Ethical considerations
The study procedures were conducted at Fundación Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Luz I.A.P., in México City from May 2022 to March 2023 and received approval from the ethics committee in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Patients
Patients of any gender above 18 years old with diabetic retinopathy and combined retinal detachment, defined as tractional retinal detachment (TRD) associated with the presence of one or more rhegmatogenous lesions, were included. Lesions could be present prior to surgery (Figure 1A-B) or occur incidentally during the removal of fibrovascular tissue.
All included patients were examined by refraction, biomicroscopy, tonometry, and fundus examination by indirect ophthalmoscopy before and after surgery by an SRJ retina specialist who has a high level of expertise and plenty of experience. Follow-up took place the day after surgery and at one week, one month, and 3 months post-surgery. Postsurgical outcomes were documented using fundus photographs and SD-OCT with segmentation at the site of amniotic membrane implantation. Patients with another type of retinal detachment, glaucoma, or intraocular inflammation and those included who did not comply with a minimum follow-up of 3 months were excluded.
Surgical technique:
Vitrectomy was performed through three 25-gauge ports using a standard platform (Alcon – Constellation). After central vitrectomy, the removal of fibrovascular tissue was performed by combining segmentation and delamination techniques; in complex cases, bimanual surgery was performed. Once the traction component was released, the retinal breaks were marked with diathermy, fluid-air exchange was performed, and the subretinal fluid was drained using a soft-tip cannula through either the larger rhegmatogenous lesion or the one that had a greater amount of subretinal fluid. We proceeded to dry the external orifice of the trocar cannula and the surface of the eye around the cannula with Merocel sponges. The LAM was clamped with a completely dry 25-gauge ILM clamp and then trimmed according to the break size. When introducing the membrane through the trocar cannula, folding sometimes occurred. We found that using forceps with a smaller calibre than the trocar cannula created more space and provided more freedom to mobilize the membrane towards the trocar to the vitreous cavity. If this material was not available, a second instrument of the same calibre could be used to facilitate deployment with a bimanual technique.
Once the membrane was completely deployed, it was placed over the break(s) covering the edges of the lesion in its entirety, bringing it closer to the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). As the membrane tissue is very thin, it is difficult to distinguish the basal and stromal poles, which is why in this technique, they were considered interchangeable for placement. The surgery concluded with panretinal photocoagulation without applying a laser to the rhegmatogenous lesion. The form of endotamponade, i.e., air, gas, or silicone oil, was determined at the surgeon's discretion. Patients were instructed to maintain a prone position for at least 3 days. All surgical procedures were performed by 2 experienced surgeons, with more than 15 years performing retinal surgery.
Safety evaluation
Safety was clinically evaluated and defined as a lack of adverse events or the absence of damage to the retinal tissue adjacent to the treated rhegmatogenous lesion or to the remaining intraocular structures. Efficacy was determined by evaluating SD-OCT images to assess whether complete coverage of the retinal break favouring the proximity of the edges and closure of the retinal break was achieved.
Surgical success
Anatomical surgical success was defined as retinal reattachment up to 3 months after surgery.
To further examine the results, patients were organized into 3 groups according to the number of rhegmatogenous lesions: those in group A had a single break, those in group B had two breaks, and those in group C had three or more breaks, as mentioned above. The greater the number of breaks, the worse the prognosis. In turn, the location of the break was determined to be superior when it was above an imaginary line drawn from the 4 to 8 o'clock meridian crossing below the inferior temporal vascular arcade, including the macular area and peripapillary region, and inferior when it was below this imaginary line, similar to the description provided by Starr in the management of inferior retinal breaks [18]. When retinal breaks coexisted in both the superior and inferior sectors, they were classified according to the sector where there was a greater number of breaks or a larger break.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad V5.0 software. The normality of variables was tested using the Kolmogorov‒Smirnov test. The Mann‒Whitney test was used for comparisons between groups. Chi-square analysis and Fisher's exact test were used to test differences between study group proportions using 2 x 2 and 3 x 2 contingency tables, as appropriate. P values < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.