Bioclimatic layers
The current studies data were downloaded from the world-climatic database and ArcESRI information was applied to incorporate the data. The annual mean temp, annual precipitation, mean diurnal range, and pre-seasonality layers were applying on the mention areas of the Malakand division KP, Pakistan, while the GPS data were recorded at the point of collection where the collected samples were found the different regions such as healthy and mature plants. The annual mean temperature from low to high was noted by the different color layers while annual precipitation layers were presented in (Fig 1A and B). The mean diurnal range and precipitation seasonality from low to high layers were noted by colors and while shows the overall temperature range and their distribution of the Z. nummularia in the selected three different regions of Malakand division, KP, Pakistan. Data maps were shown in (Fig 2A and B and Fig 3A, B and C), respectively.
Phenotypic diversity and correlation among the traits
11 phenotypic traits were recorded for 180 Z. nummularia genotypes collected from various locations of Malakand division, which was found in variation in fruits, leaves, color etc. (Fig 4), the phenotypic diversity was using different statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics of the morphological parameters are summarized in (Table 2). The %CV was calculated for phenotypic traits in genotypes was 90.55%, for ZNDR (Dir (L) was 54.86, for ZNBU (Buner) was 11, Significant variation was found for the branching (BR) among the genotypes of (3) regions, the highest value was observed for genotypes collected from ZNST (Swat) (69.46%) followed by ZNDR (Dir (L) (41.84 %) while, the lowest value was recorded for the genotypes collected from ZNBU (8.766%). For LL in genotypes collected from (Swat) was (57.47%), ZNDR (Dir L) (50.80%), for ZNBU (9.97%). Furthermore, the highest variation was observed for LW> LT> PL> InL> StD> FtW. The number of FtL varied for genotypes collected from ZNST, ZNDR, ZNBU (56.10%, 45.31%, and 7.47%), respectively. Furthermore, the Pearson correlation coefficient revealed a significant positive as well as a negative association (p = 0.05 and 0.01) among the studied traits of Z. nummularia (Table 3). Several traits revealed strong interrelationships within phenotype categories, particularly leaf traits with yield contributing traits and a few traits correlating with other categories, such as inherently linked growth and phenology-related traits (Tables 2 and 3).
Table 2. Descriptive Statistics of Z. nummularia genotypes collected from different geographical regions of KP, Pakistan
Swat (ZNST)
|
Dir (ZNDR)
|
Buner (ZNBU)
|
Traits
|
NO
|
MN
|
MX
|
Mean
|
Std. Devi-
|
% CV
|
MN
|
MX
|
Mean
|
Std. Devi-
|
% CV
|
MN
|
MX
|
Mean
|
Std. Devi-
|
% CV
|
PH
|
60
|
3.7
|
75.2
|
14.73
|
13.34
|
90.56
|
3
|
25
|
8.6
|
4.72
|
54.87
|
3.5
|
5.5
|
4.36
|
0.5
|
11.46
|
BR
|
60
|
2
|
38
|
9.17
|
6.37
|
69.47
|
2
|
16
|
5.73
|
2.4
|
41.84
|
13.5
|
20
|
16.38
|
1.44
|
8.77
|
LL
|
60
|
11.8
|
83
|
32.65
|
18.77
|
57.47
|
11.2
|
62.8
|
22.65
|
11.51
|
50.81
|
7.57
|
11.57
|
9.15
|
0.91
|
9.97
|
LW
|
60
|
8.8
|
55.4
|
24.34
|
13.58
|
55.78
|
5.8
|
40.6
|
14.97
|
6.85
|
45.76
|
5.17
|
7.83
|
6.46
|
0.74
|
11.47
|
LT
|
60
|
0.13
|
4.45
|
0.42
|
0.34
|
80.83
|
0.11
|
0.6
|
0.32
|
0.12
|
36.46
|
3.6
|
6.17
|
4.79
|
0.65
|
13.58
|
PL
|
60
|
2.8
|
20.6
|
7.38
|
4.39
|
59.48
|
2.2
|
34.8
|
7.25
|
5.54
|
76.45
|
2.5
|
3.97
|
3.46
|
0.37
|
10.76
|
InL
|
60
|
2.18
|
65.4
|
17.27
|
10.45
|
60.5
|
1.42
|
25.2
|
13.84
|
5.4
|
39.05
|
1.67
|
5.33
|
3.53
|
0.73
|
20.75
|
StD
|
60
|
1.1
|
21.6
|
4.12
|
3.25
|
78.95
|
1
|
14
|
3.19
|
2.07
|
64.9
|
9.87
|
13.03
|
11.27
|
0.68
|
6.06
|
FtW
|
60
|
65
|
148
|
104
|
18.83
|
18.14
|
58.02
|
230.6
|
1.11
|
27.12
|
24.37
|
22
|
32
|
28.26
|
2.57
|
9.08
|
FtD
|
60
|
4.8
|
334.8
|
25.26
|
41.9
|
165.87
|
4.2
|
28.8
|
9.71
|
4.32
|
44.45
|
3.67
|
15.53
|
4.73
|
2.04
|
43.18
|
FtL
|
60
|
5.2
|
48.6
|
20.66
|
11.59
|
56.11
|
6.4
|
35.2
|
12.45
|
5.64
|
45.32
|
206.33
|
303.67
|
2.7
|
20.22
|
7.48
|
Note: plant height (PH), branching (BR), leaf length (LL), leaf width (LW), leaf types (LT), petiole length (PL), internode length (InL), stem diameter (StD), fruit width (FtW), fruit diameter (FtD), fruit length (FtL), NO (Number of genotypes), MN (Minimum), MX (Maximum) and CV (Coefficient of variance)
Table 3. The correlation coefficient among Z. nummularia genotypes
Swat (ZNST)
|
|
PH
|
BR
|
LL
|
LW
|
LT
|
PL
|
InL
|
StD
|
FtW
|
FtD
|
FtL
|
PH
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BR
|
-0.04
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LL
|
.386**
|
.395**
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LW
|
.492**
|
.258*
|
.859**
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LT
|
-0.03
|
0.11
|
0.09
|
0.14
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PL
|
0.07
|
-0.06
|
-0.12
|
-0.14
|
0.16
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
InL
|
0.10
|
-0.11
|
-.335**
|
-.341**
|
-0.14
|
0.25
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
|
StD
|
.681**
|
-0.18
|
0.11
|
.268*
|
0.00
|
0.23
|
0.09
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
FtW
|
-0.08
|
-0.07
|
-.332**
|
-0.25
|
0.16
|
0.09
|
0.06
|
-0.02
|
1.00
|
|
|
FtD
|
-0.04
|
0.04
|
-0.02
|
0.02
|
-0.03
|
-0.12
|
-0.21
|
-0.02
|
-0.16
|
1.00
|
|
FtL
|
0.20
|
.366**
|
.341**
|
.368**
|
0.11
|
-0.18
|
0.02
|
0.16
|
0.19
|
0.14
|
1.00
|
|
Dir L (ZNDR)
|
|
PH
|
BR
|
LL
|
LW
|
LT
|
PL
|
InL
|
StD
|
FtW
|
FtD
|
FtL
|
PH
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BR
|
0.14
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LL
|
0.04
|
.301*
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LW
|
0.15
|
0.23
|
.862**
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LT
|
0.23
|
0.17
|
0.01
|
0.04
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PL
|
0.06
|
0.02
|
.565**
|
.656**
|
-0.08
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
InL
|
0.11
|
0.15
|
0.02
|
0.00
|
-0.01
|
-0.24
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
|
StD
|
.529**
|
.364**
|
.313*
|
.330*
|
0.17
|
0.20
|
-0.04
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
FtW
|
0.00
|
0.07
|
.278*
|
.340**
|
0.05
|
0.16
|
0.13
|
-0.20
|
1.00
|
|
|
FtD
|
0.09
|
0.25
|
.511**
|
.559**
|
-.324*
|
.547**
|
-0.24
|
0.20
|
.299*
|
1.00
|
|
FtL
|
-0.02
|
0.07
|
.416**
|
.469**
|
-.322*
|
.482**
|
-0.19
|
0.02
|
.438**
|
.785**
|
1.00
|
|
Buner (ZNBU)
|
|
PH
|
BR
|
LL
|
LW
|
LT
|
PL
|
InL
|
StD
|
FtW
|
FtD
|
FtL
|
PH
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BR
|
-0.012
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LL
|
-0.079
|
.475**
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LW
|
0.237
|
.303*
|
.298*
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LT
|
0.148
|
.508**
|
.397**
|
.329*
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PL
|
-0.037
|
-0.076
|
-0.065
|
-.263*
|
-0.135
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
InL
|
-0.205
|
0.117
|
0.19
|
-0.029
|
0.032
|
0.089
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
StD
|
0.149
|
-0.021
|
-0.016
|
0.024
|
-.260*
|
0.061
|
-0.174
|
1
|
|
|
|
FtW
|
-0.163
|
-0.018
|
0.113
|
0.072
|
0.207
|
-0.093
|
-0.104
|
-.300*
|
1
|
|
|
FtD
|
.364**
|
-0.194
|
-0.129
|
0.132
|
0.005
|
0.149
|
-.329*
|
0.051
|
0.233
|
1
|
|
FtL
|
-.285*
|
0.156
|
0.252
|
-0.075
|
0.058
|
0.094
|
.352**
|
-0.253
|
-0.143
|
-.602**
|
1
|
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Genetic diversity and population structure
The current research works total of 27 SSRs pair primers were successfully amplified size of the PCR bands ranged from 137 bp up to 240 bp (JSSR-181 repeat motif as CTT-17 and JSSR-460 as AG-11). Total 120 alleles were reported from 27 SSRs markers average allele was 4.42 per locus. The allele frequency at each SSRs ranged from 0.510 to 1.190 in locus number JSSR-513 and JSSR-181 respectively, the lowest number of alleles were noted at of the 11 loci range from 2 to 3 in (JSSR-21, JSSR-93, JSSR-239, JSSR-247, JSSR-261, JSSR-262, JSSR-414, JSSR-416, JSSR-485, and JSSR-490), respectively. The observed genetic diversity, PIC (polymorphic information content), ranged from 0.33 at the locus of JSSR-490 to a maximum of 0.79 at locus as JSSR-97, there were five different loci (JSSR-95, JSSR-152, JSSR-175, JSSR-188, and JSSR-513) were highly polymorphic, with PIC values higher than the other locus and where no locus was recorded with a PIC less than 0.25, respectively.* ne = Effective number of alleles,* I, Shannon's Information index and *BP Polymorphic bands were presented in (Table 4).
The observed heterozygosity (Ho) in Z. nummularia ranged from 0.070 to 0.968 in the locus JSSR-414 and JSSR-152 with an average of 0.66 and the expected heterozygosity varies from 0.140 to 0.760 in the locus JSSR-414 and JSSR-95, respectively, with an average value of 0.575. The important information of the Z. nummularia genotypes, Viz, the effective number of alleles (*ne), and the Shannon information index (*I) are summarized in (Table 4). The observed number of alleles (*na) varied from 2 to 6 in the locus as JSSR-490 and JSSR-152 in Z. nummularia genotypes. The **Nei's ranged between 0.140 for locus JSSR-414 and 0.758for locus JSSR-95. FIS varied from -0.110 to 0.816 with an average of -0.210. The FIS values obtained for most of the populations were not significant and negative (P> 0.05), which suggests that there is no loss of heterozygosity. FIT, FST, and Nm* (Table 4). Most of the Z. nummularia genotypes in population three showed abundant genetic variation and the average gene diversity is 0.4944. The estimate of gene flow (Nm*) based on FST in all populations has an average value of 6.415, respectively.
Table 4. Genetic variation analysis for 27 SSRs markers studied among Z. nummularia genotypes
Locus
|
Sample Size
|
BP
|
Observed _Het*
|
Expected _Het*
|
Nei**
|
PIC
|
GD
|
AF
|
ne*
|
I*
|
na*
|
Fis
|
Fit
|
Fst
|
Nm*
|
JSSR-21
|
184
|
3
|
0.88
|
0.6
|
0.6
|
0.59
|
0.47
|
0.85
|
2.51
|
0.99
|
3
|
-0.6
|
-0.5
|
0.03
|
7.2
|
JSSR-93
|
268
|
3
|
0.78
|
0.6
|
0.6
|
0.55
|
0.42
|
0.76
|
2.51
|
0.99
|
3
|
-0.3
|
-0.29
|
0.01
|
33.77
|
JSSR-95
|
266
|
5
|
0.95
|
0.76
|
0.76
|
0.75
|
0.61
|
1.1
|
4.13
|
1.49
|
5
|
-0.3
|
-0.26
|
0.05
|
4.75
|
JSSR-97
|
222
|
6
|
0.48
|
0.73
|
0.72
|
0.79
|
0.53
|
0.96
|
3.62
|
1.46
|
6
|
0.17
|
0.33
|
0.19
|
1.06
|
JSSR-110
|
226
|
4
|
0.94
|
0.57
|
0.57
|
0.65
|
0.51
|
0.91
|
2.31
|
0.95
|
4
|
-0.7
|
-0.65
|
0
|
193.4
|
JSSR-129
|
158
|
4
|
0.22
|
0.39
|
0.39
|
0.61
|
0.36
|
0.65
|
1.64
|
0.77
|
4
|
0.41
|
0.46
|
0.09
|
2.56
|
JSSR-152
|
250
|
6
|
0.97
|
0.71
|
0.7
|
0.77
|
0.29
|
0.53
|
3.38
|
1.43
|
6
|
-0.4
|
-0.38
|
0
|
67.41
|
JSSR-175
|
250
|
5
|
0.11
|
0.54
|
0.54
|
0.72
|
0.55
|
0.99
|
2.16
|
0.92
|
5
|
0.82
|
0.82
|
0.01
|
33.35
|
JSSR-181
|
198
|
5
|
0.91
|
0.68
|
0.68
|
0.70
|
0.66
|
1.19
|
3.13
|
1.28
|
5
|
-0.4
|
-0.35
|
0.02
|
11.82
|
JSSR-183
|
186
|
4
|
0.87
|
0.57
|
0.56
|
0.67
|
0.66
|
1.19
|
2.29
|
0.94
|
4
|
-0.6
|
-0.6
|
0.01
|
48.42
|
JSSR-188
|
298
|
6
|
0.97
|
0.72
|
0.72
|
0.77
|
0.44
|
0.8
|
3.53
|
1.44
|
6
|
-0.4
|
-0.35
|
0
|
74.54
|
JSSR-192
|
238
|
6
|
0.94
|
0.73
|
0.73
|
0.73
|
0.32
|
0.57
|
3.65
|
1.48
|
6
|
-0.3
|
-0.31
|
0.01
|
38.24
|
JSSR-207
|
300
|
4
|
0.95
|
0.62
|
0.62
|
0.54
|
0.72
|
1.3
|
2.64
|
1.05
|
4
|
-0.6
|
-0.53
|
0.01
|
21.39
|
JSSR-209
|
190
|
5
|
0.16
|
0.48
|
0.47
|
0.68
|
0.49
|
0.88
|
1.9
|
0.78
|
5
|
0.68
|
0.69
|
0.05
|
4.49
|
JSSR-239
|
236
|
3
|
0.62
|
0.51
|
0.51
|
0.59
|
0.41
|
0.73
|
2.03
|
0.74
|
3
|
-0.2
|
-0.22
|
0.02
|
14.84
|
JSSR-222
|
262
|
5
|
0.33
|
0.59
|
0.59
|
0.72
|
0.58
|
1.04
|
2.44
|
1.18
|
5
|
0.16
|
0.38
|
0.26
|
0.71
|
JSSR-247
|
128
|
3
|
0.44
|
0.53
|
0.52
|
0.59
|
0.65
|
1.17
|
2.1
|
0.9
|
3
|
0.12
|
0.14
|
0.02
|
13.07
|
JSSR-261
|
290
|
3
|
0.34
|
0.31
|
0.3
|
0.47
|
0.51
|
0.92
|
1.44
|
0.58
|
3
|
-0.1
|
-0.13
|
0.01
|
30.84
|
JSSR-262
|
278
|
3
|
0.86
|
0.61
|
0.61
|
0.56
|
0.41
|
0.74
|
2.55
|
1
|
3
|
-0.4
|
-0.4
|
0.01
|
16.51
|
JSSR-414
|
200
|
3
|
0.07
|
0.14
|
0.14
|
0.47
|
0.51
|
0.91
|
1.16
|
0.3
|
3
|
0.47
|
0.5
|
0.05
|
4.51
|
JSSR-416
|
138
|
3
|
0.68
|
0.67
|
0.66
|
0.55
|
0.58
|
1.05
|
2.97
|
1.09
|
3
|
-0.1
|
-0.04
|
0.06
|
3.68
|
JSSR-460
|
210
|
4
|
0.92
|
0.69
|
0.69
|
0.65
|
0.34
|
0.61
|
3.22
|
1.26
|
4
|
-0.4
|
-0.34
|
0.01
|
37.52
|
JSSR-465
|
248
|
4
|
0.96
|
0.63
|
0.62
|
0.65
|
0.48
|
0.87
|
2.66
|
1.07
|
4
|
-0.5
|
-0.54
|
0
|
92.14
|
JSSR-485
|
176
|
3
|
0.57
|
0.49
|
0.49
|
0.50
|
0.52
|
0.93
|
1.95
|
0.8
|
3
|
-0.2
|
-0.2
|
0.02
|
16.04
|
JSSR-490
|
224
|
2
|
0.21
|
0.24
|
0.24
|
0.33
|
0.29
|
0.52
|
1.31
|
0.4
|
2
|
0.09
|
0.13
|
0.05
|
4.48
|
JSSR-513
|
192
|
4
|
0.88
|
0.73
|
0.73
|
0.65
|
0.28
|
0.51
|
3.68
|
1.34
|
4
|
-0.2
|
-0.2
|
0.03
|
9.48
|
JSSR-774
|
300
|
5
|
0.89
|
0.68
|
0.68
|
0.75
|
0.55
|
0.99
|
3.14
|
1.3
|
5
|
-0.3
|
-0.3
|
0
|
57.96
|
Mean
|
227
|
4.43
|
0.662
|
0.575
|
0.572
|
0.671
|
0.494
|
0.89
|
2.6
|
1.03
|
4.11
|
-0.2
|
-0.17
|
0.04
|
6.415
|
Note; * Expected homozygosity and heterozygosity were computed using, ** Nei's (1973) expected heterozygosity*BP= Polymorphic bands * ne = Effective number of alleles, * I = Shannon's Information index, * Nm = Gene flow estimated from Fst = 0.25(1 - Fst)/Fst.
The population structure analysis was carried out for the 180 Z. nummularia genotypes collected from three geographical regions of KP, Pakistan, were estimated by the user of Bayesian clustering system probabilistically assigned individuals to respective populations there have three types of clustering were identifies which showed relationship among them of different geographical origin, K values were estimated as the mean of the final estimations of L″(K) found the middle value of more than 20 runs isolated by the standard deviation of L(K), Δ K = m(| L″(K) |)/s[L(K)] (Pritchard et al. 2000). For the given ranges, i.e., 1 to 20 and the highest values were recorded in K=3 and K=5 consequently, the analysis of the STRUCTURE software was performed for the K=3 which largely grouped by the genotypes, according to Pritchard et al. (2010) and Bayes’ rule estimation of K, values give a comparative estimation of LnP(D) and the smallest value is regarded as almost correct. The estimation of ΔK, values that the peak reached K=5, according to the formula our result shows clear peaks of ΔK at K=3 of Z. nummularia genotypes accordingly (Fig 5). In the absence of clear-cut origins of the accessions, a non-stratified strategy was adopted for the genetic structure analysis. Our results showed a clear peak for ΔK at K = 3, where all the accessions were roughly divided into three major groups, with some admixture among groups (Fig 6). ΔK value was recorded in K = 3 which were suggested that the 180 Z. nummularia genotypes were approximately divided into three Pops (Pop =1, Pop =2 and POP=3) accordingly, (Fig 1 and 2). The genetic relationship among the Pop s provided various confirmations for gene flow between Pop s. Pop =2 consisted of the highest number of genotypes 63, followed by Pop =3 having 44 number of genotypes was recorded and while Pop =1 as contains 27 genotypes of Z. nummularia. Pop =3 was comprised almost all of the ‘ZNBU was included in Pop =2 while of the collected genotypes from ZNDR of the Z. nummularia were assigned to Pop=2 and Pop =3. Notably, which were highly adaptable to moderate climates, were included in Pop=2 and Pop =3, ‘suggesting that it may have a unique ancestry type. Statistical analysis indicated that the percentage of genotypes with a membership coefficient ≥ of 67% was 45.00%. A total of 60.00% of genotypes exhibited a membership coefficient ≥ of 73%, and only 1.99% of the genotypes exhibited a membership coefficient of 3.2% or less. Based on standard permutation tests of the full data set, the groups defined by Structure suggest moderate genetic differentiation, as indicated by the global Fst mean value of 0.038 (P < 0.01). Pairwise FST comparisons among the different geographical regions showed that FST values varied from 0.0013 to 0.1913 respectively, (Table 5).
Neighbor-joining (NJ) and Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA)
The neighbor-joining system was used for the composite phylogenetic tree for the 180 Z. nummularia genotypes collected from three geographical regions. Viz, ZNST, ZNDR and ZNBU (Swat, Dir, and Buner) of KP, Pakistan, largely agreed with the results of the STRUCTURE analysis showed that, in general, the genotypes from the different regions were clustered together represented three clusters i.e. Cluster 1, cluster 2 and cluster 3, (Fig 7). Cluster 1 was the largest group which comprised mainly the ZNBU, 16 genotypes from ZNST regions and 27 genotypes from ZND region, Cluster, 2 contained a total of 40 genotypes, 9 from ZNBU, 03 were ZNDR and 28 from ZNST regions, Cluster, 3 comprised most genotypes ZNST (Swat), from ZNBU (Buner). The 54 Z. nummularia genotypes were separated into two sub-clusters within the cluster (Fig 3), sub-cluster 2 comprised only ZNST, Z. nummularia genotypes sub-cluster 1 included ZNBU and ZNDR respectively, however, and there is very strong support for clustering genotypes with related geographical origins.
The PCoA (Principal co-ordinate analysis) were divided into three clusters (Fig 8), which contained the assignments composite by ZN clustering method and population structure (Fig 5 and 7) respectively. The majority of Z. nummularia genotypes belonging to cluster I, ZNST genotypes were distributed in the left half of the PCoA plot. While the rest of the Z. nummularia genotypes from district ZNBU and ZNDR regions belonging to clusters II and III are distributed in the right of the PCoA plot. The distribution of cluster I was more widely scattered than clusters II and III, indicating that Z. nummularia genotypes of the Swat region had higher diversity than the genotypes of Buner and Dir regions. The PCoA results corresponded to cluster analysis as the Swat genotypes were close to Dir and Buner genotypes were joined with Buner region of Z. nummularia genotypes.
Analysis of molecular variance (MOVA)
The genetic diversity was recorded within and among the population of different geographical regions and population structure providing arranged data for the hierarchical AMOVA (analysis of molecular variance), the current total genetic variances among the population 8% while differences among individuals within populations contributed 12% to total variance and 72.00% of the total variance occurred within individuals. The determination of FIS value as 0.102, FIT showed the highest level of genetic variation as 0.105 and FST values 0.092 respectively, suggesting that the fixation index value of the Z. nummularia genotypes was highly significant (P-Value 0.001), (Table 5).
Table 5. AMOVA (Analysis of molecular variance) for the 180 Z. nummularia genotypes
Source
|
Df
|
SS
|
Component of variance
|
Percentage of variation
|
Fixation index
|
P-Value
|
Among Populations
|
2
|
82.985
|
0.321
|
8%
|
Fst 0.092
|
0.001
|
Among Individual with in Population
|
176
|
565.959
|
0.453
|
12%
|
Fis 0.102
|
0.001
|
Within Individual
|
179
|
559.000
|
3.123
|
80%
|
Fit 0.105
|
0.001
|
Total
|
357
|
1207.944
|
3.490
|
100%
|
|
|
Note: df, degrees of freedom; SSD, sum of squares; FIT, fixation index within individuals; FIS, Fixation index among populations; FST, among individuals within populations.