operation

Sprague Dawley Rat

(6w, 180g)

WISTAR rat

(6w, 180g)

Drug

Dosage

Drug

Dosage

Atropine

0.05 mg/kg, SC

0.9% Saline

3 mL, Twice a day, SC

ketoprofen

5 mg/kg,

SC

Cefazolin

30 mg/kg, once a day, SC

tramadol

5 mg/kg,

SC

ketoprofen

5 mg/kg, Twice a day, SC

Cefazolin

30 mg/kg, SC

tramadol

5 mg/kg, once a day, SC

Dexamethasone

5 mg/kg,

SC

Ranitidin

5 mg/kg, Twice a day, SC

FK506

1 mg/kg, Twice a day, SC

Histological assessment of donor liver grafts

Fibrosis and infiltration of inflammatory cells were analyzed through H&E, MT, and Sirius red staining. Liver tissue from the rejection groups showed significantly severe liver damage with infiltration of inflammatory cells, collagen deposition, and hepatic fibrosis. The infiltration of inflammatory cells and fibrosis were reduced in liver tissue from the FK506-treated groups (Figure 2). Additionally, we used immunohistochemistry to detect inflammatory mediators and fibrosis markers in the transplanted livers. Administration of FK506 decreased the expression of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17, and TGF-β (Figure 3). Thus, FK506 ameliorated allograft rejection by downregulating the expression of inflammatory and fibrogenic factors.

Tacrolimus suppressed in vivo T-cell responses in an outbred LT model

To investigate the in vivo mechanism underlying the action of FK506 in the outbred LT model, we counted the number of CD4⁺ interferon (IFN)-γ⁺, CD4⁺IL-17⁺, and CD4⁺IL-10⁺cells in splenocytes isolated from each group using flow cytometry. The numbers of CD4⁺IFN-γ⁺ and CD4⁺IL-17⁺ T cells in spleens from FK506-treated LT model rats were decreased compared with those in the vehicle-treated group. The numbers of CD4⁺IL-10⁺cells in the splenocytes were also reduced in the FK506-treated LT model compared with those in the vehicle-treated group (Figure 4A). Furthermore, confocal microscopic analysis showed decreases in the numbers of CD4+IFN-γ+ and CD4+IL-17+ T cells in the spleens of FK506-treated rats (Figure 4B). These results suggest that the alleviation of acute allograft rejection following transplantation with FK506-treated splenocytes is the result of the suppression of the pathogenic T-cell response.

In the inbred LT model, liver allografts can be accepted across mismatched MHCs without immunosuppressive drug therapy [15]. Unlike in the outbred system, the rate of successful transplant engraftment is high in inbred mouse models. However, human systems are very different from inbred mouse systems. The human outbred population contains an excess of heterozygotes. The genetic diversity and heterosis in the outbred human population have been suggested to make successful organ transplantation very difficult [16, 17]. To establish the outbred rat LT model in this study, we used outbred Wistar and SD rats, which are typically used in transplantation and functional tests. We created a strong rejection model using outbred rats to approximate the clinical situation. This model will deepen our understanding of the mechanisms underlying LT tolerance.

Immunosuppressive drugs are commonly used following LT [11]. Calcineurin inhibitors, including FK506, serve to prevent transcription of the autocrine factor IL-2, preventing cell proliferation [18]. FK506 greatly reduced the rate of allograft rejection, although the chronic use of such drugs is marred by a range of side effects, including vascular toxicity [13]. We found that FK506 treatment significantly prolonged graft survival and reduced hepatic inflammation. In addition, FK506 suppressed pro-inflammatory T helper (Th)1/Th17 responses [19, 20] and Foxp3 + Treg [21]. However, FK506 also inhibits immunomodulatory IL-10 cytokines [22]. In a mouse transplantation model, the genetic delivery of IL-10 to allografts led to prolonged graft survival [23, 24]. Novel immunomodulatory regimens that maximize beneficial effects for transplantation tolerance without the aforementioned adverse effects are needed. Further research is needed to determine the minimum effective FK506 dosage when used in combination with immunoregulatory drugs.

Blood chemistry tests showed that liver function was improved [25]. The levels of enzyme-related liver metabolites (ALT, AST, and ALP) were significantly reduced in the group treated with FK506 compared with the rejection group. The ALT and ALP levels were restored to similar levels as in the wild-type (WT) group.

Interestingly, FK506 treatment also had significant effects on lipid metabolism. The TG level was lower than in the rejection group and similar to that in the WT group. The total cholesterol level was slightly higher than in the rejection group, but the levels of LDL cholesterol and FFAs were low; the HDL cholesterol level was higher and close to that in the WT group. Considering that fatty liver disease is a common factor for LT and is likely to recur after transplantation, FK506 represents a new alternative post-LT treatment for patients with fatty liver disease.

In this study, we found that an outbred hepatic transplantation model led to robust immune rejection and that FK506 induced long-term allograft acceptance.

LT, liver transplantation; OLT, orthotopic liver transplantation; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; TG, triglycerides; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; FFA, free fatty acid; IFN, interferon; IL, interleukin; Th, T helper.

Authors’ Contributions

MJP, study concept and design, analysis and interpretation of the data, statistical analysis, drafting and critical revision of the manuscript; HSN, acquisition of the data, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting of the manuscript; YSJ, acquisition of the data, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting of the manuscript; KHC, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting of the manuscript; SYK, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting of the manuscript; JWC, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting of the manuscript; JAB, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting of the manuscript; JYC, study concept and design, drafting of the manuscript; YKY, study concept and design, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting of the manuscript; MLC, study concept and design, acquisition of the data, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting of the manuscript, study supervision.

Acknowledgments

None.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Availability of data and materials

All data are available in the manuscript or upon request to the authors.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethical approval

All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Catholic University of Korea (approval no. CUMS-IACUC-2017-0215-03).

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute, funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant no. HI15C3062).

Merion RM. Current status and future of liver transplantation. Semin Liver Dis. 2010;30:411–21.
Bodzin AS, Baker TB. Liver Transplantation Today: Where We Are Now and Where We Are Going. Liver Transpl. 2018;24:1470–5.
Chiang KC, Ohmori N, Goto T. The search for immunosuppressive therapies to induce tolerance in organ transplantation. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2011;11:173–80.
Kourkoumpetis T, Levitsky J. Immunosuppressive Drug Levels in Liver Transplant Recipients: Impact in Decision Making. Semin Liver Dis. 2019;39:414–21.
Lee S, Charters AC, Chandler JG, Orloff MJ. A technique for orthotopic liver transplantation in the rat. Transplantation. 1973;16:664–9.
Hori T, Nguyen JH, Zhao X, Ogura Y, Hata T, Yagi S, Chen F, Baine AM, Ohashi N, Eckman CB, et al. Comprehensive and innovative techniques for liver transplantation in rats: a surgical guide. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:3120–32.
Spiegel HU, Palmes D. Surgical techniques of orthotopic rat liver transplantation. J Invest Surg. 1998;11:83–96.
Nagai K, Yagi S, Uemoto S, Tolba RH. Surgical procedures for a rat model of partial orthotopic liver transplantation with hepatic arterial reconstruction. J Vis Exp 2013:e4376.
Madariaga ML, Kreisel D, Madsen JC. Organ-specific differences in achieving tolerance. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2015;20:392–9.
Qian S, Demetris AJ, Murase N, Rao AS, Fung JJ, Starzl TE. Murine liver allograft transplantation: tolerance and donor cell chimerism. Hepatology. 1994;19:916–24.
Moini M, Schilsky ML, Tichy EM. Review on immunosuppression in liver transplantation. World J Hepatol. 2015;7:1355–68.
Dhanasekaran R. Management of Immunosuppression in Liver Transplantation. Clin Liver Dis. 2017;21:337–53.
Schutte-Nutgen K, Tholking G, Suwelack B, Reuter S. Tacrolimus - Pharmacokinetic Considerations for Clinicians. Curr Drug Metab. 2018;19:342–50.
Deng M, Wang J, Wu H, Wang M, Cao D, Li J, Wu Y, Gong J. IL-4 Alleviates Ischaemia-Reperfusion Injury by Inducing Kupffer Cells M2 Polarization via STAT6-JMJD3 Pathway after Rat Liver Transplantation. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:2953068.
Limmer J, Herbertson BM, Calne RY. Orthotopic rat liver transplantation using different combinations of four inbred strains. Eur Surg Res. 1980;12:343–8.
Reichenbach DK, Li Q, Hoffman RA, Williams AL, Shlomchik WD, Rothstein DM, Demetris AJ, Lakkis FG. Allograft outcomes in outbred mice. Am J Transplant. 2013;13:580–8.
Brekke TD, Steele KA, Mulley JF. Inbred or Outbred? Genetic Diversity in Laboratory Rodent Colonies. G3 (Bethesda) 2018, 8:679–686.
Beckebaum S, Cicinnati VR, Radtke A, Kabar I. Calcineurin inhibitors in liver transplantation - still champions or threatened by serious competitors? Liver Int. 2013;33:656–65.
Shao K, Lu Y, Wang J, Chen X, Zhang Z, Wang X, Wang X, Yang H, Liu G. Different Effects of Tacrolimus on Innate and Adaptive Immune Cells in the Allograft Transplantation. Scand J Immunol. 2016;83:119–27.
Li Y, Guptill JT, Russo MA, Massey JM, Juel VC, Hobson-Webb LD, Howard JF, Chopra M, Liu W, Yi JS. Tacrolimus inhibits Th1 and Th17 responses in MuSK-antibody positive myasthenia gravis patients. Exp Neurol. 2019;312:43–50.
Miroux C, Morales O, Ghazal K, Othman SB, de Launoit Y, Pancre V, Conti F, Delhem N. In vitro effects of cyclosporine A and tacrolimus on regulatory T- cell proliferation and function. Transplantation. 2012;94:123–31.
Yoon KH. Efficacy and cytokine modulating effects of tacrolimus in systemic lupus erythematosus: a review. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;2010:686480.
Zuo Z, Wang C, Carpenter D, Okada Y, Nicolaidou E, Toyoda M, Trento A, Jordan SC. Prolongation of allograft survival with viral IL-10 transfection in a highly histoincompatible model of rat heart allograft rejection. Transplantation. 2001;71:686–91.
Tashiro H, Shinozaki K, Yahata H, Hayamizu K, Okimoto T, Tanji H, Fudaba Y, Yamamoto H, Fan X, Ito H, Asahara T. Prolongation of liver allograft survival after interleukin-10 gene transduction 24–48 hours before donation. Transplantation. 2000;70:336–9.
Khullar V, Dolganiuc A, Firpi RJ. Pre-and-post transplant considerations in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Transplant. 2014;4:81–92.

Induction of liver transplant immune tolerance in an outbred rat strain model using tacrolimus Subtitle: Therapeutic effect of tacrolimus in rat orthotopic liver transplantation models

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Background

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Status:

Version 1