COVID-19 infection can cause life-threatening respiratory disease. This study aimed to fully characterize the clinical features associated with postponed viral shedding and disease progression, then develop and validate two prognostic discriminant models.
This study included 125 hospitalized patients with COVID-19. 44 parameters were recorded, including age, gender, underlying comorbidities, epidemic features, laboratory indexes, imaging characteristics and therapeutic regimen, et al. F-test and χ2 test were used for feature selection. All models were developed with 4-fold cross-validation, and the final performances of each model were compared by the Area Under Receiving Operating Curve (AUROC). After optimizing the parameters via L2 regularization, prognostic discriminant models were built to predict postponed viral shedding and disease progression of COVID-19 infection. The test set was then used to detect the predictive values via assessing models sensitivity and specificity.
69 patients had a postponed viral shedding time (> 14 days), and 28 of 125 patients progressed into severe cases. Eleven and six demographic, clinical features and therapeutic regimen were significantly associated with postponed viral shedding and disease progressing, respectively (p < 0.05). The optimal discriminant models are: y1 (postponed viral shedding) = -0.244 + 0.2829x1 (the interval from the onset of symptoms to antiviral treatment) + 0.2306x4 (age) + 0.234x28 (Urea) − 0.2847x34 (Dual-antiviral therapy) + 0.3084x38 (Treatment with antibiotics) + 0.3025x21 (Treatment with Methylprednisolone); y2 (disease progression) = -0.348–0.099x2 (interval from Jan 1st, 2020 to individualized onset of symptoms) + 0.0945x4 (age) + 0.1176x5 (imaging characteristics) + 0.0398x8 (short- term exposure to Wuhan) − 0.1646x19 (lymphocyte counts) + 0.0914x20 (neutrophil counts) + 0.1254x21 (neutrphil/lymphocyte ratio) + 0.1397x22 (C-Reactive Protein) + 0.0814x23 (Procalcitonin) + 0.1294x24 (Lactic dehydrogenase) + 0.1099x29 (Creatine kinase). The output ≥ 0 predicted postponed viral shedding or disease progressing to severe/critical state. These two models yielded the maximum AUROC, and faired best in terms of prognostic performance (sensitivity of 73.3%, 75%, and specificity of 78.6%, 75% for prediction of postponed viral shedding and disease severity, respectively).
The two discriminant models could effectively predict the postponed viral shedding and disease severity, and be used as early-warning tools for COVID-19.

Figure 1

Figure 2
The full text of this article is available to read as a PDF.
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...
Posted 24 Jul, 2020
Received 13 Sep, 2020
On 13 Sep, 2020
Received 11 Sep, 2020
On 26 Aug, 2020
On 20 Aug, 2020
Invitations sent on 28 Jul, 2020
On 13 Jul, 2020
On 13 Jul, 2020
On 12 Jul, 2020
On 12 Jul, 2020
Posted 24 Jul, 2020
Received 13 Sep, 2020
On 13 Sep, 2020
Received 11 Sep, 2020
On 26 Aug, 2020
On 20 Aug, 2020
Invitations sent on 28 Jul, 2020
On 13 Jul, 2020
On 13 Jul, 2020
On 12 Jul, 2020
On 12 Jul, 2020
COVID-19 infection can cause life-threatening respiratory disease. This study aimed to fully characterize the clinical features associated with postponed viral shedding and disease progression, then develop and validate two prognostic discriminant models.
This study included 125 hospitalized patients with COVID-19. 44 parameters were recorded, including age, gender, underlying comorbidities, epidemic features, laboratory indexes, imaging characteristics and therapeutic regimen, et al. F-test and χ2 test were used for feature selection. All models were developed with 4-fold cross-validation, and the final performances of each model were compared by the Area Under Receiving Operating Curve (AUROC). After optimizing the parameters via L2 regularization, prognostic discriminant models were built to predict postponed viral shedding and disease progression of COVID-19 infection. The test set was then used to detect the predictive values via assessing models sensitivity and specificity.
69 patients had a postponed viral shedding time (> 14 days), and 28 of 125 patients progressed into severe cases. Eleven and six demographic, clinical features and therapeutic regimen were significantly associated with postponed viral shedding and disease progressing, respectively (p < 0.05). The optimal discriminant models are: y1 (postponed viral shedding) = -0.244 + 0.2829x1 (the interval from the onset of symptoms to antiviral treatment) + 0.2306x4 (age) + 0.234x28 (Urea) − 0.2847x34 (Dual-antiviral therapy) + 0.3084x38 (Treatment with antibiotics) + 0.3025x21 (Treatment with Methylprednisolone); y2 (disease progression) = -0.348–0.099x2 (interval from Jan 1st, 2020 to individualized onset of symptoms) + 0.0945x4 (age) + 0.1176x5 (imaging characteristics) + 0.0398x8 (short- term exposure to Wuhan) − 0.1646x19 (lymphocyte counts) + 0.0914x20 (neutrophil counts) + 0.1254x21 (neutrphil/lymphocyte ratio) + 0.1397x22 (C-Reactive Protein) + 0.0814x23 (Procalcitonin) + 0.1294x24 (Lactic dehydrogenase) + 0.1099x29 (Creatine kinase). The output ≥ 0 predicted postponed viral shedding or disease progressing to severe/critical state. These two models yielded the maximum AUROC, and faired best in terms of prognostic performance (sensitivity of 73.3%, 75%, and specificity of 78.6%, 75% for prediction of postponed viral shedding and disease severity, respectively).
The two discriminant models could effectively predict the postponed viral shedding and disease severity, and be used as early-warning tools for COVID-19.

Figure 1

Figure 2
The full text of this article is available to read as a PDF.
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...