Temperature changes in subtropical regions and southern Brazil are influenced by the entry of cold fronts, frequent during autumn and winter (Sant’Anna Neto et al. 2015). Sudden and repetitive thermal changes have a negative impact on fish, with consequences for the immune and antioxidant systems (Abram et al. 2017; Xu et al. 2019; Zhou 2019). To assess the impact of temperature reduction in the pacu, found in regions where temperature drops are common, we submitted juveniles to two temperature reductions (from 28 ºC to 16 ºC, for 24 h, with 5 days of recovery between exposures). The reduction in temperature, which took six hours, and the maintenance of fish in this condition for 24 h, activated the stress response, the innate immune system and the antioxidative system. We found that the intermittent exposure of fish to cold increased the cortisol response in both exposures, in particular in the 2nd one, after 5 days of the reestablishment of the control condition, indicating that lowering the temperature activated a stress response (Wendelaar Bonga 1997). Increased blood cortisol in after changes in water temperature has been described in other fish, such as Dicentrarchus labrax (Samaras et al. 2018), Oreochromis niloticus (Liu et al. 2011), Sebastes schlegelii (Zhang et al. 2015) and Oncorhynchus mykiss (Foss et al. 2012). Glucose concentrations did not change. Glucose is considered an important indicator of stress along with cortisol (Sopinka et al. 2016). Considering that there was an increase in cortisol, the lack of glucose response can be due to the time between the beginning of exposure to the cold and blood collection (24 h). It is possible that higher levels of glucose occurred more acutely and returned to initial levels when fish were sampled.
Regarding immune system biomarkers, in the 1st exposure the RAL increased in both groups of fish and was reestablished after 5 days of recovery. This suggests that it was the change in the water flow regime, which was common to both groups, that caused the cell activation and not the temperature. In the 2nd exposure, activation only occurred in fish exposed to cold, a response that disappeared after re-establishment of the control temperature. Fish exposed to cold for the 2nd time maintained their ability to activate this immune response. RAL is a response of phagocytic cells, and under stress conditions macrophages can be activated as an important defense mechanism. When activated, these cells produce large amounts of ROS with bactericidal activity (Secombes et al. 1996).
In the control fish, the complement system was activated after the 2nd exposure to cold; this was probably associated with the change in the water flow regime, though we did not find the same response in fish exposed to 16 ºC. In relation to lysozyme, in the control group, concentrations increased after the 2nd change in the water flow, while in fish exposed to 16 ºC the increase occurred after the recovery of the 1st and 2nd cold exposures (5 days and 48 h, respectively), suggesting a delayed compensatory response to the temperature lowering. Other studies that diverge from our data showed reduced activities of the complement system and lysozyme in Oncorhynchus mykiss (Nikoskelainen et al. 2004) and Epinephelus coioides (Cheng et al. 2009) exposed to cold.
Low temperature can alter the body homeostasis and promote changes in the liver's antioxidant capacity, resulting in oxidative stress (Kaushik and Kaur 2003; Ye et al. 2015). Components of the antioxidant defense system, such as the enzymes SOD, CAT and GPx, play a role in scavenging superoxide anions, free radicals, hydroxyl, and other radicals, protecting cells from oxidative damage (Bartoskova et al. 2013; Lortz et al. 2000). The exposure of pacu to 16 ºC activated CAT and SOD in the 1st and 2nd cold exposures, respectively, and GPx was activated in fish after the 2nd exposure compared to control fish. In the control fish, at 28 ºC, the 1st change in the water flow regime reduced the GPx activity. The SOD-CAT system is considered the first line of defense against excess ROS (Pandey et al. 2003). SOD acts by catalyzing the dismutation of superoxide into peroxide, which is decomposed by CAT into water and oxygen (Aebi 1984; Van Der Oost et al. 2003). The increase in SOD and CAT was observed in Etroplus suratensis (Joy et al. 2017) and Danio rerio (Malek et al. 2004) exposed to low temperatures. GST activity was not affected by temperature and was reduced in both groups of fish 5 days after the reestablishment of the control temperature when the water flow was opened.
The antioxidant GSH increased at both temperatures after the 1st cold exposure and recovered thereafter, suggesting it was caused by the change in the water flow regime, which was common to both groups of fish, and not by the temperature. In fish, GSH concentrations can increase through biosynthesis or by increasing its regeneration by glutathione reductase (GR) as a protective response (Peña-Llopis et al. 2002). In relation to LPO levels, the high variations observed in the values of fish exposed to cold do not allow confirmation of the occurrence of oxidative stress despite an increase of 60–70% after the 1st exposure coinciding with the increase in GSH. In control fish, this increase was significant. From there, the LPO returned to the initial values. Temperature variation affects antioxidant defenses, as observed in zebrafish exposed to a lower temperature (a decrease of 28°C to 18°C), resulting in increased activities of antioxidant enzyme genes such as GPx, Cu, Zn-SOD, Mn-SOD, GST (Malek et al. 2004).
Triglyceride levels increased after 5 days of recovery from the 1st cold exposure in both groups of fish, probably from food. The higher levels remained stable in fish exposed to cold for the 2nd time, suggesting that this energy source was preserved during the temperature lowering. At the same time, we observed moderate mobilization in visceral fat stores in the 2nd exposure in those fish. From the 2nd recovery period, the energy mobilization normalized. Regarding the increased liver glycogen in the control group in the 2nd cold exposure, this probably represents the reserve from the food consumed during the 5 days of recovery, while in fish exposed to cold this energy source remained unchanged throughout the experiment. Glycogen reserves were preserved.
Regarding hematological biomarkers, we did not observe significant changes in the number of total leukocytes except for an increase in the 2nd cold exposure compared to the control values, which inverted when recovery started. In contrast, in Epinephelus coioides exposed to 19 ºC, 27 ºC, and 35 ºC, for 3–96 h, total WBC count, respiratory burst, and phagocytic activity decreased 3, 48, and 96 h after fish were transferred to 19 ºC and 35°C (Nikoskelainen et al. 2004). In our study, cold was associated with the profile of monocytes, which increased during the recovery from the 1st cold exposure, reduced in the 2nd exposure and increased again after that. Monocytes are cells in transit in the peripheral bloodstream. During the inflammatory process they migrate to the connective tissue where they transform into macrophages (Cuesta et al. 1999). The macrophage is probably the most important cell in the immune response because in addition to being a phagocytic cell it produces and releases cytokines involved in the signaling between cells during the triggering of immune responses and is involved in presenting antigens to lymphocytes (Secombes and Fletcher 1992; Cuesta et al. 1999).
Temperature shifts, among other stressful procedures in aquaculture, regularly promote infections of farmed fish, activating functional mechanisms of fish antimicrobial host defenses. In fish, macrophage-lineage cells are integral to immune responses (Grayfer 2018). Phagocytic cells’ ROS response is an attribute of these cells’ antimicrobial defense, and the efficiency of this response often reflects the ability of macrophages to eliminate microorganisms. The cold also affected the granulocyte response in pacu, which increased throughout the experiment compared to the control temperature condition from the 1st exposure. Granulocytes act in the recognition and elimination of pathogens (Ellis 1999). In the case of eosinophils, we did not observe changes in fish exposed to cold, but their values were always lower than those observed in fish kept at 28 ºC. Although the function of eosinophils is not fully understood, these cells act in the processes of inflammation and cellular defense through degranulation (Urbinati et al. 2020).