DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-436944/v1
This study aimed to evaluate long-term prognosis of contralateral central neck dissection in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) patients with ipsilateral lateral neck metastasis. We aimed to produce clinical evidence to help determine the extent of central neck dissection (CND) focusing on the separation between the ipsilateral and contralateral sides. A total of 708 PTC patients who underwent total thyroidectomy and concomitant ipsilateral or bilateral CND with ipsilateral lateral neck dissection (LND) were retrospectively included between January 1997 and December 2015 at a single institution. The median follow-up time was 89.7 months, the mean age was 44.7 years and the mean tumor size was 1.5 cm. Among the study population, 507 were female (71.5%) and 201 (28.5%) were male. Locoregional recurrence (LRR) was observed in 26 (7.9%) patients and 30 (7.9%) patients in the ipsilateral and bilateral CND groups, respectively. There were 6 (1.8%) contralateral recurrence cases in the ipsilateral CND group and 5 (1.3%) cases in the bilateral CND group. Male sex (adjusted HR = 1.857, p = 0.034), larger tumor size (adjusted HR = 4.298, p = 0.006), and more metastatic ipsilateral central lymph nodes (adjusted HR = 1.078, p = 0.014) significantly increased the risk of LRR. Ipsilateral CND only did not significantly increase the risk of LRR (adjusted HR = 1.110, p = 0.712). There were no significant differences in recurrence according to contralateral central neck dissection status after propensity score matching (p = 0.424), either. The incidence of hypocalcemia (p = 0.007) was higher in the bilateral CND group compared to the ipsilateral CND group. Surgeons may consider performing contralateral CND only for therapeutic purposes to reduce unnecessary complications.
Ipsilateral CND only did not significantly increase the risk of locoregional recurrence in clinical or radiological contralateral central lymph node negative PTC patients with unilateral lateral neck metastasis. Therefore, Ipsilateral CND only will be sufficient surgical treatment for those patients.
Cervical lymph node metastases in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) are quite common1,2 and are associated with increased locoregional recurrence (LRR)3–7. However, PTC has a relatively good prognosis compared to other types of thyroid cancers8. For this reason, local recurrence and postoperative quality of life remain important issues. The 2015 ATA guidelines for thyroid cancer management recommend that prophylactic CND (ipsilateral or bilateral) should be considered in clinically involved lateral neck nodes9, but there is no detailed guideline for the extent of CND with the separation of the ipsilateral or contralateral compartment, and the extent of prophylactic CND depends on the preference of the individual surgeon. To date, there are various studies about the central compartment, however, only a few are about the contralateral central compartment in PTC patients with ipsilateral lateral neck metastasis. Some studies have been conducted to examine contralateral central neck metastasis status and its associated factors but without long-term outcomes dealing with the extent of CND6,10. It is clinically significant to clarify long-term clinical outcomes for contralateral central neck dissection in PTC patients with ipsilateral lateral neck metastasis because of its important role in determining the extent of CND. It is certain that the incidence of surgery-related morbidities, such as hypoparathyroidism or hypocalcemia or VCP, were observed more prominently in bilateral CND compared to ipsilateral CND11–15. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the recurrence rate and the risk factors associated with recurrence in accordance with prophylactic contralateral CND. This, in turn, could potentially decrease postoperative morbidities from unnecessary neck dissection.
Patient selection. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Samsung Medical Center(SMC) and all process were done in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent form from all participated patients in this study was obtained. We conducted a retrospective study at a single institution between January 1997 and December 2015. A total of 1,026 patients underwent lateral neck dissection (LND) with concomitant total thyroidectomy at the Thyroid Cancer Center of SMC, a tertiary referral center in Korea. Patients with the following were excluded: preoperative contralateral cN1a patients, a history of previous thyroidectomy, an age younger than 20 years or older than 80 years, non-PTC carcinomas (follicular/medullary/anaplastic), PTC variants, mixed type PTC, LND without thyroidectomy due to lateral neck recurrence, completion thyroidectomy, bilateral LND, distant metastasis, and follow-up duration less than 6 months (residual tumor or suspicious lymph node detected in the bilateral CND group within 6 months after initial surgery or loss to follow-up within 6 months)16. Finally, a total of 708 PTC patients who underwent total thyroidectomy with either ipsilateral central neck dissection (CND) + ipsilateral LND or bilateral CND + ipsilateral LND were enrolled (Fig. 1).
All patients were examined by ultrasonography (US) and/or computed tomography (CT) preoperatively to evaluate primary tumor and the presence of suspected nodal metastases. Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System(K-TIRADS) by The Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) was used as a guideline for US-based diagnosis. Suspicious lesions were diagnosed by fine needle aspiration (FNA). Suspicious lymph nodes in the lateral compartment were confirmed by FNA or thyroglobulin (Tg) washout measurement. Based on the American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines9, clinically involved lymph node disease (cN1) was defined as lymph node metastases in the central neck compartment on preoperative imaging16.
Surgical methods. Surgical strategies were chosen according to the ATA Guidelines9. All patients underwent total thyroidectomy with either ipsilateral CND + ipsilateral LND or bilateral CND + ipsilateral LND. Therapeutic contralateral CND was typically performed after central lymph node metastasis was detected during preoperative US or surgery. Patients without contralateral central lymph node metastasis by preoperative exams underwent prophylactic contralateral CND at the discretion of the surgeon. The operations were performed by three endocrine surgeons (A, B, C) in our hospital; surgeon A performed routine bilateral CND and surgeon B and C preferred to perform bilateral CND only if contralateral central lymph node metastasis was suspected using preoperative images or gross inspection during surgery regardless of pathological contralateral central neck metastasis16. Approximately 61% of the patients with bilateral CND were patients who underwent surgery by surgeon A. The rest 39% of the patients with bilateral CND were patients who underwent surgery by surgeon B and C. Thyroditis with CLN enlargement is common in Korean patients who live in an iodine-rich area. Ultrasound features can be diverse depending on the severity of disease in patients with thyroditis. Among the patients who underwent surgery by surgeon B and C, 51% presented with CLT. In addition, our analysis is based on the cohort without radiologically detectable contralateral central lymph node metastasis. The term “ipsilateral” was used to indicate the same side as the main tumor, and “contralateral” was defined as the opposite side relative to the main tumor. In cases of bilateral tumors, the largest tumor was considered to be the main tumor. Ipsilateral central lymph nodes were defined as ipsilateral paratracheal, pretracheal lymph nodes, and precricoid (Delphian) nodes. Lymph nodes in the paratracheal region that were contralateral to the main tumor or opposite to a lateral neck metastasis were defined as contralateral central lymph nodes. LND refers to a lateral neck compartmental lymph node dissection. LND was defined as a neck dissection of levels II–V, conserving the internal jugular vein, spinal accessory nerve, and sternocleidomastoid muscle. Therapeutic LND was performed only in patients with lateral neck metastasis confirmed by FNA preoperatively. LND specimens were separated by the surgeon according to the neck level at the time of surgery16.
Histopathological examination of surgical specimens. Surgical specimens were microscopically examined by two or more experienced pathologists. The following histopathologic factors were assessed: main tumor size (longest diameter of the largest lesion), cell type of main tumor, multifocality, tumor bilaterality, extrathyroidal extension (ETE; microscopic or gross), regional LN metastasis (central or lateral compartment), and underlying conditions of the thyroid, such as chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis (CLT). The staging of thyroid cancer was determined in accordance with the 7th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM17.
Surgery-related outcomes. Various surgery-related outcomes were assessed. The terms “transient” and “permanent” were defined on a six-month basis. “Transient” was defined as a symptom duration of less than 6 months and “permanent” was defined as a symptom duration of more than 6 months. Hypocalcemia was defined as a serum calcium < 8.0 mg/dl. Calcium level were the lowest value within or more than six months of surgery accordingly. Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury described as vocal cord palsy (VCP) was diagnosed by laryngoscopy or patient’s symptoms. Postoperative serum thyroglobulin (Tg) level in Table 1 was defined as the stimulated Tg after the first ablation.
Ipsilateral CND No. (%) | Bilateral CND No. (%) | p value | |
---|---|---|---|
Total | 329 (46.5) | 379(53.5) | |
Age (yr) | |||
Mean ± SD | 45.1 ± 12.6 | 44.31 ± 12.5 | 0.429 |
< 55 | 258 (78.4) | 307 (81.0) | 0.393 |
≥ 55 | 71 (21.6) | 72 (19.0) | |
Sex | 0.367 | ||
Female | 241 (73.3) | 266 (70.2) | |
Male | 88 (26.7) | 113 (29.8) | |
BMI (kg/m2) | |||
Mean ± SD | 23.8 ± 3.5 | 24.0 ± 3.5 | 0.338 |
Preoperative ipsilateral cN1a | 77 (23.4) | 61 (16.1) | 0.014 |
Tumor size (cm) | |||
Mean ± SD | 1.4 ± 1.0 | 1.5 ± 1.0 | 0.056 |
< 1.0 | 143 (43.5) | 134 (35.4) | 0.012 |
1.0–2.0 | 131 (39.8) | 159 (42.0) | |
2.0–4.0 | 48 (14.6) | 74 (19.5) | |
> 4.0 | 7 (2.1) | 12(3.2) | |
Multiplicity | 0.004 | ||
Absent | 221 (67.2) | 214 (56.5) | |
Present | 108 (32.8) | 165 (43.5) | |
Bilaterality | 0.824 | ||
Absent | 238(72.3) | 277 (73.1) | |
Present | 91(27.7) | 102 (26.9) | |
Gross ETE | 0.824 | ||
Absent | 290 (88.1) | 332 (87.6) | |
Present | 39 (11.9) | 47 (12.4) | |
Number of Retrieved CLNs | 10.3 ± 12.6 | 16.0 ± 19.2 | < 0.001 |
Number of Metastatic ipsilateral CLNs | 2.8 ± 4.1 | 3.8 ± 3.2 | 0.001 |
Number of Metastatic CCLNs | N/A | 2.5 ± 2.0 (1–10) | N/A |
Number of Retrieved LLNs | 25.9 ± 13.5 | 37.6 ± 13.9 | < 0.001 |
Number of Metastatic LLNs | 7.5 ± 10.1 | 5.8 ± 4.0 | 0.007 |
Ipsilateral CNM | 245 (74.5) | 318 (83.9) | 0.002 |
Contralateral CNM | 0 (0.0) | 131(34.6) | N/A |
Radioactive iodine therapy | < 0.001 | ||
Yes | 310 (94.2) | 379 (100) | |
No | 19 (5.8) | 0 (0.0) | |
Radioactive iodine, mCi, mean ± SD | 117.6 ± 80.0 | 142.2 ± 67.6 | < 0.001 |
Stimulated serum Tg after ablation | 1.97 ± 2.4 | 1.28 ± 2.0 | < 0.001 |
Overall Recurrence | 26 (7.9) | 30 (7.9) | 0.995 |
Contralateral recurrence | 4 (1.2) | 4 (1.1) | 1.000 |
PTC papillary thyroid carcinoma, CND central neck dissection, LND lateral neck dissection, SD standard deviation, LN lymph node, BMI Body mass index, ETE extrathyroidal extension, CLT chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis, CLN central lymph node, CCLN contralateral central lymph node, CNM central neck metastasis, CCND contralateral central neck dissection, CCNM contralateral central neck metastasis. |
Postoperative follow-up and management. After the initial surgery, all patients underwent regular follow-up at 6- to 12-month intervals with clinical evaluations including physical examinations, US, CT, Iodine-131 (131I) scans, and serum unstimulated Tg level. Suspicious lesions for recurrence were confirmed by US-guided FNA biopsy with or without Tg washout level and/or CT or positron emission tomography (PET). Locoregional recurrence was defined as the presence of tumors or metastatic lymph nodes on cytology from FNA. Radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy was performed with 131I at 4–12 weeks after surgery according to the ATA guidelines9. RAI was administered after thyroid hormone withdrawal or after stimulation with recombinant thyroid-stimulating hormone. When RAI treatment was no longer required, patients resumed regular follow-up. The last date of follow-up was defined as loss to follow-up, withdrawal, recurrence, or death. In this study, all patients received postoperative RAI therapy, and TSH suppression was performed according to the ATA guidelines9.
Statistical analysis. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22.0 software (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA), and statistically significant differences were defined as P-values less than 0.05. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and categorical variables are presented as the number with percentage (%) and odds ratio (OR). The chi-square test and linear-by-linear association were used for categorical variables and the Student’s t-test for continuous variables. For recurrence analysis, Cox regression was used to determine if the clinicopathological characteristics were associated with contralateral CND in patients with PTC. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust clinicopathological variables which can effect on recurrence. Under the matched condition, Kaplan-Meier and the log-rank test were adopted to analyze time-dependent LRR.
Clinicopathological characteristics of 708 PTC patients who underwent total thyroidectomy with either ipsilateral CND + ipsilateral LND or bilateral CND + ipsilateral LND. The mean patient age was 44.7 years (range, 20–77) and the mean tumor size was 1.5 cm (range, 0.1–8). Among the study population, 507 were female (71.5%) and 201 (28.5%) were male. Of the 708 patients, 329 (46.5%) underwent ipsilateral CND and 379 (53.5%) patients underwent bilateral CND. Tumor multiplicity was seen in 108 (32.8%) patients in the ipsilateral CND group and 165 (43.5%) patients in the bilateral CND group. Tumor bilaterality was found in 91 (27.7%) patients in the ipsilateral CND group and 102 (26.9%) patients in the bilateral CND group. Gross ETE was observed in 39 (11.9%) patients in the ipsilateral CND group and 47 (12.4%) patients in the bilateral CND group. In the bilateral CND group of 379 patients, contralateral central neck metastasis occurred in 131 (34.6%) patients. Of the 33 patients with tumor encroaching on isthmus, there were 23 (69.7%) patients who underwent bilateral CND; 13 (39.4%) patients had contralateral central lymph node metastasis and 10 (30.3%) patients had no contralateral central lymph node metastasis. The final 10 (30.3%) patients with tumor encroaching on isthmus were in the ipsilateral CND group. For RAI therapy, most patients in the whole cohort received RAI treatment except for the 19 (5.8%) patients in the ipsilateral CND group.
A comparison of the two groups showed that preoperative ipsilateral cN1a (p = 0.014), tumor multiplicity in a single lobe (p = 0.004), a number of retrieved central lymph nodes (CLN) (p < 0.001), number of metastatic ipsilateral CLNs (p = 0.001), a number of retrieved lateral lymph nodes (LLN) (p < 0.001), a number of metastatic LLNs (p = 0.007), ipsilateral central neck metastasis (CNM) (p = 0.002), RAI treatment status (p < 0.001), RAI dose difference (p < 0.001), and post-operative stimulated Tg level (p < 0.001) were significantly different (Table 1). Recurrence (p = 0.995) and contralateral recurrence (p = 1.000) were not statistically different between the two groups. LRR was observed in 26 (7.9%) patients in the ipsilateral CND group and 30 (7.9%) patients in the bilateral CND group. Contralateral recurrence occurred in 8 patients in the whole cohort; there were 4 (1.2%) contralateral recurrence cases in the ipsilateral CND group and 4 (1.1%) cases in the bilateral CND group (Table 1).
Recurrence sites for 56 recurred patients. There were 56 (7.9%) recurred patients in the whole population. Among 26 (7.9%) patients with LRR in the ipsilateral CND group, recurrence was detected at the ipsilateral thyroidectomy site in 1 (0.3%) patient, ipsilateral central neck in 5 (1.5%) patients, and ipsilateral lateral neck in 11 (3.3%) patients. Contralateral recurrence occurred in 6 patients overall: 1 (0.3%) cases in the contralateral lateral neck, 1 (0.3%) case in the ipsilateral thyroidectomy site + contralateral central neck, 1 (0.3%) case in the contralateral thyroidectomy site + contralateral lateral neck, and 1 (0.3%) case in the ipsilateral thyroidectomy site + contralateral central and lateral neck. In addition, 2 (0.6%) bilateral lateral neck metastasis cases were also observed (Table 2).
Recurrence site | Ipsilateral CND (n = 329) No. (%) | Bilateral CND (n = 379) No. (%) |
---|---|---|
Total | 26 (7.9) | 30 (7.9) |
Ipsilateral thyroidectomy site | 1 (0.3) | 6 (1.6) |
Contralateral thyroidectomy site | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.3) |
Ipsilateral central neck | 5 (1.5) | 2 (0.5) |
Contralateral central neck | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
Ipsilateral lateral neck | 11 (3.3) | 18 (4.8) |
Contralateral lateral neck | 1 (0.3) | 3 (0.8) |
Bilateral lateral neck | 2 (0.6) | |
Ipsilateral thyroidectomy site + Ipsilateral central neck | 2 (0.6) | |
Ipsilateral thyroidectomy site + contralateral central neck | 1 (0.3) | |
Ipsilateral thyroidectomy site + ipsilateral lateral neck | ||
Contralateral thyroidectomy site + contralateral lateral neck | 1 (0.3) | |
Ipsilateral thyroidectomy site + contralateral central and lateral neck | 1 (0.3) | |
Ipsilateral central neck + ipsilateral lateral neck | 1 (0.3) | |
CND central neck dissection, LND lateral neck dissection, CCNM contralateral central neck metastasis. |
In the bilateral CND group, there were 30 (7.9%) patients with LRR. Recurrence occurred at the ipsilateral thyroidectomy site in 6 (1.6%) patients, contralateral thyroidectomy site in 1 (0.3%) patients, ipsilateral central neck in 2 (0.5%) patients, and ipsilateral lateral neck in 18 (4.8%) patients. Contralateral recurrence occurred in 4 patients overall; there were 1 (0.3%) case in the contralateral thyroidectomy site, 3 (0.8%) cases in the contralateral lateral neck. There was no contralateral central neck recurrence in either groups (Table 2).
Prognostic impact of node dissection status on locoregional recurrence in 708 PTC patients. The median follow-up time was 89.7 months (range, 7–212 months). After adjustment for clinicopathological characteristics in the Cox proportional hazard model, male sex (adjusted HR = 1.857, p = 0.034), larger tumor size (adjusted HR = 4.298, p = 0.006), and greater number of metastatic ipsilateral CLNs (adjusted HR = 1.078, p = 0.014) significantly increased the risk of LRR. It was shown that ipsilateral CND only did not significantly increased the risk of LRR (adjusted HR = 1.110, p = 0.712) (Table 3).
Loco-regional recurrence | ||
---|---|---|
Adjusted HR (95 % CI)a | p value | |
Age < 55 years | 1.000 (0.506–1.929) | 0.971 |
Male sex | 1.857 (1.049–3.289) | 0.034 |
Tumor Size | 0.003 | |
≤ 1.0 | Ref | Ref |
1.0–2.0 | 0.794(0.400-1.587) | 0.514 |
2.0–4.0 | 2.056(1.032–4.096) | 0.040 |
> 4.0 | 4.298(1.533–12.051) | 0.006 |
Gross ETE (Ref = absent) | 1.297 (0.598–2.809) | 0.510 |
CLT (Ref = absent) | 0.930 (0.464–1.866) | 0.839 |
Multiplicity (Ref = absent) | 1.117 (0.604–2.065) | 0.725 |
Bilaterality (Ref = absent) | 0.773 (0.390–1.531) | 0.460 |
Ipsilateral CND (Ref = Biilateral CND) | 1.110 (0.638–1.931) | 0.712 |
Number of Metastatic ipsilateral CLNs | 1.078 (1.016–1.144) | 0.014 |
Radioactive iodine | 1.000(0.997–1.003) | 0.923 |
PTC papillary thyroid carcinoma, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, ETE extrathyroidal extension, CLT chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis, LN lymph node, CNM central neck metastasis, CND central neck dissection, Ref reference. | ||
aAdjusted for sex, age < 55 years, tumor size, gross ETE, CLT, multiplicity, bilaterality, Number of Metastatic CLNs, RAI dose. |
Prognostic impact of contralateral central node dissection status on locoregional recurrence in 706 PTC patients after propensity score matching. Propensity Score matching was performed to compare “contralateral central node dissection” with “no contralateral central node dissection”. Before propensity score matching, tumor size (p = 0.012), multifocality (p = 0.004) were more frequently observed in contralateral central neck dissection group. The patients who underwent contralateral central neck dissection received relatively higher dose RAI (117.6 mCi vs 142.2 mCi, p < 0.001) (Table 4). After propensity matching, there were 130 matched pairs. There was no significant difference in patients’ characteristics between two groups and loco-regional recurrence was analyzed. The median follow-up time was 93.7 months (range, 6– 212 months). Of 11 recurred patients, 8(6.2%) and 3(2.3%) patients were in CCND (-) group and CCND (+) group, respectively. Recurrence-free survival rates in either ipsilateral or bilateral CND groups were 97.8% versus 97.6% at 5 years, 75.5% versus 97.6% at 10 years, respectively (p = 0.424) (Fig. 2). Furthermore, the recurrence-free survival rates for overall contralateral recurrence, including thyroidectomy site, central or lateral neck, in the ipsilateral or bilateral CND groups were 100.0% versus 99.2% at 5 years, 86.8% versus 99.2% at 10 years, respectively (p = 0.609) (Fig. 3). There were no statistically significant differences in RFS rates according to contralateral central neck dissection status.
Before propensity score matching | After propensity score matching | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCND (-) N (%) | CCND (+) N (%) | p value | CCND (-) N (%) | CCND (+) N (%) | p value | |
Total | 329 (46.5) | 379 (53.5) | N/A | 130 (50.0) | 130 (50.0) | N/A |
Age (yr) | 0.393 | 1.000 | ||||
< 55 | 258 (78.4) | 307 (81.0) | 115 (88.5) | 115 (88.5) | ||
≥ 55 | 71 (21.6) | 72 (19.0) | 15 (11.5) | 15 (11.5) | ||
Sex | 0.367 | 1.000 | ||||
Female | 241 (73.3) | 266 (70.2) | 104 (80.0) | 104 (80.0) | ||
Male | 88 (26.7) | 113 (29.8) | 105 (20.0) | 160 (20.0) | ||
Tumor size (cm) | 0.012 | 1.000 | ||||
≤ 1.0 | 143 (43.5) | 134 (35.4) | 50 (38.5) | 50 (38.5) | ||
1.0–2.0 | 131 (39.8) | 159 (42.0) | 67 (51.5) | 67 (51.5) | ||
2.0–4.0 | 48 (14.6) | 74 (19.5) | 12 (9.2) | 12 (9.2) | ||
> 4.0 | 7 (2.1) | 12 (3.2) | 1 (0.8) | 1 (0.8) | ||
Gross ETE | 0.824 | 1.000 | ||||
Absent | 290 (88.1) | 332 (87.6) | 124 (95.4) | 124 (95.4) | ||
Present | 39 (11.9) | 47 (12.4) | 6 (4.6) | 6 (4.6) | ||
CLT | 0.081 | 1.000 | ||||
Absent | 259 (78.7) | 277 (73.1) | 108 (83.1) | 108 (83.1) | ||
Present | 70 (21.3) | 102 (26.9) | 22 (16.9) | 22 (16.9) | ||
Multifocality | 0.004 | 1.000 | ||||
Absent | 221 (67.2) | 214 (56.5) | 82 (63.1) | 82 (63.1) | ||
Present | 108 (32.8) | 165 (43.5) | 48 (36.9) | 48 (36.9) | ||
Bilaterality | 0.824 | 1.000 | ||||
Absent | 238 (72.3) | 277 (73.1) | 101 (77.7) | 101 (77.7) | ||
Present | 91 (27.7) | 102 (26.9) | 29 (22.3) | 29 (22.3) | ||
RAI (mCi) | < 0.001 | 1.000 | ||||
dose | 117.6 ± 79.9 | 142.2 ± 67.6 | 124.5 ± 46.9 | 124.5 ± 46.9 | ||
ETE extrathyroidal extension, CLT chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis, CND central neck dissection, CCND contralateral central neck dissection, RAI radioactive iodine therapy, N/A not available, Ref reference. |
Surgery-related outcomes in 706 PTC patients according to contralateral CND status. Hospital days (5.37 days vs 5.31 days; p = 0.814), postoperative days (4.04 days vs 4.21 days; p = 0.302), total drainage (234 mL vs 273 mL; p = 0.320), VCP (0.0% vs 0.3%; p = 1.000), postoperative bleeding (0.6% vs 0.5%; p = 1.000), chyle leak (1.8% vs 1.3%; p = 0.280), and wound infection were not different between the ipsilateral CND and bilateral CND groups. However, the incidence of hypocalcemia (4.0% vs 7.1%; p = 0.007) was significantly higher in the bilateral CND group and operation time (170.4 min vs 220.3 min, p < 0.001) were longer in the bilateral CND group compared to the ipsilateral CND group (Table 5).
Total (n = 708) | Ipsilateral CND (n = 329) No. (%) | Bilateral CND (n = 379) No. (%) | p value |
---|---|---|---|
Hospital days | |||
Mean ± SD | 5.37 ± 3.976 | 5.31 ± 2.382 | 0.814 |
Postoperative days | |||
Mean ± SD | 4.04 ± 2.427 | 4.21 ± 1.555 | 0.302 |
Operation time (min) | |||
Mean ± SD | 170.41 ± 51.66 | 220.32 ± 52.32 | < 0.001 |
Total drainage (mL) | |||
Mean ± SD | 234.03 ± 56.37 | 273.35 ± 51.38 | 0.320 |
Hypocalcemia | 13 (4.0) | 27 (7.1) | 0.007 |
Vocal cord palsy | 0(0.0) | 1(0.3) | 1.000 |
Wound infection | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | N/A |
Bleeding | 2 (0.6) | 2 (0.5) | 1.000 |
Chyle leakage | 6 (1.8) | 5 (1.3) | 0.280 |
CND central neck dissection, SD, standard deviation. |
Previous studies have reported that the rate of regional lymph node metastasis in patients with PTC is approximately 30% up to 80%18,19 and central lymph node metastasis is already present in 40–60% of patients at the time of diagnosis20–22. Other studies demonstrated that the rate of contralateral central neck metastasis in patients with ipsilateral lateral neck metastasis was 34.7% and 5–30% in the final pathology, respectively23,24. Since these rates were relatively high, there has been a controversy as to whether or not surgeons should perform contralateral central neck dissection (CND) without suspicious contralateral central lymph nodes on preoperative imaging. In addition, there have not been many studies on this subject to date, therefore the long term effect of prophylactic contralateral CND in PTC patients with ipsilateral lateral neck metastasis are still unclear. To the best of our knowledge, this study is one of the few studies to investigate the long-term outcome of prophylactic contralateral central neck dissection in PTC patients with ipsilateral lateral neck metastasis.
In our study, male sex, larger tumor size, and greater number of metastatic ipsilateral CLNs significantly increased the risk of LRR, however, ipsilateral CND only did not increase the risk of recurrence (Tables 3 and 4, Figs. 2 and 3). In the ipsilateral CND group, the rate of recurrence in the ipsilateral central or lateral neck was higher than those in the contralateral central or lateral neck (Table 2). There was no significant difference in recurrence regarding CND status with either the ipsilateral or bilateral sides (Figs. 2 and 3).
The point is, recurrence is more likely to occur in the ipsilateral neck, not in the contralateral central neck or lateral neck in this whole study population (Table 2). A previous study reported by Oshima et al. demonstrated that male sex, larger tumor size, ETE, and gross nodal metastasis were associated factors for contralateral lateral neck recurrence25. However, contralateral neck recurrence rarely occurred so it was difficult to analyze risk factors for contralateral recurrence in our study.
Based on our results, we found that ipsilateral CND only was not associated with a higher risk of either overall recurrence or contralateral recurrence. Interestingly, there was no tumor recurrence in the contralateral central neck among the whole study population, regardless of whether bilateral CND was performed. LRR occurred mostly in the ipsilateral thyroidectomy site and/or ipsilateral compartment.
Some studies concluded that microscopic node metastasis occurs frequently, but it does not give rise to the higher recurrence risk seen in clinically detectable macroscopic disease26,27. Randolph et al. reported that microscopic lymph node metastasis appeared to be present in up to 80% of patients, but recurrence rates ranged from 2–6%26. Our study showed that microscopic central neck metastasis was present in 68.5% of patients, and recurrence rate was 7.9%. Hughes DT et al. concluded that there was no significant difference in postoperative Tg level between the thyroidectomy alone group and prophylactic CND group in pathologic N1a patients who presented preoperatively cN027. On the other hand, even if there’s a difference in study population, this study found that Tg was higher in the ipsilateral CND group than in the bilateral CND group with no difference in overall recurrence.
The prevalence of contralateral central neck metastasis in our study was 37.8% (150/397) of patients with ipsilateral lateral neck metastasis. Out of theses 150 patients, preoperative contralateral cN1a was found in only 20 (13.3%) patients, implying that most contralateral central lymph node metastasis is microscopic metastasis. Preoperative contralateral cN1a was not commonly found in PTC patients with ipsilateral lateral neck metastasis (N1b) and we were not even able to ensure that contralateral cN1a increased the likelihood of LRR as well as microscopic contralateral central neck metastasis from this study.
Postoperative complications such as hypocalcemia were higher in patients who underwent bilateral CND than those who underwent ipsilateral CND (Table 4). This is a critical issue in thyroid surgery because hypocalcemia is closely associated with the patients’ quality of life, and all endocrine surgeons should not ignore it.
Given the results above, prophylactic contralateral CND may not be necessary in patients with ipsilateral cN1b as a routine procedure. These retrospective data suggest that PTC patients with ipsilateral N1b presenting with evident lymphadenopathy intraoperatively or on preoperative imaging in the contralateral central compartment should undergo therapeutic contralateral CND. Unless there is an evident contralateral metastatic lymph node preoperatively or a detectable contralateral cN1a intraoperatively, ipsilateral CND may be sufficient surgical treatment of the PTC patients with ipsilateral N1b.
This study had several limitations. First, our study was a non-randomized, retrospective, cohort study. Confounding variables or unmeasured factors may not have been identified, and there was possible surgeon bias in the decision to undergo ipsilateral CND versus bilateral CND. That is, the whole cohort was not treated in a random fashion. Thus, further prospective, randomized trials are needed to resolve this selection bias issue in order to clearly compare recurrence rates between the ipsilateral CND and bilateral CND groups. Second, a longer follow-up period is required to assess recurrence and survival more completely. Third, inter-observer variation in the detection and interpretation of cervical lymph node metastasis and inconsistent surgical management were involved because of the long-term period of data collection. Fourth, our findings may not be applicable to smaller centers without a skilled team such as high volume surgeons or radiologists since the experts’ factor could contribute to the low incidence of recurrence and contralateral recurrence. Performing prophylactic contralateral CND may rather decrease recurrence and help postoperative treatment planning and follow-up in small institutions with less skill in preoperative node evaluation; even this may demonstrate higher microscopic nodal disease. Despite these limitations, this study still has the value of a retrospective study in examining the role of CND in PTC as a prospective randomized trial may not easily feasible28. By analyzing adequate sample size in a single institution, we tried to minimize inadequate statistical power and local institutional variability using specific inclusion factors and follow-up.
In conclusion, This study suggests that bilateral central neck dissection increased surgery-related complications, especially hypocalcemia, and may not reduce the risk of recurrence in PTC patients with unilateral N1b; therefore, surgeons may perform contralateral CND only in the presence of clinically evident or suspected nodal disease.
Funding Support
This work had no specific funding.
Author Disclosure Statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Author contributions
Kyorim Back and Jung-Han Kim have set up and conducted the experiment. Jee Soo Kim, Jun-Ho Choe and Jung-Han Kim contributed to thyroid operation and diagnostics development. Kyorim Back analyzed the data, and Ra-Yeong Song and Yoo Shin Choi prepared the figures. Kyorim Back wrote the manuscript. Jee Soo Kim, Jun-Ho Choe and Jung-Han Kim supervised the project. All authors reviewed the manuscript and contributed to discussions
Competing interests
The author(s) declare no competing interests