Role of Dietary Antioxidants and Vitamins Intake in Semen Quality Parameters: A Cross-sectional Study

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-42856/v1

Download PDF

Research

Role of Dietary Antioxidants and Vitamins Intake in Semen Quality Parameters: A Cross-sectional Study

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-42856/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Objective

Infertility had an increasing trend between couples in Iran. Several factors such as lifestyle, physical activity, unhealthy dietary habits and stress are associated with production of ROS in seminal fluid. The aim of this study was to identify the role of dietary antioxidants and vitamins intake on semen quality parameters, among Iranian infertile men.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was performed on 400 newly diagnosed infertile men in Yazd Reproductive sciences Institute from July 2019 to December 2019. The presence of infertility was confirmed by an expert andrologist, based on WHO criteria. Dietary antioxidants and vitamins intake were assessed using a 168 items semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ).

Results

We found an association between semen volume and Alpha Carotene dietary intake, total motility and Beta Cryptoxanthin dietary intake, and sperm count with riboflavin intake (P = 0.03).

Conclusions

We concluded that dietary intake of Alpha Carotene, Beta Cryptoxanthin, and Riboflavin are related to sperm count, semen volume and total motility in Iranian infertile men, respectively. Our data suggest that that adhering to a diet that is rich in sources of antioxidant and vitamin can have a positive effect on men’s sexual health. However, more research is needed to confirm these relations and provide the evidence needed to exert these findings into clinical practice.

Nutrition & Dietetics

Antioxidant

Vitamin

Diet

male infertility

Semen quality

Sperm parameters

Male infertility is one of the major stressful factors which affects almost 40–50% of all infertile couples (1). Prevalence of infertility has experienced an increasing trend between couples in Iran(2). Also reduce semen quality and impaired sperm function have been considered as the most common causes of infertility in men(3). Spermatozoa consist of 50 to 75 mitochondria, as other kind of cells that accomplish aerobic metabolism, is related to assembly free reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide anion (•O2−), hydroxyl radicals (•OH), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and nitric oxide (NO)(4). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a crucial role in sperm functions through activation of intracellular mechanisms, such as sperm capacitation associated-events(5). However, higher level of ROS in the reproductive tract lead to sperm DNA damage, lipid oxidation and depletes sperm antioxidant system(5). Imbalance between level of ROS and antioxidants capacity has been reported to reduced sperm quality(6). There are evidence that spermatozoa membrane is full of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), that improve membrane flexibility(7) and increases the risk of their vulnerability to oxidants (8) .In the seminal plasma, several antioxidant mechanisms protect spermatozoa contrary to oxidative stress(9). Furthermore, several factors in lifestyle such as stress and anxiety, smoking, alcohol consumption, pesticides in food, unhealthy dietary habits are associated with production of ROS in semen fluid(10–15). Unhealthy eating habits such as high intake of hydrogenated oils, processed meats, fried foods, synthetic dyes in food and low intake of rich sources of antioxidants, such as leafy green vegetables and fruits lead to Increase ROS level (16, 17). Regarding the association of ROS and antioxidants with men's Sexual Health, the dietary antioxidants and vitamins may play an important role in the progression of male infertility. Few studies have conducted on the relationship between dietary antioxidants and male infertility. Most studies focused on effect antioxidant supplementation on semen quality parameters, instead of assessing antioxidants status that intake from diets (18–22). Also, available evidence show that high dose antioxidant supplementation is associated with inconsistent results which called “antioxidant paradox” (23). specific negative effects have been reported for many of the usually recommended antioxidants such as selenium or vitamins C and E. Selenium intake and increased seminal levels of selenium were (≥ 80 ng/ml) were associated with declined motility(20, 24). Thus, due to the limited evidence on status of antioxidants dietary intake in infertile men, aim of this study was to evaluate the role of dietary antioxidants and vitamins intake in semen quality parameters and sperm functions in Iranian infertile men.

Study population

In this cross-sectional study, we recruited 400 infertile men from Yazd Reproduction Research Institute, diagnosed by andrologist's indices participated to our study from July 2019 to December 2019. Inclusion criteria include age between 20 to 55 years, being married, normal morphology less than 4%, semen volume less than 1.5 ml, progressive motility less than 40% and sperm count less than 20 million per milliliter. Also, exclusion criteria include testicular atrophy, hypospadias, chronic diseases, stenosis, varicocele, ejaculatory disorder, non-response to more than 35 items of food frequency questionnaire adherence to specific diets and underreporting and over-reporting of energy intake (more than 4,200 and less than 800)(25, 26). All subjects completed the consent at the baseline of the study. General and dietary information was collected by trained interviewer.

Physical examination and lifestyle variable

Physical activity data were accumulated using a validated and reliable questionnaire (International Physical Activity Questionnaire) (27). This form provides information about levels of strenuous activity, moderate activity, inactivity and walking. Furthermore, we assembled the data regarding duration (minutes per day) and frequency (days per week) for all types of activities. Socioeconomic status (SES) of the participants was determined according to variables, such as home situation (landlord-tenant), number of overseas trips, washing machine and dishwasher (yes-no), has car (yes-no), individual occupation, education (number of years of study).

Anthropometric data

Anthropometric data such as Waist to hip ratio (WHR) and Body mass index (BMI) calculated according to standard protocol of World Health Organization (WHO), based on no shoes and minimal clothing, by using Falcon scales (Seca, Hamburg, Germany) to the nearest 0.1 kg(28). Also, all measurements were archived with an accuracy of 0.1 cm. Waist circumference (WC) was measured midpoint between the last rib and the iliac crest (umbilical level) and hip circumference (HC) was measured since the hips are the widest part of buttocks and. BMI and WHR were identified based on this formula: weight (kg)/height (m2) and WC (cm)/HC (cm), respectively(28).

Dietary assessment

Dietary intake was assessed by using a 168 items semiquantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ). The validity of this questionnaire is confirmed in Iran (29). The FFQ was designed according to frequency of consumption of the common foods of one’s country during the past 12 months (number of times consumed daily, weekly, monthly, and annually). FFQ was filled out by a trained interviewer, by interviewing. The dietary antioxidants and vitamins intake were determined by computer program from the food- frequency data, using standard portion sizes and the vitamin contents given in the food composition tables. Household measurements were monitored by a nutritionist to calculate the total energy and nutrients consumed in actual food consumption (grams per day). The dietary habits of each person were assessed one year prior to infertility diagnosis. Information on alcohol use was not collected for cultural reasons and was therefore not analyzed.

Semen analysis

Semen samples should be assembled after three days of abstinence. Before conveying the samples into the container, the temperature of the container should be close to the body temperature of 37 ° C. Semen samples were kept in sterile containers for 30 minutes. They were then evaluated and analyzed according to the WHO Fifth Edition Laboratory Guidelines(30). Four parameters including semen and sperm including semen volume, sperm concentration, normal sperm morphology and sperm motility were measured.

Statistical methods:

Sperm volume, density, total motility and morphology were outcomes variables. Average antioxidants and vitamins intake were expose variables. Based on the amount of intake, antioxidants and vitamins were divided into four groups. Lowest quartile of each micronutrient intake was considered as the reference group. To investigate the association between each micronutrient with sperm parameters, Linear regression was used for crude and adjusted model. The adjusted model included age, BMI, physical activity, smoking status and energy intake. For the crude and adjusted model, beta and confident interval 95% (CI 95%) were calculated. Also, covariance test (ANCOVA) used to calculated micronutrient mean in each quartile. For statistical analyses, STATA 14 (Stata Corp, College Station, Texas, USA) was used. P-value less than 0.5 considered as significant.

Our study population were Iranian infertile men, with the mean age of 33.66 years [standard deviation (SD): 6.4] and a BMI of 26.12 (SD: 5.33). Almost 54% were smokers. The mean semen volume was 3.57 ml (SD: 1.76), the mean percentage of motile sperm was 41.05% (SD: 16.58%), The mean value for morphologically normal sperm was 2.59% (SD: 1.38%) and the mean count of them was 40.90 × 10⁶ (SD:33.72) (Table 1).

Table 1

Demographic characteristics of participants.
Characteristics	Mean ± SD
Age (year) BMI (kg/m²) Weight (kg) Waist Circumference (cm) Hip Circumference (cm) Volume (ml) Count (n × 10⁶) Total Motility (%) Morphology (%) Energy Intake (Kcal) Carbohydrate Intake (g) Protein Intake (g) Fat Intake (g) Physical Activity A. Inactive (%) B. Minimally activity (%) C. Highly activity (%) Smoking Status A. Current smokers (%) B. Never smokers (%) C. Ex-smokers (%)	33.66 ± 6.4 26.12 ± 5.33 79.24 ± 18.39 93.61 ± 20.13 96.89 ± 21.75 3.57 ± 1.76 40.90 ± 33.72 41.05 ± 16.58 2.59 ± 1.38 3001.30 ± 659.11 619.77 ± 306.28 152.88 ± 66.91 154.54 ± 78.45 136 (34%) 157 (39.25%) 107 (26.75%) 219 (54.75%) 160 (40%) 21 (5.25%)
¹ All values are means ± standard error (SE) and Percent.

Table 2 presents dietary intakes of energy and selected nutrients of study participants between different quartile. These were evaluated due to the influence of covariates, for example there was a significant positive relationship between the energy intake, Lycopene, Vitamin B6 and quartiles (P < 0.001).

Table 2

Dietary intakes of energy and selected nutrients of study participants between different quartiles¹.
	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	P-value
Energy (Kcal)	2151.43 ± 232.28	2723.23 ± 162.61	3284.06 ± 119.02	3846.48 ± 214.71	< 0.001
Carbohydrate (g)	345.85 ± 54.47	454.51 ± 27.32	616.28 ± 74.73	1073.14 ± 264.74	< 0.001
Protein (g)	82.03 ± 8.32	115.99 ± 9.89	163.53 ± 22.30	254.40 ± 23.81	< 0.001
Fat (g)	80.10 ± 9.21	107.69 ± 6.52	157.86 ± 21.68	272.91 ± 53.72	< 0.001
Beta Carotene (µg)	1143.51 ± 326.55	2133.76 ± 337.45	3962.52 ± 597.84	7152.53 ± 1686.29	< 0.001
Alpha Carotene (µg)	78.48 ± 30.02	164.26 ± 17.29	273.24 ± 52.82	789.26 ± 522.59	< 0.001
Beta Cryptoxanthine (µg)	34.94 ± 12.65	94.27 ± 17.36	179.81 ± 39.9	388.49 ± 313.28	< 0.001
Lutein (µg)	713.13 ± 187.88	1122.69 ± 65.43	1650.79 ± 273.57	4534.43 ± 1663.49	< 0.001
Lycopene (µg)	1015.95 ± 501.66	2559.47 ± 438.00	4386.38 ± 900.92	11615.93 ± 6009.06	< 0.001
Alpha Tocopherol (mg)	8.31 ± 1.33	12.39 ± 0.52	14.81 ± 1.35	28.00 ± 21.97	< 0.001
Vitamin E (mg)	14.10 ± 2.37	19.69 ± 1.48	23.55 ± 1.32	39.64 ± 26.83	< 0.001
Vitamin C (mg)	60.36 ± 16.20	116.31 ± 20.56	171.53 ± 17.29	300.29 ± 107.26	< 0.001
Selenium (mg)	0.006 ± 0.006	0.910 ± 0.056	0.31 ± 0.10	0.68 ± 0.16	< 0.001
Vitamin A (REA) (µg)	299.87 ± 94.58	560.93 ± 59.81	1066.58 ± 276.21	4890.54 ± 4374.67	< 0.001
Thiamin (mg)	1.95 ± 0.39	3.07 ± 0.23	3.80 ± 0.28	6.49 ± 1.36	< 0.001
Riboflavin (mg)	1.87 ± 0.22	2.77 ± 0.43	3.73 ± 0.23	7.48 ± 2.19	< 0.001
Niacin (mg)	24.06 ± 2.72	32.05 ± 2.68	43.02 ± 7.04	75.17 ± 10.76	< 0.001
Pantothenic Acid (mg)	1323.57 ± 180.41	2120.45 ± 238.25	2905.27 ± 297.43	4477.86 ± 463.83	< 0.001
Vitamin B6 (mg)	1.66 ± 0.22	2.46 ± 0.13	3.35 ± 0.46	5.02 ± 0.65	< 0.001
Folate (µg)	584.67 ± 46.15	775.06 ± 103.73	1142.163.27	2055.42 ± 539.21	< 0.001
Dietary Folate Equivalent (µg)	2.64 ± 0.78	6.72 ± 1.28	10.23 ± 1.20	50.09 ± 44.24	< 0.001
Vitamin B12 (µg)	22.63 ± 6.93	42.69 ± 3.72	62.82 ± 7.04	101.04 ± 28.29	< 0.001
¹ All values are means ± standard error (SE).
² Obtained from ANCOVA.

Tables 3 and 4 present the multivariate adjusted model of dietary intake of antioxidant, vitamins and semen parameters. The semen volume was associated with Alpha Carotene intake (P = 0.03), being higher for Q3 and Q4 than for Q2 of intake. The median intake of Alpha Carotene for the first quartile was 78 µg per day. Differences were also found in the total motility and Beta Cryptoxanthin intakes in the Q4 compared with the lowest quartile of intake (Ptrend¼0.03). However, the P for trends was not statistically significant for Beta Cryptoxanthin intakes and normal morphology (Ptrend¼0.05). Riboflavin intakes in the Q2 was associated with sperm count (Ptrend¼0.03). Other dietary intake of antioxidants and vitamins did not show statistically significant differences with the semen parameters.

Table 3

Multivariable- adjusted for abnormal semen quality across quartiles of Antioxidants intake¹.
			Volume (ml)		Count (n × 10⁶)		Total motility (%)		Normal morphology (%)
Antioxidants			Beta (CI 95%)	P	Beta (CI 95%)	P	Beta (CI 95%)	P	Beta (CI 95%)	P
Beta Carotene	Crude Adjusted	Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4	Ref. -0.19 (-0.69, 0.30) -0.30 (-0.78, 0.17) 0.07 (-0.39, 0.54) Ref. -0.06 (-0.60, 0.47) -0.28 (-0.77, 0.20) 0.05 (-0.41, 0.52)	0.448 0.211 0.744 0.80 0.24 0.81	Ref. -5.17 (-14.74, 4.39) -6.39 (-15.62, 2.82) 0.95 (-8.02, 9.92) Ref. -5.09 (-15.47, 5.29) -6.57 (-15.91, 2.75) 1.99 (-7.09, 11.09)	0.28 0.17 0.83 0.33 0.16 0.66	Ref. -0.11 (-4.83, 4.60) -1.94 (-6.49, 2.61) 0.17 (-4.25, 4.60) Ref. 0.52 (-4.61, 5.67) -1.58 (-6.21, 3.04) 0.58 (-3.92, 5.09)	0.96 0.40 0.93 0.84 0.50 0.79	Ref. 0.17 (-0.21, 0.57) 0.06 (-0.32, 0.44) 0.03 (-0.33, 0.40) Ref. 0.04 (-0.38, 0.47) 0.03 (-0.35, 0.42) 0.05 (-0.32, 0.43)	0.89 0.31 0.20 0.83 0.86 0.77
Alpha Carotene	Crude Adjusted	Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4	Ref. -0.52 (-1.02, -0.02) -0.44 (-0.92, 0.03) -0.29 (-0.79, 0.19) Ref. -0.42 (-0.94, 0.09) -0.42 (-0.91, 0.06) -0.24 (-0.74, 0.26)	0.03 0.07 0.23 0.11 0.08 0.35	Ref. -2.68 (-12.25, 6.88) -4.53 (-13.79, 4.71) -1 (-10.49, 8.49) Ref. -2.47 (-12.5, 7.55) -3.15 (-12.6, 6.29) -0.02 (-9.75, 9.71)	0.58 0.33 0.83 0.62 0.51 099	Ref. -0.83 (-5.54, 3.87) 1.28 (-3.26, 5.83) -3.49 (-3.49, 5.84) Ref. -0.76 (-5.71, 4.17) 1.65 (-3.0, 6.31) 1.51 (-3.28, 6.31)	0.72 0.57 0.62 0.76 0.48 0.53	Ref. 0.12 (-0.27, 0.51) -0.02 (-0.40, 0.35) 0.11 (-0.27, 0.50) Ref. 0.04 (-0.36, 0.46) -0.07 (-0.46, 0.31) 0.07 (-0.32, 0.47)	0.54 0.88 0.57 0.82 0.68 0.70
Beta Cryptoxanthine	Crude Adjusted	Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4	Ref. 0.15 (-0.33, 0.63) -0.14 (-0.64, 0.34) -0.10 (-0.60, 0.38) Ref. 0.36 9-0.15, 0.87) -0.12 (-0.62, 0.37) -0.0003 (-0.51, 0.51)	0.54 0.55 0.67 0.16 0.62 0.99	Ref. 2.89 (-6.35, 12.13) 1.56 (-7.95, 11.07) -2.29 (-11.79, 7.19) Ref. 5.20 (-4.63, 15.05) 1.71 (-7.92, 11.36) 0.86 (-9.12, 10.86)	0.53 0.74 0.63 0.29 0.72 0.86	Ref. 1.37 (-3.15, 5.90) 0.30 (-4.36, 4.96) 4.13 (-0.51, 8.79) Ref. 2.30 (-2.53, 7.14) 069 (-4.04, 5.43) 5.19 (0.28, 10.10)	0.55 0.89 0.08 0.34 0.77 0.03	Ref. 0.04 (-0.33, 0.42) 0.12 (-0.26, 0.51) 0.38 (-0.008, 0.76) Ref. -0.05 (-0.45, 0.35) 0.08 (-0.30, 0.48) 0.33 (-0.07, 0.74)	0.81 0.51 0.05 0.80 0.65 0.10
Lutein	Crude Adjusted	Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4	Ref. 0.22 (-0.26, 0.71) 0.15 (-0.32, 0.63) 0.02 (-0.46, 0.50) Ref. 0.17 (-0.32, 0.66) 0.03 (-0.48, 0.55) 0.01 (-0.48, 0.52)	0.36 0.52 0.93 0.49 0.88 0.94	Ref. -2.17 (-11.49, 7.13) -5.21 (-14.48, 4.04) -5.06 (-14.33, 4.19) Ref. -1.96 (-11.45, 7.51) -3.34 (-13.32, 6.63) -3.03 (-12.74, 6.67)	0.64 0.26 0.28 0.68 0.51 0.53	Ref. -0.09 (-4.67, 4.48) -1.31 (-5.87, 3.23) -2.79 (-7.35, 1.75) Ref. 0.02 (-4.64, 4.70) -1.01 (-5.93, 3.90) -2.64 (-7.42, 2.14)	0.96 0.57 0.22 0.99 0.68 0.27	Ref. -0.08 (-0.47, 0.29) -0.08 (-0.47, 0.29) 0.01 (-0.36, 0.39) Ref. -0.09 (-0.48, 0.29) -0.0 (-0.46, 0.35) -0.01 (-0.41, 0.38)	0.65 0.64 0.69 0.62 0.79 0.95
Lycopene	Crude Adjusted	Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4	Ref. -0.25 (-0.75, 0.24) -0.23 (-0.73, 0.26) 0.08 (-0.37, 0.54) Ref. -0.12 (-0.63, 0.38) -0.16 (-0.68, 0.34) 0.12 (-0.33, 0.59)	0.31 0.36 0.71 0.62 0.51 0.58	Ref. 0.40 (-9.12, 9.92) -7.41 (-17.005, 2.17) -4.17 (-1.96, 4.60) Ref. -0.16 (-9.99, 9.65) -6.05 (-15.92, 3.81) -3.62 (-12.50, 5.26)	0.93 0.12 0.35 0.97 0.22 0.42	Ref. 2.63 (-2.05, 7.32) -0.39 (-5.11, 4.32) 2.72 (-1.59, 7.05) Ref. 2.48 (-2.35, 7.32) -0.71 (-5.57, 4.14) 2.75 (-1.62, 7.13)	0.26 0.86 0.21 0.31 0.77 0.21	Ref. 0.31 (-0.07, 0.70) -0.26 (-0.65, 0.12) 0.062 (-0.29, 0.42) Ref. 0.27 (-0.13, 0.67) -0.29 (-0.70, 0.10) 0.03 (-0.32, 0.40)	0.11 0.18 0.73 0.18 0.15 0.83
Alpha Tocopherol	Crude Adjusted	Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4	Ref. -0.03 (-0.53, 0.47) -0.09 (-0.56, 0.37) -0.06 (-0.55, 0.41) Ref. -0.12 (-0.63, 0.39) -0.11 (-0.61, 0.38) -0.15 (-0.66, 0.36)	0.90 0.69 0.77 0.64 0.64 0.56	Ref. -3.54 (-13.12, 6.04) -5.41 (-14.47, 3.64) -0.86 (-10.15, 8.41) Ref. -1.36 (-11.29, 8.55) -2.23 (-11.84, 7.37) 2.29 (-7.56, 12.15)	0.46 0.24 0.85 0.78 0.64 0.64	Ref. -2.55 (-7.27, 2.16) -1.03 (-5.49, 3.42) -0.18 (-4.75, 4.37) Ref. -2.04 (-6.94, 2.85) -0.79 (-5.53, 3.94) 0.17 (-4.68, 5.04)	0.28 0.64 0.93 0.41 0.74 0.94	Ref. -0.15 (-0.54, 0.24) -0.08 (-0.46, 0.28) 0.23 (-0.14, 0.61) Ref. -0.11 (-0.52, 0.29) -0.06 (-0.45, 0.33) 0.28 (-0.11, 0.69)	0.44 0.63 0.22 0.58 0.75 0.16
Vitamin E	Crude Adjusted	Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4	Ref. -0.005 (-0.49, 0.48) 0.03 (-0.46, 0.53) -0.01 (-0.51, 0.48) Ref. -0.03 (-0.52, 0.45) 0.02 (-0.48, 0.54) -0.11 (-0.64, 0.40)	0.98 0.89 0.95 0.87 0.91 0.65	Ref. 0.51 (-8.78, 9.82) -1.68 (-11.21, 7.84) -1.53 (-11.08, 8.01) Ref. 1.20 (-8.20, 10.62) -0.13 (-10.08, 9.80) 0.93 (-9.14, 11.02)	0.91 0.72 0.75 0.80 0.97 0.85	Ref. 0.48 (-4.08, 5.06) -1.61 (-6.30, 3.06) -0.73 (-5.42, 3.96) Ref. 0.75 (-3.89, 5.39) -1.55 (-6.46, 3.34) -0.61 (-5.58, 4.35)	0.83 0.49 0.75 0.75 0.53 0.80	Ref. -0.05 (-0.43, 0.32) -0.17 (-0.57, 0.21) 0.08 (-0.30, 0.47) Ref. 0.02 (-0.40, 0.36) -0.17 (-0.58, 0.23) 0.18 (-0.23, 0.59)	0.77 0.36 0.68 0.91 0.40 0.39
Vitamin C	Crude Adjusted	Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4	Ref. -0.29 (-0.77, 0.18) -0.41 (-0.91, 0.08) -0.11 (-0.58, 0.35) Ref. -0.27 (-0.77, 0.22) -0.42 (-0.93, 0.09) -0.20 (-0.67, 0.27)	0.23 0.10 0.63 0.28 0.10 0.40	Ref. -5.10 (-14.36, 4.46) -5.74 (-15.31, 3.83) -0.82 (-9.83, 8.18) Ref. -4.40 (-14.04, 5.22) -5.74 (-15.57, 4.07) 0.14 (-8.99, 9.29)	0.28 0.23 0.85 0.36 0.25 0.95	Ref. 0.31 (-4.25, 4.87) 1.43 (-3.28, 6.14) 2.13 (-2.29, 6.57) Ref. 0.92 (-3.83, 5.68) 1.74 (-3.11, 6.59) 2.50 (-2.01, 7.02)	0.89 0.55 0.34 0.74 0.48 0.27	Ref. 0.33 (-0.04, 0.71) 0.18 (-0.20, 0.58) 0.10 (-0.26, 0.47) Ref. 0.27 (-0.12, 0.67) 0.17 (-0.22, 0.58) 0.14 (-0.23, 0.51)	0.87 0.34 0.57 0.17 0.39 0.46
Selenium	Crude Adjusted	Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4	Ref. -0.13 (-0.63, 0.36) 0.22 (-0.24, 0.70) 0.02 (-0.45, 0.51) Ref. -0.07 (-0.64, 0.49) 0.09 (-0.47, 0.65) -0.01 (-0.52, 0.48)	0.60 0.34 0.90 0.79 0.75 0.94	Ref 0.66 (-8.91, 10.24) -5.63 (-14.66, 3.39) -2.30 (-11.60, 7.00) Ref. 3.47 (-7.46, 14.41) -2.40 (-13.28, 8.47) -1.80 (-11.50, 7.89)	0.89 0.22 0.62 0.53 0.66 0.71	Ref. 0.98 (-3.73, 5.70) -0.42 (-4.87, 4.02) -1.00 (-5.58, 3.58) Ref. 1.71 (-3.69, 7.11) 0.39 (-4.917, 5.76) -0.80 (-5.59, 3.98)	0.68 0.85 0.66 0.53 0.88 0.74	Ref. 0.06 (-0.33, 0.45) -0.06 (-0.43, 0.30) -0.09 (-0.47, 0.29) Ref. -0.02 (-0.48, 0.42) -0.02 (-0.47, 0.42) -0.07 (-0.47, 0.32)	0.76 0.64 0.62 0.89 0.90 0.70
¹All values are odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.
Adjusted model: Adjusted for age, BMI, physical activity, smoking status and energy intake.

Table 4

Multivariable- adjusted for abnormal semen quality across quartiles of Dietary vitamins intake¹.
			Volume (ml)		Count (n × 10⁶)		Total motility (%)			Normal morphology (%)
Vitamins			Beta (CI 95%)	P	Beta (CI 95%)	P	Beta (CI 95%)		P	Beta (CI 95%)	P
Vitamin A	Crude Adjusted	Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4	Ref. 0.06 (-0.43, 0.55) 0.12 (-0.36, 0.63) 0.25 (-0.23, 0.73) Ref. 0.04 (-0.49, 0.58) 0.13 (-0.37, 0.65) 0.16 (-0.32, 0.66)	0.81 0.61 0.31 0.87 0.60 0.50	Ref. 0.81 (-8.70, 10.34) -5.22 (-14.78, 4.32) 1.36 (-7.87, 10.60) Ref. -1.26 (-11.61, 9.08) -5.73 (-15.65, 4.19) 2.04 (-7.50, 11.58)	0.86 0.28 0.77 0.81 0.25 0.67	Ref. -1.25 (-5.95, 3.44) -0.64 (-5.36, 4.06) -0.64 (-5.20, 3.91) Ref. -0.80 (-5.92, 4.32) -0.35 (-5.26, 4.56) -0.07 (-4.80, 4.64)		0.59 0.78 0.78 0.75 0.88 0.97	Ref. 5.83 (-0.39, 0.39) 0.25 (-0.13, 0.64) 0.04 (-0.33, 0.42) Ref. -0.06 (-0.49, 0.36) 0.21 (-0.19, 0.62) 0.07 (-0.32, 0.46)	1.00 0.20 0.80 0.76 0.31 0.72
Thiamin	Crude Adjusted	Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4	Ref. -0.19 (-0.69, 0.30) -0.06 (-0.54, 0.41) 0.25 (-0.21, 0.72) Ref. -0.39 (-0.92, 0.13) -0.27 (-0.79, 0.25) 0.01 (-0.49, 0.52)	0.45 0.79 0.28 0.14 0.31 0.94	Ref. -6.29 (-15.81, 3.23) -0.73 (-9.92, 8.45) 5.94 (-3.04, 14.92) Ref. -3.88 (-14.06, 6.28) 0.84 (-9.30, 11.00) 6.36 (-3.40, 16.14)	0.19 0.87 0.19 0.45 0.86 0.20	Ref. -2.08 (-6.78, 6.62) -3.49 (-8.03, 1.04) 0.02 (-4.41, 4.46) Ref. -1.80 (-6.83, 3.22) -3.30 (-8.33, 1.71) 0.33 (-4.50, 5.16)	0.38 0.13 0.99 0.48 0.19 0.89		Ref. -0.05 (-0.44, 0.34) -0.07 (-0.45, 0.30) -0.05 (-0.42, 0.31) Ref. 0.01 (-0.41, 0.43) -0.02 (-0.44, 0.39) 0.04 (-0.36, 0.44)	0.79 0.71 0.77 0.96 0.90 0.83
Riboflavin	Crude Adjusted	Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4	Ref. -0.15 (-0.63, 0.33) -0.19 (-0.69, 0.30) 0.12 (-0.34, 0.59) Ref. -0.40 (-0.92, 0.12) -0.13 (-0.65, 0.38) -0.17 (-0.70, 0.34)	0.53 0.44 0.60 0.13 0.60 0.50	Ref. -9.84 (-19.02, -0.67) -1.93 (-11.44, 7.57) 2.31 (-6.65, 11.29) Ref. -8.24 (-18.25, -1.77) -0.95 (-10.92, 9.00) 3.84 (-6.24, 13.93)	0.03 0.68 0.61 0.10 0.85 0.45	Ref. -1.56 (-6.12, 2.98) -2.05 (-6.76, 2.66) -0.17 (-4.62, 4.27) Ref. -0.75 (-5.73, 4.22) -1.58 (-6.53, 3.36) 0.78 (-4.23, 5.80)	0.49 0.39 0.93 0.76 0.53 0.75		Ref. -0.09 (-0.47, 0.28) 0.29 (-0.09, 0.69) -0.008 (-0.37, 0.36) Ref. -0.03 (-0.45, 0.38) 0.25 (-0.16, 0.66) 0.05 (-0.36, 0.47)	0.63 0.13 0.96 0.86 0.23 0.79
Niacin	Crude Adjusted	Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4	Ref. -0.19 (-0.67, 0.28) -0.01 (-0.52, 0.49) 0.27 (-0.21, 0.75) Ref. -0.37 (-0.89, 0.13) -0.37 (-0.95, 0.20) 0.01 (-0.55, 0.51)	0.42 0.96 0.27 0.15 0.20 0.94	Ref. -5.96 (-15.15, 3.22) -4.02 (-13.74,3.70) 4.90 (-4.34, 14.15) Ref. -5.09 (-15.06, 4.86) -2.87 (-14.00, 8.26) 5.36 (-4.92, 15.64)	0.20 0.41 0.29 0.31 0.61 0.30	Ref. -2.75 (-7.29, 1.78) -2.39 (-7.20, 2.40) 0.34 (-4.23, 4.91) Ref. -2.51 (-7.44, 2.42) -1.85 (-7.37, 3.66) 0.74 (-4.34, 5.84)	0.23 0.32 0.88 0.31 0.51 0.77		Ref. -0.06 (-0.44, 0.31) -0.07 (-0.47, 0.33) 0.0001 (-0.38, 0.38) Ref. 0.01 (-0.40, 0.42) 0.08 (-0.38, 0.54) 0.13 (-0.29, 0.55)	0.74 0.73 0.99 0.96 0.68 0.74
Pantothenic Acid	Crude Adjusted	Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4	Ref. -0.26 (-0.75, 0.22) -0.18 (-0.66, 0.29) 0.27 (-0.21, 0.77) Ref. -0.32 (-0.83, 0.18) -0.37 (-0.88, 0.13) 0.11 (-0.40, 0.62)	0.29 0.44 0.26 0.21 0.14 0.67	Ref. -6.29 (-15.76, 3.18) -1.11 (-10.36, 8.13) 1.77 (-7.74, 11.29) Ref. -5.22 (-15.04, 4.59) 0.34 (-9.36, 10.11) 3.64 (-6.35, 13.63)	0.19 0.81 0.71 0.29 0.94 0.47	Ref. -0.62 (-5.29, 4.05) -1.42 (-5.98, 3.13) -0.008 (-4.70, 4.68) Ref. -0.04 (-4.90, 4.82) -0.85 (-5.69, 3.98) 0.58 (-4.36, 5.53)	0.79 0.54 0.99 0.98 0.72 0.81		Ref. 0.22 (-0.16, 0.61) 0.12 (-0.25, 0.50) 0.09 (-0.29, 0.48) Ref. 0.19 (-0.21, 0.59) 0.19 (-0.20, 0.59) 0.17 (-0.24, 0.58)	0.25 0.52 0.64 0.35 0.34 0.41
Vitamin B6	Crude Adjusted	Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4	Ref. -0.30 (-0.80, 0.19) 0.10 (-0.36, 0.57) 0.28 (-0.20, 0.76) Ref. -0.48 (-1.00, 0.03) -0.07 (-0.58, 0.43) 0.07 (-0.45, 0.59)	0.22 0.66 0.25 0.06 0.76 0.79	Ref. -6.11 (-15.62, 3.40) -2.47 (-11.51, 6.56) 3.01 (-6.24, 12.28) Ref. -4.36 (-14.39, 5.66) -1.12 (-10.89, 8.65) 3.83 (-6.21, 13.89)	0.20 0.59 0.52 0.39 0.82 0.45	Ref. -1.42 (-6.11, 3.25) -2.17 (-6.63, 2.27) 0.78 (-3.78, 5.35) Ref. -0.92 (-5.88, 4.03) -1.31 (-6.14, 3.51) 1.45 (-3.51, 6.42)	0.54 0.33 0.73 0.71 0.59 0.56		Ref. 0.11 (-0.27, 0.50) -0.08 (-0.46, 0.28) 0.09 (-0.28, 0.47) Ref. 0.17 (-0.23, 0.59) -0.01 (-0.42, 0.38) 0.20 (-0.20, 0.62)	0.55 0.64 0.62 0.40 0.92 0.32
Folate	Crude Adjusted	Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4	Ref. -0.03 (-0.52, 0.46) 0.03 (-0.44, 0.51) 0.24 (-0.24, 0.74) Ref. -0.12 (-0.63, 0.39) -0.07 (-0.60, 0.44) 0.08 (-0.46, 0.64)	0.89 0.88 0.32 0.63 0.77 0.75	Ref. -2.14 (-11.60, 7.32) -0.08 (-9.25, 9.08) 8.74 (-0.71, 18.20) Ref. -2.15 (-12.00, 7.69) 0.54 (-9.50, 10.59) 7.62 (-2.98, 18.23)	0.65 0.95 0.07 0.66 0.91 0.15	Ref. -0.55 (-5.23, 4.12) -1.77 (-6.31, 2.75) 0.77 (-3.90, 5.45) Ref. -0.48 (-5.36, 4.38) -1.84 (-6.82, 3.12) 1.49 (-3.76, 6.74)	0.81 0.44 0.74 0.84 0.46 0.57		Ref. 0.10 (-0.29, 0.49) -0.06 (-0.43, 0.31) 0.11 (-0.28, 0.50) Ref. 0.17 (-0.23, 0.58) 0.02 (-0.39, 0.44) 0.21 (-0.22, 0.65)	0.61 0.75 0.56 0.39 0.90 0.34
Dietary Folate Equivalent	Crude Adjusted	Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4	Ref. 0.15 (-0.34, 0.65) 0.23 (-0.25, 0.71) 0.23 (-0.24, 0.70) Ref. 0.14 (-0.38, 0.66) 0.25 (-0.24, 0.75) 0.15 (-0.34, 0.65)	0.53 0.34 0.33 0.59 0.31 0.53	Ref. -3.04 (-12.62, 6.53) -0.54 (-9.87, 8.78) -2.50 (-11.53, 6.52) Ref. -3.74 (-13.82, 6.33) -1.87 (-11.44, 7.69) 0.34 (-9.19, 9.88)	0.53 0.90 0.58 0.46 0.70 0.94	Ref. -2.49 (-7.19, 2.20) 1.17 (-3.40, 5.75) -1.56 (-5.99, 2.86) Ref. -1.87 (-6.84, 3.09) 1.61 (-3.09, 6.33) -1.01 (-5.71, 3.68)	0.29 0.61 0.48 0.45 0.50 0.67		Ref. 0.03 (-0.35, 0.43) 0.26 (-0.11, 0.65) 0.09 (-0.27, 0.46) Ref. -0.03 (-0.44, 0.38) 0.25 (-0.14, 0.64) 0.10 (-0.28, 0.49)	0.85 0.16 0.61 0.88 0.20 0.59
Vitamin B12	Crude Adjusted	Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4	Ref. -0.14 (-0.64, 0.35) 0.01 (-0.47, 0.49) 0.19 (-0.27, 0.67) Ref. -0.20 (-0.71, 0.30) -0.08 (-0.58, 0.42) 0.03 (-0.45, 0.53)	0.57 0.96 0.40 0.42 0.75 0.88	Ref. -6.27 (-15.82, 3.28) -2.66 (-11.93, 6.61) 1.45 (-7.57, 10.47) Ref. -6.31 (-16.05, 3.42) -0.25 (-9.93, 9.42) 1.77 (-7.69, 11.23)	0.19 0.57 0.75 0.20 0.95 0.71	Ref. 1.24 (-3.46, 5.95) -1.00 (-5.57, 3.57) 0.19 (-4.25, 4.64) Ref. 1.78 (-3.03, 6.61) -0.51 (-5.30, 4.27) 0.82 (-3.86, 5.50)	0.60 0.66 0.93 0.46 0.83 0.73		Ref. -0.04 (-0.44, 0.34) -0.16 (-0.54, 0.21) 0.11 (-0.26, 0.48) Ref. -0.05 (-0.46, 0.34) -0.13 (-0.52, 0.26) 0.18 (-0.20, 0.57)	0.81 0.38 0.55 0.77 0.52 0.34
¹All values are odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.
Adjusted model: Adjusted for age, BMI, physical activity, smoking status and energy intake.

We found an association between the dietary intake of several antioxidants, and vitamins, including Alpha Carotene, Beta Cryptoxanthin and Riboflavin, and the semen volume, sperm count and total motility in Iranian infertile men. For carotenoids, Eskenazi et al. founds a positive association between b-carotene and perm concentrations and progressive sperm motility (31). In aforementioned study cryptoxanthin and lycopene were not analyzed. Mendiola et al. reported that lycopene but not alpha Carotene and beta-carotene was associated with good semen quality(32). There is evidence that carrot, red palm oil, some cultivars of squash, pumpkin, burrito has high amounts of alpha-carotene (33).

we also found an association between Beta Cryptoxanthin and total sperm motility. Lorenzo Y et al. suggested that Beta cryptoxanthin plays a role in the protection of spermatozoa against oxidative stress(34). One possible mechanism would be the conversion of cryptoxanthin to vitamin A(35). These molecules play crucial roles as chromophores and signaling molecules(36). Suggested mechanism is that Beta-cryptoxanthin is as an affective antioxidant which protects cells against ROS (37, 38). Beta-Cryptoxanthin Seems to have higher absorption than other carotenoids(39, 40). A comparison of bioavailability of different provitamin A carotenoids suggested that beta-cryptoxanthin–rich foods had 72.5% higher bioavailability than beta-carotene–sources(41). However, food processing decline b-cryptoxanthin concentrations in foods. for all that, food processing and cooking may increase or decrease the bio accessibility. Many beta-cryptoxanthin–food sources (such as peaches and tangerines) are consumed raw or juiced, but others (such as pumpkin and butternut squash) are added to mixed dishes or bake. (38, 42–44).

Our study showed that riboflavin intakes in the Q2 was associated with sperm count. According to our findings, riboflavin may considered a crucial component of the antioxidant defense system of human body and riboflavin deficiency could impair the oxidant/antioxidant balance(45). Another mechanism may be related to role of flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) as a crucial cofactor in enzymatic redox reactions, that are performed in cellular metabolism and homeostasis(46). disturbance of flavin homeostasis in humans has been associated with several diseases, including: cardiovascular diseases, cancer, anemia, abnormal fetal development, and neuromuscular and neurological disorders(47); however, the connection between FAD homeostasis and fertility is not investigated(46).

For other nutrients such as Beta-carotene, lutein, zeaxanthin, vitamin C, vitamin b6, vitamin b12, vitamin D, vitamin E and folate, we did not find an association with sperm parameters. likewise, a study published in 2005, suggested that folate intake did not improve semen quality in healthy men(31).However, Mendiola et al. in a clinical trial found higher intake of folate in normozoospermia controls(32). On the other hand, in that case–control study, vitamin E intake was not associated with semen quality(32) but Eskenazi et al found that it was associated with sperm motility in healthy men(31).Also Supplementation with vitamin E and selenium was associated with improved sperm quality in infertile men and suggested the beneficial impact of vitamin E on sperm motility(48).

There are several limitations that should mentioned. Similar to other cross-sectional studies, the inherent methodological limitations make it impossible to describe a causal link between dietary antioxidant, vitamin and semen quality. Another concern is that participants may change their diet choices and this might alter the risk estimates.

In conclusion, this study with high sample size, provides important data on the association between dietary intake of antioxidant, vitamin and semen quality. We found that dietary intake of Alpha Carotene, Beta Cryptoxanthin, and Riboflavin are related to semen volume, sperm count and total motility in Iranian infertile men and shows that changing diet quality might have beneficial effects in improvement semen quality and sperm parameters. However, more studies are needed to confirm these relations and provide the evidence needed to exert these findings into clinical practice.

Ethical Approval and Consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences code IR.MUI.RESEARC H.REC.1398.264.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests" in this section.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Islamic Republic of Iran.

Authors ‘contributions

FH, RGh: designed research; FH: conducted research; FH, LDM, AJ: provided essential materials; MN: analyzed data; FH: wrote paper; FH: had primary responsibility for final content. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgement

The author of the article would like to thank all the participants in this project. We knowledge of the researchers of Yazd Reproduction Research for providing data from this study.

Kumar N, Singh AK. Trends of male factor infertility, an important cause of infertility: A review of literature. Journal of human reproductive sciences. 2015;8(4):191.
Safarinejad MR. Infertility among couples in a population-based study in Iran: prevalence and associated risk factors. Int J Androl. 2008;31(3):303–14.
Cyrus A, Kabir A, Goodarzi D, Moghimi M. The effect of adjuvant vitamin C after varicocele surgery on sperm quality and quantity in infertile men: a double blind placebo controlled clinical trial. International braz j urol. 2015;41(2):230–8.
Birben E, Sahiner UM, Sackesen C, Erzurum S, Kalayci O. Oxidative stress and antioxidant defense. World Allergy Organization Journal. 2012;5(1):9–19.
Martin-Hidalgo D, Bragado MJ, Batista AR, Oliveira PF, Alves MG. Antioxidants and male fertility: From molecular studies to clinical evidence. Antioxidants. 2019;8(4):89.
Aitken RJ, Smith TB, Jobling MS, Baker MA, De Iuliis GN. Oxidative stress and male reproductive health. Asian journal of andrology. 2014;16(1):31.
Ahmadi S, Bashiri R, Ghadiri-Anari A, Nadjarzadeh A. Antioxidant supplements and semen parameters: An evidence based review. International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine. 2016;14(12):729.
Sheweita SA, Tilmisany AM, Al-Sawaf H. Mechanisms of male infertility: role of antioxidants. Curr Drug Metab. 2005;6(5):495–501.
Gvozdjáková A, Kucharská J, Dubravicky J, Mojto V, Singh RB. Coenzyme Q10, α-tocopherol, and oxidative stress could be important metabolic biomarkers of male infertility. Disease markers. 2015;2015.
Durairajanayagam D. Lifestyle causes of male infertility. Arab journal of urology. 2018;16(1):10–20.
Hayden RP, Flannigan R, Schlegel PN. The role of lifestyle in male infertility: diet, physical activity, and body habitus. Curr Urol Rep. 2018;19(7):56.
Ilacqua A, Izzo G, Emerenziani GP, Baldari C, Aversa A. Lifestyle and fertility: the influence of stress and quality of life on male fertility. Reproductive Biology Endocrinology. 2018;16(1):115.
Kumar S, Murarka S, Mishra V, Gautam A. Environmental & lifestyle factors in deterioration of male reproductive health. Indian J Med Res. 2014;140(Suppl 1):29.
Leisegang K, Dutta S. Do lifestyle practices impede male fertility? Andrologia. 2020:e13595.
Niknamian S. Effects of Phosalone plant pesticide on male fertility by using experiment on Rat. 2019.
Ali SS, Ahsan H, Zia MK, Siddiqui T, Khan FH. Understanding oxidants and antioxidants: Classical team with new players. J Food Biochem. 2020;44(3):e13145.
Xiong Q, Zhang M, Wang T, Wang D, Sun C, Bian H, et al. Lipid oxidation induced by heating in chicken meat and the relationship with oxidants and antioxidant enzymes activities. Poult Sci. 2020;99(3):1761–7.
Dimitriadis F, Tsounapi P, Zachariou A, Kaltsas A, Sokolakis I, Hatzichristodoulou G, et al. Therapeutic effects of micronutrient supplements on sperm parameters: Fact or Fiction? Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2020.
Garolla A, Petre GC, Francini-Pesenti F, De Toni L, Vitagliano A, Di Nisio A, et al. Dietary Supplements for Male Infertility: A Critical Evaluation of Their Composition. Nutrients. 2020;12(5):1472.
Henkel R, Sandhu IS, Agarwal A. The excessive use of antioxidant therapy: A possible cause of male infertility? Andrologia. 2019;51(1):e13162.
da Silva SJM. Male infertility and antioxidants: one small step for man, no giant leap for andrology? Reproductive biomedicine online. 2019;39(6):879–83.
Hasson MA. The Relationship Between The Use of L-Carnitine Supplements and The Male Sub-Infertility. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance. 2019;10(04):735–40.
Halliwell B. The antioxidant paradox. The Lancet. 2000;355(9210):1179–80.
Ménézo Y, Entezami F, Lichtblau I, Belloc S, Cohen M, Dale B. Oxidative stress and fertility: incorrect assumptions and ineffective solutions? Zygote. 2014;22(1):80–90.
Nouri M, Amani R, Nasr-Esfahani M, Tarrahi MJ. The effects of lycopene supplement on the spermatogram and seminal oxidative stress in infertile men: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Phytother Res. 2019;33(12):3203–11.
Hu FB, Rimm E, Smith-Warner SA, Feskanich D, Stampfer MJ, Ascherio A, et al. Reproducibility and validity of dietary patterns assessed with a food-frequency questionnaire. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69(2):243–9.
Lee PH, Macfarlane DJ, Lam TH, Stewart SM. Validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:115.
Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organization technical report series. 2000;894:i-xii, 1-253.
Asghari G, Rezazadeh A, Hosseini-Esfahani F, Mehrabi Y, Mirmiran P, Azizi F. Reliability, comparative validity and stability of dietary patterns derived from an FFQ in the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Br J Nutr. 2012;108(6):1109–17.
Edition F. Examination and processing of human semen. World Health [Internet]. 2010.
Eskenazi B, Kidd SA, Marks AR, Sloter E, Block G, Wyrobek AJ. Antioxidant intake is associated with semen quality in healthy men. Human reproduction (Oxford England). 2005;20(4):1006–12.
Mendiola J, Torres-Cantero AM, Vioque J, Moreno-Grau JM, Ten J, Roca M, et al. A low intake of antioxidant nutrients is associated with poor semen quality in patients attending fertility clinics. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(4):1128–33.
Rodriguez-Amaya DB. Latin American food sources of carotenoids. Arch Latinoam Nutr. 1999;49(3 Suppl 1):74S–84S.
Lorenzo Y, Azqueta A, Luna L, Bonilla F, Domínguez G, Collins AR. The carotenoid beta-cryptoxanthin stimulates the repair of DNA oxidation damage in addition to acting as an antioxidant in human cells. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30(2):308–14.
Kelly ME, Ramkumar S, Sun W, Colon Ortiz C, Kiser PD, Golczak M, et al. The biochemical basis of vitamin A production from the asymmetric carotenoid β-cryptoxanthin. ACS chemical biology. 2018;13(8):2121–9.
Moise AR, von Lintig J, Palczewski K. Related enzymes solve evolutionarily recurrent problems in the metabolism of carotenoids. Trends in plant science. 2005;10(4):178–86.
Maiani G, Periago Castón MJ, Catasta G, Toti E, Cambrodón IG, Bysted A, et al. Carotenoids: actual knowledge on food sources, intakes, stability and bioavailability and their protective role in humans. Molecular nutrition food research. 2009;53(S2):194–218.
La Frano MR, Zhu C, Burri BJ. Assessment of tissue distribution and concentration of β-cryptoxanthin in response to varying amounts of dietary β-cryptoxanthin in the Mongolian gerbil. British journal of nutrition. 2014;111(6):968–78.
Burri BJ, Chang JS, Neidlinger TR. β-Cryptoxanthin- and α-carotene-rich foods have greater apparent bioavailability than β-carotene-rich foods in Western diets. Br J Nutr. 2011;105(2):212–9.
O'Connell OF, Ryan L, O'Brien NM. Xanthophyll carotenoids are more bioaccessible from fruits than dark green vegetables. Nutr Res. 2007;27(5):258–64.
Burri BJ, Chang JS, Neidlinger TR. β-Cryptoxanthin-and α-carotene-rich foods have greater apparent bioavailability than β-carotene-rich foods in Western diets. British journal of nutrition. 2011;105(2):212–9.
Namitha KK, Negi PS. Chemistry and biotechnology of carotenoids. Critical reviews in food science nutrition. 2010;50(8):728–60.
Boon CS, McClements DJ, Weiss J, Decker EA. Factors influencing the chemical stability of carotenoids in foods. Critical reviews in food science nutrition. 2010;50(6):515–32.
Pugliese A, O'Callaghan Y, Tundis R, Galvin K, Menichini F, O'Brien N, et al. In vitro investigation of the bioaccessibility of carotenoids from raw, frozen and boiled red chili peppers (Capsicum annuum). Eur J Nutr. 2014;53(2):501–10.
Ashoori M, Saedisomeolia A. Riboflavin (vitamin B 2) and oxidative stress: a review. British journal of nutrition. 2014;111(11):1985–91.
Yen C-A, Ruter DL, Turner CD, Pang S, Curran SP. Loss of flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) impairs sperm function and male reproductive advantage in C. elegans. Elife. 2020;9:e52899.
Barile M, Anna Giancaspero T, Brizio C, Panebianco C, Indiveri C, Galluccio M, et al. Biosynthesis of flavin cofactors in man: implications in health and disease. Curr Pharm Design. 2013;19(14):2649–75.
Moslemi MK, Tavanbakhsh S. Selenium-vitamin E supplementation in infertile men: effects on semen parameters and pregnancy rate. Int J Gen Med. 2011;4:99–104.

Download PDF

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Role of Dietary Antioxidants and Vitamins Intake in Semen Quality Parameters: A Cross-sectional Study

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Introduction

Materials And Methods

Study population

Physical examination and lifestyle variable

Anthropometric data

Dietary assessment

Semen analysis

Statistical methods:

Results:

Discussion:

Conclusion

Declarations

References

Status:

Version 1