1.- Wei-Tung H, Wolfgang H. Effects of meiotic stages, cryoprotectants, cooling and vitrification on the cryopreservation of porcine oocytes. Asian-Aust Journal of Animal Sciences. 2002;4:485-493. DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2002.485
2.- Somfai T, Men NT, Noguchi J, Kaneko H, Kashiwazaki N, Kikuchi K. Optimization of cryoprotectant treatment for the vitrification of immature cumulus-enclosed porcine oocytes: comparison of sugars, combinations of permeating cryoprotectants and equilibration regimens. Journal Reproduction & Development. 2015;61:571-579. DOI: 10.1262/jrd.2015-089
3.- Wang M, Isachenko E, Todorov P, Rahimi G, Mallmann P, Katkov I, et al. Aseptic technology for cryoprotectant-free vitrification of human spermatozoa by direct dropping into clean liquid air: apoptosis, necrosis, motility and viability. BioMed Research International. 2020;2934315. 10.1155/2020/2934315
4.- Pereira BC, Ortiz I, Dorado JM, Diaz-Jimenez A, Consuegra C, Gosalvez J, et al. Effect of permeable cryoprotectants-free vitrification on DNA fragmentation of equine oocyte-cumulus cells. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 2019;3:53-56. DOI: 10.1111/rda.13491
5.- Isachenko V, Todorov P, Seisenbayeva A, Toishibekov Y, Isachenko E, Rahimi G, et al. Vitrification of human pronuclear oocytes by direct plunging into cooling agent: Non sterile liquid nitrogen vs. sterile liquid air. Cryobiology. 2018;80:84-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2017.11.009
6.- Szurek EA, Eroglu A. Comparison and avoidance of toxicity penetrating cryoprotectants. Plos One. 2011;6:e27604. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027604
7.- Casillas F, Betancourt M, Cuello C, Ducolomb Y, López A, Juárez-Rojas L, et al. An efficiency comparison of different in vitro fertilization methods: IVF, ICSI and PICSI for embryo development to the blastocyst stage from vitrified porcine immature oocytes. Porcine Health Management. 2018;4:16. DOI: 10.1186/s40813-018-0093-6
8.- Mullen SF, Fahy GM. A chronologic review of mature oocyte vitrification research in cattle, pigs, and sheep. Theriogenology. 2012;78:1709-1719. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.06.008
9.- Clark NA, Swain JE. Oocyte cryopreservation: searching for novel improvement strategies. Journal of Assisted Reproduction Genetics. 2013;30:865-875. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-013-0028-8
10.- Van Soom A, Tanghe S, De Pauw I, Maes D, De Kruif A. Function of the cumulus oophorus before and during mammalian fertilization. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 2002;37:144-151. DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0531.2002.00345.x
11.- Ekart J, McNatty K, Hutton J, Pitman J. Ranking and selection of MII oocytes in human ICSI cycles using gene expression levels from associated cumulus cells. Human Reproduction. 2013;28:2930-2942. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det357
12.- Kohaya N, Fujiwara K, Ito J, Kashiwazaki N. High developmental rates of mouse oocytes cryopreserved by an optimized vitrification protocol: the effects of cryoprotectants, calcium and cumulus cells. Journal Reproduction & Development. 2011;57:675-680. DOI: 10.1262/jrd.11-066h
13.- Tharasanit T, Colleoni S, Galli C, Colenbrander B, Stout A. Protective effects of the cumulus-corona radiata complex during vitrification of horse oocytes. Reproduction. 2009;137:391-401. DOI: 10.1530/REP-08-0333
14.- Taghizabet N, Ali Khalili M, Anbari F, Agha-Rahimi A, Nottola SA, Macchiarelli G, et al. Human cumulus cell sensitivity to vitrification, an ultrastructural study. Zygote. 2018;26:224-231. DOI: 10.1017/S0967199418000138
15.- Jin HX, Song WY, Xin ZM, Dai SJ, Chen ZJ, Sun YP. Effects of cumulus cells on vitreous cryopreservation of human mature oocytes and clinical pregnancy outcomes. Reproductive Sciences. 2012;19:216-220. DOI: 10.1177/1933719111424450
16.- Casillas F, Teteltitla-Silvestre M, Ducolomb Y, Lemus AE, Salazar Z, Casas E, et al. Co-culture with granulosa cells improve the in vitro maturation ability of porcine immature oocytes vitrified with cryolock. Cryobiology. 2014;69:299-304. DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2014.08.004
17.- Gook DA, Osborn SM, Johnston WI. Cryopreservation of mouse and human oocytes using 1,2-propanediol and the configuration of the miotic spindle. Human Reproduction. 1993;8:1101-1109. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138201
18.- Ortiz-Escribano N, Smits K, Piepers S, Van den Abbeel E, Woelders H, Van Soom A. Role of cumulus cells during vitrification and fertilization of mature bovine oocytes: Effects on survival, fertilization, and blastocyst development. Theriogenology. 2016;86:635-641. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.02.015
19.- Su YQ, Sugira K, Eppig JJ. Mouse oocyte control of granulosa cell development and function: paracrine regulation of cumulus cell metabolism. Seminars in Reproductibe Medicine. 2009;27:32-42. DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1108008
20.- Lorenzo Y, Costa S, Collins AR, Azqueta A. The comet assay, DNA damage, DNA repair and cytotoxicity: hedgehogs are not always dead. Mutagenesis. 2013;28:427-432. DOI: 10.1093/mutage/get018
21.- Rojas C, Palomo MJ, Albarracín JL, Mogas T. Vitrification of immature and in vitro matured pig oocytes: study of distribution of chromosomes, microtubules and actin microfilaments. Cryobiology. 2004;49:211-220. DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2004.07.002
22.- Brambillasca F, Guglielmo MC, Coticchio G, Mignini Renzini M, Dal Canto M, Fadini R. The current challenges to efficient immature oocyte cryopreservation. Journal of Assisted Reproduction Genetics. 2013;30:1531-1539. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-013-0112-0
23.- Lei T, Guo N, Liu JQ, Tan MH, Li YF. Vitrification of in vitro matured oocytes: effects on meiotic spindle configuration and mitochondrial function. International Journal of Clinical & Experimental Pathology. 2014;7:1159-1165. DOI: PMID: 24696732
24.- Stachowiak EM, Papis K, Kruszewski M, Iwanenko T, Bartlomiejczyk T, Modlinski JA. Comparison of the level(s) of DNA damage using comet assay in bovine oocytes subjected to selected vitrification methods. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 2009;44:653-658. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2007.01042.x
25.- Lindley EM, Jacobson JD, Corselli J, King A, Chan PJ. Cryopreservation of human cumulus cells for co-cultures and assessment of DNA damage after thawing using the comet assay. Journal of Assisted Reproduction & Genetics. 2001;18:534-538. DOI: 10.1023/A:1011991806423
26.- Raman RS, Chan PJ, Corselli JU, Patton WC, Jacobson JD, Chan SR, et al. Comet assay of cumulus cell DNA status and the relationship to oocyte fertilization via intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Human Reproduction. 2001;16:831-835. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.5.831
27.- Urrego R, Pareja A, Vásquez N, Márquez M. El ensayo cometa: una técnica para evaluar genotoxicidad en el ADN de ovocitos bovinos. Revista Colombiana Ciencias Pecuarias. 2005;18:222-227. ISSN: 2256-2958
28.- Petters RM. Transgenic livestock as genetic models of human dis- ease. Reproduction, Fertility, and Development. 1994;6:643–645. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1071/rd9940643
29.- Collins AR, El Yamani N, Lorenzo Y, Shaposhnikov S, Brunborg G, Azqueta A. Controlling variation in the comet assay. Frontiers in Genetics. 2014;20:5:359. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00359
30.- Einaudi L, Courbiere B, Tassistro V, Prevot C, Sari-Minodier I, Orsiere T, et al. In vitro exposure to benzo(a)pyrene induces significant DNA damage in mouse oocytes and cumulus cells. Human Reproduction. 2013;29:548-554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det439
31.- Berthelot-Ricou A, Perrin J, Di Giorgio C, De Meo M, Botta A, Courbiere B. Comet assay on mouse oocytes: an improved technique to evaluate genotoxic risk on female germ cells. Fertility & Sterility. 2011;95:1452-1457. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.016
32.- Racowsky C, Needleman DJ. Cumulus cell gene expression as a potential biomarker for oocyte quality. Fertility & Sterility. 2018;109:438-439. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.12.013
33.- Casillas F, Ducolomb Y, López A, Betancourt M. Effect of porcine immature oocyte vitrification on oocyte-cumulus cell gap junctional intercellular communication. Porcine Health Management. 2020;6:37. DOI: 10.1186/s40813-020-00175-x.
34.- Cheng-Jie Z, Dong-Hui W, Xin-Xin N, Xiang-Wei K, Yan-Jiao L, Jing R, et al. High survival of mouse oocytes using an optimized vitrification protocol. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:19465. DOI: 10.1038/srep19465
35.- Cuello C, Sanchez-Osorio J, Almiñana C, Gil MA, Parrilla I, Roca J, Vazquez JM, et al. Superfine open pulled straws vitrification of porcine blastocysts does not require pretreatment with cytochalasin B and/or centrifugation. Reproduction Fertility & Devoplment. 2010;28:808-817. DOI: 10.1071/RD09160
36.- Wu G, Jia B, Quan G, Xiang D, Zhang B, Shao Q, et al. Vitrification of porcine immature oocytes: association of equilibration manners with warming procedures, and permeating cryoprotectants effects under two temperatures. Cryobiology. 2017;75:21-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2017.03.001
37.- Berthelot-Ricou A, Perrin J, Di Giorgio C, De Meo M, Botta A, Courbiere B. Genotoxicity assessment of mouse oocytes by comet assay before vitrification and after warming with three vitrification protocols. Fertility & Sterility. 2013;100:882-888. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.05.025
38.- Berthelot-Ricou A, Perrin J, Orsière T, Aye M, Roustan A, Botta A, et al. Genotoxicity risk assessment and oocytes: Basis of genetic toxicology and application in reproductive science. Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite. 2013;41:544-547. DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2013.07.008
39.- Kopeika J, Thornhill A, Khalaf Y. The effect of cryopreservation on the genome of gametes and embryos: principles of cryobiology and critical appraisal of the evidence. Human Reproduction Update. 2015;21:209-227. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmu063
40.- Li X, Wang YK, Song ZQ, Du ZQ, Yang CX. Dimethyl sulfoxide perturbs cell cycle progression and spindle organization in porcine meiotic oocytes. Plos One. 2016;11:e0158074. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158074
41.- Chen X, Dong H, Cheng M, Wang Q, Jin Y. Addition of cholesterol loaded cyclodextrin prior to GV-phase vitrification improves the quality of mature porcine oocytes in vitro. Cryobiology. 2019;90:54-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2019.08.006
42.- Appeltant R, Somfai T, Kikuchi K. Faster, cheaper, defined and efficient vitrification for immature porcine oocytes through modification of exposure time, macromolecule source and temperature. Cryobiology. 2018;85:87-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2018.09.004
43.- Kharche SD, Sharma GT, Majumdar AC. In vitro maturation and fertilization of goat oocytes vitrified at the germinal vesicle stage. Small Ruminant Research. 2005;57:81-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.03.003
44.- Agca Y, Liu J, Peter AT, Crister ES, Crister JK. Effect of developmental stage on bovine oocyte plasma membrane water and cryoprotectant permeability characteristics. Molecular Reproduction & Development. 1998;49:408-415. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199804)49:4<408::AID-MRD8>3.0.CO;2-R
45.- Cuello C, Sánchez-Osorio J, Almiñana C, Gil MA, Perals ML, Lucas X, et al. Effect of the cryoprotectant concentration on the in vitro embryo development and cell proliferation of OPS-vitrified porcine blastocysts. Cryobiology. 2008;56:189-194. DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2008.02.005
46.- Gunasekarana V, Raj GB, Chand P. A comprehensive review on clinical applications of comet assay. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2015;9:GE01-GE05. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12062.5622
47.- Greco F, Perrin J, Auffan M, Tassistro V, Orsiere T, Courbiere B. A new approach for the oocyte genotoxicity assay: adaptation of comet assay on mouse cumulus-oocyte complexes. Laboratory Animals. 2015;49:251-254. DOI: 10.1177/0023677214567136
48.- Hossain MDA, Lin Y, Yan S. Single-strand break end resection in genome integrity: mechanism and regulation by APE2. International Journal Molecular Science. 2018;19:2389. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19082389
49.- Somfai T, Ozawa M, Noguchi J, Kaneko H, Karja NWK, Farhudin M, et al. Developmental competence of in vitro-fertilized porcine oocytes after in vitro maturation and solid surface vitrification: effect of cryopreservation on oocyte antioxidative system and cell cycle stage. Cryobiology. 2007;55:115-126. DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2007.06.008
50.- Sharma V, Collins LB, Chen TH, Herr N, Takeda S, Sun W, et al. Oxidative stress at low levels can induce clustered DNA lesions leading to NHEJ mediated mutations. Oncotarget. 2016;7:25377-25390. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.8298
51.- Best BP. Cryoprotectants toxicity: facts, issues and questions. Rejuvenation Research. 2015;18:422-436. DOI: 10.1089/rej.2014.1656
52.- Goud AP, Goud PT, Diamond MP, Gonik B, Abu-Soud HM. Reactive oxygen species and oocyte aging: role of superoxide, hydrogen peroxide and hypochlorous acid. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 2008;44:1295-1304. DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.11.014
53.- Kang MH, Das J, Gurunathan S, Park HW, Song H, Park C, et al. The cytotoxic effects of dimethyl sulfoxide in mouse preimplantation embryos: a mechanistic study. Theranostics. 2017;7:4735-4752. DOI: 10.7150/thno.21662
54.- Taniguchi M, Agung B, Morita Y, Sato Y, Otoi T. Meiotic competence and DNA damage of porcine immature oocytes following cryoprotectant exposure and vitrification. Asian Joutnal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 2013;8:670-676. DOI: 10.3923/ajava.2013.670.676
55.- Xian-Hong T, Li-Min W, Ren-Tao J, Li-Hua L, Hong-Bing L, Yu-Sheng L. Fertilization rates are improved after IVF if the corona radiate is left intact in vitrified-warmed human oocytes. Human Reproduction. 2012;27:3208-3214. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des295
56.- Suzuki K, Eriksson B, Shimizu H, Nagai T, Rodríguez-Martinez H. Effect of hyaluronan on monospermic penetration of porcine oocytes fertilized in vitro. International Journal of Andrology. 2000;23:13-21. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2605.2000.t01-1-00198.x
57.- Wongsrikeao P, Kaneshige Y, Ooki R, Taniguchi M, Agung B, Nii M, et al. Effect of the removal of cumulus cells on the nuclear maturation, fertilization and development of porcine oocytes. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 2005;40:166-170. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2005.00576.x
58.- Dos Santos-Neto PC, Vilariño M, Cuadro F, Barrera N, Crispo M. Cumulus cells during in vitro fertilization and oocyte vitrification in sheep: Remove, maintain ir add?. Cryobiology. 2020;92:161-167. DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2020.01.002
59.- Casillas F, Ducolomb Y, Lemus AE, Cuello C, Betancourt M. Porcine embryo production following in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection from vitrified immature oocytes matured with a granulosa cell co-culture system. Cryobiology. 2015;71:299-305. DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2015.08.003
60.- Gurtovenko AA, Anwar J. Modulating the structure and properties of cell membranes: the molecular mechanism of action of dimethyl sulfoxide. Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2007;111:10453-10460. DOI: 10.1021/jp073113e
61.- Hughes ZE, Mancera RL. Molecular mechanism of the synergistic effects of vitrification solutions on the stability of phospholipid bilayers. Biophys Journal. 2014;106:2617-2624. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.05.012
62.- Malajczuk CJ, Hughes ZE, Mancera RL. Molecular dynamics simulation of the interactions of DMSO, mono- and polyhydroxylated cryosolvents with a hydrated phospholipid bilayer. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2013;1828:2041-2055. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.05.010