For skeletally immature patients, hemiepiphysiodesis is commonly employed in clinical practice. This study retrospectively analyzes data from children with lower limb deformities due to HR who were treated with hemiepiphysiodesis using eight-plates, thereby investigating the corrective effect of hemiepiphysiodesis on diaphyseal anatomical axis angular deformities while correcting mechanical axis deformities of the lower limbs.
This study analyzed the correction of diaphyseal deformities. According to Paley's principles for measuring lower limb deformities,10 diaphyseal deformities can be classified into single apex deformities and multi-apex deformities, with different measurement methods for different deformity categories. This distinction is crucial for accurately assessing the degree of deformity correction. In this study, all cases included exhibited multi-apex deformities of the lower limb diaphyses, resulting in two deformity apexes, Mag1 and Mag2, by the final follow-up. TMag1 showed significant improvement with statistical significance, while FMag1, FMag2, and TMag2 showed relative improvements but were not statistically significant. The research by Horn et al.7 found that growth modulation surgery also partially improved the bending of the tibial and femoral diaphyses. However, their method of measuring diaphyseal deformities differed from ours, considering it as a single deformity apex. All cases included in this study were children with multi-apex diaphyseal deformities. By comparing radiographic parameters of multi-apex deformities, significant improvements were observed in the diaphyseal deformity levels among the eight patients with ideal correction outcomes. However, the final results did not show significant differences, which might be influenced by the three patients who had suboptimal correction outcomes at the last follow-up.
Furthermore, previous studies did not explore the correlation between improvement in the lower limb mechanical axis and correction of diaphyseal deformities. Our study found that when the lower limb mechanical axis was improved, the angles of multi-apex deformities in the lower limb diaphysis also proportionally improved. Spearman correlation analysis revealed a positive correlation between FMag2 and mLPFA, indicating that improvements in the mechanical axis parameters around the hip joint also lead to simultaneous correction of distal femoral deformities. Additionally, FMag1 showed a positive correlation with mLDFA and mMPTA, suggesting that improvements in the mechanical axis parameters around the knee joint lead to simultaneous correction of proximal femoral deformities. Children with HR exhibit weakened growth plates due to impaired temporary calcification of hypertrophic cartilage, resulting in widened, cup-shaped growth plates prone to deformities under compressive and shear loads. These deformities often first affect the distal femur and proximal tibia physis and gradually extend to the epiphyseal ends and diaphysis with growth, causing severe malalignment of the lower limb mechanical axis.11 Long-term misalignment of the lower limb force line and gait abnormalities may damage knee joint growth through the Heuter-Volkmann effect and eventually have adverse effects on the growth of the hip and ankle joints. According to the Heuter-Volkmann principle, normalization of physeal load eliminates ongoing imbalances in relative growth, further causing gradual correction of diaphyseal deformities.12 Thus, improvements in the mechanical axis parameters around the knee and hip joints lead to normalization of physeal load, guiding gradual correction of femoral diaphyseal deformities, as evidenced by improvements in FMag2 and FMag1 deformity parameters. Combining the results of the correlation analysis, we can infer that improvements in the lower limb mechanical axis parameters significantly affect the correction of the anatomical axis of the femoral diaphysis. However,Correlation analysis showed no significant association between the correction of TMag1 and TMag2 and the correction of the lower limb mechanical axis. This may be due to two reasons: the small sample size and the presence of patients with suboptimal correction outcomes, which could affect the results of the correlation analysis. Secondly, the different growth rates of the femur and tibia, with studies by Gigante et al.13 indicating that the femur corrects faster than the tibia, may result in less apparent correlation between tibial diaphyseal deformity correction and lower limb axis correction compared to femoral diaphyseal deformity correction. At the final follow-up in this study, significant improvements were observed in MAD, mLDFA, mMPTA, and mLPFA with statistical significance, while mLDTA correction showed no statistical difference, suggesting that hemiepiphyseal stapling has a corrective effect on the lower limb mechanical axis but not a significant effect on the correction of ankle joint walking direction angles. Studies by Kumar and Sonanis14 also confirmed that improvements in the mechanical axis parameters around the knee joint positively affect the hip joint but did not find correction for the ankle joint deformities. Considering the faster correction rate of the femur compared to the tibia,13 the difference in correction rates may result in the non-significant correction of ankle deformities during the follow-up period of this study, suggesting a longer follow-up period may be necessary to observe effects on the ankle joint.
This study is a single-center study, and the obtained samples may not fully represent a broader population, which could limit the generalizability and extrapolation of the study results. In the future, we consider conducting multi-center studies to increase the diversity and representativeness of the samples, thereby enhancing the universality and reliability of the research findings. Besides, the sample size of this study is relatively small, which might affect the extrapolability and overall credibility of the results. In the future, we plan to include more cases that meet the criteria to maximize the study's effectiveness and reliability. Finally, there is a lack of three-dimensional assessment of deformities. Our study only evaluated the correction of deformities in the coronal plane. however, research by Bonnet-Lebrun et al.15 has shown that sagittal plane measurements have significance in monitoring and assessing deformities. Future studies could further collect and analyze data from three-dimensional CT scans. Overall, future studies could involve multicenter research, collect ample samples from various sources, and perform multiplanar analysis of deformities, aiming to better assess the efficacy of hemiepiphyseal stapling in correcting lower limb deformities caused by HR.