The relationship between the probability density and area distribution of landslides in the study area fitted well with the three-parameter inverse gamma distribution. For small landslides, the area distribution exhibited an exponential flip, whereas for medium-large landslides, the area distribution decayed with a negative power-law relationship with an exponent β = -3.5, which was greater than the decay exponent β = -2.4 for the earthquake or rainfall triggered landslides (Malamud et al., 2004a,b; Xu et al. 2014). Cardinali et al. (2000) found that in the Umbria region of central Italy the 4233 snowmelt-triggered landslides occurred with a decay exponent of β = -2.4. Stark et al. (2001) found the same power-law distribution pattern for large landslides using a double Pareto distribution, with a power exponent of -2.11 for the medium and large-scale landslides in Taiwan, and corresponding power exponents of -2.44 and − 2.48 for medium and large-scale landslides in New Zealand, respectively. Eeckhaut et al. (2007) found that β values between 1.4 and 3.5 were also reasonable for individual landslide events. In this landslide event, the anomaly in the decay index β was believed to relate to incomplete historical landslides occurring in multiple periods during many years, and the recorded landslides were not induced by a single rapid snowmelt event. In addition, the number and size of snowmelt-induced loess landslides also limited the power-law index that controlled the area distribution of large landslides.
The loess landslides in the study area were very closely related to snowmelt driven by anomalous warming during the melting season. Some studies also found snowmelt-driven landslide events were very clearly linked to snowmelt driven by anomalous spring warming(Durand et al.,2009; Saez et al., 2013; Xian et al.,2022). A well-developed yield zone along the sliding surface with progressive rise in the perched water table above the toe of the slide mass may explain the snowmelt-induced slope deformation mechanism prior to the onset of catastrophic failure (Wieczorek 1996; Ishikawa & Miura, 2011; Trandafir et al., 2015; Mori et al., 2017; Subramanian et al., 2020). However, the freeze-thaw cycles, as another hydro-thermophysical process in the seasonal freezing zone, also had a significant impact on slope deformation and instability. The seasonal permafrost experienced repeated freeze-thawing cycles during melting season (Norikazu and Hiroaki ,1999; Nadim et al.,2006). The effect of freeze-thaw action on slope mainly included the freezing and stagnation effect of groundwater inside the slope and the freeze-thaw cycle in the surface layer of the slope. In the freezing period, the soil frozen layer confined infiltrating water within the slope to form frozen stagnant water, which not only expanded the range of soil softening, but also raised the water table to generate hyperstatic pore water pressure at the sliding surface. And then, static liquefaction of the soil on the slip surface occurred under the combined effect of increased overlying slip weight and reduced strength of the soil, leading to slope creeping deformation. Static liquefaction due to shearing or increased water content could be observed after some landslides (Zhang et al. 2009; Xu et al. 2012). During the melting period, the soil strength at the foot of loess slope decreased from peak to residual strength after freeze-thaw cycles, and original frozen seepage points at the slope foot thawed to form large drainage channels, resulting in rapid drainage of large amounts of frozen stagnant water within the slope to form strong dynamic water pressures. The low axial compressive strength and shear resistance of loess after freeze-thaw cycles caused the saturated loess at the toe to present high mobility and sliding liquefaction, and the strong hydrodynamic pressure caused the softening collapse and punching and shearing damages at the foot of the loess slope. The combined effect of static liquefaction of sliding surface and sliding liquefaction at slope toe was a hybrid mechanism for loess slope deformation and failure.
Atmosphere-surface interactions affected snowmelt and soil freezing and thawing process (Subramanian et al., 2020), and long-term periodic snowmelt infiltration and repeated soil freezing and thawing both influenced the slope surface and subsurface hydrothermal and mechanical equilibrium (Xian et al.,2022). Slope was disturbed to form exposed slope after the landslides occurred, and numerous surface cracks formed at the back edge of the landslide. The loss of vegetation and ground disturbance not only increased snowpack, but also reduced shear strength and increased groundwater conductivity and connectivity (Huggel, 2009; Patton et al., 2019). Furthermore, the topographic depression formed by the landslide resulted in a thicker snowpack (Essery & Pomeroy, 2004). The thicker snowmelt and the resulting freezing and thawing reinforced the impact on the hydrological and mechanical balance of the exposed slope, further contributed to persistent deformation of this landslide. Long-term snowmelt runoff had a greater cumulative impact on soil seepage (Schulz et al., 2009; Hinds et al., 2019). Snow within the landslide persisted longer after snow on the adjacent hillslope had melted (Patton et al.,2021). Thicker snowpack and faster snowmelt on exposed landslide slopes would cause original landslide to present multi-phase, multi-stage and long-term failure processes.
With global warming, the climate in Northwest China is becoming warming and humidification with a high frequency of anomalous warming and extreme precipitation events (Yao et al., 2019;Yao et al., 2022), and snowmelt-induced landslides in seasonally frozen areas will become a common disaster phenomenon. In the paper, a hybrid mechanism for loess slope deformation and failure was proposed considering snowmelt infiltration and soil freezing and thawing cycles, which would contribute to the establishment and implementation of an early warning system to reduce the snowmelt-induced landslide risk (Fig. 5). An effective warning system for snowmelt induced landslides should incorporate various environmental factors such as temperature and rain-on-snow events, as well as variations in the characteristics of the snowpack such as density and thickness (Martelloni et al. 2013). Snow depth is an important feedback indicator of snow melting and accumulation, so the research on factors affecting snow depth can help predict snowmelt landslide trends. In the future, long-term observation and monitoring of snow depth and its influencing factors should be strengthened.